What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Player Spotlight: Philip Rivers (1 Viewer)

It seems that nearly every QB projection (save for Mike Vick) we see is above the 3,000 yard threshold, yet less than 50% of the teams in the league have a passre get over that mark annually.
This is correct. But if you take this into account, you are implicitly on my side in the "games played" debate. Nearly 100% of teams throw for over 3,000 yards. But only half the starting QBs do, largely because a lot of them miss some games.Two more notes: (1) my overall passing yards are in line with league norms; and (2) my overall passing yards for starters versus backups are in line with league norms. There is no way to accomplish both (1) and (2) while projecting every starter to play in 16 games. (Whether accomplishing (1) and (2) is important is another matter, but to me it's all part of trying to be accurate.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the last seven years, consider:

On average, 9 QBs have thrown 3,500 or more yards
On average, 15 QBs have thrown 3,000 or more yardsIt seems that nearly every QB projection (save for Mike Vick) we see is above the 3,000 yard threshold, yet less than 50% of the teams in the league have a passre get over that mark annually.
This is a good example of using statistics without context.1. How many games played have all QBs averaged over that span? Jason, how many games are you assuming Rivers will play? If you use these numbers, you must be assuming he plays less than 16 games. If so, why do you think he'll play less?

As I pointed out previously, Rivers proved in college to be extremely durable, and one can argue that he is less likely to miss time due to injury. At the same time, I think there is no chance he gets replaced due to performance. In order for the Chargers to bench him in favor of Feely or Whitehurst, it would require an extraordinarily bad level of performance from him that I cannot see happening.

If we assume he does indeed play 16 games, he only needs to average 187.5 passing yards to reach 3000. Anyone want to sig bet that he won't average 187.5 passing yards per game?

2. Rivers enters a better than average offense and better than average passing offense. You can expand this to better than average situation if you want, considering that the defense will be good. The numbers you quote above are for QBs in general, few of whom have such favorable situations.

Frankly, I'm surprised that you would throw out data like that when it is so clearly faulty without that context.
It seems that nearly every QB projection (save for Mike Vick) we see is above the 3,000 yard threshold, yet less than 50% of the teams in the league have a passre get over that mark annually.
This is correct. But if you take this into account, you are implicitly on my side in the "games played" debate. Nearly 100% of teams throw for over 3,000 yards. But only half the starting QBs do, largely because a lot of them miss some games.Two more notes: (1) my overall passing yards are in line with league norms; and (2) my overall passing yards for starters versus backups are in line with league norms. There is no way to accomplish both (1) and (2) while projecting every starter to play in 16 games. (Whether accomplishing (1) and (2) is important is another matter, but to me it's all part of trying to be accurate.)
Hey JWB,Admittedly the stats in and of themselves are somewhat spurious. As you might hope, my projections (and ranking) for Rivers are based on a range of factors, one of which is a position-wide normalization I use to make sure I'm not out of whack with historical norms.

As to Rivers games played...as Maurile suggests, TEAMS almost all throw for more than 3,000 yards; it's just that the average QB doesn't play the entire season typically. To that end, even though history suggests 15 QBs will surpass the 3,000 yard mark, my most current set of projections has 23 QBs doing so (as I don't explicitly forecast for injury).

What I do forecast for, perhaps more than many on this board are comfortable (but I've found it works for me) are assumptions as to playing time relative to historical circumstance. Personally, given Rivers inexperience and what I believe to be lofty expectations (having to step into Pro Bowl shoes), I think there's a very good chance that at some point in the year he gets parked on the bench.

Like all things, my projections are fluid. I will happily tweak them as we get into the preseason if reports of Rivers command in the huddle pan out. But for now, I view him as little more than a QB3 in 10-team leagues.

One final note, relative to Yudkin's point about the Chargers being ahead of the game based on 2005 numbers. This isn't 2005. We've got a new, inexperienced quarterback at the helm, an all world running back and a conservative head coach...I have a strong suspicion the run/pass ratio (and their relative effectiveness) are going to bear little resemblance to the Chargers of 2005. :shrug:

 
Just a reference point as to how high MT is on River's prospects this year, if Rivers' plays 16 games he'll post numbers of 4159-26-17. That would have been tops in the league in yardage in 2005.
Actually, it would have been fifth in the league in yardage, behind the Cardinals, Rams, Patriots, and Colts. That may still be too high, but it's not tops in the league. (It would have been seventh in 2004.)
 
I looked into how recent QB have done that sat at least half a season (preferably 1 or more) and how they did once they took over AS A STARTER. So games with a couple last minute kneel downs or 2 passing attempts were left out. Part of the issue here is that these numbers were fragments of a season, which is a bit of the point of the exercise. Many times people will look at these QB and point to their RANKING (say #21 on the year) when we should be looking at their PPG once they became regular starters. I'm sure there are others that I left off, but here's the ones I could target in a first pass.

