What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Priest Holmes Presser (1 Viewer)

bjabrad

Footballguy
Holmes says he still needs to work on his awareness and footwork.

Says playing is out of his hands, says he's in shape and ready to go, excited to get his first TD.

His first touch of the ball in practice was a 50 yard run.

Still has not been given a roster spot, just been given a green light to practice.

Says he isn't competing with LJ to be the RB1 and doesn't care if he gets 10, 8 or 5 carries per game since he's been able to get 100 yds and a couple of TD's with only 5 carries before.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:unsure:I still don't think he'll ever play again, but with each passing day I'm paying a bit more attention.
He's just playing to get his name in the media.34 yr old RB's that have been out of the game for 2 years due to hip and neck injuries...seriously.
 
If the Chiefs were willing to deal Bennett to TB, they must have confidence that Holmes can and will play this year but I don't see him as anything more than a 2nd string RB at this point.

 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:

1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60

2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20

3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00

4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25

5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80

6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00

7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10

8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40

9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50

10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50

 
If the Chiefs were willing to deal Bennett to TB, they must have confidence that Holmes can and will play this year but I don't see him as anything more than a 2nd string RB at this point.
I think giving up Bennett shows they have faith in Holmes and/or Kolby Smith.
 
Seriously though, should an LJ owner pick up one of these guys - Smith or Priest? Is there much value there if LJ goes down? If i did so i'd probably drop Weaver who I just picked up or Ernie Graham.

 
It sounds like no one told Holmes it's not the same O-line that was there when he got hurt. On the positive for Priest, it does seem KC has some faith in him, giving up Bennett when they are still in the thick of a divison battle. On the negative, LJ outperformed him with the same offense after his injury. Now years older, rusty and with injury concerns it's hard to think Holmes will come in and do much with the present offense.

 
If the Chiefs were willing to deal Bennett to TB, they must have confidence that Holmes can and will play this year but I don't see him as anything more than a 2nd string RB at this point.
I think giving up Bennett shows they have faith in Holmes and/or Kolby Smith.
:thumbup: Agreed, Kolby Smith is also a reason that KC had enough confidence in their RB squad that they felt they could afford to trade away Bennett.
 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60 2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20 3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00 4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25 5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80 6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00 7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10 8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40 9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50 10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50
And four of those occurrences just happen to be in the KC organization. :thumbup:
 
Seriously though, should an LJ owner pick up one of these guys - Smith or Priest? Is there much value there if LJ goes down? If i did so i'd probably drop Weaver who I just picked up or Ernie Graham.
I'm not sold on either one being able to get the job done, but I'd take Smith. I'm paying attention to Priest but I still don't believe he's going to do anything. It'd make a nice story if he could prove me wrong.
 
:thumbup:I still don't think he'll ever play again, but with each passing day I'm paying a bit more attention.
He's just playing to get his name in the media.34 yr old RB's that have been out of the game for 2 years due to hip and neck injuries...seriously.
If you're right then he'll really be happy if he gets some playing time and can generate even more publicity for himself. The guy's working pretty hard away from the team just to be able to get a chance to get five carries a game. I think he knows he's got some game left in his tank and he doesn't want to walk away from the game with any regrets,,,IMO.
 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60 2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20 3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00 4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25 5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80 6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00 7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10 8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40 9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50 10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50
Here's hoping to John Riggins performance for Priest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It sounds like no one told Holmes it's not the same O-line that was there when he got hurt. On the positive for Priest, it does seem KC has some faith in him, giving up Bennett when they are still in the thick of a divison battle. On the negative, LJ outperformed him with the same offense after his injury. Now years older, rusty and with injury concerns it's hard to think Holmes will come in and do much with the present offense.
That's not the way I heard it. I remember reading a thread that stated that Holmes became a superstar RB in KC BEFORE KC had a good OL. LJ may be the better RB talent but that doesn't mean that his style will be successful against every DEF and there are some DEF's that Holmes could have a more effective style against.
 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60 2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20 3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00 4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25 5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80 6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00 7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10 8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40 9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50 10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50
Here's hoping to John Riggins performance for Priest.
or any of Marcus Allen's stat lines which by the way, were in KC, which Carl Peterson remembers.I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want to use Holmes to motivate LJ, take away some of LJ's wear/tear and have the bonus of a nice little PR angle to create some publicity and sell some jerseys.
 
