What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Teddy Bridgewater (2 Viewers)

All I'm saying is i don't think there are as many "smokescreens" as some people are insinuating. The questions being raised on all of these prospects are seemingly legitimate. Once the tape is off the NFL evaluators really get to probe these kids, and they tend to focus on the negative aspects of their games more than the positive ones. Especially in the top half of the first round. Somebody has to fall. They can't all be picked in the top 10.
This I can get on board with. I still tend to think he is a franchise NFL qb and will not slip out of the first round. Sometimes NFL GM's whiff as they over think things. Russel Wilson slipped as the negatives were stacked up against him as well.

 
All I'm saying is i don't think there are as many "smokescreens" as some people are insinuating. The questions being raised on all of these prospects are seemingly legitimate. Once the tape is off the NFL evaluators really get to probe these kids, and they tend to focus on the negative aspects of their games more than the positive ones. Especially in the top half of the first round. Somebody has to fall. They can't all be picked in the top 10.
I don't necessarily disagree with you. I'm not sure if Teddy is a franchise caliber guy to be honest. I've got concerns. He's probably a top 10 pick due to QB demand. None the less, he's the top QB in this draft IMO.
 
All I'm saying is i don't think there are as many "smokescreens" as some people are insinuating. The questions being raised on all of these prospects are seemingly legitimate. Once the tape is off the NFL evaluators really get to probe these kids, and they tend to focus on the negative aspects of their games more than the positive ones. Especially in the top half of the first round. Somebody has to fall. They can't all be picked in the top 10.
I don't necessarily disagree with you. I'm not sure if Teddy is a franchise caliber guy to be honest. I've got concerns. He's probably a top 10 pick due to QB demand. None the less, he's the top QB in this draft IMO.
There was a QB demand last year and only one went in the first round. I think teams are learning from the Gabbert/Ponder type mistakes.

 
All I'm saying is i don't think there are as many "smokescreens" as some people are insinuating. The questions being raised on all of these prospects are seemingly legitimate. Once the tape is off the NFL evaluators really get to probe these kids, and they tend to focus on the negative aspects of their games more than the positive ones. Especially in the top half of the first round. Somebody has to fall. They can't all be picked in the top 10.
I don't necessarily disagree with you. I'm not sure if Teddy is a franchise caliber guy to be honest. I've got concerns. He's probably a top 10 pick due to QB demand. None the less, he's the top QB in this draft IMO.
There was a QB demand last year and only one went in the first round. I think teams are learning from the Gabbert/Ponder type mistakes.
Bridgewater is better than anyone in last years group so it shouldn't matter much for him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All I'm saying is i don't think there are as many "smokescreens" as some people are insinuating. The questions being raised on all of these prospects are seemingly legitimate. Once the tape is off the NFL evaluators really get to probe these kids, and they tend to focus on the negative aspects of their games more than the positive ones. Especially in the top half of the first round. Somebody has to fall. They can't all be picked in the top 10.
I don't necessarily disagree with you. I'm not sure if Teddy is a franchise caliber guy to be honest. I've got concerns. He's probably a top 10 pick due to QB demand. None the less, he's the top QB in this draft IMO.
He's best all-around QB IMO. I can see him as a good starter even if he never becomes elite.

However, I can see Manziel being higher for a team willing (and able) to design around his strengths and weaknesses. Manziel with the Vikings could be very successful, with the Jags, not so much.

 
Davis: Teddy Bridgewater too good not to rise again in draftBy Mike Huguenin

College Football 24/7 writer

Excerpt:

Louisville quarterback Teddy Bridgewater has been disparaged and seen his game picked apart the past few weeks, but he remains the class of the quarterback class in this draft, NFL Media analyst Daniel Jeremiah says.

Jeremiah had Bridgewater as the leader of his top tier of quarterbacks Monday on NFL Network's "Path to the Draft." Fellow analyst Curtis Conway also has Bridgewater No. 1, and while analyst Charles Davis has Texas A&M's Johnny Manziel as his top signal-caller, he said he believes Bridgewater is due to rise again on draft boards.

"It's not a huge disagreement," Davis said. "I like Manziel at No. 1 ... but I think Bridgewater at No. 2 -- he's going to rise again. He's getting beat up all the time now. That's too much for me. I've watched too much production from him to get beat up like that."

