DenverBroncos
Footballguy
Joe Flacco Thread
Last edited by a moderator:
Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
your talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameyour talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
I'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
No kidding. The kid can make every throw and is cool under pressure. Strong arm and has nice accuracy.Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
talking about their rookie seasons...which team was better Peyton Ind or Joe's Balt???If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameyour talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
Do the first half/second half splits and see if you still feel the same. I still don't think he's the QB Ryan is, but if not for Ryan, Flacco would've gotten the offensive ROY IMO.He still might be the overall one, due to getting a playoff win, although I think that's more easily credited to the D than to Flacco.
Most QBs pass the eyeball test with flying colors compared to Kyle Boller.That's like comparing most women to Amy Winehouse - over before it started.Well if you watch him play instead of basing your decision on the stat line, you'd see he has the goods to be a very solid NFL QB. He passes the eyeball test with flying colors compared to Kyle Boller.
I second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameyour talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
Everyone that listens to The Audible knows that I have been less than kind to Flacco. We first started talking about him when we were down at the Senior Bowl in Mobile, and compared to other QBs there like Chad Henne - he didn't stand out. Going back and watching film on Flacco, specifically the Delaware/App State Game you saw a QB with a big arm, but was rattled easily.I believe that has been Joe's greatest improvement, his composure. So credit to him for getting it done on the field, and credit to Cam Cameron for making him comfortable.No kidding. The kid can make every throw and is cool under pressure. Strong arm and has nice accuracy.Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
For a rookie QB, this guy has done pretty well. But as some have said, looking beyond the stat line, Flacco appears to be headed on a path to at least a very good career. The guy makes all the throws, stands tough in the pocket and delivers accurate throws under pressure, and is pretty athletic for such a tall guy. I see a very promising future for the kid. I don't understand why you're knocking him at all.I'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
For one, when did the PLAYOFFS get brought into the conversation? The original post said only Flacco sucks because he has almost as many INT as TD's and poor passer rating. That's all it said. So, why wouldn't you compare him to Manning's rookie year? Manning had almost as many INT as TD's, too, and he doesn't suck.I second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameyour talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
After 5 games 1 TD and 7 picks. 847 yards. Rest of the way 13 and 5 for 2100 plus yards. Not to add in the factor of his mobility this year also in the equation as that was his only TD last week. Should we factor in the loss of Ogden also for the sacks. Not even close in the end. I love watching the kid play. He has great poise and has only progressed as the season has gone along. That arm is terrific also. Baltimore looks like they made a great move.Oh yeah and he also is one of the top QB to be sacked. Guy sucks!!! Boller revisited, you heard it here first. Please put that in your tag line. Boller 2004 (first full season) 2500 yards, 13 TD, 11 INT's, sacked 35 timesFlacco 2008 (first full season) 2900 yards, 14 TD's, 12 INT's, sacked 32 timesThanks in advance.
ummm I was pretending to be Jim MoraFor one, when did the PLAYOFFS get brought into the conversation? The original post said only Flacco sucks because he has almost as many INT as TD's and poor passer rating. That's all it said. So, why wouldn't you compare him to Manning's rookie year? Manning had almost as many INT as TD's, too, and he doesn't suck.I second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameyour talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
The whole "team" performance thing is crazy, point out anywhere in the first post or my post that states anything about how the team ended up.
It's worth noting that 2008 was the greatest season in QB efficiency ever, so you should keep that in mind.This will be something I'll be writing about in the summer, but I've found that a QB that completes at least 58% of his passes and has more scores than ints in his first full season, which is generally his second year (historically), goes on to have a pretty impressive career. The recent roster of players includes: Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Jeff Garcia, Kurt Warner, Peyton Manning, Marc Bulger, and Brett Favre.The dogs of the group were: Tim Couch and Jake Plummer. You could also put Chad Pennington and Culpepper somewhere in between. What I noticed about Flacco at Delaware was similar to Cecil's comment. His mobility is pretty good for a big guy, but he had the tendency to make some risky throws when under pressure he wasn't able to simply roll away from. In hindsight, this could be symptomatic of a big-time player on a small school team instilled with the need to make a play when there doesn't appear to be one. I didn't think Flacco would be this successful early. I think another year will be a better indicator of whether he'll be a decent starter or a potentially elite NFL signal caller. From a stats history, it appears he's on track to at least be the former.
