He wasn't acquitted. He was never charged.Depends what info the league has.
Just because he was acquitted doesn’t mean he isn’t a creep.
He wasn't acquitted. He was never charged.Depends what info the league has.
Just because he was acquitted doesn’t mean he isn’t a creep.
Ok, the GJ didn’t indict him.He wasn't acquitted. He was never charged.
...Buzbee added that there are four more women who have yet to file suit but whom he expects will do so.
"As far as additional lawsuits, I have been contacted by additional women, who I'm deciding whether I'm going to take their case or somebody else will, that are wanting to file suit against Deshaun Watson," Buzbee said.
The lawyer also said he expects there to be "additional women who file criminal charges."
So if more and more women keep coming out, as he says they will, what would be the point of settling any of the current civil cases? Why pay them, just to have more file suit.According to this ESPN article quoting Buzbee, there may be more to come...
It kind of sickens me that people are using the “well if 2 separate GJs didn’t indict him, he must not have done anything” argument.I now have a problem w a suspension of any kind (while still believing he gets 4).
2 separate attempts. No indictments.
What reason does the NFL have to say "well, i know you twice were let slide by the courts, but we're sure ya did something!"
This isnt a Browns thing. This isn't a fantasy thing. This is a life thing. I have issue with someone getting pummeled over and over when the courts themselves aren't making it worth their time to deal with
He might be. I’ll stand by prediction the NFL does nothing until after the civil cases are disposed of. It’s a unique situation. Given the stakes of prejudicing either side of 22 active cases, or even (in theory) becoming an active participant in those trials re: “what investigation finding led you to suspend?” the NFL probably doesn’t want to have concluded anything. There’s no public outcry to fend off.Ok, the GJ didn’t indict him.
point stands. Still might be a creep worthy of suspension.
Possible. I think it’ll be before the civil suits. The very nature of the contract seems to assume he’ll be suspended this season.He might be. I’ll stand by prediction the NFL does nothing until after the civil cases are disposed of. It’s a unique situation. Given the stakes of prejudicing either side of 22 active cases, or even (in theory) becoming an active participant in those trials re: “what investigation finding led you to suspend?” the NFL probably doesn’t want to have concluded anything. There’s no public outcry to fend off.
I could be wrong and he’s suspended tomorrow. Wouldn’t be the first time.
Curious, if you're all about innocent until proven guilty, what isn't he cleared of yet? Shouldn't he already be cleared until proven guilty?I’m all about innocent until proven guilty - Watson hasn’t been cleared yet, IMO.
The 22 civil casesCurious, if you're all about innocent until proven guilty, what isn't he cleared of yet? Shouldn't he already be cleared until proven guilty?
I may have missed this. The contract protection is limited to suspension in 2022 season? Still, he could settle at point if he chooses to.Possible. I think it’ll be before the civil suits. The very nature of the contract seems to assume he’ll be suspended this season.
No, they just paid him the smallest amount year 1, so if he’s suspended it doesn’t really hurt him.I may have missed this. The contract protection is limited to suspension in 2022 season? Still, he could settle at point if he chooses to.
Well, sounds like good motivation to settle before 2023. That cuts both ways though re: NFL acting. Why not wait to suspend if stars are aligned for this to be resolved at some point this season?No, they just paid him the smallest amount year 1, so if he’s suspended it doesn’t really hurt him.
2022 Salary Cap Charge: $10,028,000 (4.61% of cap)
2022 Cash Payout: $46,000,000 (19.29% of spending)
Almost all of his pay year 1 is in the signing bonus, 100% guaranteed. Just 10m is salary, which is what’s impacted if suspended.
Years 2-5 he’s paid an annual salary of $54,993,000.
That’s what I mean by the nature of the contract assuming suspension. So If he gets hit with a 6-game absence, he loses about 3.5 million and not 18.5 million (if it was any other year of his contract).
there really isn’t any other way to interpret such a specifically scheduled contract. It’s weird, and people smarter than me have called it out as such.
