So as a Pats fan, do you like this move?
I'm not sure how you can't. Is he Holmes or Marshall? Absolutely not. Is he better than Aiken and Stanback who were playing significant snaps last season? Absolutely. One important thing he brings to the table is the ability to to play outside. He fills the "Gaffney" role that was very much lacking last season. No one should/could expect him to pull a 1000 yard season out this late in his career. However there is no reason he can't put up a very solid
65-800-5.

I've got him at 53/700/5 at first pass.
He'll never see that in an offense that has Moss, Welker/Edelman, Faulk.
As I see it, Moss will get his, Welker and Edleman combined will post what Welker would normally get, and then after that there are a lot of unaccounted for morsels.Everyone not named Moss or Welker totaled:
- 184 receptions, 1928 receiving yards, and 11 TD last year
- 159-1617-7 in 2008 with Cassel
- 190-2197-17 in 2007 with Brady
I think it's possible for Holt to hit the numbers that Woodrow projected . . . but a lot will depend on who else ends up on the Pats roster. If they take an early round receiver and tight end, that will again change the landscape.