i wouldn't say much better. you know of other QBs that outscored Manning by 2+ppg over the first 10 weeks last year?It's difficult to say whether he can be trusted or not. He is extremely injury prone and I think that there are much better options out there instead of McNabb.
Please compare apples to apples and see that Carson Palmer was playing regular season games 8 months after his knee injury.TIACan someone remind me if Culpepper returned to practice far earlier than expected, and how that worked out for him? TIA
Good thing he's not a runningback.Guys that are over 30 normally take a lot longer to recover from an ACL injury.
while i am big on drafting with PPG in mind, how many games does he have to play to make his draft spot worth his PPG?1? 5? 10?he still goes too early for my liking given his draft spot (5.11 in the first wcoff satellite i saw and is surely to go up from there) at what other alternatives there are.The Shark move is to draft him and back him up with a solid guy, thus taking advantage of his ppg while the getting is good. He was scoring at the same pace as Peyton Manning before his injury.![]()
7.08 in a dynasty start up draft 2 weeks ago = :crossesfingers:while i am big on drafting with PPG in mind, how many games does he have to play to make his draft spot worth his PPG?1? 5? 10?he still goes too early for my liking given his draft spot (5.11 in the first wcoff satellite i saw and is surely to go up from there) at what other alternatives there are.The Shark move is to draft him and back him up with a solid guy, thus taking advantage of his ppg while the getting is good. He was scoring at the same pace as Peyton Manning before his injury.![]()
There's no apple to compare McNabb to. Maybe he heals as quickly as Palmer. That's anyone's guess.Please compare apples to apples
Two things: 1.) The last thing you want is for him to be more "cautious on the field." If he is cautious and thinking about injury, he isn't thinking about the play he is involved in 100% and that lack of focus could lead to another injury. You want him playing with every bit of aggression he has ever shown.2.) This isn't directed solely at you, but your use of "Dnabb" put me over the top finally. Can we all please stop with the "first initial/portion of last name" nicknaming? It is so stupid and so out of hand that it drives me nuts. McNabb is only one more letter, and being there is no other McNabb worth speaking of in the NFL or fantasy circles, there's no need to throw in the "D." I understand from time to time there may be a player where that is his actual nickname, but to just attach that to people is flat out annoying. :endsrant:7.08 in a dynasty start up draft 2 weeks ago = :crossesfingers:But, I agree that Dnabb will need to be backed up sooner than other QB2s - just in case. Especially if he sits out the first few games (just my worst case scenario @ this point) Though, I'm sure more news like this will move him up ADP wise, where the value proposition is more challenging.I'm hopeful that he'll become a little more cautious on the field as he moves into the last few years of his career - considering the injuries he's had the past couple of years. Throwing the ball away when nothing's there, vs. running into LBs for 3 yds. I think he's got something to prove post T.O. (still) and with Kolb in R2 of the draft. I just pray that R Brown, Curtis, and Baskett are up to the task.
There's no apple to compare McNabb to. Maybe he heals as quickly as Palmer. That's anyone's guess.Please compare apples to apples
Nice rant P-Ham.2.) This isn't directed solely at you, but your use of "Dnabb" put me over the top finally. Can we all please stop with the "first initial/portion of last name" nicknaming? It is so stupid and so out of hand that it drives me nuts. McNabb is only one more letter, and being there is no other McNabb worth speaking of in the NFL or fantasy circles, there's no need to throw in the "D." I understand from time to time there may be a player where that is his actual nickname, but to just attach that to people is flat out annoying. :endsrant:
Nice rant P-Ham.2.) This isn't directed solely at you, but your use of "Dnabb" put me over the top finally. Can we all please stop with the "first initial/portion of last name" nicknaming? It is so stupid and so out of hand that it drives me nuts. McNabb is only one more letter, and being there is no other McNabb worth speaking of in the NFL or fantasy circles, there's no need to throw in the "D." I understand from time to time there may be a player where that is his actual nickname, but to just attach that to people is flat out annoying. :endsrant:
My point is there are lots of "apples" fitting your definition that do not return to form in 8 months. That should be viewed a best case scenario subject to individual healing. Even Palmer didn't seem to return to form until mid-season, and his injury had zero impact on his non-existant running abilities. I'll probably avoid McNabb this year, anyone else is free to consider him value.There's no apple to compare McNabb to. Maybe he heals as quickly as Palmer. That's anyone's guess.Please compare apples to applesMcNabb's ACL tear was the same injury that Palmer had. Culpepper, on the other hand, tore 3 ligaments and possibly more damage. Apples to apples would be comparing the same injuries. A torn ACL is an 8 month injury in today's NFL. McNabb's injury was nothing like Culpepper's.
