What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Jalen Hurts, PHI (2 Viewers)

Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
1. They want him to commit long term eventually. Doing it this year would be WAY cheaper than doing it next year after other QBs get huge deals (Burrow, etc). And WAY WAY Cheaper than doing it after they franchise him in 2024.

2. Franchising him means the entire amount hits the cap that season. Howie is pretty smart with these kind of deals to make them cap-friendly, so getting this done makes a lot of sense for the team.
 
Yea not a chance he gets franchised. He'll get the going rate and it will be structured to hit cap wise in the later years when the cap will presumably be higher.

The way things are going, he'll be like the 8th or 9th highest paid QB by the 3rd year of the extension.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
1. They want him to commit long term eventually. Doing it this year would be WAY cheaper than doing it next year after other QBs get huge deals (Burrow, etc). And WAY WAY Cheaper than doing it after they franchise him in 2024.

2. Franchising him means the entire amount hits the cap that season. Howie is pretty smart with these kind of deals to make them cap-friendly, so getting this done makes a lot of sense for the team.
I guess the point is, he has no leverage to get the kind of deal he would get if he was a free agent. He makes 4 million this year.
Hurts has a TON of incentive to sign a more team friendly deal than risk whatever can happen making 4 million this year. I don't mean a cheap deal, but 50 million a year isn't happening unless a lot of it is not guaranteed.
He has no leverage in terms of his current contract set up I suppose.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
1. They want him to commit long term eventually. Doing it this year would be WAY cheaper than doing it next year after other QBs get huge deals (Burrow, etc). And WAY WAY Cheaper than doing it after they franchise him in 2024.

2. Franchising him means the entire amount hits the cap that season. Howie is pretty smart with these kind of deals to make them cap-friendly, so getting this done makes a lot of sense for the team.
I guess the point is, he has no leverage to get the kind of deal he would get if he was a free agent. He makes 4 million this year.
Hurts has a TON of incentive to sign a more team friendly deal than risk whatever can happen making 4 million this year. I don't mean a cheap deal, but 50 million a year isn't happening unless a lot of it is not guaranteed.
He has no leverage in terms of his current contract set up I suppose.
Maybe true that there's not much leverage he has, but QB deals these days seem to be less about negotiating, and more about just what the 'going rate" is.

If he plays out this year at a very high level again, and we try to re-sign him when he's a FA next year, he has ALL the leverage and could really push for higher than 50/yr. (The Franchise Tag makes little to no sense for him for the reasons above).
 
Let's say he can get 50 million a year for 5 years if he plays out his deal and does well.
Signing right now for 6 years at 40 million a year or even less would make a ton of sense for him. It's 14 million less over those 6 years, and no risk of catastrophic injury in 2023 to ruin a future contract.
It's the old "how rich do you need to be" question. Just make sure you're rich.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
1. They want him to commit long term eventually. Doing it this year would be WAY cheaper than doing it next year after other QBs get huge deals (Burrow, etc). And WAY WAY Cheaper than doing it after they franchise him in 2024.

2. Franchising him means the entire amount hits the cap that season. Howie is pretty smart with these kind of deals to make them cap-friendly, so getting this done makes a lot of sense for the team.
I guess the point is, he has no leverage to get the kind of deal he would get if he was a free agent. He makes 4 million this year.
Hurts has a TON of incentive to sign a more team friendly deal than risk whatever can happen making 4 million this year. I don't mean a cheap deal, but 50 million a year isn't happening unless a lot of it is not guaranteed.
He has no leverage in terms of his current contract set up I suppose.
Maybe true that there's not much leverage he has, but QB deals these days seem to be less about negotiating, and more about just what the 'going rate" is.

If he plays out this year at a very high level again, and we try to re-sign him when he's a FA next year, he has ALL the leverage and could really push for higher than 50/yr. (The Franchise Tag makes little to no sense for him for the reasons above).
Right, I'm not saying wait, I'm just saying the team has actual leverage and should not have to sign him to the top deal. His salary this year has to play a factor in negotiations
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
I saw others reply, I also wanted to respond.

