If you ever wanted to see 10,000 scientists collectively hold their breath for 5 minutes this is your chance. Anal pucker factor off the charts.
It's gonna be 3 months straight of that as they unfurl all the stuff on Webb and get it operational.If you ever wanted to see 10,000 scientists collectively hold their breath for 5 minutes this is your chance. Anal pucker factor off the charts.
of uranus.Does anyone know long until we get information back in which our collective minds are blown? We are going to learn some super weird stuff and see some outrageous pictures.
I saw that- very cool. and had forgotten you worked on that- even more cool.On another note, the Solar Probe breached the sun's corona. Way cool. Very happy on this as I did substantial work on the vehicle.
Yawn...she's flying so much I completely missed #16.
but 17 is in the books for Ginny on Dec 5th. they apparently had some telemetry issues- this time she went up 33' and to the NE 600+', but lost radio contact with Percy when she dropped behind a rock outcropping on her descent. but supposedly everything went perfectly (although they're still receiving data).
#18 upcoming in the next week or two.
considering this was all just supposed to be a proof of concept experiment with a hoped for 5 flights... it's all pretty incredible.
better than most modern appliances.
Most modern appliances don't cost eleventy bibillion dollars.better than most modern appliances.
speak for your own appliances.Most modern appliances don't cost eleventy bibillion dollars.
I’d drop that coin to get to see space.
for a fraction of that I can you you put you in contact with uranus.I’d drop that coin to get to see space.
El Floppo said:btw... Ingenuity was the answer on Final Jeopardy yesterday.
<_<El Floppo said:for a fraction of that I can you you put you in contact with uranus.
Now that's a Deep Thought.Andy Dufresne said:If we go through all this effort to just get an answer of "42", I'm asking for my money back.
Does anybody even know the question?Now that's a Deep Thought.Andy Dufresne said:If we go through all this effort to just get an answer of "42", I'm asking for my money back.
Of course. "What do you get when you multiply six times nine?"Does anybody even know the question?
Hubble was shooting for 15 yrs. 30 and counting...Andy Dufresne said:
Conservatism on top of conservatism. There is a limit to the fuel in the telescope to allow for aiming, etc. The real timeline is much, much longer.Andy Dufresne said:
If it makes you feel any better the program lead for JW came to our place a while back (we worked on this one a ton, too, including one super duper critical path that we kicked ### on) and he was very confident on everything but the launch. And Arianne is the most mature system out there right now, so this is as good as it gets. They have tested the mechanisms here to death.Sinn Fein said:NASA prepares to launch the James Webb Space Telescope, perhaps the most extraordinary piece of technology in history. What could go wrong? @JoelAchenbach asks. NASA actually has an answer: The mission faces 344 possible "single-point failures."
![]()
![]()
It worked in Contact, right?BTW, I can't figure out why they don't build 3x of each of these things in case something goes awry.
Not over yet, but I am glad for him. I know how much blood and sweat people have dedicated to this.This has been 15 years in the making for my Dad who does scheduling for Hubble and now JW at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore. He's breathing a big sigh of relief.
Sounds like things are going very very well for JWST. Keep up the good work.Sand said:
Most modern appliances don't cost eleventy bibillion dollars.
I feel like these brilliant minds could be spending their time on better things. We can circle back to this later.So there’s a news article claiming that Pluto should be a planet again. Mostly it sounds like a debate thing, but if it happens, the list of planets in our Solar System would suddenly be much, much longer.
I’m not sure, but I think they’re overestimating the gravity of the situation here.I feel like these brilliant minds could be spending their time on better things. We can circle back to this later.
So there’s a news article claiming that Pluto should be a planet again. Mostly it sounds like a debate thing, but if it happens, the list of planets in our Solar System would suddenly be much, much longer.
Huh???But a study announced in December from a team of researchers in the journal Icarus now claims the IAU’s definition was based on astrology
Then we get to argue about what "geologically active" means...The researchers say Pluto should instead be classified as a planet under a definition used by scientists since the 16th century: that “planets” are any geologically active bodies in space.
Hey, you’re the expert around here.Huh???
Then we get to argue about what "geologically active" means...
Thanks for posting this - I’ve been having fun tracking this and following along with all the different stages/deployments.
That's misinformation in that Twitter link. Kim Jong Il already landed on the sun.
Mama, that's where the fun is
It's constantly in an open tab for me. Love seeing the difference between time in days vs distance.Thanks for posting this - I’ve been having fun tracking this and following along with all the different stages/deployments.