Jene Bramel
Footballguy
1. I'd prefer not to make this an advice-for-my-team thread. Strategy and decision-making discussion is welcome, but please keep questions as general as possible.
2. Fire away.
2. Fire away.
B-but....everyone cares about my team.1. I'd prefer not to make this an advice-for-my-team thread. Strategy and decision-making discussion is welcome, but please keep questions as general as possible.
One DT I like this year who seems to be on every WW is Randy Starks in Miami. Fairly sure he will be a 3 down player and will be shifting around the line, not purely at tackle.Hey all, just joined a league where need to start 3 DT. (IDP only league.) Always learning but feel I might know the least about this position. Any chance of having a top 30 DT ranking only? Love the context of the DT mixed into the DE, but where the league is DT required more depth would be helpful. (selfish and hopefully generally helpful request.)Any DT sleepers to keep an eye on? Any chance Muhammad Wilkerson, Jared Odrick, Pernell McPhee, or others move to DT? Not sure if their talent/versatility supports it, and frankly the number of fronts defenses play have me guessing at what their bases truly are sometimes. (Jets being rumored to be moving to 4-3 for example, but not sure if the base is 46, etc.)Hopefully that's general enough, and thank you,
1) It's a multiple front, not a pure 34. He is going to be a stud, if you can get him cheaply, make a move now!2) He will be a 3 down backer, IMO its Henderson and not Brinkley is the guy to own outside of Greenway. Henderson looks to me to be a low end LB2/high end LB3'treat88 said:1. Matt Shaughnessy - is he a 34 DE now and does that leave any likelihood for meaningful production?2. Erin Henderson - 3 down backer? Increased upside if Brinkley's hip continues to ail him?
B-but....everyone cares about my team.1. I'd prefer not to make this an advice-for-my-team thread. Strategy and decision-making discussion is welcome, but please keep questions as general as possible.![]()
Not officially, but it's not a good sign that Lofa Tatupu and Barrett Ruud are getting looks earlier than Henderson has. Surprising, too, because I felt Henderson was very good between the tackles last year. Sure seems like a few teams could use an Andra Davis type veteran. Maybe it was a contract demand or yet-to-be-revealed offseason surgery that has his return on hold / market cooled.What's going on with EJ Henderson. Is he officially done?
In super deep leagues, would love to hear of which rookies at all IDP positions you have on your watch lists.....to be honest it doesn't even have to be rookies![]()
It's really difficult to answer these questions without knowing league specifics.Shallower leagues might have guys like Derrick Morgan or Donald Butler still available. Somewhat deeper leagues might have Robert Quinn or Erin Henderson on the wire. Deep rosters are probably looking at Michael Bennett or Kavell Conner.I think the best plan is to cross-check my watch lists in the tier threads and the back end of my rankings on the website with your lists to look for guys I think have rosterable value in 2012.Any dl or lb's that may be on a waiver wire, or are buy low that could break out this season?
I'll try to have a top 30 DT and CB rank list ready for camp. I don't generate those myself because there's no circumstance where I would draft the, say, 17th DT or CB from my list. I'll enter a draft or offseason with a list of 5-15 names I'm comfortable rostering. If I miss on those names, I'd rather wait and play matchups early in the season while examining trends to find the next Geno Atkins or Tim Jennings.High upside, risk-reward sleepers in the Atkins mold? Christian Ballard, maybe Arthur Jones. At CB? Aaron Williams, Jimmy Smith, Dre Kirkpatrick, maybe Aaron Berry.Wilkerson, Odrick and McPhee are all capable of playing DT, but all three are currently listed as DE at Rotoworld and aren't likely to be moved.If the Jets are serious about lining up in a 4-3 base predominantly, you may see Wilkerson moved. But I don't see it happening.Any chance of having a top 30 DT ranking only? Love the context of the DT mixed into the DE, but where the league is DT required more depth would be helpful. (selfish and hopefully generally helpful request.)Any DT sleepers to keep an eye on? Any chance Muhammad Wilkerson, Jared Odrick, Pernell McPhee, or others move to DT? Not sure if their talent/versatility supports it, and frankly the number of fronts defenses play have me guessing at what their bases truly are sometimes. (Jets being rumored to be moving to 4-3 for example, but not sure if the base is 46, etc.)
More concerned about Wimbley's tackle numbers than Wake but I think both are 40-8 or better players this year. Both are capable of performing well from a three point stance.What difference in production (if any) do you expect from guys like Cameron Wake and Kamerion Wimbley moving from rush OLB to DE?