He's doing what's been asked of him by his coaches. I'm not sure that many are over rating him. Do you mean Fantasy or NFL wise.I think Flacco's been very overrated as well, but I think his future is bright. My biggest complaint is people seem to think "great for a rookie" and "below average NFL QB" can't be synonymous. That's what I think of Flacco right now.
Do you feel the same about Ryan because Flacco outperformed him for the last 11 games each they played. 13/5 to 12/8 from that point. One reason I think Flacco has every bit of a future as Ryan does.I think Flacco's been very overrated as well, but I think his future is bright. My biggest complaint is people seem to think "great for a rookie" and "below average NFL QB" can't be synonymous. That's what I think of Flacco right now.
I agree that you've got to watch the game to determine the talent.That said, and knowing I am in the minority, I largely agree with the original poster.Flacco has surprised me with his solid play to date. However, I think there is a large smoke and mirrors quality to him. Like I say, I understand I will take some heat for it and I get why people are optimistic, but I would not be surprised if he is next year's Derek Anderson.Well if you watch him play instead of basing your decision on the stat line, you'd see he has the goods to be a very solid NFL QB. He passes the eyeball test with flying colors compared to Kyle Boller.
What did you think of Ben Roethlisberger his rookie year? I see both of them in a similar manner. Good defenses, not asked to do much but poised players. Hw he plays under pressure now may say a lot about him.He shows promise as a rookie. How he plays this week should shed more light on him. People like to predict the future but you can't do that yet.I think Flacco's been very overrated as well, but I think his future is bright. My biggest complaint is people seem to think "great for a rookie" and "below average NFL QB" can't be synonymous. That's what I think of Flacco right now.
How would you evaluate Drew Bledsoe, who had a pretty pronounced sophomore slump? Is he an exception to this system, or does he fall clearly in one or the other category?This will be something I'll be writing about in the summer, but I've found that a QB that completes at least 58% of his passes and has more scores than ints in his first full season, which is generally his second year (historically), goes on to have a pretty impressive career. The recent roster of players includes: Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Jeff Garcia, Kurt Warner, Peyton Manning, Marc Bulger, and Brett Favre.The dogs of the group were: Tim Couch and Jake Plummer. You could also put Chad Pennington and Culpepper somewhere in between. What I noticed about Flacco at Delaware was similar to Cecil's comment. His mobility is pretty good for a big guy, but he had the tendency to make some risky throws when under pressure he wasn't able to simply roll away from. In hindsight, this could be symptomatic of a big-time player on a small school team instilled with the need to make a play when there doesn't appear to be one. I didn't think Flacco would be this successful early. I think another year will be a better indicator of whether he'll be a decent starter or a potentially elite NFL signal caller. From a stats history, it appears he's on track to at least be the former.
In NFL terms I wholeheartedly agree. Far too early to make any kind of decision about Flacco's future.But for FF terms a little predicting is necessary. Even early on in his development.People like to predict the future but you can't do that yet.
Too early in the morning for me to get sarcasm I guess, sorry. Personally, I agree with you. He is a below average QB right now (not below average for a rookie, though), I was just arguing the point that TD to INT ratio in a QB's rookie year can't be used as the sole measurement of him sucking or not.ummm I was pretending to be Jim MoraFor one, when did the PLAYOFFS get brought into the conversation? The original post said only Flacco sucks because he has almost as many INT as TD's and poor passer rating. That's all it said. So, why wouldn't you compare him to Manning's rookie year? Manning had almost as many INT as TD's, too, and he doesn't suck.I second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameyour talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
The whole "team" performance thing is crazy, point out anywhere in the first post or my post that states anything about how the team ended up.Manning team sucked when he was a rookie, Joe's does not. Faulk was Manning's leading receiver! Manning had 26 tds and was always playing from behind. Joe sucks and you know it! Another Trent Edwards all over again....
