Pure hypothetical (don't panic): IF LJ goes down (1 Viewer)

[KCC]

Any thoughts appreciated.

 

[The Jacket]

Bennett's by far the best option if LJ goes down.

The Chiefs have no one else - just special teamers.

 

[mlball77]

My guess... Bennett would get a good chunk of the carries, but another scrubb or two would be worked into the mix a little as well. I just don't see Bennett carrying the ball more than 15 times a game at this point.

 

[MLBrandow]

had a thread on this before the season..

it was "Dee Brown" by a lot then

guess he disapeared again!

 

[Kevin Ashcraft]

Other than Bennett and Dee Brown, the only playable guy is Derrick Ross, an undrafted rookie from Division II Tarleton St. in TX. He has a BEAST @ teh D2 level.

And of course, there is one horse left, but he is 99% un-usable....some guy named Priest......

 

[doomsdaydoc]

It would be Bennett- and maybe a sprinkle of another player. Mostly Bennett. 20 carries a game at least. I would expect decent RB 2 numbers. If you are trying to ask whether you should have him as insurance on your team the answer is yes. If you want to trade him to the guy with LJ and hold him for ransom- yes

 

[nightshift]

Sorry, but, if LJ isn't runnin' the ball, KC is in a world of hurt. FF players would like to think that some other RB will step in and produce like LJ. That ain't real. RBs like LJ, LT2, etc. are very rare and very hard to replace.

 

[KCC]

Sorry, but, if LJ isn't runnin' the ball, KC is in a world of hurt. FF players would like to think that some other RB will step in and produce like LJ. That ain't real. RBs like LJ, LT2, etc. are very rare and very hard to replace.

I don't think anyone is suggesting that another RB would put up the same numbers as LJ. However, that doesn't mean that such a player wouldn't have any value.

 

[softball]

I think the answer is obvious.

M. Bennett would get ALL the carries. At most 50, before he;s injured and they are screwed.

There is no history of M.B. to suggest otherwise...