-All rookies but especially the Quarterbacks are on a 3 year clock, 36 months from the time they sign that rookie deal or get drafted, they can be extended. Let's assume they are 1st Rd picks, the teams get a special 5th year option which many are about to do from the 2020 Class, perhaps even some that will get extensions. To my knowledge, the 5th year options are guaranteed and many players rush to sign them and continue to negotiate, the salary on the 5th year option is usually a decent chunk of change for most positions EXCEPT when it comes to QBs who would prefer an extension appears in front of them so they can start negotiating.

-Some other important notes when discussing extensions. The 4th year salary for rookies is honored so all these QBs in the media hyped from 2020 Draft Class, they will play Year 4 out on that salary. What they get however in the extension is a lot of guaranteed money, usually a PHAT signing bonus that immediately flows right into their bank account. So when a QB plays years 4 and 5 without extending, they are losing some serious compound interest that they could already have in place if they can find an agreeable extension after Year 3. I don't know how Jackson makes up that money whenever he signs his long term deal which is now I'm guessing $45M a year where perhaps 2 years ago the Ravens could have just paid him $35M a year and big signing bonus but for whatever reason the Jackson/Ravens camp cannot get anything ironed out.

-I will be very interested in how Mike Brown handles Joe Burrow this off season, he should be the #1 paid QB in the NFL before the start of the 2023 season, in fact i would say by June if the Bengals know what's good for them. The key will be the guaranteed money and the signing bonus and how it will be prorated against the cap. Mike Brown typically does not do the right thing, I have my doubts about Burrow getting everything he wants before say June/July, I'll be mildly shocked if they can get an extension done without some drama.

Salary Cap
2023-$225M
2024-$256M
2025-$287M+

It would seem there is nothing stopping the QB market from exploding
$50M a season if not more is going to be the norm very soon for elite QBs.
$40M will be for just an average QB or one that doesn't rack up Playoff victories often.

Cheers!
 
Last edited:
If I were Hurts I would try and get the largest signing bonus possible and the shortest number of years, 4 would be the perfect target for him, not the Eagles of course but we are talking about Jalen Hurts. The QB market is going to go bananas over the next couple years and he would be due for an extension again in 3-4 years when the cap is over $300M by that point.

-Would 4 yrs/$160M+ w/$60M signing bonus, would that work? That's what the LA Rams gave Matt Stafford in March last year.
-Murray got a 5 yr/$230M deal, half the amount Staff got as a signing bonus BUT he got close to $190M guaranteed and doesn't seem to feel the least bit of guilt over it.

It's going to go one way or the other IMHO and Philly to my knowledge doesn't seem to get in huge contract disputes although i know Ertz was a bit irked towards the end but it was time for Philly to move on, and most of us all love Ertz. It didn't make me flinch when it comes to my opinion of Philly and their GM/Front office, they are willing to make tough decisions. They are rated pretty high on my list.

Pay Day in 2023, line it up so you get another one in 2026-2027, dollars will be massive and let's not forget, he signed a 4yr/$6M deal as a rookie? And he gets $4M of it this year? And you could put $40M, $50M in his bank account in March/April if he agrees to a new deal that works for both sides, that's a lot of money Philly can waive in front of him, Hurts seems very reasonable IMHO.
 
He'd be missing some serious compound interest??? Lol
Think about it...These individuals/athletes/celebrity get access to better returns on their investments, I bet they can avg 12-18% if they allow financial planners connected to their agents to manage their money. Double digit returns can double your money in 4-5 years. You take $25M and turn it into $50M and then $100M the next 4-5 years, there is some short sighted thinking sometimes when they get greedy and hold out.

I bet Lev Bell wishes he could go back in time to when it was his turn to sign an extension and he balked and then sat out an entire season.
I'm happy to make you laugh my friend but there is some validity in what I am presenting

Rumor has it Rob Gronkowski spent almost none of his NFL salary outside of the basics during his NFL career, not sure if that's true but certainly not the norm.
 
Last edited:
Jalen Hurts is so dominant the league is literally changing a rule to stop him. Haven't heard anything happen like this before, other than the tales of when Lew Alcindor was do dominant they made dunking the ball illegal. And guess what? They used almost the *same exact" language we are seeing now about why they don't want this play in football aka "not aesthetically pleasing to the eye"

What a load of crap!
 