Thats not really a fair comparison. 2004 was Bollers 2nd season, he started 9 games in 2003. By the end of 2004 (with 25 starts), his career yards per attempt was a mere 5.6, 20 TDs, 20 Ints. In that case, the handwriting was on the wall. Flacco's stat line is much more impressive with a 6.9 YA and if you look at the splits you see marked improvement in the 2nd half of the season: - 1st half 6.5 YA, 5 TDs, 7 Ints - 2nd half 7.2 YA, 9 TDs, 5 IntsI think he's going to make it and be a solid top 10 QB in the NFL.Oh yeah and he also is one of the top QB to be sacked. Guy sucks!!! Boller revisited, you heard it here first. Please put that in your tag line. Boller 2004 (first full season) 2500 yards, 13 TD, 11 INT's, sacked 35 timesFlacco 2008 (first full season) 2900 yards, 14 TD's, 12 INT's, sacked 32 timesThanks in advance.
One thing that I like to consider with Flacco is that based on the level of competition he saw in college, his learning curve in the NFL was likely to be incredibly steep for his first season or two. I find myself shocked he has played so well right out of the gate, not benefiting from a year holding the clipboard. Honestly, I think he has the potential to continue to make big strides. While Ryan is, in my mind, the superior QB currently, I'm not so sure if that will be the case in a year or two. Flacco's upside is a bit of a wildcard, and has a real shot to be quite high, imho.
He started his first year. In his second year he had a 57.9 completion pct., 4555 passing yards, 25 scores, and 27 ints. He didn't fit the statistical profile I mentioned. He came close. BTW-these stats actually made him good enough to be in the Pro Bowl that year and most importantly lead the Pats to a 10-6 record and a playoff bid. His first season, he started 13 games had a 49.9 completion pct., and 15/15 TD/IntSo Bledsoe wouldn't qualify in this club...by a very small margin. He had a pretty good career as a starting QB, don't you think? He wasn't great but he had some really good years.How would you evaluate Drew Bledsoe, who had a pretty pronounced sophomore slump? Is he an exception to this system, or does he fall clearly in one or the other category?This will be something I'll be writing about in the summer, but I've found that a QB that completes at least 58% of his passes and has more scores than ints in his first full season, which is generally his second year (historically), goes on to have a pretty impressive career. The recent roster of players includes: Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Jeff Garcia, Kurt Warner, Peyton Manning, Marc Bulger, and Brett Favre.The dogs of the group were: Tim Couch and Jake Plummer. You could also put Chad Pennington and Culpepper somewhere in between. What I noticed about Flacco at Delaware was similar to Cecil's comment. His mobility is pretty good for a big guy, but he had the tendency to make some risky throws when under pressure he wasn't able to simply roll away from. In hindsight, this could be symptomatic of a big-time player on a small school team instilled with the need to make a play when there doesn't appear to be one. I didn't think Flacco would be this successful early. I think another year will be a better indicator of whether he'll be a decent starter or a potentially elite NFL signal caller. From a stats history, it appears he's on track to at least be the former.
I guess you never saw him play!I'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
Hmmm. Bledsoe might be an interesting comparison to Flacco. They are similar in size, arm strength and demeanor. As someone who lived in New England during bledsoe's early years, and now lives in Baltimore, I might give Flacco an edge on decision-making -- you really had to see Bledsoe each week to appreciate his propensity for making poor decisions, and Flacco seems to be the opposite. Bledsoe would make throws that were too risky, Flacco will pass on throws that sometimes aren't too risky.He started his first year. In his second year he had a 57.9 completion pct., 4555 passing yards, 25 scores, and 27 ints. He didn't fit the statistical profile I mentioned. He came close. BTW-these stats actually made him good enough to be in the Pro Bowl that year and most importantly lead the Pats to a 10-6 record and a playoff bid. His first season, he started 13 games had a 49.9 completion pct., and 15/15 TD/IntSo Bledsoe wouldn't qualify in this club...by a very small margin. He had a pretty good career as a starting QB, don't you think? He wasn't great but he had some really good years.
