gruecd
Footballguy
Good luck!! And congrats on the mileage PRs!!!The_Man said:To that end, I'm one of two finalists for a job I really want -- it would be closer to home, less hours, and would probably let me do the 18/55. Hoping to hear today!
Good luck!! And congrats on the mileage PRs!!!The_Man said:To that end, I'm one of two finalists for a job I really want -- it would be closer to home, less hours, and would probably let me do the 18/55. Hoping to hear today!
oofthat's todayoh i'm stretching alright
i think what did me in is that the plan doubled my total run time from Friday last week to Monday this week.
Got my first opening day 15 bird limit ever. Absolutely unfire with the scatter gun. Probably converted at a 75% clip, although some took multiple shots. Lost two birds in the soy bean jungle. 4 of us hunted for a total of 29 birds. They didn't want theirs so my freezer is nicely stocked!!!Just looking for some confirmation on the bolded.Sunday is traditionally my day off. I went out early for some dove hunting. I got blanked. I certainly had opportunity but I am just a bad shot.Here is how I did today:mile 1 9:59I put 29:19 as my 5k time. I am looking to do a tempo run tomorrow. I set my Garmin to alert me if I fall below a pace of 9:55 or above 10:21. I got those numbers from Mcmillan site.
Also I am assuming if I follow the Mcmillan pacing that I will get faster with time. As I get faster I put in new times and get different paces, correct?
mile 2 10:07
mile 3 10:22
mile 4 10:42
mile 5 10:45
mile 6 11:06
mile 7 12:32 This last mile was quite a bit of a cool down walk. This was not a full mile either (.88 mile)
Total 6.88 miles, avg pace 10:58, max HR 177, avg HR 164
Mile one I was having a hard time staying above 9:55 as time went on I had a hard time staying under 10:21. I guess that is the point of the training? As I do this more I should get better/faster, correct?
Let's break this down. You won't drive a car with a bald tire where if something goes bad you have 3 remaining tires plus airbags and a ton of steel around you but you'll ride a questionable bike tire where a failure on a descent leaves nothing but 1mm of spandex between you and the road at 30 mph???If the tires have developed a significant flat spot where they were rounded I'd start shopping. I generally get 2000 mi (more on the front) and probably push it a tad to far.FUBAR said:Quick question regarding the bike: my tires are balding almost as much as I am. Is it a real problem to ride on bald tires? I never would with the car but the bike seems different. Is there an easy way to tell when you've worn the tires down too much before they wear through?
Ditto that.Good luck!! And congrats on the mileage PRs!!!The_Man said:To that end, I'm one of two finalists for a job I really want -- it would be closer to home, less hours, and would probably let me do the 18/55. Hoping to hear today!
A 50k is not necessarily more difficult than a marathon, it is just a different beast. Running in solitude, in nature, on rough terrain is much different than running with the masses, on asphalt with a crowd watching. Additionally, nutrition/hydration stops are much further apart. Training is similar mileage wise, but you'll need to include quite a few miles on trails, and likely much more on hills. I LOVED my first 50k and know it won't be my last. I might pull a Tri-Man and quit marathons once I'm able to finish both Boston and NY, but fully expect to continue to do ultras for quite some time. BnB: I was supposed to go hunting today, but we are getting boatloads of rain = not todaygruecd said:I haven't run one, but I know a lot of people who have, and from what I'm told, it really isn't that much harder.FUBAR said:Has anyone run a 50k? How much worse/harder is it than "just" a marathon?
Considering entering CVille 50K at the end of the month.
You must have been pretty hung over the next morning.Capped the day off with smoked BBQ and a case of beer.
Actually I wasn'tYou must have been pretty hung over the next morning.Capped the day off with smoked BBQ and a case of beer.