PLAYER, PPG, 16-GAME PROJECTION

Daunte Culpepper MIN 25.13/402

Kurt Warner STL 24.00/384

Aaron Brooks NO 22.50/360

Kordell Stewart PIT 20.75/332

Mark Brunell JAX 20.18/323

Chad Pennington NYJ 19.46/311

Trent Green WAS 18.47/295

Jeff Blake CIN 18.10/290

Brad Johnson MIN 16.90/270

Brett Favre GB 16.40/262

Brian Griese DEN 15.64/250

Carson Palmer CIN 15.00/240

Tom Brady NE 14.79/237

Drew Brees SD 14.69/235

Jake Delhomme CAR 14.44/231

Rich Gannon MIN 13.93/223

Chris Simms TB 13.50/216

Jay Fiedler MIA 13.00/208

Matt Hasselbeck SEA 12.00/192

Rivers was not exactly chopped liver as a college QB and put up some impressive numbers. He certainly was more touted than some of the guys listed above, and as I mentioned earlier, is taking over for a team that did well passing the ball.

While I certainly don't expect Rivers to be the next Culpepper or Warner, I think the automatic doom and gloom conclusion is one that may not be justified.

 
Just a reference point as to how high MT is on River's prospects this year, if Rivers' plays 16 games he'll post numbers of 4159-26-17. That would have been tops in the league in yardage in 2005.
Actually, it would have been fifth in the league in yardage, behind the Cardinals, Rams, Patriots, and Colts. That may still be too high, but it's not tops in the league. (It would have been seventh in 2004.)
Oops -- by the way, major correction: I have projected the durable starting QBs for 14 games, not 13. (I knew it was 87.5% of the snaps, but I was thinking that equated to 13 games. It doesn't. It's 14.)I've got the Chargers projected for 3768 yards -- 3379 by the starter and 389 by the backup. Nowhere near tops in the league.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just a reference point as to how high MT is on River's prospects this year, if Rivers' plays 16 games he'll post numbers of 4159-26-17.  That would have been tops in the league in yardage in 2005.
Actually, it would have been fifth in the league in yardage, behind the Cardinals, Rams, Patriots, and Colts. That may still be too high, but it's not tops in the league. (It would have been seventh in 2004.)
Oops -- by the way, major correction: I have projected the durable starting QBs for 14 games, not 13. (I knew it was 87.5% of the snaps, but I was thinking that equated to 13 games. It doesn't. It's 14.)I've got the Chargers projected for 3768 yards -- 3379 by the starter and 389 by the backup. Nowhere near tops in the league.
Well that pretty much took the wind out of my sails. ;)
 
Do you guys think Rivers will be playing with a chip on his shoulder?

It seems that certain careers are forever linked..and I don't know how Rivers won't be compared by some to Eli. Like Mier / Bledsoe or Manning / Leaf...I think these two will always be compared.

And like (I hope) Lendale White will play extra hard because of his low draft pick, I think Rivers has the extra incentive to succeed. Sometimes it helps to have an outside factore pushing you.

I'm bullish on Rivers. I think with the Chargers situation and his obvious talent he can achieve 90% of Eli's numbers. 3700*.9 = 3330 yards and 23*.9 = 21 TDs. Book it !! Next year I hope he's better than Eli.

 
Do you guys think Rivers will be playing with a chip on his shoulder?

It seems that certain careers are forever linked..and I don't know how Rivers won't be compared by some to Eli. Like Mier / Bledsoe or Manning / Leaf...I think these two will always be compared.

And like (I hope) Lendale White will play extra hard because of his low draft pick, I think Rivers has the extra incentive to succeed. Sometimes it helps to have an outside factore pushing you.

I'm bullish on Rivers. I think with the Chargers situation and his obvious talent he can achieve 90% of Eli's numbers. 3700*.9 = 3330 yards and 23*.9 = 21 TDs. Book it !! Next year I hope he's better than Eli.
Wouldn't another "career forever linked" would be Rivers and Drew Brees?
 
It seems that certain careers are forever linked..and I don't know how Rivers won't be compared by some to Eli.
Rivers has already said that opening the season on September 11 will be extra special because it's a double-header with Eli Manning playing right afterwards.
 
Chargers | Ramsdell has history with developing quarterbacks

Published Mon Aug 7 10:05:00 p.m. ET 2006

(KFFL) Jay Paris, of the North County Times, reports San Diego Chargers quarterbacks coach John Ramsdell has a history of developing quarterbacks. Ramsdell was the quarterbacks coach with the St. Louis Rams, where he and former Rams head coach Mike Martz helped QB Kurt Warner and QB Marc Bulger develop. Bulger said, "Ramsdell is bright; he's been around the best. He knew the offense just as well as coach Martz. Footballwise he knows his stuff and can relate to players pretty well. I think (Ramsdell) will be fine. He worked with Kurt coming in and me, and five or six in between us. He knows what it takes. He's seen coach Martz develop them, and he was a large part of that, too."

 
My only quibble is that you should expect Rivers to be more durable than the average QB.
After watching the first preseason game, I would have to project Rivers to be slightly less durable than average. Not because of Rivers, but because of Leander Jordan. If he starts at LT, Rivers is going to get hammered twice a game.
 
My only quibble is that you should expect Rivers to be more durable than the average QB.
After watching the first preseason game, I would have to project Rivers to be slightly less durable than average. Not because of Rivers, but because of Leander Jordan. If he starts at LT, Rivers is going to get hammered twice a game.
I was just looking at the video you posted in the "Bandwagon" thread. Rivers threw out of a LOT of one-back and no-back sets, and he was only sacked twice in that half. Throw Tomlinson (a very good blocker) and Lorenzo Neal (one of the all-time best blockers) back into the mix, and I think they might be able to make this work.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top