What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Paul Krugman is a jackass (1 Viewer)

Statorama

Footballguy
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.

 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
Krugman is a far-left nutcase. Fidel Castro is to the right of Krugman.
 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
:lmao:
 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
:shrug:
:lmao:
 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
:shrug:
:lmao:
:shrug:
 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform.
Can you summarize the proposed solutions? I think it's an easy talking point to say that Republican leaders oppose reform regarding the regulation of the financial industry, whether or not it's true. As I'm admittedly unfamiliar with the issue, I'd like to hear what initiatives are being promoted by Congressional Republicans on this issue.

 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
Meh. That's not a particularly incindiary line by Krugman's standards. I agree that he's a jackass, but you can find much better illustrations than this.Edit: The New Yorker had a profile of Krugman a month or so ago, and it turns out that his wife is the really crazy one. I didn't know this, but apparently the first drafts of many of his columns tend to be fairly tame, and it's his wife that adds/suggests a lot of the red meat.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
Meh. That's not a particularly incindiary line by Krugman's standards. I agree that he's a jackass, but you can find much better illustrations than this.Edit: The New Yorker had a profile of Krugman a month or so ago, and it turns out that his wife is the really crazy one. I didn't know this, but apparently the first drafts of many of his columns tend to be fairly tame, and it's his wife that adds/suggests a lot of the red meat.
So he's whipped? Interesting. I like tame Krugman writing for salon.com better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.

 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
Meh. That's not a particularly incindiary line by Krugman's standards. I agree that he's a jackass, but you can find much better illustrations than this.Edit: The New Yorker had a profile of Krugman a month or so ago, and it turns out that his wife is the really crazy one. I didn't know this, but apparently the first drafts of many of his columns tend to be fairly tame, and it's his wife that adds/suggests a lot of the red meat.
pics? ... or do we all run the risk of turning to stone when we look at them?
 
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.
Not a fan of this bitter, snitching version of GM.
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.B) I happen to like Cappy and think his getting a month for using the scientific name for a female body part that flies on shows like The View is pretty lame. A month? Really? For that? And yet this flies just fine?

C) Who are you again?

 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
Krugman is an idiot. He's about as far left as they come.
 
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.
Not a fan of this bitter, snitching version of GM.
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.B) I happen to like Cappy and think his getting a month for using the scientific name for a female body part that flies on shows like The View is pretty lame. A month? Really? For that? And yet this flies just fine?

C) Who are you again?
Nobel Prize Winner... :excited: :hifive: :hifive: ...Jimmah Carter, Al Gore, Obama...you get one for being liberal
 
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.
Who cares that he's a Nobel Peace Prize winner? Yeah, those far left Norwegians love him.....so what.
 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
Krugman is an idiot. He's about as far left as they come.
:excited: He may be a lot of things, but 'an idiot' isn't one of them. You make yourself look like 'an idiot' when you type things like that. You can dislike the man, but he has a Ph.D from MIT. Show a little more respect.

 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
Krugman is an idiot. He's about as far left as they come.
He may be far left, but that does not make him an idiot. I think we are all aware he is a very bright man. You may disagree with his beliefs, opinions, or conclusions. However, he is not an idiot.
 
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.
Not a fan of this bitter, snitching version of GM.
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.B) I happen to like Cappy and think his getting a month for using the scientific name for a female body part that flies on shows like The View is pretty lame. A month? Really? For that? And yet this flies just fine?

C) Who are you again?
Nobel Prize Winner... :excited: :hifive: :hifive: ...Jimmah Carter, Al Gore, Obama...you get one for being liberal
You go do it.
 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform.

Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
What are these so-called solutions? All I'm seeing from the GOP (and probably some Democrats also) is the following:
If Senate OKs bank bill, expect a year of debate: Boehner

GOP leader says he doesn't know how left-leaning House will agree to Senate

By Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- If the Senate can produce sweeping bank-reform legislation, expect House and Senate lawmakers to continue squabbling at least a year more or longer, said House Republican Leader John Boehner on Wednesday.

