What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Possible Collusion (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

bryn.tyler92

Footballguy
Hi everyone-

I have run into a scenario that doesn't smell right. Here are the specifics:

It is a Family/Friends league (no money), and my brother-in-law is the commissioner of the league. His wife is also in the league. They have their own teams.

I have offered a trade three different times to her, but she says that she has to ask her husband if it is a good trade. The first two were very even, taking the time to make sure that it worked out for everyone using Trade Dominator based on the FBG projections and also making sure that Yahoo thought that it was a good trade, as that is what she would be looking at. The first two were rejected by HIM as he told her they were crap trades. So I made the last trade semi lopsided to see what would happen.

The last trade was for:

From my team to her team:

RGIII, Hakeem Nicks, Chris Johnson

Her team to my team:

Adrian Peterson

It filled voids in QB, WR for her team and it helped me with my RB issue (S.Jackson, CJ2K are underperforming)

Again, she rejected it saying that her husband thought that it was "vomit".

She and her kids came up this last weekend without him, and I mentioned that maybe we could work something out, without naming specifics. She told me, and I quote "xxxxxx said to not accept ANY trade with you."

1. It seems that he is running her team, which is unfair.

2. It seems that if she asks another player in the league to validate a trade, and that trade is not good for the third party (husband), and is subsequently rejected (verbially and through the Yahoo interface) because of the husband knowing that both of our teams will get better, which makes it harder for him to win the league. Is she unknowinly colluding with him.

This is very frustrating to me, and I need to know if I am over reacting. Oh, and I won the league last year and in three years the husband has never beat me. I make sure to remind him of this.

Thoughts?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds stupid, but do you really want to make a big deal in a no money family league? Picking fights over small potatoes with some of the more important people in your life is generally a terrible plan.

 
This is very frustrating to me, and I need to know if I am over reacting. Oh, and I won the league last year and in three years the husband has never beat me. I make sure to remind him of this.
Instead of reminding him of your dominance over him why don't you ask him why he keeps "vetoing" fair trades with his wife?
 
'BusterTBronco said:
It is collusion and you should notify the Federal Authorities about this. Your so-called brother in law should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
This. Although you might need recorded video proof of these conversations and allegations. Can you provide such a thing?
 
I personally think this should be grounds for boycotting any future family gatherings - but then I am always looking for gorunds to boycott future family gatherings.

 
If it is free friends and family it should be fun. If this is making it not fun, do not play in the league next year. I have left a few friends/family leagues because of this type of thing. But do not let the drama from the league spill out. None of this is worth any real life friction between relations.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top