I guess the 12 dozen waters before tapping the keg and spreading it out over 10 hours helped.Thanks. The guy heading the search just emailed me to say the boss hasn't made a decision yet, but that he wants search guy to collect the references from both finalists. So I sent mine in -- they're great and I only hope he calls them.A couple of thoughts. On the good side, maybe he's collecting only my references for a final check, but he doesn't want to tell me that. On the bad side, maybe it still really is a coinflip and the boss hasn't made up his mind yet. I just can't think what else I could have done to make myself a better candidate, so if they're not sold on me yet, maybe they're just not buying what I'm selling.Also, they asked for the contact info for my current supervisor, with the caveat they wouldn't be contacted unless/until an offer is made. I gave it, telling them that they couldn't call until I gave them the news first, but it still makes me nervous. What's the deal with that? Just to make sure that I really work where I say I work and I didn't make this all up?Anyway, I'm totally on pins and needles, freaking out.We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.Ditto that.Good luck!! And congrats on the mileage PRs!!!The_Man said:To that end, I'm one of two finalists for a job I really want -- it would be closer to home, less hours, and would probably let me do the 18/55. Hoping to hear today!
I assume these are road bike tires.1. Slicks hold the road better than anything else, so bald is beautiful here.2. What do you mean by "bald"? If it just means some wear, that isn't a big deal. If you are talking seeing the casing come through it is time to replace.3. My retired tires squared off rather than rounded off - the middle wore down preferentially. Once it got to a point that it affected handling I chucked 'em. If you do lock the brakes up and put a significant wear spot in them that may require you chuck them, too.Let's break this down. You won't drive a car with a bald tire where if something goes bad you have 3 remaining tires plus airbags and a ton of steel around you but you'll ride a questionable bike tire where a failure on a descent leaves nothing but 1mm of spandex between you and the road at 30 mph???If the tires have developed a significant flat spot where they were rounded I'd start shopping. I generally get 2000 mi (more on the front) and probably push it a tad to far.FUBAR said:Quick question regarding the bike: my tires are balding almost as much as I am. Is it a real problem to ride on bald tires? I never would with the car but the bike seems different. Is there an easy way to tell when you've worn the tires down too much before they wear through?
Is this through a search agency? If so, they are probably getting your current supervisor's name in case (s)he has a sudden vacancy soon. They already know the type of candidate who would be a good fit! Regardless, good luck!! And great job on your 17!!Thanks. The guy heading the search just emailed me to say the boss hasn't made a decision yet, but that he wants search guy to collect the references from both finalists. So I sent mine in -- they're great and I only hope he calls them.A couple of thoughts. On the good side, maybe he's collecting only my references for a final check, but he doesn't want to tell me that. On the bad side, maybe it still really is a coinflip and the boss hasn't made up his mind yet. I just can't think what else I could have done to make myself a better candidate, so if they're not sold on me yet, maybe they're just not buying what I'm selling.Also, they asked for the contact info for my current supervisor, with the caveat they wouldn't be contacted unless/until an offer is made. I gave it, telling them that they couldn't call until I gave them the news first, but it still makes me nervous. What's the deal with that? Just to make sure that I really work where I say I work and I didn't make this all up?Anyway, I'm totally on pins and needles, freaking out.We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.Ditto that.Good luck!! And congrats on the mileage PRs!!!The_Man said:To that end, I'm one of two finalists for a job I really want -- it would be closer to home, less hours, and would probably let me do the 18/55. Hoping to hear today!
I'm not talking about flat spots here, I'm talking about the tread being worn to baldness, but not wearing through. If my car tire blows, I'm going to take out more than just myself. If my bike tire were to happen to pop, if I even crash, I get road burn, probably a little bloody, but my family isn't in it with me and I'm not going 80mph.Let's break this down. You won't drive a car with a bald tire where if something goes bad you have 3 remaining tires plus airbags and a ton of steel around you but you'll ride a questionable bike tire where a failure on a descent leaves nothing but 1mm of spandex between you and the road at 30 mph???If the tires have developed a significant flat spot where they were rounded I'd start shopping. I generally get 2000 mi (more on the front) and probably push it a tad to far.FUBAR said:Quick question regarding the bike: my tires are balding almost as much as I am. Is it a real problem to ride on bald tires? I never would with the car but the bike seems different. Is there an easy way to tell when you've worn the tires down too much before they wear through?
