ImTheScientist
Footballguy
Great pick, fell right to a team which gives him a great chance for success. He'll end up being one of the top 2 QBs coming out of this years draft.
Last edited by a moderator:
And this comes from a guy that thought Charlie Whitehurst was going to start over TJax last year. lolu.....5'-11"...maybe. He will go the way of Troy Smith and Pat White, both thought of as potential NFL starters yet failed miserably. His best case scenario is backup and injury fill in like that Wallace bum who I saw that they likened him to during the draft.
Where is t-joke now? Waterboy, that's where. That's how bad he is. Whitehurst obviously should have been starting. They fixed that mistake with Flynn, not the midget you are in love with.And this comes from a guy that thought Charlie Whitehurst was going to start over TJax last year. lolu.....5'-11"...maybe. He will go the way of Troy Smith and Pat White, both thought of as potential NFL starters yet failed miserably. His best case scenario is backup and injury fill in like that Wallace bum who I saw that they likened him to during the draft.
There probably isn't too many NFL GM/HC's with more job security then those two and they didn't spend to much coin on Flynn. Their philosophy is Compete.... they also believe in getting QB talent much in the way Green Bay and Philadelphia does (GM came from GB). The bottom line is winning in Seattle, starters are not determined by how you are paid, performance is all that matters (which is unique in the NFL) and they can really only do this because of the job security they have.If Wilson becomes starter this year or next, does the GM get canned? I mean, they spent some coin to bring in Flynn. If he flops, someone will take some heat. Petey will dance around it all, like he always does(or leave for another job).
I don't think anyone, besides the management that selected him, thought White would be more than a gimmick. Everyone is saying if you add two measly inches to Wilson's frame, you are looking at a 1st/2nd rounder. I think Wilson is worth a strong look based on that fact that he excelled at two different, big conference colleges...most of the time, a transfer is running from an issue, or trying to find a better program, and all Wilson did was set records at two different big college programs...at the worst, he has proven he can grasp a new concept, which happens all the time in the NFL.5'-11"...maybe. He will go the way of Troy Smith and Pat White, both thought of as potential NFL starters yet failed miserably. His best case scenario is backup and injury fill in like that Wallace bum who I saw that they likened him to during the draft.
Fantaasy irrelevant.
Smith
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=569728 & http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=577975 among others
White
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=466293 & http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=466116
So if the QB he drafts wins the starting job, he gets fired?If Wilson becomes starter this year or next, does the GM get canned? I mean, they spent some coin to bring in Flynn. If he flops, someone will take some heat. Petey will dance around it all, like he always does(or leave for another job).
So u wanna too?Russell Wilson highlights from last season in Wisconsin.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8r7wLnb1xc&feature=player_embeddedSome notes from watching: His play action? Sick, seems like everyone on D bites. Could be important with Lynch and Turbin. Way faster than I expected. Great pocket skills (granted these are highlights but judging from his numbers, most of his plays were highlights)+ arm strength and touch on his throws.I've also read that Wilson had maybe the biggest hands of any QB in the draft, which can help in rainy Seattle for holding on to the ball. Also, due to his high release point, his release point compares to RGIII and last season he had less passes batted down than Luck and Griffin.The reason he fell in the draft is solely on height but Wilson is superb at finding throwing lanes, something Brees has been able to do in his time in the NFL. I haven't even covered his character yet, he was named team captain within 20 days of being on the Wisonsin football team. One of the huge things Pete Carroll preaches is limiting turnovers and Wilson is a master at this. His freshman year at NC State the dude threw for 17 TDs and 1 INT! Last year, 39 total TDs, 4 INTs.
Are you under the impression that it rains more in Seattle than other cities during football season?..., which can help in rainy Seattle for holding on to the ball.
It doesn't rain more in inches....not sure about actual rainy days, typically nice til around mid to late October though. Regardless weather is a factor because we don't have a dome so it has to be something to consider.Are you under the impression that it rains more in Seattle than other cities during football season?..., which can help in rainy Seattle for holding on to the ball.
I think this is what's being missed, or ignored, by most folks who want to compare Wilson to Troy Smith/Pat White. Wilson can make all the requisite NFL throws. Smith/White(particularly White) can't/couldn't.That said, the height issues are very real and cannot be completely discounted. Wilson looked tremendous last year for the Badgers and equally so in the two years prior for the Woflpack, that can't be denied either, but he won't be facing Big 10+2 and ACC defenders on a weekly basis anymore. Nor will he have Wisconsin's fantastic OL in front of him either. I have no dog in this fight, but I like Wilson. I hope he pans out for some team, I'm just not holding my breath on it. However, the one thing that I think makes him more projectable than the Smiths/Whites of the world is the arm strength/touch. He's short, but he can make all the throws. That is huge.+ arm strength and touch on his throws.