Bridgewater, once considered by many a potential No. 1 overall pick, has seen his stock plummet after a much-criticized pro day workout that NFL Media analyst Mike Mayock described as "average at best."

In NFL.com's latest mock drafts, Bridgewater is still projected by most analysts to be a top-10 pick. Jeremiah actually has Bridgewater going No. 26 to the Browns, but he has said that projection has less to do with his personal evaluation of Bridgewater and more about the current buzz in NFL circles.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bridgewater/Manziel breaks as a "real football"/fantasy football distinction for me. If I was doing this for real as an NFL GM I'd feel really good about drafting Bridgewater and getting a guy who I think I could win with. He's smart, accurate, had consistent college production, and when he played against top competition (more rarely than ideal, sure) he looked very good. In dynasty FF, I prefer Manziel. Bridgewater is an underrated fantasy prospect in my opinion, but if Manziel hits--and I think he will--he could hit big.

 
Bridgewater/Manziel breaks as a "real football"/fantasy football distinction for me. If I was doing this for real as an NFL GM I'd feel really good about drafting Bridgewater and getting a guy who I think I could win with. He's smart, accurate, had consistent college production, and when he played against top competition (more rarely than ideal, sure) he looked very good. In dynasty FF, I prefer Manziel. Bridgewater is an underrated fantasy prospect in my opinion, but if Manziel hits--and I think he will--he could hit big.
I agree. If Manziel "hits" then he's going to be a commodity. But what about if Bridgewater "hits" too? I think for all the talk of Manziel hitting people are kind of discounted the upside of Bridgewater. For instance, I think Manziel's upside is between Russell Wilson and Michael Vick. I'd put Bridgewater's Matt Ryan and Aaron Rodgers.

Now I don't know if I'd say that Manziel is more likely to hit his upside than Bridgewater. If anything I think I'd give the edge to Teddy on who is more likely to actually approach their upside. Teddy for me all day pre draft.

 
Bridgewater/Manziel breaks as a "real football"/fantasy football distinction for me. If I was doing this for real as an NFL GM I'd feel really good about drafting Bridgewater and getting a guy who I think I could win with. He's smart, accurate, had consistent college production, and when he played against top competition (more rarely than ideal, sure) he looked very good. In dynasty FF, I prefer Manziel. Bridgewater is an underrated fantasy prospect in my opinion, but if Manziel hits--and I think he will--he could hit big.
I agree with this assessment. From a practical standpoint, Teddy Bridgewater is the high floor, lower ceiling guy. If I'm an NFL GM and I need an upgrade at QB, there's no doubt that Bridgewater can provide a quick return on investment. He's got a skill set that is hard to see busting at the next level, and will be at least a competent game manager. But that's not too exciting for fantasy, where he's with the Sam Bradford and maybe Andy Dalton tier. QB2 with low QB1 upside.

Johnny Manziel is more of a wildcard, depending on where he lands and what coordinator he pairs up with, and of course his offensive weapons. He could be really really good, or he could flame out. He's got solid mid level QB1 upside with room to grow. If I'm drafting a rookie QB, since there are already so many good QB's on QB1 tier, I'd take the upside of Manziel over the safe but boring floor of Bridgewater.

 
Bridgewater/Manziel breaks as a "real football"/fantasy football distinction for me. If I was doing this for real as an NFL GM I'd feel really good about drafting Bridgewater and getting a guy who I think I could win with. He's smart, accurate, had consistent college production, and when he played against top competition (more rarely than ideal, sure) he looked very good. In dynasty FF, I prefer Manziel. Bridgewater is an underrated fantasy prospect in my opinion, but if Manziel hits--and I think he will--he could hit big.
I agree with this assessment. From a practical standpoint, Teddy Bridgewater is the high floor, lower ceiling guy. If I'm an NFL GM and I need an upgrade at QB, there's no doubt that Bridgewater can provide a quick return on investment. He's got a skill set that is hard to see busting at the next level, and will be at least a competent game manager. But that's not too exciting for fantasy, where he's with the Sam Bradford and maybe Andy Dalton tier. QB2 with low QB1 upside.