"If the Senate is able to produce a bill, I think it's just as likely that we'll be talking about the same issue a year from now as we are right now," Boehner, R-Ohio, told an enthusiastic crowd of bankers at the American Bankers Association government relations summit.

Boehner argued that a Senate bill that is approved will be "way, way, way" to the right of bank-reform legislation approved by the House in December, leaving the two chambers far apart from each other on key pieces of the bill.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., on Monday introduced a revised bank-reform bill without Republican support. He plans to have the panel vote on the bill next week and hopes to have the bill considered by the Senate in April.

"I don't know how they ever come to an agreement on some kind of a bill they can bring back to both houses and pass," Boehner said.

Boehner's comments come as bankers prepare to descend upon Capitol Hill to press for changes to the bank-reform legislation, which they wouldn't support in its present form. Boehner said he urged bankers not to be shy when meeting with the lawmaker staff members and to send a message that new regulations and taxes translates to into banks having less available for lending.

Can inflation be a good thing?

Anti-inflation sentiment obscures a nuanced economic picture, Thorold Barker argues on the News Hub panel.

"Don't let those little punk staffers take advantage of you and stand up for yourselves," Boehner said. "All of us are hearing from our friends and constituents on lack of credit, you can't get a loan, the more your government takes and taxes, the more regulations you have to comply with the more cost you have there and less amount you are going to have available to loan to customers."

Before Boehner, ABA President Edward Yingling told bankers that the longer that the Senate lawmakers can't come to an agreement on the bank-reform bill, the more leverage Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the banking committee's ranking member, has to prompt concessions.

"Every day that passes gives more leverage to Shelby," Yingling told bankers.

The banking committee is concerned about the bill's intention to create an independent consumer financial protection division, with a presidentially appointed chairperson, within the Federal Reserve. They argue that bank regulators should continue to be responsible for protecting consumers as well as making sure financial institutions have sufficient capital. The proposed consumer unit would write rules for mortgages and credit card products.

The group is also concerned about additional fees that would be collected from large banks that would be allocated to a fund that would be used to dismantle a failed mega-bank so that its collapse wouldn't unsettle the markets. The House bill seeks to create a $150 billion fund while the Senate is seeking to create only a $50 billion fund.

The ABA is also opposed to a provision in the Senate bill that would have state-chartered banks that also register with the Fed as their federal regulator, transfer over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The Fed would continue to oversee and conduct onsite exams for 35 banks with $50 billion or more in assets.
 
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.
Not a fan of this bitter, snitching version of GM.
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.B) I happen to like Cappy and think his getting a month for using the scientific name for a female body part that flies on shows like The View is pretty lame. A month? Really? For that? And yet this flies just fine?

C) Who are you again?
Nobel Prize Winner... :sadbanana: ;) :lmao: ...Jimmah Carter, Al Gore, Obama...you get one for being liberal
They don't hand out the Economics Nobel prize for just showing up.
 
What a jag. How can you take any columnist seriously when he begins a column off in this manner

The White House is confident that a financial regulatory reform bill will soon pass the Senate. I’m not so sure, given the opposition of Republican leaders to any real reform.
WTF? Republican leaders are begging for real reform. They are providing solutions that constitute real reform. Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
Krugman is an idiot. He's about as far left as they come.
His being a proponent of a flawed economic theory doesn't make him an idiot.
 
Can we please get to dicussing the solutions of Republican leaders that constitute real reform?
OK I got one from reading this thread:1) Award GWB a Nobel Peace Prize
Assuming they are as easy to scoop up as some are alluding to here, what would our good cowboy earn his Nobel Prize for? Peace is out...we can probably rule out science due to his religious beliefs. How about "Fuzzy Math"?
 