Jalen Hurts is so dominant the league is literally changing a rule to stop him.
Seems a bit farfetched to say this. Jacoby Brissett had a similar success rate on that play.
Also that comment gives no credit to the majority of the reason why that play worked so well for Philly.
 
Jalen Hurts is so dominant the league is literally changing a rule to stop him.
Seems a bit farfetched to say this. Jacoby Brissett had a similar success rate on that play.
Also that comment gives no credit to the majority of the reason why that play worked so well for Philly.
I am willing to listen, but lets be real, Jalen is one of the most *powerful* QB's the league has ever seen, from a strength standpoint.

If its "Well Philly's offensive line is just too good/strong" seems cut from the same cloth.

The league is literally saying "Its ugly" from what I can tell, nothing like "unfair advantage" or similar.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
Because you want your franchise QB who just led you to a SB, had a near MVP season and is extremely respected in the locker room to be happy. You don’t antagonize him by underpaying him and not committing to him.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
Because you want your franchise QB who just led you to a SB, had a near MVP season and is extremely respected in the locker room to be happy. You don’t antagonize him by underpaying him and not committing to him.
Antagonize him? I'm pretty sure they can figure out a way to make the guy happy without paying top dollar when they don't need to, and without antagonizing him.
On the flip side, giving him the world when they have the contractual leverage might blow up his head like a balloon and he might not be the same guy.
The extension will be huge, but acting like his 2023 salary won't matter for these negotiations is silly.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
Because you want your franchise QB who just led you to a SB, had a near MVP season and is extremely respected in the locker room to be happy. You don’t antagonize him by underpaying him and not committing to him.
The biggest leverage is time. I mean look at what Dak could have signed for and what he eventually signed for. Every big time QB "Should" be resetting the market a little, so do you want to be at the beginning of that line or near the end?

Also, we really don't know how Jalen will be in negotiations. I can't see him being a hard line negotiator but something we haven't obviously dealt with yet from his camp.

I am expecting a fair contract, nothing to be like "Holy crap" and the cap numbers to be *friendly* since its Howie doing the structure and he is the master of this.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
Because you want your franchise QB who just led you to a SB, had a near MVP season and is extremely respected in the locker room to be happy. You don’t antagonize him by underpaying him and not committing to him.
Antagonize him? I'm pretty sure they can figure out a way to make the guy happy without paying top dollar when they don't need to, and without antagonizing him.
On the flip side, giving him the world when they have the contractual leverage might blow up his head like a balloon and he might not be the same guy.
The extension will be huge, but acting like his 2023 salary won't matter for these negotiations is silly.
I can't see a scenario where this every happens. He's not built like that.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
Because you want your franchise QB who just led you to a SB, had a near MVP season and is extremely respected in the locker room to be happy. You don’t antagonize him by underpaying him and not committing to him.
And yet other teams have done the very thing you are suggesting teams not do...upsetting the QB and locker room.
 
Market Value on Spotrac
$44M+ annually
6yrs/$265M is the market projection for a contract
They lowballed him on the annual amount and he'd be a fool to take that many years, even if you guaranteed it all.

He's coming in over Murray and Wilson. He's likely a $50M a year player with 65-70% guaranteed. It's just a matter of the structure and years.
I'm thinking 5/250 but if its 265 I won't be mad, ain't my money.
 
Jalen Hurts is so dominant the league is literally changing a rule to stop him. Haven't heard anything happen like this before, other than the tales of when Lew Alcindor was do dominant they made dunking the ball illegal. And guess what? They used almost the *same exact" language we are seeing now about why they don't want this play in football aka "not aesthetically pleasing to the eye"

What a load of crap!
LOL!!! Well If there was any debate regarding the most overatted player in the NFL you just made it a unanimous decision ... maybe even a tko !!!
 
I'm thinking 5/250
My thinking is if Philly knew Hurts would take this deal with similar guarantees as Wilson/Murray and what Lamar was offered, so in the 67-68% range they would be happy to sign him. I also think Philly would prefer to go 6/300 and Jalen would prefer 4/200 and that might be the biggest holdup to the deal getting done, unless Jalen tried to hold his ground like Lamar and start making full guarantees his focus the major thing to negotiate will be the years and structure.
 