Johnny Manziel is more of a wildcard, depending on where he lands and what coordinator he pairs up with, and of course his offensive weapons. He could be really really good, or he could flame out. He's got solid mid level QB1 upside with room to grow. If I'm drafting a rookie QB, since there are already so many good QB's on QB1 tier, I'd take the upside of Manziel over the safe but boring floor of Bridgewater.
I don't necessarily think Bridgewater's ceiling is lower than Manziel. He's not limited in any way really. Not sure why this is assumed.

 
Bridgewater/Manziel breaks as a "real football"/fantasy football distinction for me. If I was doing this for real as an NFL GM I'd feel really good about drafting Bridgewater and getting a guy who I think I could win with. He's smart, accurate, had consistent college production, and when he played against top competition (more rarely than ideal, sure) he looked very good. In dynasty FF, I prefer Manziel. Bridgewater is an underrated fantasy prospect in my opinion, but if Manziel hits--and I think he will--he could hit big.
I agree with this assessment. From a practical standpoint, Teddy Bridgewater is the high floor, lower ceiling guy. If I'm an NFL GM and I need an upgrade at QB, there's no doubt that Bridgewater can provide a quick return on investment. He's got a skill set that is hard to see busting at the next level, and will be at least a competent game manager. But that's not too exciting for fantasy, where he's with the Sam Bradford and maybe Andy Dalton tier. QB2 with low QB1 upside.

Johnny Manziel is more of a wildcard, depending on where he lands and what coordinator he pairs up with, and of course his offensive weapons. He could be really really good, or he could flame out. He's got solid mid level QB1 upside with room to grow. If I'm drafting a rookie QB, since there are already so many good QB's on QB1 tier, I'd take the upside of Manziel over the safe but boring floor of Bridgewater.
I don't necessarily think Bridgewater's ceiling is lower than Manziel. He's not limited in any way really. Not sure why this is assumed.
Despite the interesting link that Faust put up yesterday explaining why Bridgewater's deep ball accuracy is underrated, I've seen plenty of tape on Bridgewater that tells me he doesn't have the gun to make defenses pay for crowding the LOS. He's too in love with the intermediate and short game. And that's fine, he's excellent there. But at the next level, coordinators can game plan for those short game tendencies and force him out of his comfort zone. From a non-fantasy, NFL perspective, I like Teddy B the best of all the QB's. But to me his upside is Andy Dalton. Sorry, but I can't get excited about Andy Dalton in fantasy. He can lead your favorite team to the playoffs, but he's not going to win you any fantasy football league championships.

 
Bridgewater/Manziel breaks as a "real football"/fantasy football distinction for me. If I was doing this for real as an NFL GM I'd feel really good about drafting Bridgewater and getting a guy who I think I could win with. He's smart, accurate, had consistent college production, and when he played against top competition (more rarely than ideal, sure) he looked very good. In dynasty FF, I prefer Manziel. Bridgewater is an underrated fantasy prospect in my opinion, but if Manziel hits--and I think he will--he could hit big.
I agree with this assessment. From a practical standpoint, Teddy Bridgewater is the high floor, lower ceiling guy. If I'm an NFL GM and I need an upgrade at QB, there's no doubt that Bridgewater can provide a quick return on investment. He's got a skill set that is hard to see busting at the next level, and will be at least a competent game manager. But that's not too exciting for fantasy, where he's with the Sam Bradford and maybe Andy Dalton tier. QB2 with low QB1 upside.

Johnny Manziel is more of a wildcard, depending on where he lands and what coordinator he pairs up with, and of course his offensive weapons. He could be really really good, or he could flame out. He's got solid mid level QB1 upside with room to grow. If I'm drafting a rookie QB, since there are already so many good QB's on QB1 tier, I'd take the upside of Manziel over the safe but boring floor of Bridgewater.
I don't necessarily think Bridgewater's ceiling is lower than Manziel. He's not limited in any way really. Not sure why this is assumed.
Despite the interesting link that Faust put up yesterday explaining why Bridgewater's deep ball accuracy is underrated, I've seen plenty of tape on Bridgewater that tells me he doesn't have the gun to make defenses pay for crowding the LOS. He's too in love with the intermediate and short game. And that's fine, he's excellent there. But at the next level, coordinators can game plan for those short game tendencies and force him out of his comfort zone. From a non-fantasy, NFL perspective, I like Teddy B the best of all the QB's. But to me his upside is Andy Dalton. Sorry, but I can't get excited about Andy Dalton in fantasy. He can lead your favorite team to the playoffs, but he's not going to win you any fantasy football league championships.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that was a knock on Matt Ryan coming out of BC and there was even some minor criticism of Luck at Stanford for relying too much on shorter throws when that was just what their offense was built around. I wouldn't be surprised if that is something Teddy shows differently at the next level.