Can we please get to dicussing the solutions of Republican leaders that constitute real reform?
OK I got one from reading this thread:1) Award GWB a Nobel Peace Prize
Assuming they are as easy to scoop up as some are alluding to here, what would our good cowboy earn his Nobel Prize for? Peace is out...we can probably rule out science due to his religious beliefs. How about "Fuzzy Math"?
Cheerleading?
 
Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
With respect to to this point here, Republicans made a strategic decision to be party-line against the health care reform bill and use it as a campaign tool. They could just have easily decided to offer amendments and try to change the shape of the reform bill that was passed. By deciding to be against the bill, no matter what was in it, they lost any leverage to make substantive changes to the bill. Maybe this was good politics for the election, but really, if the bill was all that terrible, wouldn't we have been better off with their efforts to make it better?
 
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.
Not a fan of this bitter, snitching version of GM.
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.B) I happen to like Cappy and think his getting a month for using the scientific name for a female body part that flies on shows like The View is pretty lame. A month? Really? For that? And yet this flies just fine?

C) Who are you again?
SacramentoBob(Here's a hint: just look to the left of the post. That tells you who wrote it.

HTH)

Oh, and I'm a big fan of bitter, snitching GM. Keep up the good work.

 
Democratic leaders ignore them and pass things like Obamacare.

I'm sure this clown has a column ready for the inevitable economic collapse, blaming it on the Republicans refusal to be bipartisan.
With respect to to this point here, Republicans made a strategic decision to be party-line against the health care reform bill and use it as a campaign tool. They could just have easily decided to offer amendments and try to change the shape of the reform bill that was passed. By deciding to be against the bill, no matter what was in it, they lost any leverage to make substantive changes to the bill. Maybe this was good politics for the election, but really, if the bill was all that terrible, wouldn't we have been better off with their efforts to make it better?
I believe the bill as passed contained between 150 and 200 Republican amendments, but garnered nary a GOP vote.
 
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.
Not a fan of this bitter, snitching version of GM.
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.B) I happen to like Cappy and think his getting a month for using the scientific name for a female body part that flies on shows like The View is pretty lame. A month? Really? For that? And yet this flies just fine?

C) Who are you again?
SacramentoBob(Here's a hint: just look to the left of the post. That tells you who wrote it.

HTH)
;) Maybe I need to sign my posts from now on.

LAUNCH

 
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.
Not a fan of this bitter, snitching version of GM.
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.B) I happen to like Cappy and think his getting a month for using the scientific name for a female body part that flies on shows like The View is pretty lame. A month? Really? For that? And yet this flies just fine?

C) Who are you again?
SacramentoBob(Here's a hint: just look to the left of the post. That tells you who wrote it.

HTH)

Oh, and I'm a big fan of bitter, snitching GM. Keep up the good work.
Not like I reported the guy. I just don't get what flies and what doesn't around here. :shrug:

Who is Sacramento Bob an alias for?

 
So Capella gets a month for using the "V" word while making a hilarious joke buried deep inside a thread, but JACKASS in headlines not once but twice flies just fine?

Oh yeah, things are absolutely the same as Day 1.
Not a fan of this bitter, snitching version of GM.
A) I happen to like Krugman and think the title is beyond ridiculous. Not only is he a Nobel Prize winner, not only is he a product of the Ivy Leagues, but he accurately predicted our financial collapse years before it unraveled. He was highly critical of Bush's policies (rightly so) and I'm guessing that's the reason the OP thought to call him a 'jackass'.B) I happen to like Cappy and think his getting a month for using the scientific name for a female body part that flies on shows like The View is pretty lame. A month? Really? For that? And yet this flies just fine?

C) Who are you again?
SacramentoBob(Here's a hint: just look to the left of the post. That tells you who wrote it.

HTH)

Oh, and I'm a big fan of bitter, snitching GM. Keep up the good work.
Not like I reported the guy. I just don't get what flies and what doesn't around here. :shrug:

Who is Sacramento Bob an alias for?
It's like we're meeting again for the first time. :dejavu:PM sent.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top