Side note....

If he plays this weekend and happens to find the endzone.....his name is going to be all over FF boards, ESPN, etc. I would look to pick him up now and sell high next week.

 
Holmes' availability, Smith's emergence made Bennett expendable

Oct. 17, 2007

Although he may have had a hard time believing it, saying “it was a shock to me,” we heard the writing was on the wall for RB Michael Bennett’s trade to Tampa Bay, which went down Monday night. First off, Bennett, who was the first-team option during Larry Johnson’s training-camp holdout, had played sparingly in recent weeks, and solid rookie Kolby Smith had been seeing more of Bennett’s reps in practice of late. Add to that the fact that Priest Holmes was eligible to return to practice this week after spending the first six games on the NFL’s non-football injury list, and it becomes more clear that Bennett was deemed expendable, though it’s uncertain as to exactly what the Chiefs received in compensation. The Chiefs have a three-week exemption to decide on Holmes’ status for the remainder of this year and the foreseeable future: They can add him to the active roster, release him or place him back on the non-football injury list, the latter of which would end his season. Holmes, 34, hasn’t practiced or played in two years since being sidelined by head and neck trauma, but he is in much better shape physically than he was in training camp, soon after he was cleared to play by team physicians, and he has been in constant communication with head coach Herm Edwards while working out at the team facility.

:thumbup:

 
Herm Edwards said in his press conference that "Preist was definitely excited to be out there, he had fresh legs and bounced out there quite a bit, he took some big hits and now we just want to see how he feels the next couple of days before we make any decisions about playing him this week. "

Paraphrased from a radio interview I just heard.

BTW, Herm was giggling when recalling how Holmes had fresh legs and had a lot of bounce. He sounded like somebody who thinks that they have a new toy.

Edit to add that I'm not trying to pimp this guy. I'm just trying to figure it all out with the rest of you guys. I've got waivers tonight and right now I honestly don't know what I'm going to do. I really don't have any room for him in my #1 league with only 5 RB spots that are already filled with Bush, ADP, Lamont Jordan, Kenton Keith and Fred Taylor. Add in the fact that KC plays OAK this weekend and then goes on BYE and you have to hold onto Holmes for two or three weeks before you can figure out if he'll be worth a maximum of a 40% split. His upside appears to be that of Derrick Ward's current value. Still, it's a great story and I hope he can pull it off.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oct 17 Holmes went through a full practice Wednesday, a giant step toward what could be turning into one of the NFL's great comebacks. Out of football since suffering neck and spinal injuries two years ago, Holmes was cleared to practice for the first time since he shocked the Chiefs last summer and showed up at training camp.

Advice: Coach Herm Edwards said he still did not know if Holmes would be activated for this week's game at Oakland - or, for that matter, ever. "We'll see how he feels tomorrow," Edwards said. "That's the whole key now, how is he going to feel tomorrow? And then the next day? Where is he going to be the next couple of days?''

 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60 2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20 3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00 4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25 5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80 6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00 7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10 8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40 9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50 10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50
Yeah and apparently his name was Marcus Allen and John Riggins.
 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60 2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20 3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00 4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25 5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80 6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00 7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10 8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40 9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50 10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50
Both Riggins and Allen had relatively limited numbers of carries before they turned 30, and for two of those years Riggins was the goalline back in one of the more prolific NFL offenses. Also, none of those guys had a major injury to my knowledge before they put up those numbers. I think the thing to take from your list is that it's a pretty rare thing for a RB of a certain age to put up meaningful numbers, and even moreso if they've been seriously injured.
 