 
Bridge water is a much better prospect than Dalton was. I think Dalton is closer to his floor than his ceiling. Russel Wilson is a better comp than Daltob.

 
2014 NFL Draft: Bridgewater to Vikings?

By Jeff Reynolds | NFLDraftScout.com

Louisville quarterback Teddy Bridgewater worked out for the Minnesota Vikings on Saturday and stuck around for an extended visit with the team through Monday.

The multi-day trip is the latest signal from the Vikings that quarterback is again a priority in the 2014 draft. The Vikings pick eighth overall and the 2012 Big East Offensive Player of the Year could still be available.

He had a below-average showing at his March 17 pro day in Louisville with Vikings head coach Mike Zimmer and general manager Rick Spielman present.

Spielman said in February that the Vikings are taking a very close look at the position despite investing in multiple passers in recent years.

Minnesota re-signed quarterback Matt Cassell to a two-year contract in March, but 2011 first-round pick Christian Ponder could be traded or released. The 12th overall pick has been inconsistent in two-plus seasons as a starter.

Before drafting Ponder, the Vikings last invested a first-round pick in a quarterback when they selected Daunte Culpepper with the 11th overall pick in 1999.

Bridgewater is the top pro-style quarterback in the draft. While many analysts openly pounded the sledgehammer after Bridgewater's pro day, he is the top available quarterback on Dane Brugler's latest top 100 and is projected by NFLDraftScout.com as a top 10 pick.

With the Cardinals, he operated under center -- especially early last season -- and out of the shotgun. Offensive coordinator Norv Turner offered one of very few positive reviews of Bridgewater's on-campus workout, saying he was "pretty good." Turner's offense utilizes play-action and downfield throws, and deep accuracy was one concern voiced by scouts in attendance at Bridgewater's March throwing session.

Some compare Bridgewater's QB skill set to former No. 1 overall pick Alex Smith, who was a Turner pupil in San Francisco. If the Vikings are comfortable with what they saw from him at their facility in Eden Prairie last weekend, the marriage makes sense. If not, there is no reason for Spielman and Zimmer to repeat the panicked Ponder mistake.

Fresno State's Derek Carr and Eastern Illinois' Jimmy Garroppolo are options for the Vikings if they choose to move back in the draft or follow Spielman's recent history of trading back into the first round for multiple picks. The Vikings dealt back into the first round each of the past two years, adding wide receiver Cordarrelle Patterson (29th overall) last year and safety Harrison Smith (29th) in 2012
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bridgewater/Manziel breaks as a "real football"/fantasy football distinction for me. If I was doing this for real as an NFL GM I'd feel really good about drafting Bridgewater and getting a guy who I think I could win with. He's smart, accurate, had consistent college production, and when he played against top competition (more rarely than ideal, sure) he looked very good. In dynasty FF, I prefer Manziel. Bridgewater is an underrated fantasy prospect in my opinion, but if Manziel hits--and I think he will--he could hit big.
I agree with this assessment. From a practical standpoint, Teddy Bridgewater is the high floor, lower ceiling guy. If I'm an NFL GM and I need an upgrade at QB, there's no doubt that Bridgewater can provide a quick return on investment. He's got a skill set that is hard to see busting at the next level, and will be at least a competent game manager. But that's not too exciting for fantasy, where he's with the Sam Bradford and maybe Andy Dalton tier. QB2 with low QB1 upside.