I'm listening. What other QB's tore an ACL (and nothing more) in the past few years and took longer than 8 months to return to practice?My point is there are lots of "apples" fitting your definition that do not return to form in 8 months. That should be viewed a best case scenario subject to individual healing. Even Palmer didn't seem to return to form until mid-season, and his injury had zero impact on his non-existant running abilities. I'll probably avoid McNabb this year, anyone else is free to consider him value.There's no apple to compare McNabb to. Maybe he heals as quickly as Palmer. That's anyone's guess.Please compare apples to applesMcNabb's ACL tear was the same injury that Palmer had. Culpepper, on the other hand, tore 3 ligaments and possibly more damage. Apples to apples would be comparing the same injuries. A torn ACL is an 8 month injury in today's NFL. McNabb's injury was nothing like Culpepper's.
I'm sorry, did I invite a research assignment? I think not. I was not limiting my point to QBs, and I take exception to that as a starting point since QBs have different styles and, as a result, rely on their legs differently. Palmer vs. McNabb is a good example of that since Palmer has just 78 rushing yards in his 3 year career. I'll remain a skeptic until I see McNabb actually return to form in real game action, and you're free to assume all guys return to practice in 8 months as a time-tested golden rule.I'm listening. What other QB's tore an ACL (and nothing more) in the past few years and took longer than 8 months to return to practice?My point is there are lots of "apples" fitting your definition that do not return to form in 8 months. That should be viewed a best case scenario subject to individual healing. Even Palmer didn't seem to return to form until mid-season, and his injury had zero impact on his non-existant running abilities. I'll probably avoid McNabb this year, anyone else is free to consider him value.There's no apple to compare McNabb to. Maybe he heals as quickly as Palmer. That's anyone's guess.Please compare apples to applesMcNabb's ACL tear was the same injury that Palmer had. Culpepper, on the other hand, tore 3 ligaments and possibly more damage. Apples to apples would be comparing the same injuries. A torn ACL is an 8 month injury in today's NFL. McNabb's injury was nothing like Culpepper's.
You did when you said:I'm sorry, did I invite a research assignment? I think not. I was not limiting my point to QBs,
Since there is zero evidence to the contrary, I will say that ACL rehab is about 8 months in today's NFL for QBs, and possibly any position. Culpepper had ACL rehab, MCL rehab, PCL rehab and other stuff. Not even the same ballpark. Regardless of how much they run, the McNabb/Palmer comparison in the only one you can make.Can someone remind me if Culpepper returned to practice far earlier than expected, and how that worked out for him?
The problem with the McNabb / Palmer comparison is age and years in the NFL. McNabb was 30 when he tore his ACL, with 8 years of NFL wear and tear on his knees. Palmer was 26 with only two years of NFL wear and tear. Trust me, that's a big difference. Look at other over 30 guys that have torn their ACL, the recovery doesn't go as smoothly. Lets see how long it take Toomer to get back to the NFL.You did when you said:I'm sorry, did I invite a research assignment? I think not. I was not limiting my point to QBs,Since there is zero evidence to the contrary, I will say that ACL rehab is about 8 months in today's NFL for QBs, and possibly any position. Culpepper had ACL rehab, MCL rehab, PCL rehab and other stuff. Not even the same ballpark. Regardless of how much they run, the McNabb/Palmer comparison in the only one you can make.Can someone remind me if Culpepper returned to practice far earlier than expected, and how that worked out for him?
Well, I guess that closes that debate. You heard it folks, going forward all ACLs are rehabbed in 8 months. Happy drafting.zadok said:Since there is zero evidence to the contrary, I will say that ACL rehab is about 8 months in today's NFL for QBs, and possibly any position.
Not much to work with on QB ACL tears butDaunte Culpepper in 2005 (didn't fully recover)Brian Griese in 2005 (backup in 2006)Rex Grossman in 2004 (broke ankle in 2005)Jeff Garcia in 2004 (backup in 2005)Trent Green in 1999 (backup in 2000)The problem with the McNabb / Palmer comparison is age and years in the NFL. McNabb was 30 when he tore his ACL, with 8 years of NFL wear and tear on his knees. Palmer was 26 with only two years of NFL wear and tear. Trust me, that's a big difference. Look at other over 30 guys that have torn their ACL, the recovery doesn't go as smoothly. Lets see how long it take Toomer to get back to the NFL.
That has some merit, but the amount of running other skill position players do, play in and play out, practice and games year round is not even close to what QBs do. Not even Vick comes close what a backup RB or WR does. Totally different animal, IMHO. So there are really only 2 QB this has happened to recently, McNabb and Palmer.toxicbees said:The problem with the McNabb / Palmer comparison is age and years in the NFL. McNabb was 30 when he tore his ACL, with 8 years of NFL wear and tear on his knees. Palmer was 26 with only two years of NFL wear and tear. Trust me, that's a big difference. Look at other over 30 guys that have torn their ACL, the recovery doesn't go as smoothly. Lets see how long it take Toomer to get back to the NFL.