Jalen Hurts is so dominant the league is literally changing a rule to stop him. Haven't heard anything happen like this before, other than the tales of when Lew Alcindor was do dominant they made dunking the ball illegal. And guess what? They used almost the *same exact" language we are seeing now about why they don't want this play in football aka "not aesthetically pleasing to the eye"

What a load of crap!
LOL!!! Well If there was any debate regarding the most overatted player in the NFL you just made it a unanimous decision ... maybe even a tko !!!
Where do you think the NFL players will "Rate" him when the NFL Top 100 comes out? Who is right now "overrating" him, the guy who finished behind only Mahomes for MVP?
I see him coming in at no lower than QB5 in the NFL top 100, and probably/most likely a top 25 player overall. Again, just my personal opinion of *their* personal collective opinions.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
Because you want your franchise QB who just led you to a SB, had a near MVP season and is extremely respected in the locker room to be happy. You don’t antagonize him by underpaying him and not committing to him.
And yet other teams have done the very thing you are suggesting teams not do...upsetting the QB and locker room.

Sure but some teams aren't well run. Look at Washington with Cousins. How did that work out? The Ravens and Lamar situation has been a mess for the Ravens. If you get a franchise QB, you need to show respect and commitment by locking him down.
 
Antagonize him? I'm pretty sure they can figure out a way to make the guy happy without paying top dollar when they don't need to, and without antagonizing him.
On the flip side, giving him the world when they have the contractual leverage might blow up his head like a balloon and he might not be the same guy.
The extension will be huge, but acting like his 2023 salary won't matter for these negotiations is silly.
Please explain what exactly would be a fair offer to a 24 year old MVP runner up QB that doesn't involve paying top dollar? Why are we worrying about his ego ballooning when he is paid and then him not playing well? I don't think I have ever heard that argument presented as a reason not to sign a star QB.
 
Last edited:
Jalen Hurts is so dominant the league is literally changing a rule to stop him. Haven't heard anything happen like this before, other than the tales of when Lew Alcindor was do dominant they made dunking the ball illegal. And guess what? They used almost the *same exact" language we are seeing now about why they don't want this play in football aka "not aesthetically pleasing to the eye"

What a load of crap!
LOL!!! Well If there was any debate regarding the most overatted player in the NFL you just made it a unanimous decision ... maybe even a tko !!!
Where do you think the NFL players will "Rate" him when the NFL Top 100 comes out? Who is right now "overrating" him, the guy who finished behind only Mahomes for MVP?
I see him coming in at no lower than QB5 in the NFL top 100, and probably/most likely a top 25 player overall. Again, just my personal opinion of *their* personal collective opinions.
Even the best QBs in the League are only as good as the team around them
Put the best QBs in the NFL on a **** team and they will do ok, on an OK team they will be good, a good team very good and a very good team great.
Hurts made a great team very good ... put him on an OK team and they will be ****

Dak is the perfect comp to Hurts ... almost identical
 
Jalen Hurts is so dominant the league is literally changing a rule to stop him. Haven't heard anything happen like this before, other than the tales of when Lew Alcindor was do dominant they made dunking the ball illegal. And guess what? They used almost the *same exact" language we are seeing now about why they don't want this play in football aka "not aesthetically pleasing to the eye"

What a load of crap!
LOL!!! Well If there was any debate regarding the most overatted player in the NFL you just made it a unanimous decision ... maybe even a tko !!!
Where do you think the NFL players will "Rate" him when the NFL Top 100 comes out? Who is right now "overrating" him, the guy who finished behind only Mahomes for MVP?
I see him coming in at no lower than QB5 in the NFL top 100, and probably/most likely a top 25 player overall. Again, just my personal opinion of *their* personal collective opinions.
Even the best QBs in the League are only as good as the team around them
Put the best QBs in the NFL on a **** team and they will do ok, on an OK team they will be good, a good team very good and a very good team great.
Hurts made a great team very good ... put him on an OK team and they will be ****

Dak is the perfect comp to Hurts ... almost identical
So where do you think the players will have him ranked in the TOP 100 when it comes out, compared to Dak?
 
