bicycle_seat_sniffer
Smells like chicken
Well let's start with my team:
PDSL1 - 12th pick
QB- Palmer(5), Garcia(10), Simms(10)
Got an absolute steal in Palmer in the 4th round. I normally dont take QB's early at all, but he was too good to pass up. The platoon of the Tampa QB's should net me some points on Palmer bye and a down week here and there.
Grade : A
RB- Portis(4), Jacobs(9),Perry(5),Moats(5)
Now when my pick in the first round came up I almost went Travis Henry. Decided to take Portis. The Henry pick IMO looks to good to be true. Plus he is one joint away from a year off. And Im not as worried about Betts as most. After going RB/WR in 1/2 grabbed Jacobs in round3 at RB24 looks like a bargin to me, cause I'll bet you he finishes higher than RB24. Chris Perry if heathly can throw up some ppr game specials and Moats might get moved Depth is not great, but really no one's will be. I wanted to grab at least one of Droughns/Betts but Betts got taken way too early and I missed Ruben by a couple picks.
grade: B-
WR- LarryFitz(8), Berrian(9), Kennison(8), Keyshawn(7), Lelie(6), Roscoe P. (6),TabPerry(5)
I wanted to grab a stud WR in round2 cause I knew WR's of that calibre would not be available in round3. I wanted Lfitz or ChadJ. End up with Larry. My next 4 Berrian-Kennison-Key-Lelie are going to produce just fine for 2 spots most weeks. I really like Berrian to be the #1 in Chicago and Eddie and Key just keep producing at great value in these drafts. I like Lelie's upside and big games. Roscoe had 40 targets last year and returns punts. Tab Perry should grab the #3 job in CIncy while Henry is on suspension.
Overall I feel I have good depth at this spot.
Grade: A-
TE- V.Davis(6), Troupe (4)
Some risk here no doubt, but VDavis will be going in round 3 of these next year. :( . Troupe is a nice young player with good upside too. I should get no worse than top 8 scoring here, if Vernon stays healthy.
Grade: B
K- Tynes(8), Feeley (9)
D- Carolina(7),San Fran (6)
Got decent K's and one nice D with a young and up & coming. Nothing too great, but I dont think I'll be hurting here either
Grade: :shrugs: B
Overall:
Im going to survive awhile, to win the thing though Im going to have to have hit on Jacobs and Vernon Davis, which I do no think is that big of a stretch. Would love to get some others input on this squad. And throw your team in here and I'll tell you what I think
PDSL1 - 12th pick
QB- Palmer(5), Garcia(10), Simms(10)
Got an absolute steal in Palmer in the 4th round. I normally dont take QB's early at all, but he was too good to pass up. The platoon of the Tampa QB's should net me some points on Palmer bye and a down week here and there.
Grade : A
RB- Portis(4), Jacobs(9),Perry(5),Moats(5)
Now when my pick in the first round came up I almost went Travis Henry. Decided to take Portis. The Henry pick IMO looks to good to be true. Plus he is one joint away from a year off. And Im not as worried about Betts as most. After going RB/WR in 1/2 grabbed Jacobs in round3 at RB24 looks like a bargin to me, cause I'll bet you he finishes higher than RB24. Chris Perry if heathly can throw up some ppr game specials and Moats might get moved Depth is not great, but really no one's will be. I wanted to grab at least one of Droughns/Betts but Betts got taken way too early and I missed Ruben by a couple picks.
grade: B-
WR- LarryFitz(8), Berrian(9), Kennison(8), Keyshawn(7), Lelie(6), Roscoe P. (6),TabPerry(5)
I wanted to grab a stud WR in round2 cause I knew WR's of that calibre would not be available in round3. I wanted Lfitz or ChadJ. End up with Larry. My next 4 Berrian-Kennison-Key-Lelie are going to produce just fine for 2 spots most weeks. I really like Berrian to be the #1 in Chicago and Eddie and Key just keep producing at great value in these drafts. I like Lelie's upside and big games. Roscoe had 40 targets last year and returns punts. Tab Perry should grab the #3 job in CIncy while Henry is on suspension.
Overall I feel I have good depth at this spot.
Grade: A-
TE- V.Davis(6), Troupe (4)
Some risk here no doubt, but VDavis will be going in round 3 of these next year. :( . Troupe is a nice young player with good upside too. I should get no worse than top 8 scoring here, if Vernon stays healthy.
Grade: B
K- Tynes(8), Feeley (9)
D- Carolina(7),San Fran (6)
Got decent K's and one nice D with a young and up & coming. Nothing too great, but I dont think I'll be hurting here either
Grade: :shrugs: B
Overall:
Im going to survive awhile, to win the thing though Im going to have to have hit on Jacobs and Vernon Davis, which I do no think is that big of a stretch. Would love to get some others input on this squad. And throw your team in here and I'll tell you what I think
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll trade ya.
Maybe in grad school. All I know is that my entry level engineering classes graded on a curve.....60 out of 100 was often the top score and those classes include 20% foreigners who were doomed to the rice fields if the screwed up. I had one class where the prof flat out said that 20% of you were destined to repeat this class.Regarding grading here, I would like to see an entire range used so I can see where people really stand. With A+ to F- consuming 15 spots, it meshes well with the 16 teams here.
Maybe in grad school. All I know is that my entry level engineering classes graded on a curve.....60 out of 100 was often the top score and those classes include 20% foreigners who were doomed to the rice fields if the screwed up. I had one class where the prof flat out said that 20% of you were destined to repeat this class.Regarding grading here, I would like to see an entire range used so I can see where people really stand. With A+ to F- consuming 15 spots, it meshes well with the 16 teams here.
Maybe in grad school. All I know is that my entry level engineering classes graded on a curve.....60 out of 100 was often the top score and those classes include 20% foreigners who were doomed to the rice fields if the screwed up. I had one class where the prof flat out said that 20% of you were destined to repeat this class.Regarding grading here, I would like to see an entire range used so I can see where people really stand. With A+ to F- consuming 15 spots, it meshes well with the 16 teams here.
