Positional eligibility rules? (Commish) (1 Viewer)

[Hanson Brother4]

Does anyone have a good rule for determining positional eligibility?  MFL doesn't change during the season.  Last year Taysom Hill was NOT a TE, but this year it seems that Cordarelle should be able to be used at RB.  I know it when I see it, but I'm struggling to find consistently applicable rules.  Does anyone have one that they like?  Thanks!

 

[tangfoot]

Does anyone have a good rule for determining positional eligibility?

For the leagues I commish, I defer to the site’s determination, which may very well be inconsistent between sites. 

 

[jobarules]

Yeah I don't touch what the site allows.

 

[Hanson Brother4]

Thanks!  That's the most straightforward.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Does anyone have a good rule for determining positional eligibility?  MFL doesn't change during the season.  Last year Taysom Hill was NOT a TE, but this year it seems that Cordarelle should be able to be used at RB.  I know it when I see it, but I'm struggling to find consistently applicable rules.  Does anyone have one that they like?  Thanks!

I’ve played on several different formats. In my IDP league, Patterson is a WR. In my dynasty league on MFL he’s a WR.

so that’s what he is. If my league was on a site that gave him RB eligibility, that’s what he’d be. 

I tend to look at site eligibility as one of those quirks of the game. Whatever he is wherever I am is what he is 

 

[habsfan]

In general terms, when it comes to overriding your host settings, the juice usually isn't worth the squeeze.