What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pure Speculation - Vick to the Raiders? (1 Viewer)

Jeff Pasquino

Footballguy
Just had this thought today once I was getting caught up on the news. I posted this in the Philly thread but I'd like to get some other opinions.

I'm purely speculating here - but this would make sense to me.Kirk Morrison just signed for 1-yr back with the Raiders, and rumors have it that he's available for a 4th/5th.Give Gradkowski's injury, doesn't a Vick for Morrison deal make sense?
 
Yes.

I think Ron Mexico could easily outperform the rubbish bin QBs

currently littering the Oakland Raider roster.

Russell

Gradkowski

Frye

Boller

 
Where would Morrison play? Outside. Bradley looked awesome in the playoffs vs Minnesota (2009). Is his recovery not going well?

Suffice it to say, I think Vick is more valuable to Philly than Morrison.

 
Where would Morrison play? Outside. Bradley looked awesome in the playoffs vs Minnesota (2009). Is his recovery not going well? Suffice it to say, I think Vick is more valuable to Philly than Morrison.
Why is Vick more valuable?If the choice is Vick + FA LB or Garcia + Kirk Morrison, would you still think Philly would want Vick?
 
Where would Morrison play? Outside. Bradley looked awesome in the playoffs vs Minnesota (2009). Is his recovery not going well? Suffice it to say, I think Vick is more valuable to Philly than Morrison.
Why is Vick more valuable?If the choice is Vick + FA LB or Garcia + Kirk Morrison, would you still think Philly would want Vick?
The answer is obviously Yes. Garcia is a free agent. If they preferred Garcia they could sign him at any time. Many Raider fans think that Morrison is over-rated. I am questioning if he will start over Stewat Bradley and I think the anwser is no if Bradley is healthy.
 
Do you guys think the Raiders will definitely get a new QB? Doesn't the Kyle Boller signing kind of indicate that they'll be sticking with what they have? What do y'all think?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you guys think the Raiders will definitely get a new QB? Doesn't the Kyle Boller signing kind of indicate that they'll be sticking with what they have? What do y'all think?
Just another body to bring onto camp.There will be multiple cuts at the QB position by the time roster cut down rolls around.
 
The thought process is there, but I think the Boller signing nulifies it from happening. I assume the Boller pick up was to cover Gradkowski, who is out with a pectoral tear. That leaves Oakland with JaMarcus Russell, Kyle Boller, Charlie Frye and a recovering Bruce Gradkowski. If they added Vick, they would have five QBs. I don't even think Al Davis would want that.

 
The thought process is there, but I think the Boller signing nulifies it from happening. I assume the Boller pick up was to cover Gradkowski, who is out with a pectoral tear. That leaves Oakland with JaMarcus Russell, Kyle Boller, Charlie Frye and a recovering Bruce Gradkowski. If they added Vick, they would have five QBs. I don't even think Al Davis would want that.
All fodder and they still need a real QB. I think they should go after Rosenfels.
 
Do you guys think the Raiders will definitely get a new QB? Doesn't the Kyle Boller signing kind of indicate that they'll be sticking with what they have? What do y'all think?
It's been hard to predict the Raiders in recent year, but....Tom Cable MUST win this year or he is toast. So, I doubt he wants to go to camp with Russell and a handful of peanuts like Boller. The injury to Gradowski makes a move more imperative. I don't think anyone really thinks Boller is the answer. Boller is a good backup but that's it.So, who will the Raiders pursue?Vick?Roethlisberger?Jason Cambell?It seems like the market for Vick is pretty weak. I doubt Roethlisberger is really on the market--most of that talk I suspect is just for publicity since the team needs to put up a good show of being outraged. But will they really trade a franchise QB at the height of his productivity? Maybe if they could get the Raiders first but I doubt it.Most likely seems Campbell. He is a good stop gap QB who can help them win 9 and maybe slip into the playoffs if all the other pieces fall into place just right.
 
If they can get Campbell cheap then it's a no-brainer they should do it, but I haven't heard what the Redskins want for him other than a "low pick".

 
Mekes sense for both squads. I think Philly can find a better fit as backup off the street (Garcia/Bulger as mentioned].

I think Vick makes sense for Buffalo and Gailey if they just choose to try to pound the ball 40 times/game to win [probably their only shot].

I see them dealing Vick for a 4-6 Round pick on draft day.

 
I think I, and many others thought for sure that the team that would give Vick a shot at being a starting QB and would give him a chance when he got out of prison was the Raiders, so it wouldn't be a big stretch...

 
With Philly having 5 of the first 87 picks, and then some, they won't be dealing Vick for another late pick, unless it's a bump in position perhaps?

I think Al is crazy enough to pull off a deal and stash 5qbs, and deal Morrisson, especially if they are eyeing Mcclain at the 8 spot

 
If the Eagles are desperate for LBs, why did they cut Will Witherspoon?
There's a difference between being desperate for a LB and having the ability to get a Top 15 LB for the past 4 years for a 4th/5th.
Why do you think he's a top-15 LB? Because that's where he finishes in fantasy points? Morrison is just a guy. I'd be hard-pressed to rank him in the top 30 LBs, maybe even top 40.
 
It would definitely make the game more interesting, that's for sure. I think he'd be a perfect fit in Cleveland.