Im guessing the dump Tjax and keep Flynn, Wilson, and Portis. A lot of people really really like the talent of Portis...but he's raw. I still think Wilson plays a few games this year and goes into next year as the starter. If Portis is ready they will drop Flynn and draft another QB.QBBC - 3 guys who arent special. I see Seattle drafting another QB in 2 years
That's the part that always seems to get lost...I think Waldman had the stat in another thread, but I believe his "shortest" lineman at Wisconsin was a 6'4 Center. All of the Centers drafted in the NFL the past five drafts are 6'4 or shorter. While some say he won't have a line like that in the NFL, truth is, he is one of the few we know that can succeed behind an NFL sized line.It is likely that I am a bigger Badger fan than all but 100 or so people in the world. So while I'm certainly biased, I know a lot about Russell Wilson.
Wilson has all the skills necessary to be successful in the NFL. He has intelligence, character, leadership, and work ethic that are off the charts. He makes less than 1 bad decision per game. I love the stat about how many passes Wilson got knocked down, but the NFL is a completely different game, so it's tough to know how much that tells us. I will say that the UW line was gigantic, so it's not like his OL will be any bigger.
Like Mel Kiper said when he was drafted, if Wilson can't succeed in the NFL, no short QB should ever be drafted again because the only thing that Wilson doesn't have is height. It's nearly impossible to predict QB success in the NFL, though, so who knows.
Bottom line, though, is that he's not in a position to be fantasy relevant for the next couple of years. It's really hard for me to believe that Seattle is going to pay Matt Flynn ~$8M / year to backup Wilson. My hope is that Seattle ends up trading one of the two guys.
His offensive line may have been big in Wisconsin but what doesn't get mentioned is that Wisconsin tailored their offense to help Wilson. Instead of taking 3 or 5 step drops they ran more 7 step drops. I imagine the same will have to be done in Seattle.'Sweet Love said:That's the part that always seems to get lost...I think Waldman had the stat in another thread, but I believe his "shortest" lineman at Wisconsin was a 6'4 Center. All of the Centers drafted in the NFL the past five drafts are 6'4 or shorter. While some say he won't have a line like that in the NFL, truth is, he is one of the few we know that can succeed behind an NFL sized line.'breadtree said:It is likely that I am a bigger Badger fan than all but 100 or so people in the world. So while I'm certainly biased, I know a lot about Russell Wilson.
Wilson has all the skills necessary to be successful in the NFL. He has intelligence, character, leadership, and work ethic that are off the charts. He makes less than 1 bad decision per game. I love the stat about how many passes Wilson got knocked down, but the NFL is a completely different game, so it's tough to know how much that tells us. I will say that the UW line was gigantic, so it's not like his OL will be any bigger.
Like Mel Kiper said when he was drafted, if Wilson can't succeed in the NFL, no short QB should ever be drafted again because the only thing that Wilson doesn't have is height. It's nearly impossible to predict QB success in the NFL, though, so who knows.
Bottom line, though, is that he's not in a position to be fantasy relevant for the next couple of years. It's really hard for me to believe that Seattle is going to pay Matt Flynn ~$8M / year to backup Wilson. My hope is that Seattle ends up trading one of the two guys.
If none work out then their may start to be some issues.'proninja said:If either Flynn or Wilson become a legitimate, good, starting QB, I promise nobody cares which one it is, and nobody will get any heat if either of them work out.If Wilson becomes starter this year or next, does the GM get canned? I mean, they spent some coin to bring in Flynn. If he flops, someone will take some heat. Petey will dance around it all, like he always does(or leave for another job).
Hmmm, where did you read/hear that? I was just looking at Waldman's RSP and it gives a lot of individual play details for the first MSU and Oregon games. There's overlap and I didn't take the time to sort that out, but I count 5 step drops as by far the most common, followed by 3 steps, with 1- and 7-step drops being basically tied for 3rd most common.His offensive line may have been big in Wisconsin but what doesn't get mentioned is that Wisconsin tailored their offense to help Wilson. Instead of taking 3 or 5 step drops they ran more 7 step drops. I imagine the same will have to be done in Seattle.