Johnny Manziel is more of a wildcard, depending on where he lands and what coordinator he pairs up with, and of course his offensive weapons. He could be really really good, or he could flame out. He's got solid mid level QB1 upside with room to grow. If I'm drafting a rookie QB, since there are already so many good QB's on QB1 tier, I'd take the upside of Manziel over the safe but boring floor of Bridgewater.
I don't necessarily think Bridgewater's ceiling is lower than Manziel. He's not limited in any way really. Not sure why this is assumed.
You may be right, and I personally have only a hair's difference between both of them. I'm assuming extra points from rushing for Manziel which has helped even mediocre QBs have extra value for FF. Also, I think Manziel has a slightly better arm. But I do agree with your post further up that Bridgewater's ceiling could be Rodgers. I think Manziel's perceived value, if not his combined production, could be something like RG3's rookie season; I think that's the image that sticks in my mind, even if their games are pretty different.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But to me his upside is Andy Dalton. Sorry, but I can't get excited about Andy Dalton in fantasy. He can lead your favorite team to the playoffs, but he's not going to win you any fantasy football league championships.
If he lands in a good situation, I think Dalton is TB's upside during his rookie year and his floor once he hits his stride.

I think his "upside" is between Ryan and Brady. Not saying he'll get there, as a lot of unknowns remain about his eventual situation, but he has that kind of potential IMO.

 
But to me his upside is Andy Dalton. Sorry, but I can't get excited about Andy Dalton in fantasy. He can lead your favorite team to the playoffs, but he's not going to win you any fantasy football league championships.
If he lands in a good situation, I think Dalton is TB's upside during his rookie year and his floor once he hits his stride.

I think his "upside" is between Ryan and Brady. Not saying he'll get there, as a lot of unknowns remain about his eventual situation, but he has that kind of potential IMO.
I think he'll be solid and really think he's got a solid stable floor. Maybe I could push his upside to Matt Ryan if he has the right weapons around him, but I'm sorry that I don't share your optimism that he will ever be as good as a Peyton (or Brady). I'm not seeing that. But then again, I don't consider Ryan an "elite" QB the way some people do.

 
LawFitz said:
Jordan Matthews visiting today.

My wet dream...

1.5 Teddy Bridgewater

2.5 Jordan Matthews

Sadly though, we've had visits from Carr, Manziel and Bortles, but not Teddy. Either that's a smokescreen or the Raiders have decided they're not interested. :kicksrock:
Really? I thought the Raiders managed an interview with him after his pro day workout? In any case, there has been a lot of scuttlebutt about how Bridgewater didn't handle his interviews well. Had a lot of scouts shaking their head. I don't have any details or links to that, just what I've heard. I am thinking there's too much smoke to just be a smokescreen. I expect Bridgewater to fall deep into the mid or even late first round.

 
LawFitz said:
Jordan Matthews visiting today.

My wet dream...

1.5 Teddy Bridgewater

2.5 Jordan Matthews

Sadly though, we've had visits from Carr, Manziel and Bortles, but not Teddy. Either that's a smokescreen or the Raiders have decided they're not interested. :kicksrock:
Really? I thought the Raiders managed an interview with him after his pro day workout? In any case, there has been a lot of scuttlebutt about how Bridgewater didn't handle his interviews well. Had a lot of scouts shaking their head. I don't have any details or links to that, just what I've heard. I am thinking there's too much smoke to just be a smokescreen. I expect Bridgewater to fall deep into the mid or even late first round.
With all the noise being said about him, he's guarantee that he'll be a top 10 pick.

 
LawFitz said:
Jordan Matthews visiting today.

My wet dream...

1.5 Teddy Bridgewater

2.5 Jordan Matthews

Sadly though, we've had visits from Carr, Manziel and Bortles, but not Teddy. Either that's a smokescreen or the Raiders have decided they're not interested. :kicksrock:
Really? I thought the Raiders managed an interview with him after his pro day workout? In any case, there has been a lot of scuttlebutt about how Bridgewater didn't handle his interviews well. Had a lot of scouts shaking their head. I don't have any details or links to that, just what I've heard. I am thinking there's too much smoke to just be a smokescreen. I expect Bridgewater to fall deep into the mid or even late first round.
Sorry that post was meant for the Raiders thread. Deleted it here and posted it there.

That said, can you provide link(s) for the bolded. I haven't read that anywhere. Just some BS Chris Mortensen tripe that his private workouts haven't been going well, which was later debunked (he had only one private workout at that point, and it did go well).

 
LawFitz said:
Jordan Matthews visiting today.

