Gruden's Keyboard
Footballguy


The media is just repeating what they hear from league/team sources. The media hasn’t talked Caleb Williams into the 1st pick.^I feel like you could swap market with media.
For the guys so sure Caleb is #1...
Who do you guys believe is #2?
Sure. How do you see that applying?@Alex P Keaton yeah I know what you mean...but have you ever heard the term smoke screen season?
Nobody. That's why he's so solidly #1 in my personal record book.For the guys so sure Caleb is #1...
Who do you guys believe is #2?
I think it'll be Maye, but I also think Washington already screwed up by trading Howell. They should have stuck with Howell and taken Harrison in my opinion. Oh well, it'll probably be better for Harrison's career to go to Arizona or LA and get Kyler or Herbert throwing to him. QB desperation is a hell of a thing. Personally, I think other than Caleb, this class is mostly overrated. I think a few teams are gonna wish they'd gone the Fields/Howell route instead of burning a top pick on a non-elite prospect.For the guys so sure Caleb is #1...
Who do you guys believe is #2?
I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.The bigger question would be what is the probability that all 3 top QBs bust? I peg it between 40 and 60%.
One could also make the case that Maye has the lowest bust chance of the three.
Unfortunately, you're almost bound to pick here based on ceiling...which goes against the golden rule about not losing the draft in the first round. Give me mid to late first round every year please.
Well I agree that Caleb is getting drafted #1 overall...I was just throwing out a thought nuggetSure. How do you see that applying?@Alex P Keaton yeah I know what you mean...but have you ever heard the term smoke screen season?
I expect Maye to go #2 despite all the prospect fatigue happening right now around him. I also expect him to be a massive, massive bust.
Some people think if you don't have a top 8 QB, then you don't actually have a QB. That might not be a bad outlook...I just wonder where a guy like Jared Goff fits into the equation.I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.
#9Some people think if you don't have a top 8 QB, then you don't actually have a QB. That might not be a bad outlook...I just wonder where a guy like Jared Goff fits into the equation.I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.
The Trevor Lawrence hype we saw a few years ago makes me wonder if Caleb is also being overhyped. That said, at least Caleb is being set up for success a lot more than Trevor was, with a solid coaching staff around him and some very good weapons.It’s not really a question. I think he’ll have an early career similar to Lawrence but with more theater.
Very true. Just by avoiding a season with Urban Meyer, he’s two steps ahead of Lawrence.The Trevor Lawrence hype we saw a few years ago makes me wonder if Caleb is also being overhyped. That said, at least Caleb is being set up for success a lot more than Trevor was, with a solid coaching staff around him and some very good weapons.It’s not really a question. I think he’ll have an early career similar to Lawrence but with more theater.
Unfortunately, you're almost bound to pick here based on ceiling...which goes against the golden rule about not losing the draft in the first round. Give me mid to late first round every year please.
I've always hated that logic. Now don't get me wrong, having a top QB is a huge deal, but its entirely possible to win without one, and just having one isn't a fix-all for a team. Neither SF nor Detroit have top QBs, Eagles are probably borderline, as were the Rams. I think if you have a great roster, you just need a competent QB, if you have a mediocre roster, you need an elite QB. If you have both, and perhaps even more importantly the right HC, then you are a dynasty.Some people think if you don't have a top 8 QB, then you don't actually have a QB. That might not be a bad outlook...I just wonder where a guy like Jared Goff fits into the equation.I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.
I've always hated that logic. Now don't get me wrong, having a top QB is a huge deal, but its entirely possible to win without one, and just having one isn't a fix-all for a team. Neither SF nor Detroit have top QBs, Eagles are probably borderline, as were the Rams. I think if you have a great roster, you just need a competent QB, if you have a mediocre roster, you need an elite QB. If you have both, and perhaps even more importantly the right HC, then you are a dynasty.Some people think if you don't have a top 8 QB, then you don't actually have a QB. That might not be a bad outlook...I just wonder where a guy like Jared Goff fits into the equation.I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.
Not when they have leadership like this:teams like Detroit come and go. People always seem to forget that. Pretty fair chance the Lions go something like 8-9 next year or the year after and fade back to the middle as those teams constantly do in the NFL (but everyone forgets about, and constantly rates teams based on last year's playoff runs).
