This is in the works.And if that is important, have the projections include projected games played and ppg columns
This is in the works.And if that is important, have the projections include projected games played and ppg columns
This is correct. But if you take this into account, you are implicitly on my side in the "games played" debate. Nearly 100% of teams throw for over 3,000 yards. But only half the starting QBs do, largely because a lot of them miss some games.Two more notes: (1) my overall passing yards are in line with league norms; and (2) my overall passing yards for starters versus backups are in line with league norms. There is no way to accomplish both (1) and (2) while projecting every starter to play in 16 games. (Whether accomplishing (1) and (2) is important is another matter, but to me it's all part of trying to be accurate.)It seems that nearly every QB projection (save for Mike Vick) we see is above the 3,000 yard threshold, yet less than 50% of the teams in the league have a passre get over that mark annually.
This is a good example of using statistics without context.1. How many games played have all QBs averaged over that span? Jason, how many games are you assuming Rivers will play? If you use these numbers, you must be assuming he plays less than 16 games. If so, why do you think he'll play less?In the last seven years, consider:
On average, 9 QBs have thrown 3,500 or more yards
On average, 15 QBs have thrown 3,000 or more yardsIt seems that nearly every QB projection (save for Mike Vick) we see is above the 3,000 yard threshold, yet less than 50% of the teams in the league have a passre get over that mark annually.
As I pointed out previously, Rivers proved in college to be extremely durable, and one can argue that he is less likely to miss time due to injury. At the same time, I think there is no chance he gets replaced due to performance. In order for the Chargers to bench him in favor of Feely or Whitehurst, it would require an extraordinarily bad level of performance from him that I cannot see happening.
If we assume he does indeed play 16 games, he only needs to average 187.5 passing yards to reach 3000. Anyone want to sig bet that he won't average 187.5 passing yards per game?
2. Rivers enters a better than average offense and better than average passing offense. You can expand this to better than average situation if you want, considering that the defense will be good. The numbers you quote above are for QBs in general, few of whom have such favorable situations.
Frankly, I'm surprised that you would throw out data like that when it is so clearly faulty without that context.
Hey JWB,Admittedly the stats in and of themselves are somewhat spurious. As you might hope, my projections (and ranking) for Rivers are based on a range of factors, one of which is a position-wide normalization I use to make sure I'm not out of whack with historical norms.This is correct. But if you take this into account, you are implicitly on my side in the "games played" debate. Nearly 100% of teams throw for over 3,000 yards. But only half the starting QBs do, largely because a lot of them miss some games.Two more notes: (1) my overall passing yards are in line with league norms; and (2) my overall passing yards for starters versus backups are in line with league norms. There is no way to accomplish both (1) and (2) while projecting every starter to play in 16 games. (Whether accomplishing (1) and (2) is important is another matter, but to me it's all part of trying to be accurate.)It seems that nearly every QB projection (save for Mike Vick) we see is above the 3,000 yard threshold, yet less than 50% of the teams in the league have a passre get over that mark annually.
Actually, it would have been fifth in the league in yardage, behind the Cardinals, Rams, Patriots, and Colts. That may still be too high, but it's not tops in the league. (It would have been seventh in 2004.)Just a reference point as to how high MT is on River's prospects this year, if Rivers' plays 16 games he'll post numbers of 4159-26-17. That would have been tops in the league in yardage in 2005.
Oops -- by the way, major correction: I have projected the durable starting QBs for 14 games, not 13. (I knew it was 87.5% of the snaps, but I was thinking that equated to 13 games. It doesn't. It's 14.)I've got the Chargers projected for 3768 yards -- 3379 by the starter and 389 by the backup. Nowhere near tops in the league.Actually, it would have been fifth in the league in yardage, behind the Cardinals, Rams, Patriots, and Colts. That may still be too high, but it's not tops in the league. (It would have been seventh in 2004.)Just a reference point as to how high MT is on River's prospects this year, if Rivers' plays 16 games he'll post numbers of 4159-26-17. That would have been tops in the league in yardage in 2005.
Well that pretty much took the wind out of my sails.Oops -- by the way, major correction: I have projected the durable starting QBs for 14 games, not 13. (I knew it was 87.5% of the snaps, but I was thinking that equated to 13 games. It doesn't. It's 14.)I've got the Chargers projected for 3768 yards -- 3379 by the starter and 389 by the backup. Nowhere near tops in the league.Actually, it would have been fifth in the league in yardage, behind the Cardinals, Rams, Patriots, and Colts. That may still be too high, but it's not tops in the league. (It would have been seventh in 2004.)Just a reference point as to how high MT is on River's prospects this year, if Rivers' plays 16 games he'll post numbers of 4159-26-17. That would have been tops in the league in yardage in 2005.
Wouldn't another "career forever linked" would be Rivers and Drew Brees?Do you guys think Rivers will be playing with a chip on his shoulder?
It seems that certain careers are forever linked..and I don't know how Rivers won't be compared by some to Eli. Like Mier / Bledsoe or Manning / Leaf...I think these two will always be compared.
And like (I hope) Lendale White will play extra hard because of his low draft pick, I think Rivers has the extra incentive to succeed. Sometimes it helps to have an outside factore pushing you.
I'm bullish on Rivers. I think with the Chargers situation and his obvious talent he can achieve 90% of Eli's numbers. 3700*.9 = 3330 yards and 23*.9 = 21 TDs. Book it !! Next year I hope he's better than Eli.
I always consider Brees + Tomlinson linked to VickWouldn't another "career forever linked" would be Rivers and Drew Brees?
Rivers has already said that opening the season on September 11 will be extra special because it's a double-header with Eli Manning playing right afterwards.It seems that certain careers are forever linked..and I don't know how Rivers won't be compared by some to Eli.
looks about right...assuming he can stay healthy, which is always a question mark for inexperienced players.Rivers: 2875 - 18td/20int - 58% comp
After watching the first preseason game, I would have to project Rivers to be slightly less durable than average. Not because of Rivers, but because of Leander Jordan. If he starts at LT, Rivers is going to get hammered twice a game.My only quibble is that you should expect Rivers to be more durable than the average QB.
:finger:After watching the first preseason game, I would have to project Rivers to be slightly less durable than average. Not because of Rivers, but because of Leander Jordan. If he starts at LT, Rivers is going to get hammered twice a game.My only quibble is that you should expect Rivers to be more durable than the average QB.
I was just looking at the video you posted in the "Bandwagon" thread. Rivers threw out of a LOT of one-back and no-back sets, and he was only sacked twice in that half. Throw Tomlinson (a very good blocker) and Lorenzo Neal (one of the all-time best blockers) back into the mix, and I think they might be able to make this work.After watching the first preseason game, I would have to project Rivers to be slightly less durable than average. Not because of Rivers, but because of Leander Jordan. If he starts at LT, Rivers is going to get hammered twice a game.My only quibble is that you should expect Rivers to be more durable than the average QB.
looks about right...assuming he can stay healthy, which is always a question mark for inexperienced players.Rivers: 2875 - 18td/20int - 58% comp