My wet dream...

1.5 Teddy Bridgewater

2.5 Jordan Matthews

Sadly though, we've had visits from Carr, Manziel and Bortles, but not Teddy. Either that's a smokescreen or the Raiders have decided they're not interested. :kicksrock:
Really? I thought the Raiders managed an interview with him after his pro day workout? In any case, there has been a lot of scuttlebutt about how Bridgewater didn't handle his interviews well. Had a lot of scouts shaking their head. I don't have any details or links to that, just what I've heard. I am thinking there's too much smoke to just be a smokescreen. I expect Bridgewater to fall deep into the mid or even late first round.
Sorry that post was meant for the Raiders thread. Deleted it here and posted it there.

That said, can you provide link(s) for the bolded. I haven't read that anywhere. Just some BS Chris Mortensen tripe that his private workouts haven't been going well, which was later debunked (he had only one private workout at that point, and it did go well).
I can't access youtube from here, but last night live on youtube, Sigmund Bloom and some of his pals conducted a live mock draft. I don't remember the other guys names, (bleacher report NFL writers) but they mentioned Bridgewater's interview problems like it was common knowledge. FWIW, in that draft, Bridgewater fell to the Jets and everyone seemed to be ok with that even though they just drafted Geno last year. I'm not buying that move by the Jets though.

 
Bridgewater/Manziel breaks as a "real football"/fantasy football distinction for me. If I was doing this for real as an NFL GM I'd feel really good about drafting Bridgewater and getting a guy who I think I could win with. He's smart, accurate, had consistent college production, and when he played against top competition (more rarely than ideal, sure) he looked very good. In dynasty FF, I prefer Manziel. Bridgewater is an underrated fantasy prospect in my opinion, but if Manziel hits--and I think he will--he could hit big.
I agree with this assessment. From a practical standpoint, Teddy Bridgewater is the high floor, lower ceiling guy. If I'm an NFL GM and I need an upgrade at QB, there's no doubt that Bridgewater can provide a quick return on investment. He's got a skill set that is hard to see busting at the next level, and will be at least a competent game manager. But that's not too exciting for fantasy, where he's with the Sam Bradford and maybe Andy Dalton tier. QB2 with low QB1 upside.

Johnny Manziel is more of a wildcard, depending on where he lands and what coordinator he pairs up with, and of course his offensive weapons. He could be really really good, or he could flame out. He's got solid mid level QB1 upside with room to grow. If I'm drafting a rookie QB, since there are already so many good QB's on QB1 tier, I'd take the upside of Manziel over the safe but boring floor of Bridgewater.
I don't necessarily think Bridgewater's ceiling is lower than Manziel. He's not limited in any way really. Not sure why this is assumed.
Despite the interesting link that Faust put up yesterday explaining why Bridgewater's deep ball accuracy is underrated, I've seen plenty of tape on Bridgewater that tells me he doesn't have the gun to make defenses pay for crowding the LOS. He's too in love with the intermediate and short game. And that's fine, he's excellent there. But at the next level, coordinators can game plan for those short game tendencies and force him out of his comfort zone. From a non-fantasy, NFL perspective, I like Teddy B the best of all the QB's. But to me his upside is Andy Dalton. Sorry, but I can't get excited about Andy Dalton in fantasy. He can lead your favorite team to the playoffs, but he's not going to win you any fantasy football league championships.
The same way coordinators game plan for the short game tendencies of Peyton Manning and Tom Brady?

Brady threw 74.4% of his attempts in the 0-20 yard range. Manning at 73.9%. Someone with a big arm like Foles who actually takes his shots downfield is at 59.9%.

Keep in mind Dalton has AJ Green to throw to. I'd love to see Bridgewater on a team with a Green-level talent.

 
Has there ever been a consensus #1 QB during their final season that ended up becoming SOD? I guess Aaron is close, but him and Smith were always neck and neck.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't think of another prospect who's opinion is so split among the press and "NFL sources". The press watches the tape and almost unanimously agrees that Bridgewater is a top 10 talent. While the "NFL sources" are lukewarm at best and consider him to be no more than a late first or early second rounder. The media is made up of a lot of ex-scouts so this is surprising. I don't know if I can accept the reports of Teddy Bridgewater's upcoming draft slide until I see it. I still will not be surprised to see him go in the top 8 picks.