Yes, road bike tires. No casing, pretty much just wear. I guess that answers the question though, I'm probably good for a while. The only "concern" I have is when turning, I don't have the same grip as I used to, or maybe that's just in my head. I don't usually lock the brakes. Thanks!I assume these are road bike tires.1. Slicks hold the road better than anything else, so bald is beautiful here.2. What do you mean by "bald"? If it just means some wear, that isn't a big deal. If you are talking seeing the casing come through it is time to replace.3. My retired tires squared off rather than rounded off - the middle wore down preferentially. Once it got to a point that it affected handling I chucked 'em. If you do lock the brakes up and put a significant wear spot in them that may require you chuck them, too.
Tires are good for longer than you think. As they wear you'll notice that they will square off. Once that gets too bad you'll have to replace. Then again they are softer than you think - it might take only one bad braking incident to torch a pair of tires. I assume you had some tires with a bit of a pattern on them and now the pattern is gone? Not a worry - like I said before slicks actually have the best grip on the road's surface.One thing that can kill tires as well are nicks from rocks. You can patch them with superglue, but once they get numerous, you get a big one, or you get one in the sidewall it is again time to look at something new.I'm not talking about flat spots here, I'm talking about the tread being worn to baldness, but not wearing through. If my car tire blows, I'm going to take out more than just myself. If my bike tire were to happen to pop, if I even crash, I get road burn, probably a little bloody, but my family isn't in it with me and I'm not going 80mph.Let's break this down. You won't drive a car with a bald tire where if something goes bad you have 3 remaining tires plus airbags and a ton of steel around you but you'll ride a questionable bike tire where a failure on a descent leaves nothing but 1mm of spandex between you and the road at 30 mph???If the tires have developed a significant flat spot where they were rounded I'd start shopping. I generally get 2000 mi (more on the front) and probably push it a tad to far.Quick question regarding the bike: my tires are balding almost as much as I am. Is it a real problem to ride on bald tires? I never would with the car but the bike seems different. Is there an easy way to tell when you've worn the tires down too much before they wear through?Yes, road bike tires. No casing, pretty much just wear. I guess that answers the question though, I'm probably good for a while. The only "concern" I have is when turning, I don't have the same grip as I used to, or maybe that's just in my head. I don't usually lock the brakes. Thanks!I assume these are road bike tires.1. Slicks hold the road better than anything else, so bald is beautiful here.2. What do you mean by "bald"? If it just means some wear, that isn't a big deal. If you are talking seeing the casing come through it is time to replace.3. My retired tires squared off rather than rounded off - the middle wore down preferentially. Once it got to a point that it affected handling I chucked 'em. If you do lock the brakes up and put a significant wear spot in them that may require you chuck them, too.
Tempo Runs: This is a continuous run with a buildup in the middle to near 10-K race pace. A Tempo Run of 30 to 45 minutes would begin with 10-15 minutes easy running, build to 15-20 minutes near the middle, then 5-10 minutes easy toward the end. The pace buildup should be gradual, not sudden, with peak speed coming about two-thirds into the workout. Hold that peak only for a minute or two. I consider Tempo Runs to be the "Thinking Runner's Workout." A Tempo Run can be as hard or easy as you want to make it, and it has nothing to do with how long (in time) you run or how far. In fact, the times prescribed for Tempo Runs serve mainly as rough guidelines. Feel free to improvise. Improvisation is the heart of doing a Tempo Run correctly.