I must admit I didn't see him play much at all, but from what I've been reading on this kid the ONLY knock on him is his height. But as you mentioned, he has a high to low throwing motion which makes up for his height. Philip Rivers has/had an awkward sidearm throwing motion that people said wouldn't work in the NFL because his passes would get swatted at the line. What's his stat line looked like since coming in to the league?With that said, I just picked him up with the 5.05 pick in a 12 team start 2 QB league. He's being overlooked at the moment, but that may not last if word keeps getting out.Russell Wilson highlights from last season in Wisconsin.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8r7wLnb1xc&feature=player_embeddedSome notes from watching: His play action? Sick, seems like everyone on D bites. Could be important with Lynch and Turbin. Way faster than I expected. Great pocket skills (granted these are highlights but judging from his numbers, most of his plays were highlights)+ arm strength and touch on his throws.I've also read that Wilson had maybe the biggest hands of any QB in the draft, which can help in rainy Seattle for holding on to the ball. Also, due to his high release point, his release point compares to RGIII and last season he had less passes batted down than Luck and Griffin.The reason he fell in the draft is solely on height but Wilson is superb at finding throwing lanes, something Brees has been able to do in his time in the NFL. I haven't even covered his character yet, he was named team captain within 20 days of being on the Wisonsin football team. One of the huge things Pete Carroll preaches is limiting turnovers and Wilson is a master at this. His freshman year at NC State the dude threw for 17 TDs and 1 INT! Last year, 39 total TDs, 4 INTs.
As usual, very classy intelligent post SL. Just because a guy is not prototypical size, does not mean he can't have success. People prove the "experts" wrong everyday in the NFL. If a guy has the skill set and then you add in hard worker and intelligence, he may end up proving people wrong if given a chance.I don't think anyone, besides the management that selected him, thought White would be more than a gimmick. Everyone is saying if you add two measly inches to Wilson's frame, you are looking at a 1st/2nd rounder. I think Wilson is worth a strong look based on that fact that he excelled at two different, big conference colleges...most of the time, a transfer is running from an issue, or trying to find a better program, and all Wilson did was set records at two different big college programs...at the worst, he has proven he can grasp a new concept, which happens all the time in the NFL.5'-11"...maybe. He will go the way of Troy Smith and Pat White, both thought of as potential NFL starters yet failed miserably. His best case scenario is backup and injury fill in like that Wallace bum who I saw that they likened him to during the draft.
Fantaasy irrelevant.
Smith
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=569728 & http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=577975 among others
White
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=466293 & http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=466116
Correct, it's a very big obstacle for him to overcome but he has all the skills you would want from a franchise QB. If RG3 were 3" shorter they'd be very comparable prospects, slight edge to RG3 still because of the deep ball accuracy but that's about it.Love Wilson.'Warpig said:the ONLY knock on him is his height.
Did they run 7 step drops at NC State? Legit question (I do not know the answer), but again, he is the only guy in memory to rip it up at two different BCS conference schools...it is kind of my point, in that he seems to be "plug and play"...more so than any other prospect we have seen.His offensive line may have been big in Wisconsin but what doesn't get mentioned is that Wisconsin tailored their offense to help Wilson. Instead of taking 3 or 5 step drops they ran more 7 step drops. I imagine the same will have to be done in Seattle.That's the part that always seems to get lost...I think Waldman had the stat in another thread, but I believe his "shortest" lineman at Wisconsin was a 6'4 Center. All of the Centers drafted in the NFL the past five drafts are 6'4 or shorter. While some say he won't have a line like that in the NFL, truth is, he is one of the few we know that can succeed behind an NFL sized line.It is likely that I am a bigger Badger fan than all but 100 or so people in the world. So while I'm certainly biased, I know a lot about Russell Wilson.
Wilson has all the skills necessary to be successful in the NFL. He has intelligence, character, leadership, and work ethic that are off the charts. He makes less than 1 bad decision per game. I love the stat about how many passes Wilson got knocked down, but the NFL is a completely different game, so it's tough to know how much that tells us. I will say that the UW line was gigantic, so it's not like his OL will be any bigger.
Like Mel Kiper said when he was drafted, if Wilson can't succeed in the NFL, no short QB should ever be drafted again because the only thing that Wilson doesn't have is height. It's nearly impossible to predict QB success in the NFL, though, so who knows.
Bottom line, though, is that he's not in a position to be fantasy relevant for the next couple of years. It's really hard for me to believe that Seattle is going to pay Matt Flynn ~$8M / year to backup Wilson. My hope is that Seattle ends up trading one of the two guys.