Holmes says he still needs to work on his awareness and footwork.Says playing is out of his hands, says he's in shape and ready to go, excited to get his first TD.His first touch of the ball in practice was a 50 yard run.Still has not been given a roster spot, just been given a green light to practice.Says he isn't competing with LJ to be the RB1 and doesn't care if he gets 10, 8 or 5 carries per game since he's been able to get 100 yds and a couple of TD's with only 5 carries before.
has anyone ever watched a non-contact NFL practice.....every run is 50 yards
 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60 2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20 3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00 4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25 5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80 6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00 7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10 8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40 9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50 10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50
Both Riggins and Allen had relatively limited numbers of carries before they turned 30, and for two of those years Riggins was the goalline back in one of the more prolific NFL offenses. Also, none of those guys had a major injury to my knowledge before they put up those numbers. I think the thing to take from your list is that it's a pretty rare thing for a RB of a certain age to put up meaningful numbers, and even moreso if they've been seriously injured.
I'm not saying Priest will do anything, so it's not like I'm pimping him.But Riggins missed an entire season. And Allen missed half of two seasons with injuries. And Holmes only has 1734 carries vs 3000+ for Allen and Riggins almost had that many.
 
That's not the way I heard it. I remember reading a thread that stated that Holmes became a superstar RB in KC BEFORE KC had a good OL.
KC line was still good in 2001...just not what it was the year after. Priest's first year (1,555 ru yds), there was no Willie Roaf, and Brian Waters was still trying to find a spot on the O-line. I think he was playing Center, I can't remember. But the line was still decent.
 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60 2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20 3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00 4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25 5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80 6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00 7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10 8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40 9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50 10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50
Both Riggins and Allen had relatively limited numbers of carries before they turned 30, and for two of those years Riggins was the goalline back in one of the more prolific NFL offenses. Also, none of those guys had a major injury to my knowledge before they put up those numbers. I think the thing to take from your list is that it's a pretty rare thing for a RB of a certain age to put up meaningful numbers, and even moreso if they've been seriously injured.
Priest has less NFL carries than both Riggins and Allen and Priest also had little wear and tear in college. When you mention Priest's serious injury are you talking about his hip and knee he injured or the spinal injury that forced him to sit out two years? He's already made comebacks from the hip and knee and while the spinal injury could force him back out of the game as it relates to his ability to run I'd call it a non-issue.
 
SteelerMurf said:
Holmes says he still needs to work on his awareness and footwork.

Says playing is out of his hands, says he's in shape and ready to go, excited to get his first TD.

His first touch of the ball in practice was a 50 yard run.

Still has not been given a roster spot, just been given a green light to practice.

Says he isn't competing with LJ to be the RB1 and doesn't care if he gets 10, 8 or 5 carries per game since he's been able to get 100 yds and a couple of TD's with only 5 carries before.
has anyone ever watched a non-contact NFL practice.....every run is 50 yards
I guess this wasn't a non-contact practice.http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/2007/10/17/qa...t_holmes__1017/

Q&A with PRIEST HOLMES - 10/17

Oct 17, 2007, 5:11:49 PM

VIDEO: Windows | Real | Audio

Q: How did your first day of practice go?

HOLMES: “It went very well. One of the things that I can take from practice is that I still have a lot in me. That was one of the surprising things, not so much for the team to see, but also for myself to see how well I perform getting back to practice. Knowing that it’s nowhere near the speed of the game, there were a few things that took me by surprise during practice. There are three things I need to work on. My awareness, like anything, being away from the game you get away from the minor details. My footwork, not so much on the actual play like the draw or Tex play, but more my footwork while I’m going into the line of scrimmage. And the third thing is vision. Being away from the game you start to get tunnel vision as far as what you want in life. I spent the last 22 months thinking about the things I wanted in my life and being a better person. Now it’s time to expand that and get back into football shape. My vision is the only vision that is the key thing in this organization it’s about winning a championship.”

Q: When do you think you’d be ready to play in a game?

HOLMES: “I’m ready now. But it’s really not up to me so it’s a matter of when they give me the green light. They’ve given me the green light to practice, so this is basically test two. I get a chance to see where I’m at and go against a defense and I had a couple reps on the scout team. That was a lot of fun. There was no one that was going to be blocking so the number one defense gets to tee off and hit you as hard as they can and it’s all within the realms of playing the game.”

Q: On the reaction to getting his first playing time in a game after the layoff…

HOLMES: “The most exciting thing will be my first touchdown. That’s what I’m excited about. Not so much the first run, because I think that the first run could come on a play where there is a nine-man blitz and they get me for a loss of two. That possibly could happen, or it could be a 50-yard run. Any of those things can happen, but what is going to be exciting is my first touchdown.”