Yeah, that's weird. Pfitz is much more clear on that, i.e. "LT 10 mile with 5 @ 15K to HMP." Everyone I know does their tempo runs in a more structured fashion like this. His sounds like more of a fartlek workout.Anyway.....crazy wind gusts here today, so I took to the gym for my VO2max workout. Knocked out 6 miles total with 5 x ~0.4 miles at 6:00 pace with 90-second recovery jogs. I was sweating like a pig on the treadmill, but otherwise it didn't feel horribly difficult. Still, glad to have it done.Any tips on running these Tempo runs? Higdon leaves the door pretty wide open on this, which bothers me since I have no self control when it comes to pace...
Tempo Runs: This is a continuous run with a buildup in the middle to near 10-K race pace. A Tempo Run of 30 to 45 minutes would begin with 10-15 minutes easy running, build to 15-20 minutes near the middle, then 5-10 minutes easy toward the end. The pace buildup should be gradual, not sudden, with peak speed coming about two-thirds into the workout. Hold that peak only for a minute or two. I consider Tempo Runs to be the "Thinking Runner's Workout." A Tempo Run can be as hard or easy as you want to make it, and it has nothing to do with how long (in time) you run or how far. In fact, the times prescribed for Tempo Runs serve mainly as rough guidelines. Feel free to improvise. Improvisation is the heart of doing a Tempo Run correctly.
massive head cold + 40+ mph winds + "hard drizzle" but i.did.not.BONK.RAAAAAAAAAWR!oofthat's todayoh i'm stretching alright
i think what did me in is that the plan doubled my total run time from Friday last week to Monday this week.![]()
I am with Ned. I dont get it either. What does "LT 10 mile with 5 @ 15K to HMP." mean? That is like reading russian to me. I will say I am getting frustrated with all of the terminology. I have been reading quite a bit at runners world and it is not helping me much. It is either to vague or I have no idea what they are talking about. The above is a good example of WTF????????Yeah, that's weird. Pfitz is much more clear on that, i.e. "LT 10 mile with 5 @ 15K to HMP." Everyone I know does their tempo runs in a more structured fashion like this. His sounds like more of a fartlek workout.Anyway.....crazy wind gusts here today, so I took to the gym for my VO2max workout. Knocked out 6 miles total with 5 x ~0.4 miles at 6:00 pace with 90-second recovery jogs. I was sweating like a pig on the treadmill, but otherwise it didn't feel horribly difficult. Still, glad to have it done.Any tips on running these Tempo runs? Higdon leaves the door pretty wide open on this, which bothers me since I have no self control when it comes to pace...
Tempo Runs: This is a continuous run with a buildup in the middle to near 10-K race pace. A Tempo Run of 30 to 45 minutes would begin with 10-15 minutes easy running, build to 15-20 minutes near the middle, then 5-10 minutes easy toward the end. The pace buildup should be gradual, not sudden, with peak speed coming about two-thirds into the workout. Hold that peak only for a minute or two. I consider Tempo Runs to be the "Thinking Runner's Workout." A Tempo Run can be as hard or easy as you want to make it, and it has nothing to do with how long (in time) you run or how far. In fact, the times prescribed for Tempo Runs serve mainly as rough guidelines. Feel free to improvise. Improvisation is the heart of doing a Tempo Run correctly.
Hope you all have a good night.
I got this at runners world. I think this is vague as well. I guess it means start slow, run fast,end slow?A tempo run: is a run at around your 10K race pace (or about 80-85% of your heart rate or so). Traditionally tempo runs were 20 minutes or so in length, but they vary. It's often described as being "comfortably hard" -- it's a challenging, but managable pace. You want to finish a tempo feeling challenged, but not exhausted. Most tempo runs consist of ten to fifteen minutes of easy running, then the tempo part, then ten to fifteen minutes to cool down. Tempo runs build speed and teach your body to run at a certain pace.Took the family to Hershey, PA for a long weekend and just got back. Great place for little kids![]()
This week is the start of Week 2 of the Higdon program. I did my usual 3 today and have a 30min Tempo on the schedule for tomorrow. I'm curious to see how my body reacts to the slow increase in mileage. Depending on what I get in for tomorrow's 30min run, I should be hitting about 19 miles this week. +2 from last week.