I agree, but I think having that super long window is such a rarity, that it sometimes feels silly to chase it, and makes more sense to just hope you happen into it. For every Mahomes/Allen, there's 15 Zach Wilsons. Chasing Allen especially is a horrible idea, because he's pretty much the Halley's comet of QBs as guys with that many accuracy issues, almost never fix it to that level.I've always hated that logic. Now don't get me wrong, having a top QB is a huge deal, but its entirely possible to win without one, and just having one isn't a fix-all for a team. Neither SF nor Detroit have top QBs, Eagles are probably borderline, as were the Rams. I think if you have a great roster, you just need a competent QB, if you have a mediocre roster, you need an elite QB. If you have both, and perhaps even more importantly the right HC, then you are a dynasty.Some people think if you don't have a top 8 QB, then you don't actually have a QB. That might not be a bad outlook...I just wonder where a guy like Jared Goff fits into the equation.I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.
It's hard to have a great roster for very long, but if you hit on a great QB you can have them for a decade or longer.
Purdy is a top QB imo, and teams like Detroit come and go. People always seem to forget that. Pretty fair chance the Lions go something like 8-9 next year or the year after and fade back to the middle as those teams constantly do in the NFL (but everyone forgets about, and constantly rates teams based on last year's playoff runs). But almost no chance the Bills or Chiefs do that.
I agree, but I think having that super long window is such a rarity, that it sometimes feels silly to chase it, and makes more sense to just hope you happen into it. For every Mahomes/Allen, there's 15 Zach Wilsons. Chasing Allen especially is a horrible idea, because he's pretty much the Halley's comet of QBs as guys with that many accuracy issues, almost never fix it to that level.I've always hated that logic. Now don't get me wrong, having a top QB is a huge deal, but its entirely possible to win without one, and just having one isn't a fix-all for a team. Neither SF nor Detroit have top QBs, Eagles are probably borderline, as were the Rams. I think if you have a great roster, you just need a competent QB, if you have a mediocre roster, you need an elite QB. If you have both, and perhaps even more importantly the right HC, then you are a dynasty.Some people think if you don't have a top 8 QB, then you don't actually have a QB. That might not be a bad outlook...I just wonder where a guy like Jared Goff fits into the equation.I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.
It's hard to have a great roster for very long, but if you hit on a great QB you can have them for a decade or longer.
Purdy is a top QB imo, and teams like Detroit come and go. People always seem to forget that. Pretty fair chance the Lions go something like 8-9 next year or the year after and fade back to the middle as those teams constantly do in the NFL (but everyone forgets about, and constantly rates teams based on last year's playoff runs). But almost no chance the Bills or Chiefs do that.
I look at teams right now like the Patriots and Giants, and think they are both making a mistake if they take 1st round QBs. I'd just roll with Brissett and D.Jones/Lock if I were them. All drafting a QB does is put them in the same terrible situation Mac/Daniel Jones had where you are asked to carry an offense mostly full of weapons who would be backups on a good team. Worry about QB when you aren't just offering them up as sacrificial lambs to opposing defenses.
On the flip side, teams like the Bears and Vikings offer ideal starting points for a rookie QB.
I'm with you to an extent, but I think its grossly underestimating how rare those elite guys are. I'd also argue that the Steelers and ESPECIALLY the Bengals don't suck. The Bengals are arguably the 2nd best team in the AFC, they just had bad injury luck. I think they are a solid bet to be in the final 4 next year.I agree, but I think having that super long window is such a rarity, that it sometimes feels silly to chase it, and makes more sense to just hope you happen into it. For every Mahomes/Allen, there's 15 Zach Wilsons. Chasing Allen especially is a horrible idea, because he's pretty much the Halley's comet of QBs as guys with that many accuracy issues, almost never fix it to that level.I've always hated that logic. Now don't get me wrong, having a top QB is a huge deal, but its entirely possible to win without one, and just having one isn't a fix-all for a team. Neither SF nor Detroit have top QBs, Eagles are probably borderline, as were the Rams. I think if you have a great roster, you just need a competent QB, if you have a mediocre roster, you need an elite QB. If you have both, and perhaps even more importantly the right HC, then you are a dynasty.Some people think if you don't have a top 8 QB, then you don't actually have a QB. That might not be a bad outlook...I just wonder where a guy like Jared Goff fits into the equation.I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.