There are so many dream scenarios where QB needy teams can take a stud in the early first round and still get Teddy Bridgewater in the second round. In Evan Silva's mock draft for instance, Bridgewater falls all the way to pick #39 JAX, while the Raiders take Derek Carr at pick #36. I cannot envision a scenario where that happens. Jacksonville fans would be throwing a party.

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/46936/60/silvas-two-round-mock-draft

 
I can't think of another prospect who's opinion is so split among the press and "NFL sources". The press watches the tape and almost unanimously agrees that Bridgewater is a top 10 talent. While the "NFL sources" are lukewarm at best and consider him to be no more than a late first or early second rounder. The media is made up of a lot of ex-scouts so this is surprising. I don't know if I can accept the reports of Teddy Bridgewater's upcoming draft slide until I see it. I still will not be surprised to see him go in the top 8 picks.

There are so many dream scenarios where QB needy teams can take a stud in the early first round and still get Teddy Bridgewater in the second round. In Evan Silva's mock draft for instance, Bridgewater falls all the way to pick #39 JAX, while the Raiders take Derek Carr at pick #36. I cannot envision a scenario where that happens. Jacksonville fans would be throwing a party.

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/46936/60/silvas-two-round-mock-draft
Last year at this time everyone was talking about Geno Smith about a top 10 pick and possibly #1 overall. He went middle of round two.

 
I can't think of another prospect who's opinion is so split among the press and "NFL sources". The press watches the tape and almost unanimously agrees that Bridgewater is a top 10 talent. While the "NFL sources" are lukewarm at best and consider him to be no more than a late first or early second rounder. The media is made up of a lot of ex-scouts so this is surprising. I don't know if I can accept the reports of Teddy Bridgewater's upcoming draft slide until I see it. I still will not be surprised to see him go in the top 8 picks.

There are so many dream scenarios where QB needy teams can take a stud in the early first round and still get Teddy Bridgewater in the second round. In Evan Silva's mock draft for instance, Bridgewater falls all the way to pick #39 JAX, while the Raiders take Derek Carr at pick #36. I cannot envision a scenario where that happens. Jacksonville fans would be throwing a party.

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/46936/60/silvas-two-round-mock-draft
Last year at this time everyone was talking about Geno Smith about a top 10 pick and possibly #1 overall. He went middle of round two.
Yeah, and as a Teddy Bridgewater fan who thinks he's nothing like Geno, I hope against hope that he somehow falls to the early second round.

 
Kiper has Teddy falling to the second round.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/04/18/teddy-bridgewater-falls-to-second-round-in-mel-kipers-latest-mock-draft/

Teddy Bridgewater falls to second round in Mel Kiper’s latest mock draftPosted by Curtis Crabtree on April 18, 2014, 2:19 AM EDT

For most of the fall, Louisville quarterback Teddy Bridgewater was talked about as being almost a lock to be the first quarterback selected in the NFL Draft and perhaps the first overall selection by the Houston Texans.

As the draft has drawn closer, that sentiment no longer seems to be the case. However, Bridgewater still seems likely to be one of the first few quarterbacks when the draft finally gets here on May 8. That hasn’t stopped a somewhat unexpected projected from Mel Kiper in his latest mock draft for ESPN.com on Thursday.

Kiper has Bridgewater falling out of the first round with the Houston Texans selecting him with the first pick of the second round.

Kiper’s reasoning is as follows:

“Let me be clear: This is the top-rated quarterback on my Big Board, a player I have rated higher than Bortles, Manziel or Carr,” Kiper wrote. “But my reading of the tea leaves in speaking with many evaluators around the league is that Bridgewater could drop if he slides past a couple of points early on. If I could project trades, I’d have someone taking him later in Round 1 having moved up. Obviously, he’s a steal at this point.”

Perhaps this is the tangible result of the draft being pushed back an extra two weeks. More time is available for front offices to out-think themselves or for teams to disparage a prospect in the hope he falls farther down on the draft board. It seems somewhat crazy that a quarterback some people still rank as the best in this draft could fall out of the first round based on a non-stellar pro day or workout instead of the performances at Louisville that grabbed the attention of scouts in the first place.
 