I like to think of a team's fantasy value in terms of a triangle. I'm willing to project three defenders to elite numbers if the talent and opportunity are there. The talent is there in SF but there could be a question of opportunity if the Niners offense improves enough to increase the number of extended drives or length of time they have a lead of more than a touchdown.There's precedent for multiple linebackers, including two ILBs, having elite fantasy value. Some situations, like the early Texans' 3-4 years, can support big numbers from two ILBs from even below average talent.Bowman is much more likely to regress multiple tiers than Willis, but I think Bowman can still threaten the 92-95 solo tackle plateau alongside Willis.How will the value of Patrick Willis and Navorro Bowman shake out this year and in future years? Can there really be two elite linebackers on that team?
Well, in that case....'Jene Bramel said:B-but....everyone cares about my team.1. I'd prefer not to make this an advice-for-my-team thread. Strategy and decision-making discussion is welcome, but please keep questions as general as possible.![]()
Never thought I'd see 5-ish speechless.
Think that depends on how Zach Brown performs in camp. If he's impressive enough to win a starting job, he's probably going to challenge for nickel snaps.I think there's a chance that Ayers improves regardless, but it'll be hard for him to have more than marginal matchup value -- even in an every-down situation.Well, in that case....'Jene Bramel said:B-but....everyone cares about my team.1. I'd prefer not to make this an advice-for-my-team thread. Strategy and decision-making discussion is welcome, but please keep questions as general as possible.![]()
Never thought I'd see 5-ish speechless.
Akeem Ayers: Expecting a large bump in production? 3-down player this year or big play only type? What's the Magic 8 Ball say?
Well Brown certainly has motivation. He heard people call him soft so we'll see how he responds. I like his speed if he can work off blocks and tackle.Think that depends on how Zach Brown performs in camp. If he's impressive enough to win a starting job, he's probably going to challenge for nickel snaps.I think there's a chance that Ayers improves regardless, but it'll be hard for him to have more than marginal matchup value -- even in an every-down situation.
Lofa getting looks? I haven't heard anything what am I missing?Not officially, but it's not a good sign that Lofa Tatupu and Barrett Ruud are getting looks earlier than Henderson has. Surprising, too, because I felt Henderson was very good between the tackles last year. Sure seems like a few teams could use an Andra Davis type veteran. Maybe it was a contract demand or yet-to-be-revealed offseason surgery that has his return on hold / market cooled.What's going on with EJ Henderson. Is he officially done?
signed in AtlantaLofa getting looks? I haven't heard anything what am I missing?
I think this is a great question and will expand on it somewhat. What value do you see for slot corners these days in the NFL? I'm guessing it's probably more of a matchup thing though would like your insight Jene. Guys like this are going to be getting 40 to 60% of snaps in subpackage looks based on the matchup I'm thinking. How do you see this one Jene?'Ashem said:Do nickelbacks have any value, or do they go at the very bottom of any DB draft list?Why does a player end up as a nickleback? Is he too slow to play outside?
'Ashem said:Do nickelbacks have any value, or do they go at the very bottom of any DB draft list?Why does a player end up as a nickleback? Is he too slow to play outside?
Nickel corners can have lots of fantasy value. They have to have a very high point-to-snap ratio, but it's possible. Richard Marshall was a CB1 in his first two seasons despite seeing only nickel duty. But that's rare. I wouldn't put them at the bottom of the list, but you'll need a compelling reason (very high matchup value, skill set that's likely to support tackle numbers, etc) to draft/hold one. As RMc notes, the trend toward spread base offensive sets will increase the likelihood that a slot corner will hold consistent value.The angle you'll want to watch is the corner who plays outside against traditional sets and slides inside in nickel/dime sets. Those players -- if they can tackle -- are primed for very good numbers. It's not a common scenario (though it's becoming moreso lately) but it's supported the value of guys like Ronde Barber and others in past seasons.I think this is a great question and will expand on it somewhat. What value do you see for slot corners these days in the NFL? I'm guessing it's probably more of a matchup thing though would like your insight Jene. Guys like this are going to be getting 40 to 60% of snaps in subpackage looks based on the matchup I'm thinking. How do you see this one Jene?
Slot coverage will prop his value up some, but I think Mark Barron will make it very difficult for Barber to push above 65 solos if he plays FS in the base defense.Speaking of Ronde....if that switch to Free Safety is permanent(and it appears it will be), does it pretty much squash any value he had remaining? Or would that all be predicated on whether he is/isn't going to be covering the slot in subs?
Absolutely and thank you, I've actually held off responding, as I was hoping he would drop to me in a draft, and not sure who's trolling these boards.One DT I like this year who seems to be on every WW is Randy Starks in Miami. Fairly sure he will be a 3 down player and will be shifting around the line, not purely at tackle.Any DT sleepers to keep an eye on?