I'm curious to see how much Hurts and others value themselves in comparison to winning. Once that QB cap hit passes 15% of the total team cap you're getting into rough waters if that QB is not able to carry. Mahomes and Brady left money on the table so their teams could still remain competitive, and both have shown they can carry a franchise anyways.
 
Hurts made the Eagles worse? Just a ridiculous opinion.
Yeah since ya know, they weren't in the playoffs until he became the full time starter these last 2 years. So going from "not" in the playoffs to being in the Super Bowl 2 years later is worse....Its not a real opinion its a very lame troll attempt haha
 
I'm curious to see how much Hurts and others value themselves in comparison to winning. Once that QB cap hit passes 15% of the total team cap you're getting into rough waters if that QB is not able to carry. Mahomes and Brady left money on the table so their teams could still remain competitive, and both have shown they can carry a franchise anyways.
I wonder if we see more teams try it out- offer a long contract with a large overall guarantee. Some players would likely sacrifice per year potential if they know they have a long term commitment with a massive overall value.
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
Because you want your franchise QB who just led you to a SB, had a near MVP season and is extremely respected in the locker room to be happy. You don’t antagonize him by underpaying him and not committing to him.
Antagonize him? I'm pretty sure they can figure out a way to make the guy happy without paying top dollar when they don't need to, and without antagonizing him.
On the flip side, giving him the world when they have the contractual leverage might blow up his head like a balloon and he might not be the same guy.
The extension will be huge, but acting like his 2023 salary won't matter for these negotiations is silly.
I can't see a scenario where this every happens. He's not built like that.
Then you also shouldn't think he would be "antagonized"
 
Hurts made the Eagles worse? Just a ridiculous opinion.
Put Dak, Jacoby Brissett, Kirk Cousins, Tannehill, Goff on the Eagles and they are going to and losing the SB
Put Burrow, Mahomes , Josh Allen, Daniel Jones, Lamar Jackson, Trevor Lawrence, Herbert and of course Brady, Rogers and Russell Wilson ... Eagles win the SB

Have Mahomes and Hurts switch teams ... Eagles win the SB and KC gets eliminated by Jacksonville and or Cincy
 
Wait, so he's in the last year of his deal making what, a couple million?? How is there any leverage for 50 million a year when he makes nothing this year and could be franchised for 2024?
Because you want your franchise QB who just led you to a SB, had a near MVP season and is extremely respected in the locker room to be happy. You don’t antagonize him by underpaying him and not committing to him.
Antagonize him? I'm pretty sure they can figure out a way to make the guy happy without paying top dollar when they don't need to, and without antagonizing him.
On the flip side, giving him the world when they have the contractual leverage might blow up his head like a balloon and he might not be the same guy.
The extension will be huge, but acting like his 2023 salary won't matter for these negotiations is silly.
I can't see a scenario where this every happens. He's not built like that.
Then you also shouldn't think he would be "antagonized"
Not my words. We saw what happened in the Dak negotiations when they tried to be cute, despite a large people of saying "Dak>>>Wentz" yet when Wentz signed a deal, along w Goff, the Cowboys delayed and it cost them cap room in the end. So thats what I want to "not happen" to the Eagles. So your initial question was "How does he have leverage" this should answer it. Its only gonna get more expensive as time goes without signing him...
 
I'm curious to see how much Hurts and others value themselves in comparison to winning. Once that QB cap hit passes 15% of the total team cap you're getting into rough waters if that QB is not able to carry. Mahomes and Brady left money on the table so their teams could still remain competitive, and both have shown they can carry a franchise anyways.
I wonder if we see more teams try it out- offer a long contract with a large overall guarantee. Some players would likely sacrifice per year potential if they know they have a long term commitment with a massive overall value.
I think most of these guys are seeking the 4 to 5 year deals, but the teams would love a Mahomes-type deal to sign them into. Guys like Watson and Murray used all their leverage and cashed out big, but at what price to their respective team's chances of success going forward?
 