Seems like if I’m the Watson/the Browns I want the suspension early rather than late.Well, sounds like good motivation to settle before 2023. That cuts both ways though re: NFL acting. Why not wait to suspend if stars are aligned for this to be resolved at some point this season?
No, I assure you Watson doesn’t want to defend 22 claims explaining why his employer suspended him if he did nothing wrong. That’s what I meant by suspension prejudicing his defense.Seems like if I’m the Watson/the Browns I want the suspension early rather than late.
Don’t want to be in the middle of a playoff races and then get hit with a suspension between weeks 8-14.![]()
ETA: the NFL has specifically said they won’t rule while Watson was in criminal jeopardy.
But their investigation is entirely unconnected to the civil suits.
These 2 issues, however, have nothing to do with “innocent until proven guilty”…that’s strictly criminal law. I’m 99% certain double jeopardy does not factor in since he hasn’t been charged/indicted, meaning new evidence in these cases can be found and explored yet againThe 22 civil cases
the NFL internal investigation.
I mentioned both of those in my post. How is this even a question?
I don’t disagree with any of this. I also think he gets 6 games.These 2 issues, however, have nothing to do with “innocent until proven guilty”…that’s strictly criminal law. I’m 99% certain double jeopardy does not factor in since he hasn’t been charged/indicted, meaning new evidence in these cases can be found and explored yet again
That said, a jury could absolutely find Watson liable without any criminal charge/conviction and the league can certainly find him in violation of policies without such as well
He gets 6 games in my opinion unless something more comes of criminal cases
I’m betting he does he best to settle every one of those suits so whatever they have against him never sees the light of day.No, I assure you Watson doesn’t want to defend 22 claims explaining why his employer suspended him if he did nothing wrong. That’s what I meant by suspension prejudicing his defense.
I'm betting Buzbee knows he wants to do this alsoI’m betting he does he best to settle every one of those suits so whatever they have against him never sees the light of day.
I’d do that in his shoes, particularly if he has contract protection. That may not be possible though if Buzbee is making media rounds about new plaintiffs. I’m not really following the end game strategy for either side. My gut is Buzbee lost a ton of leverage when Watson was traded, richly paid, and not indicted. If Watson was motivated to settle in order for those things to happen, he certainly isn’t now.I’m betting he does he best to settle every one of those suits so whatever they have against him never sees the light of day.
It kind of sickens me that people are using the “well if 2 separate GJs didn’t indict him, he must not have done anything” argument.
Hey Bud, I was wanting to post at you since my Phins traded for Hill, not quite like Watson for you all/Browns but believe me this city is losing their minds right now, feels like 1995 when JJ took over the Dolphins.I've never once said, nor implied this. And I assume you're just saying this in general, as Im sure some think that way.
I'm certain he was creepy to AT LEAST some of the accusers. To what degree, I have no idea. Could be as little as creepy to as much as completely inappropriate.
My critisism is of how the whole system works... If the courts (the HIGHEST power in society) passes on something like this, why does it then become the responsibility of the employer to slap Deshaun's wrist? And 4 games? 6 games?
Honestly, what the hell is a 4-6 game suspension? What does that do? What does it change? It's laughable and as relevent as 0 games. It's basically pissing in the women's faces and saying "you're welcome... your lips were on fire".
Apologies if I misunderstood, but your post pretty specifically implied that.I've never once said, nor implied this. And I assume you're just saying this in general, as Im sure some think that way.
fairI’m certain he was creepy to AT LEAST some of the accusers. To what degree, I have no idea. Could be as little as creepy to as much as completely inappropriate.
If the NFL finds violations of the PCP, they can suspend him. They’re not the judicial system - they’re a monopoly under the jurisdiction of an all-powerful commissioner.My critisism is of how the whole system works... If the courts (the HIGHEST power in society) passes on something like this, why does it then become the responsibility of the employer to slap Deshaun's wrist? And 4 games? 6 games?