I really don't get the growing doubt. I'll be scooping him up everywhere I can.
where would you begin taking him??
I am a Brees owner looking for his eventual successor. I own picks 1.1, 1.8 and 1.9 in my rookie draft and am strongly considering Manziel and Bridgewater at 1.8 and 1.9 if they are there, hoping one of them hit big. I am afraid both will be gone by middle of the 2nd........

 
Phil Savage said that 'to a man" every NFL talent evaluator he had spoken to said that Teddy Bridgewater was not a top-ten pick.

Savage says he could see Bridgewater dropping to the second round ALA Geno Smith.

Quick two minute audio clip where Phil gives the insight he has on Teddy.

Insightful stuff from Phil Savage, good listen.

https://soundcloud.com/#siriusxmsports/former-gm-phil-savage-says-that-teams-dont-think-teddy-bridgewater-is-a-top-10-pickSiriusXM Sports

Former GM Phil Savage says that teams don't think Teddy Bridgewater is a top 10 pick

Former GM Phil Savage says that teams don't think Teddy Bridgewater is a top 10 pick on Late Hits.

Hear former GM Phil Savage every Thursday night on Late Hits with Alex Marvez from 7 - 11 pm ET., only on SiriusXM NFL Radio Channel 88!
 
I respect Phil Savage's insight but I still suspect smokescreen. This will be the opposite of Geno. By draft night everyone will be predicting Teddy to fall and then will be surprised when the Vikings take him at #8.

 
After reading Mark Dominik's 'scouting report' on Bridgewater i am absolutely stunned he got fired. Stunned I tell ya.

 
I respect Phil Savage's insight but I still suspect smokescreen. This will be the opposite of Geno. By draft night everyone will be predicting Teddy to fall and then will be surprised when the Vikings take him at #8.
I believe that one team can sustain a smokescreen (like potentially the Rams leading teams to believe they're going to draft a QB or Clowney so that someone will trade up and they can still get an OT and more picks) but I don't believe the whole league can keep up something like this. That being said, it only takes one team to like him to take him.

I don't think he's a top 10 pick but I'm still not sure he falls into the 2nd

 
Bridgewater slipping into the second round is now consistent in both ESPN and NFLN echo chambers. It's always tough (at least in my opinion) to know what's being manufactured by the networks as "news"(e.g. ESPN's habit of having one of their analysts say something controversial and then spending 3 days debating it as "the latest talk out there....") and what's reflective of league sources' actual statements (and even then, as several people have noted, you never know when these are strategic leaks). Any which way if Bridgewater really does fall to the second round I just don't get it. It'll provide an opportunity for any of us who like him to wait/trade into spots to grab him later than before, considering the way that dynasty drafters often respond to the NFL draft.

 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/04/18/mark-dominik-teddy-bridgewaters-problems-go-beyond-pro-day/

Mark Dominik: Teddy Bridgewater’s problems go beyond Pro DayPosted by Michael David Smith on April 18, 2014, 5:43 PM EDT

Former Louisville quarterback Teddy Bridgewater’s draft stock has appeared to decline dramatically in recent weeks, as a disappointing Pro Day has led to talk that he’s not the potential No. 1 overall pick that he was proclaimed to be during the 2013 season. But one NFL personnel man says that in reality, Bridgewater’s stock was never that high to begin with.

Mark Dominik, the former Buccaneers general manager who now serves as an analyst for ESPN, said on NFL Live that he doesn’t believe Bridgewater’s Pro Day is a problem so much as his skinny frame, as well as the fact that Bridgewater didn’t always look like an elite passer on tape.

“There were things you saw on tape when you watched him,” Dominik said. “Something that scouts internally, we talked about it in Tampa with Teddy Bridgewater last year. Is he really the premiere quarterback? I like the young man, I think he’s a quality individual, he’s got character and leadership and those things. But this is a quarterback, and you’re judged by what quarterback you draft, and I think Teddy Bridgewater might not have all the pieces you’re looking for.

Dominik indicated that if teams with Top 5 picks like the Texans, Jaguars and Browns are interested in Bridgewater, their interest is in hoping Bridgewater falls all the way out of the first round and is still available early in the second round. That’s a long fall from where most people thought Bridgewater would be drafted.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top