Hurts made the Eagles worse? Just a ridiculous opinion.
Put Dak, Jacoby Brissett, Kirk Cousins, Tannehill, Goff on the Eagles and they are going to and losing the SB
Put Burrow, Mahomes , Josh Allen, Daniel Jones, Lamar Jackson, Trevor Lawrence, Herbert and of course Brady, Rogers and Russell Wilson ... Eagles win the SB

Have Mahomes and Hurts switch teams ... Eagles win the SB and KC gets eliminated by Jackson and or Cincy
Where do you think the players will have him ranked when the Top 100 comes out? You seem to be avoiding this discussion.
 
I think most of these guys are seeking the 4 to 5 year deals, but the teams would love a Mahomes -type deal to sign them into. Guys like Watson and Murray used all their leverage and cashed out big, but at what price to their respective team's chances of success going forward?
I think there is a chance a mobile physical QB like a Lamar or Hurts could be tempted by a larger guarantee from a longer term deal but obviously pure speculation on my part.
 
Then you also shouldn't think he would be "antagonized"
This is ridiculous. Being insulted isn't the same as being rewarded. If my job were to offer me an insulting amount of money or be unwilling to pay me my value, I would be pissed after all I've invested with them and I would surely start to look for another job. If my employer offered me a huge raise, I would feel respected and it would strengthen my commitment. I wouldn't take it as a reason to loaf off. These reactions have no relation to each other.
 
If my employer offered me a huge raise, I would feel respected and it would strengthen my commitment. I wouldn't take it as a reason to loaf off.

I agree with the points you're trying to make in general, but this one? Uh, ask Muhammad Wilkerson or Albert Haynesworth about that. Those guys got paid and then did nothing.
 
I think most of these guys are seeking the 4 to 5 year deals, but the teams would love a Mahomes -type deal to sign them into. Guys like Watson and Murray used all their leverage and cashed out big, but at what price to their respective team's chances of success going forward?
I think there is a chance a mobile physical QB like a Lamar or Hurts could be tempted by a larger guarantee from a longer term deal but obviously pure speculation on my part.
Speculation or not, I think you might be correct when all is said and done. Time will tell.
 
Then you also shouldn't think he would be "antagonized"
This is ridiculous. Being insulted isn't the same as being rewarded. If my job were to offer me an insulting amount of money or be unwilling to pay me my value, I would be pissed after all I've invested with them and I would surely start to look for another job. If my employer offered me a huge raise, I would feel respected and it would strengthen my commitment. I wouldn't take it as a reason to loaf off. These reactions have no relation to each other.
Did anyone say make him an insulting offer??
Unless you think "not the highest amount of all time" = insulting.
Especially given their leverage of him making 4 million this year and the possibility of franchising him twice.
 
Hurts made the Eagles worse? Just a ridiculous opinion.
Put Dak, Jacoby Brissett, Kirk Cousins, Tannehill, Goff on the Eagles and they are going to and losing the SB
Put Burrow, Mahomes , Josh Allen, Daniel Jones, Lamar Jackson, Trevor Lawrence, Herbert and of course Brady, Rogers and Russell Wilson ... Eagles win the SB

Have Mahomes and Hurts switch teams ... Eagles win the SB and KC gets eliminated by Jacksonville and or Cincy
And you know this how?
 
If my employer offered me a huge raise, I would feel respected and it would strengthen my commitment. I wouldn't take it as a reason to loaf off.

I agree with the points you're trying to make in general, but this one? Uh, ask Muhammad Wilkerson or Albert Haynesworth about that. Those guys got paid and then did nothing.
I am not saying it doesn't happen. There are certainly players who get paid and immediately begin slacking. My point was the reaction one has to being insulted isn't related to the reaction they would have if they got a ton of money. It's two totally different mental processes. We know Michael Jordan was not a slacker. Never ever no matter how much money he made did he ever loaf. How do you think he would have reacted to the Bulls trying to lowball him? or play some leverage game? You think that it would just roll off his back?

If a team is worried about paying a young MVP candidate QB because he might check out mentally (despite absolute zero personal history from this player to give this impression) then they need to just sell the team and move on to some other line of work.
 