Q: On his relationship with RB Larry Johnson…

HOLMES: “I texted Larry right after the game on Sunday and the first thing I told him was, ‘regardless of how you feel, you have to remember, as you go we go.’ Then he called me back and told me, ‘I was really bummed out as far as the fumble.’ And that takes a lot of energy out of any player. For a quarterback it’s an interception, for a defensive back it’s getting burned for an 80-yard touchdown. It can flatten you. That’s where you get guys that can be encouraging. That’s the first thing I did. Then about an hour later I texted him again. He had a red Gucci jacket on and everybody was looking at that. So I texted him and said ‘Man you know what? You looked so good on Sunday it makes me want to go out and buy one of those jackets.’ He can’t do anything about the fumble but we can go on with life and talk about other things and there is another game.”

Q: On the first hit he took…

HOLMES: “My first touch of the ball was a 50-yard run. The first hit I took, I couldn’t even tell you. It’s just a part of practice. There was one play where they sent two linebackers in on me and just like I said as far as my awareness, it really wasn’t there initially. So I’m seeing two guys coming at me and wondering which one do I take. The better one gets a good hit on me. That’s just part of football. The best thing I can say is that I stood in there, got my wig split, got hit pretty hard, but bounced back and got ready to play the next snap.”

Q: On the trading of RB Michael Bennett possibly opening up a spot for him…

HOLMES: “I haven’t filled a spot at this point. I’ve just been cleared to be able to practice. Until I actually get that green light, that’s when I’ll be able to really focus on that.”

Q: Are you here to compete with Johnson, or are you okay with a limited role?

HOLMES: “As far as competing with LJ, that’s not anything that’s necessary to do. Once I’m contributing and making touchdowns, it won’t be something about competition. With him getting 20 touches, he’s going to get his opportunity in order to do everything he can do successfully. And the same with me, whether it’s five, eight or 10 (touches), even if it’s one, hopefully it will be the one that will be for a touchdown.”

Q: On he and Johnson…

HOLMES: “As he goes, we go and he has to keep that in the back of his mind and always know that regardless of the frustrations that is something very important. He’s our guy, he’s our leader right now and he’s the one guy who is heading our running back position, which I believe is a very key ingredient on the football field.

Q: On this Sunday’s game…

HOLMES: “There is another game this week, it’s one of our rivalries in Oakland. I’m excited about actually get an opportunity to practice to be able to show that I can get past test number two in order to get an opportunity to suit up in the future.”

 
Here is the info from Herm's presser

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/2007/10/17/qa..._edwards__1017/

Q: How did RB Priest Holmes look?

EDWARDS: “He’s got fresh legs and he was bouncing around good. He was excited about practicing; there is no doubt about it. He bounced around well and we’ll see how he feels tomorrow, that’s the key. How is he going to feel tomorrow and the next day? That’s the whole key for me now. What is he going to do in the next couple of days and how is his body going to feel? He got banged around a little bit and seemed to take it ok.”

Q: Did he participate fully?

EDWARDS: “Yeah, he did a little bit of everything.”

Q: Could he possibly be activated and play on Sunday?

EDWARDS: “I don’t know, we’ll just wait and see. We’ll see.”

Q: Did you ever imagine that you would see what you saw out there today with him practicing?

EDWARDS: “What was surprising was that he decided not to retire and told us that he was coming back. That was surprising when that conversation took place, but from there, once he showed up, nothing else surprised me about the guy because of his history. I’m a big history kind of guy. I think that history shows you the past and kind of gives you a good idea about what is going to happen in the future. I just think that when you look at what he’s done before and accomplished when people thought he was out, he came back. This guy has a great mindset and that’s what life is about. Most people, if you listen to them, you get distracted. He doesn’t get distracted. He has great focus on what he wants to do and he wanted to attempt to come back and he’s put a lot into this. It’s been three months of doing what he’s doing every day and now he’s all of a sudden practicing and a lot of people probably didn’t anticipate that he’d be practicing or that he would check out before that, but he hasn’t.”

Q: Have you sat down and really got to know him?

