What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Max Brosmer, MIN (8 Viewers)

This sounds promising (from the link)

Weaknesses
Has touch but lacks consistent accuracy on deep throws.
Low release point causes throws to sail or get batted at the line.
Below-average placement forces receivers to break stride.
Rushes his process once the pocket alarm goes off.
Lacks arm talent and mobility to make plays off-schedule.
Play takes a noticeable downturn when he can’t work in rhythm.
Now go back and read everthing this same front office was saying about JJM.

Effusive praise seems to come easy. When Brosmer is sacked a dozen times with 4 turnovers, this topic’s tone will change pretty quickly.

I’m not buying what the Vikings are selling.
Ahem
 
It is unbelievable that he turned out to be actually worse than JJM.
Counterpoint: it’s totally believable. Weak arm, rookie quarterback against a top-notch Seattle defense. Not only was it believable, it was predictable.

Yes, it was. No doubt. I saw menobrown's post about 1/3 of his playoff teams going up against Seattle and felt sick because if things went like I figured, they'd have no hook for the kid because who was backing him up?
 
It is unbelievable that he turned out to be actually worse than JJM.
Counterpoint: it’s totally believable. Weak arm, rookie quarterback against a top-notch Seattle defense. Not only was it believable, it was predictable.

Yes, it was. No doubt. I saw menobrown's post about 1/3 of his playoff teams going up against Seattle and felt sick because if things went like I figured, they'd have no hook for the kid because who was backing him up?
didn’t realize I accurately called the number of turnovers until I quoted myself.

I did fall a few short of my dozen sacks prediction. Hard to get sacked when he’s throwing interceptions though. To be fair.
 
I face the SEA D in a little over a 1/3rd of my playoff games this week and I'm absolutely terrified.

Faced SEA defense in Main Event playoffs. ☠️⚰️
That was one of the 3 places I faced them as well.

The other two places were Big Gorilla playoffs. Both of my teams were top seedd, combined 21-3 record and most points in the regular season. 30th and 468th overall. The team that finished 30th also faced Meyers, so the guy got 52 from his TD and K. Never seen that before. Now it's season over and I got nothing to show for these teams, not a cent won, just a lottery ticket in a contest it's hard to cash. Tough to take man.
 
It is unbelievable that he turned out to be actually worse than JJM.
Counterpoint: it’s totally believable. Weak arm, rookie quarterback against a top-notch Seattle defense. Not only was it believable, it was predictable.

Yes, it was. No doubt. I saw menobrown's post about 1/3 of his playoff teams going up against Seattle and felt sick because if things went like I figured, they'd have no hook for the kid because who was backing him up?
didn’t realize I accurately called the number of turnovers until I quoted myself.

I did fall a few short of my dozen sacks prediction. Hard to get sacked when he’s throwing interceptions though. To be fair.

I was just reading through at everybody's behest and was going to quote your prediction that turned exact (did he fumble? You said "turnovers." I kid.) but you've already patted yourself on the back; no need for me to do it also. 😁
 
I face the SEA D in a little over a 1/3rd of my playoff games this week and I'm absolutely terrified.

Faced SEA defense in Main Event playoffs. ☠️⚰️
That was one of the 3 places I faced them as well.

The other two places were Big Gorilla playoffs. Both of my teams were top seedd, combined 21-3 record and most points in the regular season. 30th and 468th overall. The team that finished 30th also faced Meyers, so the guy got 52 from his TD and K. Never seen that before. Now it's season over and I got nothing to show for these teams, not a cent won, just a lottery ticket in a contest it's hard to cash. Tough to take man.

Ugh. I can't commiserate with you on that level, but I felt pretty bad reading your post today. I'm not Nostradamus, but I didn't think it would be quite so bad until I reminded myself there was really no back up to the back up.

Sorry about the end of your curation. I don't know how many teams you had and still might have, but it still must feel lousy regardless. Peace and I wish you better luck as this goes on.
 
I face the SEA D in a little over a 1/3rd of my playoff games this week and I'm absolutely terrified.

Faced SEA defense in Main Event playoffs. ☠️⚰️
That was one of the 3 places I faced them as well.

The other two places were Big Gorilla playoffs. Both of my teams were top seedd, combined 21-3 record and most points in the regular season. 30th and 468th overall. The team that finished 30th also faced Meyers, so the guy got 52 from his TD and K. Never seen that before. Now it's season over and I got nothing to show for these teams, not a cent won, just a lottery ticket in a contest it's hard to cash. Tough to take man.
Awe man, sorry to hear.

Ernest Jones scored nearly that (47.5) in my 16 team IDP league, clinching a playoff berth.

But I thought of your post watching that game - I knew it would be bad for you, but didn’t expect quite this level of butt whoopery. Condolences.

That said, isn’t it really about the friends you made along the way? (I kid because I know how bad it sucks - I got officially eliminated in my home league today, with the best team I’ve had in years. I also dropped from 1st to 2nd in my NFFC BB. Gah.)
 