It's hard to have a great roster for very long, but if you hit on a great QB you can have them for a decade or longer.
Purdy is a top QB imo, and teams like Detroit come and go. People always seem to forget that. Pretty fair chance the Lions go something like 8-9 next year or the year after and fade back to the middle as those teams constantly do in the NFL (but everyone forgets about, and constantly rates teams based on last year's playoff runs). But almost no chance the Bills or Chiefs do that.
I look at teams right now like the Patriots and Giants, and think they are both making a mistake if they take 1st round QBs. I'd just roll with Brissett and D.Jones/Lock if I were them. All drafting a QB does is put them in the same terrible situation Mac/Daniel Jones had where you are asked to carry an offense mostly full of weapons who would be backups on a good team. Worry about QB when you aren't just offering them up as sacrificial lambs to opposing defenses.
On the flip side, teams like the Bears and Vikings offer ideal starting points for a rookie QB.
It doesn't even have to be a 10-15 year window with the QB to make it worthwhile, because the reality is with the "build a roster" approach the window is most often just 1 year. People are vastly underrating the likelihood that the Lions aren't even a good team next year and don't make the playoffs, just like they did with the 2021 Titans (#1 seed) and the 2020 Browns. We see these teams every year where everything just clicks and everyone thinks they're the next consistent competitor, and then they fizzle out immediately.
If you want a high likelihood to make a lot of money, hammer the under on the Lions win total next year. That's the exact same advice I offered (and followed) here on this forum with those two teams mentioned above, and it was stress free money.
Again, we're not talking a 3 year window vs a 10 year window here. We're talking a 1-year window most typically, maybe 2, because it's just really difficult to hold together a great overall roster and keep everyone healthy.
Look at the 2021 AFC playoff teams: Titans (#1 seed), Chiefs, Bills, Bengals, Raiders, Patriots, Steelers.
4 of those teams suck now (yes I realize the Steelers found a way into the playoffs this year, but let's be real, they suck), and pretty much started sucking the very next year. 3 of those teams are still good and considered Super Bowl contenders at the start of every year. The common denominator is obvious. The teams that are still good are the teams that have good QBs. The teams that were a flash in the pan are the teams that had mediocre QBs but were able to put together a roster around them good enough to create a good team. But that roster around them is just impossible to hold together and keep healthy and keep playing at a high level. The 9ers are pretty much the only exception. Every other team that is consistently good has a consistently top QB.
I mean, ideally you have all of them.@travdogg
I think the most important pieces for a young QB is a strong offensive line, good coaching and culture. If you have all that and then surround him with weapons, then you're cooking with grease!
I get that, but a Carr type on a rookie contract can be really valuable.I'd rather have a 10% chance of getting a Burrow/Allen type player than a 100% chance of getting a Derek Carr level player.
I'm with you to an extent, but I think its grossly underestimating how rare those elite guys are. I'd also argue that the Steelers and ESPECIALLY the Bengals don't suck. The Bengals are arguably the 2nd best team in the AFC, they just had bad injury luck. I think they are a solid bet to be in the final 4 next year.
If you can get 6:1 on the Chiefs right now, I like betting it... but only what you can afford to comfortably lose of course.Yes the Steelers aren't terrible, but they're 75:1 to win the Super bowl this year, compared to 14:1 Bengals, 12:1 Bills, 6:1 Chiefs.