Any tips on running these Tempo runs? Higdon leaves the door pretty wide open on this, which bothers me since I have no self control when it comes to pace...
Tempo Runs: This is a continuous run with a buildup in the middle to near 10-K race pace. A Tempo Run of 30 to 45 minutes would begin with 10-15 minutes easy running, build to 15-20 minutes near the middle, then 5-10 minutes easy toward the end. The pace buildup should be gradual, not sudden, with peak speed coming about two-thirds into the workout. Hold that peak only for a minute or two. I consider Tempo Runs to be the "Thinking Runner's Workout." A Tempo Run can be as hard or easy as you want to make it, and it has nothing to do with how long (in time) you run or how far. In fact, the times prescribed for Tempo Runs serve mainly as rough guidelines. Feel free to improvise. Improvisation is the heart of doing a Tempo Run correctly.
I think I got the translation: LT 10 mile with 5 @ 15K to HMP = run 10 miles with 5 miles at 15k to half marathon pace. I would guess the 5 is sandwhiched between 2.5 miles at the beginning and the end. As far as what the 15k to half marathon pace is I think I would get that from Mcmillan tool.So for me I would run 5 miles @ 10:07 with the first/last 2.5 mile at a slower pace. Gruecd is this correct? If it is correct what would my pace for the first/last 2.5 miles be?I am with Ned. I dont get it either. What does "LT 10 mile with 5 @ 15K to HMP." mean? That is like reading russian to me. I will say I am getting frustrated with all of the terminology. I have been reading quite a bit at runners world and it is not helping me much. It is either to vague or I have no idea what they are talking about. The above is a good example of WTF????????Yeah, that's weird. Pfitz is much more clear on that, i.e. "LT 10 mile with 5 @ 15K to HMP." Everyone I know does their tempo runs in a more structured fashion like this. His sounds like more of a fartlek workout.Anyway.....crazy wind gusts here today, so I took to the gym for my VO2max workout. Knocked out 6 miles total with 5 x ~0.4 miles at 6:00 pace with 90-second recovery jogs. I was sweating like a pig on the treadmill, but otherwise it didn't feel horribly difficult. Still, glad to have it done.Any tips on running these Tempo runs? Higdon leaves the door pretty wide open on this, which bothers me since I have no self control when it comes to pace...
Tempo Runs: This is a continuous run with a buildup in the middle to near 10-K race pace. A Tempo Run of 30 to 45 minutes would begin with 10-15 minutes easy running, build to 15-20 minutes near the middle, then 5-10 minutes easy toward the end. The pace buildup should be gradual, not sudden, with peak speed coming about two-thirds into the workout. Hold that peak only for a minute or two. I consider Tempo Runs to be the "Thinking Runner's Workout." A Tempo Run can be as hard or easy as you want to make it, and it has nothing to do with how long (in time) you run or how far. In fact, the times prescribed for Tempo Runs serve mainly as rough guidelines. Feel free to improvise. Improvisation is the heart of doing a Tempo Run correctly.
Hope you all have a good night.
Exactly. And yes, I usually run a warm-up, then the tempo miles, and finally a cool-down. Those first and last miles can be done at whatever pace is comfortable. The tempo miles are the important part.The one thing I'll disagree about is the point about tempo runs being "comfortably hard." IMHO, there's nothing "comfortable" about them. As far as I'm concerned, the toughest workout in Pfitz's entire schedule is the "dreaded" 11 miles with 7 tempo. Scares the hell out of me every time.I think I got the translation: LT 10 mile with 5 @ 15K to HMP = run 10 miles with 5 miles at 15k to half marathon pace. I would guess the 5 is sandwhiched between 2.5 miles at the beginning and the end. As far as what the 15k to half marathon pace is I think I would get that from Mcmillan tool.So for me I would run 5 miles @ 10:07 with the first/last 2.5 mile at a slower pace. Gruecd is this correct? If it is correct what would my pace for the first/last 2.5 miles be?I came up with the 10:07 pace using my 5k time 29:19 and the Mcmillan tool.