EDWARDS: “I’ve had some conversations, but I don’t think that anyone really knows Priest Holmes. So I’m not going to sit here and say that I know Priest Holmes. I know what I see and I know the conversations that I’ve had with him have been good. I’ve been up front with the guy, I’ve been truthful with him and he’s been truthful with me. That’s what the conversations have been, I don’t bother the guy, he’s a veteran football player who has accomplished a lot in his career and that’s how I go about doing business. I treat everyone fair, I don’t treat everyone the same. With that being said, there was a certain agenda that he had to meet and he met that. When he came back he knew what I expected of him as a football player for this football team and he met that. I gave him leeway because he needed some leeway. He needed to do some things a little bit different and that’s ok. He’s practicing, which is good for him, so we’ll see where he’s at.”

Q: What do you need to see from him that will convince you that he’s ready to get back on to the playing field?

EDWARDS: “It’s just a matter of how his body feels after the next few days. It’s like people that ski, I would assume. When the skiing season is over and you go back to skiing you are pretty sore the first day. Sometimes, on the second day, you really don’t want to go skiing again. He’ll practice again tomorrow and we’ll see how he feels. That’s the key.”

Q: Do you need to see speed or contact from him?

EDWARDS: “You saw speed. He’s got quickness. He has quickness in the hole, he has burst, he has great acceleration, he has a good vision and he hasn’t lost that. He doesn’t have what he had four years ago, but he’s still ok. He got hit some today and he didn’t lie down and not want to come back. He got back up, dusted himself off, got back into the huddle and did it again.”

Q: Did you see a guy out there that can help you win?

EDWARDS: “I saw a guy out there that has worked his tail off for the last three months to do what he did today. He’s worked three months to be able to put on a uniform and practice. That, alone to me, says something about the person. He’s been out two years, he’s been anticipating this day and he got through it. Now, I have to see what happens tomorrow and the next day. There is still a lot to be seen, so we’ll see what happens.”

Q: Does he still fit in here with this offense?

EDWARDS: “Yeah, he’s a good football player. Good football players fit in with any offense or any defense. It doesn’t matter because you are a good football player. The one thing that’s good is that the guy knows the plays. It’s not like he’s been somewhere else, he knows the plays. They know him better then I know him. Mike Solari was the offensive line coach when he was the running back. He knows what he’s doing. If you ask (Priest) what plays he likes, he says that Mike knows.”

Q: How difficult is it to get your third running back on the active roster when he doesn’t play special teams?

EDWARDS: “Well, when you look at it, it’s really flipped. If he dresses, it’s flipped. We had RB Michael Bennett who really wasn’t’ a special teams guy and RB Kolby Smith and RB Larry Johnson. So we’ve already done that and it’s flipped.”

Q: How does the fullback position affect Priest when that was a position that he depended on for so long?

EDWARDS: “I think that FB Boomer Grigsby is a guy that we need to get some more reps to at fullback to see if he can be the lead guy. FB Kris Wilson is more of a position guy, his body is not built to do that and he’s done a great job for us. But you’re right, FB Tony Richardson was a great fullback for both backs and those kind of guys are hard to find. We’re trying to develop one, obviously in Boomer. I think Priest is excited to have the opportunity to play again, so I don’t think he’s going to worry about who the fullback is. He’s got his other issues that he needs to worry about. When he plays again, he’ll be worrying about holding onto the football, do I pick up the hot protection and those kind of things. I think those are the kind of things that we sometimes lose sight of.”

Q: At what point do you need to make a decision on Priest?

EDWARDS: “I don’t have to make a decision until Saturday.”

Q: Might it go that long?

EDWARDS: “Maybe.”

Q: Does the bye week enter into it at all?

EDWARDS: “No, it’s a matter of how he feels and where he’s at. That’s a conversation that we’ll have.”

Q: You obviously admire the dedication that he has shown.

EDWARDS: “No doubt.”

Q: Is that something that you are going to take into account?

EDWARDS: “No, when you decide this the main purpose is if he can help you win a game. At the end, that’s what you have to decide when you dress those 45 guys. Which 45 guys are the ones that give you the best opportunity to win games?”

Q: But you’ve seen how dedicated he is.

EDWARDS: “Yeah, dedication is a good thing and I applaud that, but if you put him on the 45 you have say that he can help us win a game and be productive for us. That’s how I think about it when I think about the 45-man roster.”

Q: How are you going to know that?