Honestly, what the hell is a 4-6 game suspension? What does that do? What does it change? It's laughable and as relevent as 0 games. It's basically pissing in the women's faces and saying "you're welcome... your lips were on fire".
You have the gist of it but the details are way off.No, they just paid him the smallest amount year 1, so if he’s suspended it doesn’t really hurt him.
2022 Salary Cap Charge: $10,028,000 (4.61% of cap)
2022 Cash Payout: $46,000,000 (19.29% of spending)
Almost all of his pay year 1 is in the signing bonus, 100% guaranteed. Just 10m is salary, which is what’s impacted if suspended.
Years 2-5 he’s paid an annual salary of $54,993,000.
That’s what I mean by the nature of the contract assuming suspension. So If he gets hit with a 6-game absence, he loses about 3.5 million and not 18.5 million (if it was any other year of his contract).
there really isn’t any other way to interpret such a specifically scheduled contract. It’s weird, and people smarter than me have called it out as such.
I copy/pasted from a site detailing his contract so yeah - my bad.You have the gist of it but the details are way off.
First the important thing here, is that for non-drug related suspensions, only salary is automatically lost. Signing bonus could also be lost, but the team has to choose to go after it. The Browns won't do that, and possibly even gave him that concession as a contract term. Not sure, but have heard it speculated it's probably in there.
Previously he had a $35m salary for 2022. Each game he got suspended would have cost him 1/17 of that, or a bit over $2m.
Instead they converted nearly $34m to a signing bonus, leaving him just over $1m in salary. So now his suspension would cost him only 1/17 of $1m base salary which is going to be about $60k lost per game instead of $2m lost per game.
The "cap figure" of $10m won't really play a role in it since all but $1m is prorated signing bonus, and the Browns won't try to recoup it.
Is it really a rumor or just Florio?Rumors are that if he continues his legal fight he will be placed on the commissioner’s exempt list and then suspended once it all wraps up.
Probably just Florio but that’s a rumor, right?Is it really a rumor or just Florio?
Rumor in the singular, not rumors and not credible.Probably just Florio but that’s a rumor, right?
I’d call it speculation. He put his name to it.Rumor in the singular, not rumors and not credible.
I don’t think Kareem Hunt ever faced criminal chargesWatson would be first player ever put on the exempt list not facing criminal charges. I think that's been said about 1,000 times in this thread.
Good call, I actually forgot he was put on it.I don’t think Kareem Hunt ever faced criminal charges
Winner winner chicken dinner.I don’t think Kareem Hunt ever faced criminal charges
That would take a lot longer for him to see the field...imagine Baker being held captive by Cleveland and expect him to gleefully take the field and start while Watson collects checks. I must be obtuse but I just cannot see it happening.Florio is speculating that if he continues his legal fight he will be placed on the commissioner’s exempt list and then suspended once it all wraps up.
IMO they’ll release him before this ever happens. I agree with you that this ain’t it.That would take a lot longer for him to see the field...imagine Baker being held captive by Cleveland and expect him to gleefully take the field and start while Watson collects checks. I must be obtuse but I just cannot see it happening.
Always worth repeating, some folks need to be remindedWatson would be first player ever put on the exempt list not facing criminal charges. I think that's been said about 1,000 times in this thread.
It’s not true though. See above.Always worth repeating, some folks need to be reminded![]()
Easiest thing for the league to do = no suspension.
Have they ever suspended anyone just because of an outstanding civil case??
The idea of exempt list until the civil cases are settled is silly.
I would assume the NFL would take these on a case by case basis. There has to be some level of substance and credibility. There clearly was something here if it went to a grand jury.Get ready for 100 new money grab civil cases towards NFL players if that happens
all the more reason for the league to wait until the cases are resolvedPossible. I think it’ll be before the civil suits. The very nature of the contract seems to assume he’ll be suspended this season.
Glad you repeated it, some folks needed to be reminded.It’s not true though. See above.Always worth repeating, some folks need to be reminded![]()