Last edited:
One of these millennia the Vikings are going to identify a QB, draft him, develop him…and it is going to be glorious.
Too early to give up on McCarhty, but he needs have the off-season of all offseason’s. I can see them brining a veteran in as insurance. Mac Jones seems to make sense but he may fetch a longer term/larger deal than what MIN would be willing to pay.
 
One of these millennia the Vikings are going to identify a QB, draft him, develop him…and it is going to be glorious.
Too early to give up on McCarhty, but he needs have the off-season of all offseason’s. I can see them brining a veteran in as insurance. Mac Jones seems to make sense but he may fetch a longer term/larger deal than what MIN would be willing to pay.
The Vikings are $35M over the cap for next year, so that will limit who they bring in to compete for the job.
 
This dude has no business playing QB in the NFL.

The only thing this MIN season has been good for is getting rid of the old phrase that some WRs are so good "they are QB proof"... MythBusters "Vikings edition" has blown that one up.
 
Last edited:
One of these millennia the Vikings are going to identify a QB, draft him, develop him…and it is going to be glorious.
I'll either be worm food or a crispy critter, haven't really decided yet. Not that I care about what the Vikings do however. Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
Agree. Just like CIN was at for years when they had Dalton. Dalton was a decent QB that couldn't get them too far in the playoffs. Kept CIN in the mediocre to decent for years....never good enough to contend but never bad enough to get the high draft pick to select a potential generational QB. That's a terrible place to be.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
Agree. Just like CIN was at for years when they had Dalton. Dalton was a decent QB that couldn't get them too far in the playoffs. Kept CIN in the mediocre to decent for years....never good enough to contend but never bad enough to get the high draft pick to select a potential generational QB. That's a terrible place to be.
You don't need a generational QB to get to the Super Bowl. There are plenty of teams that can build in a way that doesn't take a generational QB (even if that is a bit of a cheat code - but doesn't work all the time). What you cannot have is a QB that will fold under pressure like Darnold and prevent you from getting there.

I don't mind the approach of building the defense and skill positions like the Vikes have done but they definitely haven't found the right QB that can do enough and not kill the pressure games for them. I am not sure who that could be at this point or who would be available that can do that. Therein lies the problem.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
 
One of these millennia the Vikings are going to identify a QB, draft him, develop him…and it is going to be glorious.
It still could be JJM. Dude’s had less than a dozen starts. He’s shown flashes, but that OL is Swiss cheese. No QB has a chance back there. If Darnold stayed on the team they’d have the exact same record.

Vikings are dumb if they don’t commit to developing JJM & their 1st 3 draft picks should be OL.
 
This dude has no business playing QB in the NFL.

The only thing this MIN season has been good for is getting rid of the old phrase that some WRs are so good "they are QB proof"... MythBusters "Vikings edition" has blown that one up.
Still need an OL. Mahomes on this Vikings team goes 3-14, probably on the IR by week 9.
 
This dude has no business playing QB in the NFL.

The only thing this MIN season has been good for is getting rid of the old phrase that some WRs are so good "they are QB proof"... MythBusters "Vikings edition" has blown that one up.
Still need an OL. Mahomes on this Vikings team goes 3-14, probably on the IR by week 9.
I don't necessarily think this is true (even though I know you are trying to be a bit hyperbolic). If the Vikes had Mahomes they would probably have the #1 seed at this point. That would open KOC up to so much more offensively that the O-line can be helped by the QB getting them in favorable plays. Quick hitters and Mahomes improv plays to Jefferson would be daggers to other teams.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
 
It still could be JJM. Dude’s had less than a dozen starts. He’s shown flashes,
I agree. He could still develop into something for sure. He has shown he can make plays and make all the throws but has zero consistency (which the O-line isn't helping him out any). And surprisingly the "great" receiving group has really let down the QB's as much as the QB's have let them down. There have been a ton of drops over the last few weeks by all pass catchers (yes - even Jefferson) that have really hurt. It's really been a complete team effort to get to this level of incompetency.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
I don't claim to be a cap expert, but it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you or I can chime in with a reality check. The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
I don't claim to be a cap expert, but it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you or I can chime in with a reality check. The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
Which is what we've had for the past 20 years except in the pandemic year. And the cap will go up even more exponential than usual when the new TV deal is reached in 2028-ish.
 
The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
Which has happened pretty consistently as far as I can remember.
it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you.
In theory I think you are correct. But in reality there are ways to move those cap hits around and still be able to sign guys you need. That in conjunction with the cap going up due to ever increasing revenues and you are able to circumvent it.