EDWARDS: “You don’t and that’s what I always say about young rookies; you don’t know until you play them.”

 
Even as an LJ owner, I have to like and pull for PH. The guy just wants to play football and is willing to work his rear off to do it, when he could just sit back and spend his money. Respect.

 
Even as an LJ owner, I have to like and pull for PH. The guy just wants to play football and is willing to work his rear off risk his life to do it, when he could just sit back and spend his money. Respect.
Fixed.Good interview with Priest. He's quite thoughtful but without coming off like a space cadet.

You know, when I first heard about the "comeback" I honestly thought that the Chiefs were just going to "humor him" for a few days and then cut him. Like one of those "One Day Contracts" that players often sign the day before they retire. But the more I read about it, the more I think that it's FOR REAL. He's really coming back. Seriously. And I get goosebumps just thinking about it. Maybe I feel a deeper sense of attachment because I "owned" Priest -- he was part of my fantasy teams and part of my virtual family, I suppose.

All I know is that if Priest does end up scoring that first touchdown to complete the comeback, there won't be a dry eye in my house.

 
I don't think he will do gangbusters if he comes back, but in the past 30 years there have been a handful of RB 34 or older that were able to score 100 fantasy points in a season in a standard scoring league:1 John Riggins 1983 34 281.60 2 John Riggins 1984 35 212.20 3 Marcus Allen 1996 36 164.00 4 Emmitt Smith 2004 35 163.25 5 Marcus Allen 1994 34 147.80 6 Marcus Allen 1995 35 140.00 7 Marcus Allen 1997 37 125.10 8 Earnest Byner 1996 34 120.40 9 John Riggins 1985 36 117.50 10 Tony Dorsett 1988 112.50
Both Riggins and Allen had relatively limited numbers of carries before they turned 30, and for two of those years Riggins was the goalline back in one of the more prolific NFL offenses. Also, none of those guys had a major injury to my knowledge before they put up those numbers. I think the thing to take from your list is that it's a pretty rare thing for a RB of a certain age to put up meaningful numbers, and even moreso if they've been seriously injured.
I'm not saying Priest will do anything, so it's not like I'm pimping him.But Riggins missed an entire season. And Allen missed half of two seasons with injuries. And Holmes only has 1734 carries vs 3000+ for Allen and Riggins almost had that many.
FYI- Riggins' missed season was a year-long contract holdout. That was why Gibbs' first stop after getting hired was to go to Riggins home in Kansas where he found him, at 9:00 a.m., in hunting gear holding a beer. He convinced Riggo to return, which prompted Riggins' famous quote to the press at the time, "I'm broke, I'm bored and I'm back." Anyway, it wasn't an injury. Allen too was influenced by off-field concerns given his battles with Al Davis, but I'm not sure about the seasons you're referring to.
 
i think Priest is crazy to risk his health returning now. he had some kind of spinal injury which put an end to his career - be happy you can walk, Priest, and walk away.

 
Priest Holmes (neck, NFI list) practiced again Thursday.

The Chiefs have yet to promote Holmes to the active roster, but he's inching towards playing again. Coach Herm Edwards says Priest wasn't sore after putting in an unlimited practice Wednesday, which is a big step.
 
Oct 18 Holmes went through another impressive workout on Thursday and the Chiefs appeared to be leaning toward activating the 34-year-old running back.

Advice: Attempting an improbable return to the NFL after being out for 22 months, Holmes had his first practice on Wednesday and coaches said they would pay particular attention to how he did Thursday. The Chiefs seemed to make roster room for Holmes this week when they traded Michael Bennett to Tampa. But coach Herm Edwards said he still had not made a decision whether Holmes would play Sunday at Oakland.

 
If the Chiefs were willing to deal Bennett to TB, they must have confidence that Holmes can and will play this year but I don't see him as anything more than a 2nd string RB at this point.
I think giving up Bennett shows they have faith in Holmes and/or Kolby Smith.
:hot: Agreed, Kolby Smith is also a reason that KC had enough confidence in their RB squad that they felt they could afford to trade away Bennett.
correct
 
OK, just so everyone here can have some laughs:

I just dropped L. White and picked up Priest.