I'm not sure what they ran at NC State. To be honest, not sure what % seven step drops they ran at WI either. Before the draft they were talking about his chances on ESPN radio in Milwaukee. They said that WI ran more 7 step drops because of his height. Sounds reasonable and that would make sense in order to compensate for it. FWIW I like Wilson and hope he succeeds. I don't see the height being a problem with a good coach. He's got everything else you would want.Did they run 7 step drops at NC State? Legit question (I do not know the answer), but again, he is the only guy in memory to rip it up at two different BCS conference schools...it is kind of my point, in that he seems to be "plug and play"...more so than any other prospect we have seen.His offensive line may have been big in Wisconsin but what doesn't get mentioned is that Wisconsin tailored their offense to help Wilson. Instead of taking 3 or 5 step drops they ran more 7 step drops. I imagine the same will have to be done in Seattle.That's the part that always seems to get lost...I think Waldman had the stat in another thread, but I believe his "shortest" lineman at Wisconsin was a 6'4 Center. All of the Centers drafted in the NFL the past five drafts are 6'4 or shorter. While some say he won't have a line like that in the NFL, truth is, he is one of the few we know that can succeed behind an NFL sized line.It is likely that I am a bigger Badger fan than all but 100 or so people in the world. So while I'm certainly biased, I know a lot about Russell Wilson.
Wilson has all the skills necessary to be successful in the NFL. He has intelligence, character, leadership, and work ethic that are off the charts. He makes less than 1 bad decision per game. I love the stat about how many passes Wilson got knocked down, but the NFL is a completely different game, so it's tough to know how much that tells us. I will say that the UW line was gigantic, so it's not like his OL will be any bigger.
Like Mel Kiper said when he was drafted, if Wilson can't succeed in the NFL, no short QB should ever be drafted again because the only thing that Wilson doesn't have is height. It's nearly impossible to predict QB success in the NFL, though, so who knows.
Bottom line, though, is that he's not in a position to be fantasy relevant for the next couple of years. It's really hard for me to believe that Seattle is going to pay Matt Flynn ~$8M / year to backup Wilson. My hope is that Seattle ends up trading one of the two guys.
We are green out here.'bonesman said:Date: Wed May 9, 2012Show: Brock and SalkSeahawks coach Pete Carroll talks about Russell Wilson's skills, getting the team's 10 draft picks on the practice field, how the NFL's emphasis on player safety affects the future of the game, and more.http://mynorthwest.com/?nid=577&a=9941444&p=3&n=pretty good interview... I liked the part where they talked about giving the rooks iPads with a playbook app to save paper.
Obviously the odds are against him... but I think he has more of a chance than he's been given in the press so far... though I expect the tables to turn on that front quite rapidly. In fact this article was posted about an hr agoWilson shows few shortcomingsDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
The devil is in the details with contracts. The Seahawks could cut Flynn after next season and only be out $10 million. Also, the contract is actually for 3 years $19 million. The rest is in bonuses if he puts up big numbers.Basically, I think Flynn has his shot to take the job and keep it this year. But if he doesn't, the Seahawks can cut bait pretty easily and relatively inexpensively in the grand scheme of things. And even if they don't cut him, Wilson is making less than $1 million a year, they could afford to pay Flynn $6 million per year to back him up. A combined $7 million for your top 2 QBs would be cheaper than pretty much 90% of the teams in the NFL.It is likely that I am a bigger Badger fan than all but 100 or so people in the world. So while I'm certainly biased, I know a lot about Russell Wilson.
Wilson has all the skills necessary to be successful in the NFL. He has intelligence, character, leadership, and work ethic that are off the charts. He makes less than 1 bad decision per game. I love the stat about how many passes Wilson got knocked down, but the NFL is a completely different game, so it's tough to know how much that tells us. I will say that the UW line was gigantic, so it's not like his OL will be any bigger.
Like Mel Kiper said when he was drafted, if Wilson can't succeed in the NFL, no short QB should ever be drafted again because the only thing that Wilson doesn't have is height. It's nearly impossible to predict QB success in the NFL, though, so who knows.
Bottom line, though, is that he's not in a position to be fantasy relevant for the next couple of years. It's really hard for me to believe that Seattle is going to pay Matt Flynn ~$8M / year to backup Wilson. My hope is that Seattle ends up trading one of the two guys.
If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
Call it a hunch but yeah, I do.Do you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
Name one.There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
Victor Cruz 2010Name one.There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
Lol. I meant a quarterback.Victor Cruz 2010Name one.There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
There have also been many times in the history of football where the better player started.There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
That is mostly the case, just not always the case.There have also been many times in the history of football where the better player started.There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
Kurt Warner 2001Lol. I meant a quarterback.Victor Cruz 2010Name one.There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
I'm fishing actually. I'll stop.Kurt Warner 2001Lol. I meant a quarterback.Victor Cruz 2010Name one.There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?
I know. I actually had a lot of examples, but some were debatable like Aaron Rodgers behind Favre. I only threw out examples that were obvious.I'm fishing actually. I'll stop.Kurt Warner 2001Lol. I meant a quarterback.Victor Cruz 2010Name one.There have been many times in the history of football where the backup is better than the starter.If he is the best in camp he will startDo you guys think he is going to get an opportunity in 2012?