I agree with you, but I disagree with the bolded part. If the Ravens lose, it won't reflect badly on Flacco, IMO, even if he struggles.Flacco is the real deal. His 90 QB rating on the road was #3 among ALL NFL QBs this year. In the second half of the Week 5 game at Indy, the Ravens were far behind and so Cameron took the training wheels off. Flacco responded with a strong effort and he's been very good ever since.
<Snip>
, the Ravens lose and the starter of this thread looks good.
In what area? Over the last 11 weeks (not counting the playoffs, just reg season), Ryan has:Same number of wins (9)Do you feel the same about Ryan because Flacco outperformed him for the last 11 games each they played. 13/5 to 12/8 from that point. One reason I think Flacco has every bit of a future as Ryan does.I think Flacco's been very overrated as well, but I think his future is bright. My biggest complaint is people seem to think "great for a rookie" and "below average NFL QB" can't be synonymous. That's what I think of Flacco right now.
Agreed.We won't know anymore about Flacco after this weekend (season) than we do now.I agree with you, but I disagree with the bolded part. If the Ravens lose, it won't reflect badly on Flacco, IMO, even if he struggles.
This allegedly awesome Baltimore team Flacco is leading won 4 games last season.Cue the 2007 excuse mongers in 3...2...1...ummm I was pretending to be Jim MoraFor one, when did the PLAYOFFS get brought into the conversation? The original post said only Flacco sucks because he has almost as many INT as TD's and poor passer rating. That's all it said. So, why wouldn't you compare him to Manning's rookie year? Manning had almost as many INT as TD's, too, and he doesn't suck.I second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameyour talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
The whole "team" performance thing is crazy, point out anywhere in the first post or my post that states anything about how the team ended up.Manning team sucked when he was a rookie, Joe's does not. Faulk was Manning's leading receiver! Manning had 26 tds and was always playing from behind. Joe sucks and you know it! Another Trent Edwards all over again....
were not talking about last year....for that look what Chad P did with the dolphins then..LMAOyou like apples?This allegedly awesome Baltimore team Flacco is leading won 4 games last season.ummm I was pretending to be Jim MoraFor one, when did the PLAYOFFS get brought into the conversation? The original post said only Flacco sucks because he has almost as many INT as TD's and poor passer rating. That's all it said. So, why wouldn't you compare him to Manning's rookie year? Manning had almost as many INT as TD's, too, and he doesn't suck.I second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameyour talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report backI'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....
The whole "team" performance thing is crazy, point out anywhere in the first post or my post that states anything about how the team ended up.Manning team sucked when he was a rookie, Joe's does not. Faulk was Manning's leading receiver! Manning had 26 tds and was always playing from behind. Joe sucks and you know it! Another Trent Edwards all over again....
![]()
Cue the 2007 excuse mongers in 3...2...1...
You obviosly don't like Flacco, but lets take a look at his season as the ROOKIE QB for the Ravens.It was obvious to anyone who watched Raven games this year that Harbaugh has kept Flacco on a leash, especially the first six weeks. After the blow out against Indy Harbaugh opened things up for him and since week 6 he has done exactly what the Ravens have asked, don't lose games.Since week 6 he has 13tds and 5 ints and 200 ypg along with 3 rushing tds. His QB rating since week 6 is 91.2, which isn't that bad for a rookie and would place him in the top 10 in QB rating.Not bad for a guy they said might not be able to make the transition from division IAA to the NFL.I'm not sure why everyone is all over Flacco's nutz like he is the franchise QB Baltimore has all but dreamed of. The guy has almost as many INT's as TD's and one of the worst passer rating in the league....