Unless you're using a very narrow definition Stafford was elite, he's been up and down with injuries but was elite when they won it.I'm with you to an extent, but I think its grossly underestimating how rare those elite guys are. I'd also argue that the Steelers and ESPECIALLY the Bengals don't suck. The Bengals are arguably the 2nd best team in the AFC, they just had bad injury luck. I think they are a solid bet to be in the final 4 next year.I agree, but I think having that super long window is such a rarity, that it sometimes feels silly to chase it, and makes more sense to just hope you happen into it. For every Mahomes/Allen, there's 15 Zach Wilsons. Chasing Allen especially is a horrible idea, because he's pretty much the Halley's comet of QBs as guys with that many accuracy issues, almost never fix it to that level.I've always hated that logic. Now don't get me wrong, having a top QB is a huge deal, but its entirely possible to win without one, and just having one isn't a fix-all for a team. Neither SF nor Detroit have top QBs, Eagles are probably borderline, as were the Rams. I think if you have a great roster, you just need a competent QB, if you have a mediocre roster, you need an elite QB. If you have both, and perhaps even more importantly the right HC, then you are a dynasty.Some people think if you don't have a top 8 QB, then you don't actually have a QB. That might not be a bad outlook...I just wonder where a guy like Jared Goff fits into the equation.I’ve seen plenty of folks who think Maye is the most likely to bust. I don’t consider any of them generational talents. I would be surprised if more than one of them will turn into a legit top tier starter.
It's hard to have a great roster for very long, but if you hit on a great QB you can have them for a decade or longer.
Purdy is a top QB imo, and teams like Detroit come and go. People always seem to forget that. Pretty fair chance the Lions go something like 8-9 next year or the year after and fade back to the middle as those teams constantly do in the NFL (but everyone forgets about, and constantly rates teams based on last year's playoff runs). But almost no chance the Bills or Chiefs do that.
I look at teams right now like the Patriots and Giants, and think they are both making a mistake if they take 1st round QBs. I'd just roll with Brissett and D.Jones/Lock if I were them. All drafting a QB does is put them in the same terrible situation Mac/Daniel Jones had where you are asked to carry an offense mostly full of weapons who would be backups on a good team. Worry about QB when you aren't just offering them up as sacrificial lambs to opposing defenses.
On the flip side, teams like the Bears and Vikings offer ideal starting points for a rookie QB.
It doesn't even have to be a 10-15 year window with the QB to make it worthwhile, because the reality is with the "build a roster" approach the window is most often just 1 year. People are vastly underrating the likelihood that the Lions aren't even a good team next year and don't make the playoffs, just like they did with the 2021 Titans (#1 seed) and the 2020 Browns. We see these teams every year where everything just clicks and everyone thinks they're the next consistent competitor, and then they fizzle out immediately.
If you want a high likelihood to make a lot of money, hammer the under on the Lions win total next year. That's the exact same advice I offered (and followed) here on this forum with those two teams mentioned above, and it was stress free money.
Again, we're not talking a 3 year window vs a 10 year window here. We're talking a 1-year window most typically, maybe 2, because it's just really difficult to hold together a great overall roster and keep everyone healthy.
Look at the 2021 AFC playoff teams: Titans (#1 seed), Chiefs, Bills, Bengals, Raiders, Patriots, Steelers.
4 of those teams suck now (yes I realize the Steelers found a way into the playoffs this year, but let's be real, they suck), and pretty much started sucking the very next year. 3 of those teams are still good and considered Super Bowl contenders at the start of every year. The common denominator is obvious. The teams that are still good are the teams that have good QBs. The teams that were a flash in the pan are the teams that had mediocre QBs but were able to put together a roster around them good enough to create a good team. But that roster around them is just impossible to hold together and keep healthy and keep playing at a high level. The 9ers are pretty much the only exception. Every other team that is consistently good has a consistently top QB.
Who are the elite QBs right now? Allen, Mahomes, Burrow, and Lamar? Maybe Stroud will be? Is Herbert? I'd argue yes, but the Chargers have been below .500 in his career. Prescott? In the regular season only. I don't think we can really call Hurts elite.
Of the 32 teams, that's 4 elite guys, and some maybes. I think for many teams, chasing the 1-2 year window makes more sense, than trying to find a Franchise QB. It worked for the Rams, it arguably worked for Tampa , Brady was elite, but short-term window.
If the end goal is a wild card weekend appearence, then Derek Carr is a meaningful player.I get that, but a Carr type on a rookie contract can be really valuable.I'd rather have a 10% chance of getting a Burrow/Allen type player than a 100% chance of getting a Derek Carr level player.
Of course I think Carr is an average starter, YMMV.