Good luck! And the 15 lbs off certainly does help, to the tune of about 2 seconds/mile/lb. lost. That ends up being the metabolic cost of lugging around that extra weight.My marathon is this coming Saturday - hoping to hit around 3:44 which is my PR, but from 8 years ago. I have run 2 others in the 3:51 and 3:55 range. I am about 15 lbs lighter than previously, so hopefully that will help. Running almost no miles this week on the taper - 3, 4 then 2.
Excellent!!!!! I am glad I got it.Exactly. And yes, I usually run a warm-up, then the tempo miles, and finally a cool-down. Those first and last miles can be done at whatever pace is comfortable. The tempo miles are the important part.The one thing I'll disagree about is the point about tempo runs being "comfortably hard." IMHO, there's nothing "comfortable" about them. As far as I'm concerned, the toughest workout in Pfitz's entire schedule is the "dreaded" 11 miles with 7 tempo. Scares the hell out of me every time.I think I got the translation: LT 10 mile with 5 @ 15K to HMP = run 10 miles with 5 miles at 15k to half marathon pace. I would guess the 5 is sandwhiched between 2.5 miles at the beginning and the end. As far as what the 15k to half marathon pace is I think I would get that from Mcmillan tool.So for me I would run 5 miles @ 10:07 with the first/last 2.5 mile at a slower pace. Gruecd is this correct? If it is correct what would my pace for the first/last 2.5 miles be?I came up with the 10:07 pace using my 5k time 29:19 and the Mcmillan tool.
If my tempo 5 miles is 10:07 what would you suggest the warm up and cool down be?I braved the wind gusts late this afternoon to get my speedwork done - 3x 1 mile at a 7:02 target w/400 RI. Most of the first repeat was directly into the wind, but I was able to manage a 7:04. The second repeat wasn't so great - 7:42, mostly because the first 1/2 was directly into the wind again and I just couldn't maintain any speed. Last repeat was 7:14, with the wind at my back. Ugh.Anyway.....crazy wind gusts here today, so I took to the gym for my VO2max workout. Knocked out 6 miles total with 5 x ~0.4 miles at 6:00 pace with 90-second recovery jogs. I was sweating like a pig on the treadmill, but otherwise it didn't feel horribly difficult. Still, glad to have it done.Hope you all have a good night.
A 50k is not necessarily more difficult than a marathon, it is just a different beast. Running in solitude, in nature, on rough terrain is much different than running with the masses, on asphalt with a crowd watching. Additionally, nutrition/hydration stops are much further apart. Training is similar mileage wise, but you'll need to include quite a few miles on trails, and likely much more on hills. I LOVED my first 50k and know it won't be my last. I might pull a Tri-Man and quit marathons once I'm able to finish both Boston and NY, but fully expect to continue to do ultras for quite some time.I haven't run one, but I know a lot of people who have, and from what I'm told, it really isn't that much harder.Has anyone run a 50k? How much worse/harder is it than "just" a marathon?
Considering entering CVille 50K at the end of the month.
I'm going to have to wait until next year or another one to do this, turns out that weekend is bad - I'm coaching soccer and we have family in town. Probably not a great idea to run it right now anyway as my longest run recently has been 15. Still, I want to do this race, so it gives me a goal for next year if we're anywhere near here.Good luck, MC.My marathon is this coming Saturday - hoping to hit around 3:44 which is my PR, but from 8 years ago. I have run 2 others in the 3:51 and 3:55 range. I am about 15 lbs lighter than previously, so hopefully that will help. Running almost no miles this week on the taper - 3, 4 then 2.