My other running backs are S. Alexander, W. McGahee, and A. Peterson(Minny). I'm 6-0 and the points leader. I figured a haymaker swing for the fences with my 4th string RB would be fun.

Stupid? Maybe. Fun? You betcha!

 
OK, just so everyone here can have some laughs:I just dropped L. White and picked up Priest.My other running backs are S. Alexander, W. McGahee, and A. Peterson(Minny). I'm 6-0 and the points leader. I figured a haymaker swing for the fences with my 4th string RB would be fun.Stupid? Maybe. Fun? You betcha!
You'll never use White and while I don't know your league, I'd think you would have been able to get some value for LenDale in a trade. Nothing wrong with what you did, winning is a blast but it's good to have fun (especially if it doesn't affect your starting lineup).
 
OK, just so everyone here can have some laughs:I just dropped L. White and picked up Priest.My other running backs are S. Alexander, W. McGahee, and A. Peterson(Minny). I'm 6-0 and the points leader. I figured a haymaker swing for the fences with my 4th string RB would be fun.Stupid? Maybe. Fun? You betcha!
You'll never use White and while I don't know your league, I'd think you would have been able to get some value for LenDale in a trade. Nothing wrong with what you did, winning is a blast but it's good to have fun (especially if it doesn't affect your starting lineup).
Noone wanted him! Well, not for what I was asking.... :shrug:
 
I have watched the comeback with a skeptical eye, as most have. A few things caught my eye today though, so will clip the three dots that I noticed and you can decide how to connect them.

#1: The Chiefs have a three-week exemption to decide on Holmes’ status for the remainder of this year and the foreseeable future: They can add him to the active roster, release him or place him back on the non-football injury list, the latter of which would end his season.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#2: Q: At what point do you need to make a decision on Priest?

EDWARDS: “I don’t have to make a decision until Saturday.”

Q: Might it go that long?

EDWARDS: “Maybe.”

Q: Does the bye week enter into it at all?

EDWARDS: “No, it’s a matter of how he feels and where he’s at. That’s a conversation that we’ll have.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#3: Q: Are you here to compete with Johnson, or are you okay with a limited role?

HOLMES: “As far as competing with LJ, that’s not anything that’s necessary to do. Once I’m contributing and making touchdowns, it won’t be something about competition. With him getting 20 touches, he’s going to get his opportunity in order to do everything he can do successfully. And the same with me, whether it’s five, eight or 10 (touches), even if it’s one, hopefully it will be the one that will be for a touchdown.”

________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________

It is very dangerous making suppositions from quotes from NFL personnel, but I am gathering that Priest thinks his role will be goal line back with 5-10 red zone carries per week if he can pull it off. Based on Edwards' response that he is focused on Saturday or before to make a decision, I think he thinks Holmes is either going to be activated or will retire. The bye week is not a factor? It is do or die then. Most likely DO. If LJ got hurt I would bet Priest's role will stay the same and the rookie would get the 20 carries. But Holmes might be the kind of inspirational boost that Edwards needs to try to salvage a season with a subpar group. Wouldn't surprise me to see Holmes as a feature story all weekend and then get 3 carries all inside the five for a punch-in. In coming weeks if Holmes' body holds up he could take advantage of a soft schedule (two matchups with Denver remaining plus Det and the Jets in weeks 16 and 17) to possibly help.

If his body can't take it he will be gone soon and I can cut him for someone else quickly. I picked him up in a 12 team, 21-player-per-team league today. I wouldn't do it except it is a really deep league which starts 3 RB's per week. I have a feeling though that he might just get a start for me at a key time. Worth a gamble. There is that wild chance that he could handle more like 15 -18 touches per game down the road and become an easier play. Anybody who has ever had to start a goal line back because of injury and circumstance will understand why anybody would spend time analyzing the prospects of someone like 34-year-old Priest Holmes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boy o boy, this is such a pain for LJ owners. IMO, don't be surprised if this becomes a full RBBC. Priest will make cuts to the hole better and he pass protects better.

 
Boy o boy, this is such a pain for LJ owners. IMO, don't be surprised if this becomes a full RBBC. Priest will make cuts to the hole better and he pass protects better.
You're kidding, right? Not saying you're crazy, but an RBBC would totally shock me. Feel free to bump this later on if it works out to be true..... :tumbleweed:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top