Unless you think "not the highest amount of all time" = insulting.
Especially given their leverage of him making 4 million this year and the possibility of franchising him twice.
Asking your franchise QB to play for $4 million on the last year of a rookie deal and then threaten to franchise him is insulting. Especially when you are then going to ask him to physically put himself at risk repeatedly in GL run situations.
 
Unless you think "not the highest amount of all time" = insulting.
Especially given their leverage of him making 4 million this year and the possibility of franchising him twice.
Asking your franchise QB to play for $4 million on the last year of a rookie deal and then threaten to franchise him is insulting. Especially when you are then going to ask him to physically put himself at risk repeatedly in GL run situations.
They don't need to ask him to do that.
It's just a possibility if Hurts decides to go for godfather deals
 
Hurts made the Eagles worse? Just a ridiculous opinion.
Put Dak, Jacoby Brissett, Kirk Cousins, Tannehill, Goff on the Eagles and they are going to and losing the SB
Put Burrow, Mahomes , Josh Allen, Daniel Jones, Lamar Jackson, Trevor Lawrence, Herbert and of course Brady, Rogers and Russell Wilson ... Eagles win the SB

Have Mahomes and Hurts switch teams ... Eagles win the SB and KC gets eliminated by Jackson and or Cincy
Where do you think the players will have him ranked when the Top 100 comes out? You seem to be avoiding this discussion.
QBs always get the credit and theEagles carried Hurts ...
  1. Take away Aj Brown they dont get a bye. (#4 in the NFL )
  2. Take away Brown and Smith they are Wild Card team (# 3 Receiving Combo in the NFL)
  3. Now If the # 1 Oline in Football was say bottom 10 they dont make the Playoff (#1 Oline in the NFL )
  4. We havent even touched their Defense (#3 in the NFL)
  5. Or TE (#6 in the NFL) (#1 WR/TE combo in the NFL)
  6. But wait that's not all ... We'll also throw in a top #5 RB
Hands down the best, deepest and healthiest roster in the NFL !!! No Other team is even that close

All this and Hurts was 10th in the NFL in passing Yds, 14th in passing TDs ., 11th completion % , tied for 18th Game Winning drives and he had the 6th most fumbles in the NFL ... That's your MVP????
 
Last edited:
As a life long Washington fan its easy to hate (or want to hate the Eagles) but I give their ownership/GM credit, they aren't stupid. They aren't going to franchise tag him consecutive seasons like we did Cousins. First, he's proven he's WAY better than Cousins, and second you couldn't have come any closer to winning a SB with him in just his 2nd year. You happily pay the man and do your best to keep this team together for another run. Now again as a Washington fan, if he follows Dan Marino's footsteps and never reaches another SB in his career in Philly I won't cry to hard ;)
 
They don't need to ask him to do that.
It's just a possibility if Hurts decides to go for godfather deals
I guess I don't get how the Eagles can use that as leverage if they aren't willing to put it on the table and it's an option. I mean they can do it but it's also the kind of thing that can cause a rift between the 2 sides. I have faith Philly and Hurts will come to a deal both sides are happy with. I think it is a well run team and I doubt Hurts wants something way out of line with market value but who knows. I would have the thought Lamar and the Ravens would have got something done much earlier as well.
 
As a life long Washington fan its easy to hate (or want to hate the Eagles) but I give their ownership/GM credit, they aren't stupid. They aren't going to franchise tag him consecutive seasons like we did Cousins. First, he's proven he's WAY better than Cousins, and second you couldn't have come any closer to winning a SB with him in just his 2nd year. You happily pay the man and do your best to keep this team together for another run. Now again as a Washington fan, if he follows Dan Marino's footsteps and never reaches another SB in his career in Philly I won't cry to hard ;)
Nobody is saying they will let him play this year for 4 million then franchise him twice.
However, that possibility is absolutely part of the negotiations.
How much would Hurts get right now if he was in the free agent pool? The answer to that is a lot more than what he WILL get when the Eagles sign him soon.

On a side note, God, I can't believe the eagles have two 1sts in this draft. Someone sure did something right in that front office to build this team.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top