DAWG POUND!

:scared:

 
I think I, and many others thought for sure that the team that would give Vick a shot at being a starting QB and would give him a chance when he got out of prison was the Raiders, so it wouldn't be a big stretch...
The Eagles messed up by demanding too much for Vick. He isn't worth more than a fifth rounder or fourth at most.
 
Which Vick does anyone think these people are getting?

The kid that ran circles around everyone years ago, or the man that ain't as fast as he used to be, and could never pass the ball very well?

If a team trades for Vick, one would assume it is to start, or compete for the job. I'm not seeing that happening.

 
Which Vick does anyone think these people are getting? The kid that ran circles around everyone years ago, or the man that ain't as fast as he used to be, and could never pass the ball very well?If a team trades for Vick, one would assume it is to start, or compete for the job. I'm not seeing that happening.
I suspect that he can be the kind of QB he was before. He is only 30--I doubt his speed is gone. Do WRs lose their speed when they turn 30? He wasn't really given much of a chance to show what he can do last season so I think the claims that he "ain't as fast as he used to be" are way over stated. As for never being able to pass very well, I can't disagree. He was an average passer. He has a career completion percentage of 53.7 and a career QB rating of 75. He has more passing TDs than INTs. And he has a strong arm and can gun the ball deep to Murphy and Schillens. The thing is that his scrambling ability set up opportunities for other RBs and for the WRs and made it hard to defend his offense.
 
Which Vick does anyone think these people are getting?

The kid that ran circles around everyone years ago, or the man that ain't as fast as he used to be, and could never pass the ball very well?

If a team trades for Vick, one would assume it is to start, or compete for the job. I'm not seeing that happening.
I suspect that he can be the kind of QB he was before. He is only 30--I doubt his speed is gone. Do WRs lose their speed when they turn 30? He wasn't really given much of a chance to show what he can do last season so I think the claims that he "ain't as fast as he used to be" are way over stated.
Just going by what I saw. He didn't look as fast. Do WRs lose their speed at 30? Yeah, I think some do, or at least slow down anyway. And a year in the pokey can't be good for maintaining speed, either. And if he has slowed down a little, it'll be that much easier for DEs to grab him and break his leg. Again. You can't survive in the NFL scrambling like that. In the NFL, they catch you. I think any Vick trade looks a lot better for the Philly side, and the arguments seem to center on convincing other teams' fans that he's just what they need. I notice I ain't hearing an outcry from Philly fans that they can't let this guy go.

We already have a QB that can't put the ball in a spot. Don't really need another.

 
Vick would be a big upgrade over what they currently have. While Vick was never a conventional qb, he did have a winning record. It wasn't pretty but he got the job done.

Of course if Oakland is going to trade for any qb they should be sniffing around the Steelers and Big Ben. He's a scumbag but he's one of the better qb's in the league and he's still fairly young.

 
As for never being able to pass very well, I can't disagree. He was an average passer. He has a career completion percentage of 53.7 and a career QB rating of 75. He has more passing TDs than INTs. And he has a strong arm and can gun the ball deep to Murphy and Schillens.
Among QBs with at least 500 attempts since 2002, Vick's 54.3% completion rating ranks 69th out of 73--not anywhere near "average." (Actual average for this population is 60.7%; median is 59.9%).For what it's worth, two of the four guys behind him are Gradkowski and Russell. This move would make great sense if Al were trying to corner the market on guys who can't complete passes. He's also have to pick up Derek Anderson and Rex Grossman.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wasn't it reported that before Vick signed with Philly that Oakland was interested but Tony Dungy strongly advised him against it?

 
Jeff Haseley said:
The thought process is there, but I think the Boller signing nulifies it from happening. I assume the Boller pick up was to cover Gradkowski, who is out with a pectoral tear. That leaves Oakland with JaMarcus Russell, Kyle Boller, Charlie Frye and a recovering Bruce Gradkowski. If they added Vick, they would have five QBs. I don't even think Al Davis would want that.
Isn't Gradkowski waiver wire fodder at this point? It sounded like his injury was pretty serious. Can't imagine they would keep him around unless he is healthy.
 
Rumors, reports, and inuendos from "sources" have every felon or suspected felon going to the Raiders. But the Raiders are bringing in high character people, and not touching questionable types. That's why they didn't draft Crabtree last year. Wouldn't be shocked to see the Raiders draft Tebow, because of this very reason.

What talent does Vick bring to the Raiders? Does he fit their scheme? This discussion is pointless. At least have an informed opinion of the Raiders before suggesting that the Raiders would pick up foul ethic players like Vick or Roethlisberger. That's why Dez Bryant is also off thier draft board.

 
Rumors, reports, and inuendos from "sources" have every felon or suspected felon going to the Raiders. But the Raiders are bringing in high character people, and not touching questionable types. That's why they didn't draft Crabtree last year. Wouldn't be shocked to see the Raiders draft Tebow, because of this very reason.What talent does Vick bring to the Raiders? Does he fit their scheme? This discussion is pointless. At least have an informed opinion of the Raiders before suggesting that the Raiders would pick up foul ethic players like Vick or Roethlisberger. That's why Dez Bryant is also off thier draft board.
Russel and McFadden weren't clean characters and I think they didn't draft Crabtree because of his 40 time, or lack of it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top