Not much to work with on QB ACL tears butDaunte Culpepper in 2005 (didn't fully recover)Brian Griese in 2005 (backup in 2006)Rex Grossman in 2004 (broke ankle in 2005)Jeff Garcia in 2004 (backup in 2005)Trent Green in 1999 (backup in 2000)
I prefer P-Mer.Nice rant P-Ham.2.) This isn't directed solely at you, but your use of "Dnabb" put me over the top finally. Can we all please stop with the "first initial/portion of last name" nicknaming? It is so stupid and so out of hand that it drives me nuts. McNabb is only one more letter, and being there is no other McNabb worth speaking of in the NFL or fantasy circles, there's no need to throw in the "D." I understand from time to time there may be a player where that is his actual nickname, but to just attach that to people is flat out annoying. :endsrant:
Re: 1.) To each his own I guess, but I'd rather see hook slides vs. attempting to bowl over OLBs for one extra yard at this stage of his career. I'm not suggesting he start folding in the pocket like Carr in recent years, but he'll be better off if he can attempt to avoid (searching out) the voilent collisions. I presume his body would agree @ this point - and I don't think his being more cautious *@ the end of the already broke-down play* will adversely effect his focus otherwise.Re: 2.) Fair enough. I guess we all have monikers for players - sry you finally crackedTwo things: 1.) The last thing you want is for him to be more "cautious on the field." If he is cautious and thinking about injury, he isn't thinking about the play he is involved in 100% and that lack of focus could lead to another injury. You want him playing with every bit of aggression he has ever shown.2.) This isn't directed solely at you, but your use of "Dnabb" put me over the top finally. Can we all please stop with the "first initial/portion of last name" nicknaming? It is so stupid and so out of hand that it drives me nuts. McNabb is only one more letter, and being there is no other McNabb worth speaking of in the NFL or fantasy circles, there's no need to throw in the "D." I understand from time to time there may be a player where that is his actual nickname, but to just attach that to people is flat out annoying. :endsrant:7.08 in a dynasty start up draft 2 weeks ago = :crossesfingers:But, I agree that Dnabb will need to be backed up sooner than other QB2s - just in case. Especially if he sits out the first few games (just my worst case scenario @ this point) Though, I'm sure more news like this will move him up ADP wise, where the value proposition is more challenging.I'm hopeful that he'll become a little more cautious on the field as he moves into the last few years of his career - considering the injuries he's had the past couple of years. Throwing the ball away when nothing's there, vs. running into LBs for 3 yds. I think he's got something to prove post T.O. (still) and with Kolb in R2 of the draft. I just pray that R Brown, Curtis, and Baskett are up to the task.
What I want to know is, with Dstall gone to Nland, will Dnabb favor Lmith? I'm not big on HBas and Rbro is really second-tier talent.Two things: 1.) The last thing you want is for him to be more "cautious on the field." If he is cautious and thinking about injury, he isn't thinking about the play he is involved in 100% and that lack of focus could lead to another injury. You want him playing with every bit of aggression he has ever shown.2.) This isn't directed solely at you, but your use of "Dnabb" put me over the top finally. Can we all please stop with the "first initial/portion of last name" nicknaming? It is so stupid and so out of hand that it drives me nuts. McNabb is only one more letter, and being there is no other McNabb worth speaking of in the NFL or fantasy circles, there's no need to throw in the "D." I understand from time to time there may be a player where that is his actual nickname, but to just attach that to people is flat out annoying. :endsrant:7.08 in a dynasty start up draft 2 weeks ago = :crossesfingers:But, I agree that Dnabb will need to be backed up sooner than other QB2s - just in case. Especially if he sits out the first few games (just my worst case scenario @ this point) Though, I'm sure more news like this will move him up ADP wise, where the value proposition is more challenging.I'm hopeful that he'll become a little more cautious on the field as he moves into the last few years of his career - considering the injuries he's had the past couple of years. Throwing the ball away when nothing's there, vs. running into LBs for 3 yds. I think he's got something to prove post T.O. (still) and with Kolb in R2 of the draft. I just pray that R Brown, Curtis, and Baskett are up to the task.
The Shark move is to draft him and back him up with a solid guy, thus taking advantage of his ppg while the getting is good. He was scoring at the same pace as Peyton Manning before his injury.![]()
What I want to know is, with Dstall gone to Nland, will Dnabb favor Lmith? I'm not big on HBas and Rbro is really second-tier talent.