Some teams are bad at cap management or are bad at football so they take the hit because they aren't going to be competitive anyway. But well run teams can avoid "paying the piper" fairly easily.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
I don't claim to be a cap expert, but it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you or I can chime in with a reality check. The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
Which is what we've had for the past 20 years except in the pandemic year. And the cap will go up even more exponential than usual when the new TV deal is reached in 2028-ish.
Do you have any numbers for what the cap increases have been the last 10 years? Is that enough to offset cap hell for teams indefinitely?
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
I don't claim to be a cap expert, but it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you or I can chime in with a reality check. The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
Which is what we've had for the past 20 years except in the pandemic year. And the cap will go up even more exponential than usual when the new TV deal is reached in 2028-ish.
Owners that don't mind spending real money to be competitive can do this as they want. The cap really is move effective for cheap owners that don't want to pay real money. That is the way they can circumvent the cap so to speak by changing the structure of the contracts which affects real money more than the cap space.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
I don't claim to be a cap expert, but it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you or I can chime in with a reality check. The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
Which is what we've had for the past 20 years except in the pandemic year. And the cap will go up even more exponential than usual when the new TV deal is reached in 2028-ish.
Do you have any numbers for what the cap increases have been the last 10 years? Is that enough to offset cap hell for teams indefinitely?
There are ways to get out of cap hell by shifting money to bonuses etc to clear up space or move payment to a year where you don't need the space and can use it up. The capologists can manipulate the money/contracts to make it work.

Do you have any numbers for what the cap increases have been the last 10 years?
Cap Status
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
I don't claim to be a cap expert, but it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you or I can chime in with a reality check. The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
Which is what we've had for the past 20 years except in the pandemic year. And the cap will go up even more exponential than usual when the new TV deal is reached in 2028-ish.
Owners that don't mind spending real money to be competitive can do this as they want. The cap really is move effective for cheap owners that don't want to pay real money. That is the way they can circumvent the cap so to speak by changing the structure of the contracts which affects real money more than the cap space.
The Vikings don't strike me as a team willing to spend a ton consistently. They are still a small market team that doesn't feel the pressure to win. I live in Minnesota and they are fair weather fans and there isn't a lot of fair weather (not to mean real weather). The fans in Minnesota find other things to do when the Vikings suck and don't seem to get angry ever.
 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
I don't claim to be a cap expert, but it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you or I can chime in with a reality check. The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
Which is what we've had for the past 20 years except in the pandemic year. And the cap will go up even more exponential than usual when the new TV deal is reached in 2028-ish.
Do you have any numbers for what the cap increases have been the last 10 years? Is that enough to offset cap hell for teams indefinitely?
  • 2011: $120.375 million
  • 2012: $120.6 million
  • 2013: $123 million
  • 2014: $133 million
  • 2015: $143.28 million
  • 2016: $155.27 million
  • 2017: $167 million
  • 2018: $177.2 million
  • 2019: $188.2 million
  • 2020: $198.2 million
  • 2021: $182.5 million (due to pandemic)
  • 2022: $208.2 million
  • 2023: $224.8 million
  • 2024: $255.4 million
  • 2025: ~$279.2 million

    It's gone up sharply each year since the end of the Great Recession in 2013 except for the COVID year of 2020. And the jump has been bigger in recent years because NFL games are about the only thing that attract massive amounts of live viewers anymore.


 
Maybe they should have kept Sam Darnold.
He wouldn't get them a Super Bowl either. I still haven't seen him perform in a game that really matters yet. While he may be better than JJM/Brosmer he isn't winning (or getting to) any Super Bowls and the money needed to sign him just would have kept the Vikes in no man's land while paying a bunch for a slightly above mediocre QB.
punt the rest of the decade. I hear they are also in cap hell.
You can always get out of cap hell. It's kind of a false narrative. Shifting bonuses and money etc and you can always find more room if need be.
Don't you eventually have to pay the pied piper?
In theory sure but in reality, there are plenty of ways to get around the salary cap in perpetuity.
No, not forever.
Name a team with a solid front office that hasn't been able to push off the piper continuously?
I don't claim to be a cap expert, but it is my understanding you can't keep pushing money and bonues into the future without it eventually catching up with you. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you or I can chime in with a reality check. The only thing I can think of that would help with that is a continueous genereous increase in the cap every year.
Which is what we've had for the past 20 years except in the pandemic year. And the cap will go up even more exponential than usual when the new TV deal is reached in 2028-ish.
Owners that don't mind spending real money to be competitive can do this as they want. The cap really is move effective for cheap owners that don't want to pay real money. That is the way they can circumvent the cap so to speak by changing the structure of the contracts which affects real money more than the cap space.
The Vikings don't strike me as a team willing to spend a ton consistently. They are still a small market team that doesn't feel the pressure to win. I live in Minnesota and they are fair weather fans and there isn't a lot of fair weather (not to mean real weather). The fans in Minnesota find other things to do when the Vikings suck and don't seem to get angry ever.
You are correct but they could if they wanted to. It goes back to the real limit of the salary cap is an owner that doesn't want to pay real money. That is the owner restriction not the cap restriction.
 
Anyone else rooting (ugh) for JJM to play this week?

I need Justin Jefferson to not FF-suck. I'm not sure how one of the best WRs gets four yards?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top