what does w/400 RI mean? I assume it is a rest period. Does it refer to distance/speed or both? If it is distance which I think it is, what speed were you doing the rest at?I braved the wind gusts late this afternoon to get my speedwork done - 3x 1 mile at a 7:02 target w/400 RI. Most of the first repeat was directly into the wind, but I was able to manage a 7:04. The second repeat wasn't so great - 7:42, mostly because the first 1/2 was directly into the wind again and I just couldn't maintain any speed. Last repeat was 7:14, with the wind at my back. Ugh.Anyway.....crazy wind gusts here today, so I took to the gym for my VO2max workout. Knocked out 6 miles total with 5 x ~0.4 miles at 6:00 pace with 90-second recovery jogs. I was sweating like a pig on the treadmill, but otherwise it didn't feel horribly difficult. Still, glad to have it done.
Hope you all have a good night.
Those would be 400-meter rest intervals. Speed doesn't matter much, but Pfitz does recommend that rest intervals be 50-90% of the time it takes you to complete the speed intervals. For example, I did my repeats yesterday at 6:00 pace, so about 2:24/repeat. As such, my rest intervals should be 50-90% of that, or somewhere between 1:12 and 2:10. The pace didn't feel horribly difficult yesterday, so I kept the rest intervals on the short end of the recommended range (1:30).Make sense?what does w/400 RI mean? I assume it is a rest period. Does it refer to distance/speed or both? If it is distance which I think it is, what speed were you doing the rest at?
Yes that makes sense. Speed doesn't matter? Could you walk the rest periods? Is this similar to fartleks only more time controlled?Those would be 400-meter rest intervals. Speed doesn't matter much, but Pfitz does recommend that rest intervals be 50-90% of the time it takes you to complete the speed intervals. For example, I did my repeats yesterday at 6:00 pace, so about 2:24/repeat. As such, my rest intervals should be 50-90% of that, or somewhere between 1:12 and 2:10. The pace didn't feel horribly difficult yesterday, so I kept the rest intervals on the short end of the recommended range (1:30).Make sense?what does w/400 RI mean? I assume it is a rest period. Does it refer to distance/speed or both? If it is distance which I think it is, what speed were you doing the rest at?
Yeah, I suppose you could walk them, but I'd recommend keeping the duration within the recommended range.Yes that makes sense. Speed doesn't matter? Could you walk the rest periods? Is this similar to fartleks only more time controlled?Those would be 400-meter rest intervals. Speed doesn't matter much, but Pfitz does recommend that rest intervals be 50-90% of the time it takes you to complete the speed intervals. For example, I did my repeats yesterday at 6:00 pace, so about 2:24/repeat. As such, my rest intervals should be 50-90% of that, or somewhere between 1:12 and 2:10. The pace didn't feel horribly difficult yesterday, so I kept the rest intervals on the short end of the recommended range (1:30).Make sense?what does w/400 RI mean? I assume it is a rest period. Does it refer to distance/speed or both? If it is distance which I think it is, what speed were you doing the rest at?
I've been walking most of my rest intervals lately, though I do try to jog them out for the most part (or do 1/2 walk and 1/2 jog). I feel a little bit like I'm cheating when I walk a lot of the RI's, but considering that I still struggle with the paces I'm not losing any sleep over it.gruecd said:Yeah, I suppose you could walk them, but I'd recommend keeping the duration within the recommended range.prosopis said:Yes that makes sense. Speed doesn't matter? Could you walk the rest periods? Is this similar to fartleks only more time controlled?gruecd said:Those would be 400-meter rest intervals. Speed doesn't matter much, but Pfitz does recommend that rest intervals be 50-90% of the time it takes you to complete the speed intervals. For example, I did my repeats yesterday at 6:00 pace, so about 2:24/repeat. As such, my rest intervals should be 50-90% of that, or somewhere between 1:12 and 2:10. The pace didn't feel horribly difficult yesterday, so I kept the rest intervals on the short end of the recommended range (1:30).Make sense?prosopis said:what does w/400 RI mean? I assume it is a rest period. Does it refer to distance/speed or both? If it is distance which I think it is, what speed were you doing the rest at?