Thanks Jene, for your thoughts, much appreciated. Have Ngata, Casey, Starks, Ballard in a 10 team, start 3 DT league. Knowing Wilkerson, not likely to be moved, helped crystalize strategy for me. Thanks.I'll try to have a top 30 DT and CB rank list ready for camp. I don't generate those myself because there's no circumstance where I would draft the, say, 17th DT or CB from my list. I'll enter a draft or offseason with a list of 5-15 names I'm comfortable rostering. If I miss on those names, I'd rather wait and play matchups early in the season while examining trends to find the next Geno Atkins or Tim Jennings.High upside, risk-reward sleepers in the Atkins mold? Christian Ballard, maybe Arthur Jones. At CB? Aaron Williams, Jimmy Smith, Dre Kirkpatrick, maybe Aaron Berry.Wilkerson, Odrick and McPhee are all capable of playing DT, but all three are currently listed as DE at Rotoworld and aren't likely to be moved.If the Jets are serious about lining up in a 4-3 base predominantly, you may see Wilkerson moved. But I don't see it happening.Any chance of having a top 30 DT ranking only? Love the context of the DT mixed into the DE, but where the league is DT required more depth would be helpful. (selfish and hopefully generally helpful request.)Any DT sleepers to keep an eye on? Any chance Muhammad Wilkerson, Jared Odrick, Pernell McPhee, or others move to DT? Not sure if their talent/versatility supports it, and frankly the number of fronts defenses play have me guessing at what their bases truly are sometimes. (Jets being rumored to be moving to 4-3 for example, but not sure if the base is 46, etc.)
Trade all of your good veteran talent for young, high upside rookies or 2nd year players. I mean, all of your good players. Get value for them. Acquire picks. I realize that means essentially not competing at all this season, but 1 year of pain equals several years of success.'Ashem said:I took over a rebuild in an IDP dynasty league. About 200 IDP's are rostered. We start 2 DL, 2 LB, 2 DB, + 1 Flex.Is it best to grab a bunch of young guys and high draft picks off of the WW and hope they develop, even if they're not MLB/WLB, 4-3 DE's, and SS since most of those are rostered, or is there so much turnover that it's better to wait until preseason or Week 1 and just grab a few guys who look like they might produce because of injury, position change, change of scheme, etc.?
Year-to-year turnover is the primary issue.I'd take a three-pronged approach.1) Deal any defensive player that isn't talented enough to stay in the elite tiers after a scheme change or increase in competiton.2) Target young players who are talented enough to stay in the elite tiers but haven't been given the opportunity yet. Don't get discouraged if there aren't any right now. They will present themselves often enough.3) Err on the side of rostering offensive upside over defensive flyers whenever possible.In the meantime, stream replacement level talent (or worse) off the free agent list when you need lineup fillers.'Ashem said:I took over a rebuild in an IDP dynasty league. About 200 IDP's are rostered. We start 2 DL, 2 LB, 2 DB, + 1 Flex.Is it best to grab a bunch of young guys and high draft picks off of the WW and hope they develop, even if they're not MLB/WLB, 4-3 DE's, and SS since most of those are rostered, or is there so much turnover that it's better to wait until preseason or Week 1 and just grab a few guys who look like they might produce because of injury, position change, change of scheme, etc.?
If you have a list or a couple at each position you really like, it would be helpful. Thanks for all your work.Year-to-year turnover is the primary issue.I'd take a three-pronged approach.1) Deal any defensive player that isn't talented enough to stay in the elite tiers after a scheme change or increase in competiton.2) Target young players who are talented enough to stay in the elite tiers but haven't been given the opportunity yet. Don't get discouraged if there aren't any right now. They will present themselves often enough.3) Err on the side of rostering offensive upside over defensive flyers whenever possible.In the meantime, stream replacement level talent (or worse) off the free agent list when you need lineup fillers.'Ashem said:I took over a rebuild in an IDP dynasty league. About 200 IDP's are rostered. We start 2 DL, 2 LB, 2 DB, + 1 Flex.Is it best to grab a bunch of young guys and high draft picks off of the WW and hope they develop, even if they're not MLB/WLB, 4-3 DE's, and SS since most of those are rostered, or is there so much turnover that it's better to wait until preseason or Week 1 and just grab a few guys who look like they might produce because of injury, position change, change of scheme, etc.?
I'd be more worried about the development of Kelvin Sheppard cutting into Wilson's numbers, although the improved defensive line could decrease the number of snaps the defense sees overall. The move to Wannstedt's system shouldn't be a major issue either way.Byrd is a bigger concern. His numbers are going to be more sensitive to opportunity, and like Atogwe and other FS whose strong tackle numbers don't necessarily match their run support capability, there's going to be variance. The defensive line could keep his big play numbers well above average and make the tackle variance more palatable.Buffalo has been a great defense for S production for awhile now. Jene, do you see any change for Wilson and Byrd given Buffalo's improved DL, and given the move to Wannestadt's system?
Not too worried about Avril's holdout. He doesn't have a new scheme to learn and his skill set isn't dependent on camp reps. The primary issue there will be whether he can survive his first week in pads without a conditioning injury.I'm reworking my tiers this week for the feature series Bloom and I do each August and I'm dropping Suh a bit. I think the his stat line is probably somewhere between his 2010 and 2011 seasons, with his ultimate upside dependent on the success of his adjustments (and the team's game plan, too) to how offensive lines have been approaching him in the run game. There's still 40/8 potential with upside in him. His perceived value / ADP is the all-important factor on whether or not he should end up on your team.Jene, the Lions' DL production has shifted all over the line the past two seasons. You have both Avril and Suh ranked pretty well this year. Any thoughts on if Avril's holdout will be an issue, and what has increased your confidence in Suh after he became more of a pressure-but-low-stats DT following his super rookie year?
I'll have a feature on undervalued IDPs next week'southeastjerome said:Jene, you helped me the past two years to identify a breakout player who would produce a high sack total. Two years ago you gave me Cam Wake, last year it was Von Miller. Who are a couple breakout sack guys?
Jackson is more than a Kirk Morrison-type of talent. He didn't get tackles becaue no-one else was there to make them. Jackson wasn't in the correct scheme for years as both Romeo Crennel and Eric Mangini ran a 3-4 base D. Things changed dramatically for him last year when Shurmur brought in **** Juroun and his 4-3 defensive scheme and the Browns used their top pick on DT Phil Taylor who lead all rookie defensie linemen in tackles and Taylor was paired with vastly underrated DT Ahtyba Rubin to form a solid wall in front of D'Qwell so he was 'covered' when he came up to plug holes. Many times in the Crennel/Mangini years Jackson was 'uncovered' and his role was to come-up and take on OG's who outweighed him by fifty to sventy five pounds.D'Qwell Jackson. Is he really elite? Or is he more like Kirk Morrison was for several seasons, whose fantasy golden value crashed and burned faster than anyone that I can just about ever think of. Is he one of those guys who gets a million tackles because nobody else is there to get them? I don't want to overpay for him this summer if there is any chance that he could move outside. He got paid big time, and probably for the last time, so will he have the motivation to make those extra tackles when he doesn't have to?
Jackson is a strong talent, but not elite. His numbers will be sensitive to surrounding cast, but the Browns are still relatively weak in the back seven. As long as Jackson stays healthy and inside, he's a threat for 95+ solos.
Ward made a big impact as a rookie in Mangini's/Rob Ryan's defense.Rob loves to utlize press coverage so he can move his strong safety up in the box and that is when Ward was a monster.I gave a head's up very early the year T.J. came into the league. Last year I cautioned people off of Ward since the scheme had changed and he would not be coming up in the box as much and would be used more in coverage.You have D'Qwell listed properly. He's the clean up man in Juroun's defense but I wouldn't use the term 'weak' to describe the back seven but in strict IDP terms their are three guys to target on the Browns defense.1. LB D'Qwell Jackson2. DT Ahtyba Rubin3. DE Jabaal SheardWildcard deep sleeperFS Eric HaggGood stuff, Bracie.I didn't mean to imply that Jackson's talent was on par with Morrison's. While I don't think he is an elite MLB talent, he is a very good player. My comment on the relatively weak back seven was in respect to competition for tackles rather than overall team defensive strength. I remain higher on Ward than most for fantasy purposes but I don't see any other clearly above league average talents capable of stealing tackles. Hagg and JMJ could provide more competition but I'll reserve judgment until I see it, since I have reservations on JMJ and have never seen Hagg play.Since I've Jackson ranked as my LB1 overall and have him at the top of my elite tier, I think it is hard to argue that I've underrated him or am in doubt that he'll again be a strong fantasy option. It is worth noting, however, that an improving defense would not necessarily be a good thing for Jackson. Fewer snaps, fewer rushing attempts faced and a better surrounding cast would not work in his favor.
Good question.I see him as a deep sleeper/flyer type of guy who no-one is talking about and the time to uncover sleepers is when no-one is talking about them.Could Hagg have db3 value?