Got some relatively good news back today. Blood and urine work came back normal except my liver numbers were slightly elevated. Something like 10-40 being normal and mine were 45. Next up is a CAT scan.
My best guess is Celiac Disease. Symptons include cramping, bloating, excessive foul smelling gas, brusing, weight loss, massive appetite, elevated liver count, milk/soy intolerence. Gluten is the issue.Got some relatively good news back today. Blood and urine work came back normal except my liver numbers were slightly elevated. Something like 10-40 being normal and mine were 45. Next up is a CAT scan.![]()
This sounds like much better than relatively good news. Keep us posted.
Best of luck. Hopefully, whatever it is, you caught it nice and early. :fingerscrossed:My best guess is Celiac Disease. Symptons include cramping, bloating, excessive foul smelling gas, brusing, weight loss, massive appetite, elevated liver count, milk/soy intolerence. Gluten is the issue.:XGot some relatively good news back today. Blood and urine work came back normal except my liver numbers were slightly elevated. Something like 10-40 being normal and mine were 45. Next up is a CAT scan.This sounds like much better than relatively good news. Keep us posted.
This thing helped me so much. There's no way I would've been able to stick to these paces without it.Time Plan Act. Act.Goal Pace Pace Mileage+----+---------+-----+-------+03:00|10-10:59 |10:37|0.28+----+---------+-----+-------+10:30}7:45-8:30|07:45|1.35+----+---------+-----+-------+03:00|10-10:59 |10:31|0.28+----+---------+-----+-------+10:30|7:45-8:30|07:53|1.33+----+---------+-----+-------+03:00|10-10:59 |10:05|0.30+----+---------+-----+-------+
^*$%#$@)"I don't know anything about Celiac, but it certainly sounds better than some other things. I hope the news keeps getting better----I was supposed to to a bike/swim today, but my calf is quite sore, so swim only it is today. I have a 1500m swim this weekend, so I bit the bullet and did 2000 with a 1500yd TT. Started off with a 100 and 200 (in the drag suit) in 1:11 and 2:39. Good start. Managed the full 1500 in 21:22 - splits 7:02, 7:08, and 7:12. 1:25/100 for 1500 ain't too bad. With my race suit this is probably a ~20 minute swim. Last workout tomorrow is my typical fast swim. Looking to set a new 500 pr. For that I need a 6:13 - that's gonna be tough.BassNBrew said:My best guess is Celiac Disease. Symptons include cramping, bloating, excessive foul smelling gas, brusing, weight loss, massive appetite, elevated liver count, milk/soy intolerence. Gluten is the issue.The_Man said:BassNBrew said:Got some relatively good news back today. Blood and urine work came back normal except my liver numbers were slightly elevated. Something like 10-40 being normal and mine were 45. Next up is a CAT scan.![]()
This sounds like much better than relatively good news. Keep us posted.
NiceNed said:After a bit of reading between the posts here (thanks to all that added their comments) and reading a few articles, I drafted up a 30min tempo run and went for it. Was it 'right'?I wanted to at least stick to Higdon's 30 minutes, so I set up the pace ranges in the Garmin to guide me through this. I'm sure I'll tweak this a ton as I feel my way through this... Garmin -
This thing helped me so much. There's no way I would've been able to stick to these paces without it.3 minutes @ Jog (10-10:59)10.5 minutes @ Run (7:45-8:30)3 minutes @ Jog (10-10:59)10.5 minutes @ Run (7:45-8:30)3 minutes @ Jog (10-10:59)Here's how I did:
Overall I'm pretty darn happy with this. I was pretty gassed at the end of the 2nd 10:30 clip, but I wasn't totally dead. I know towards the end of the 2nd 10:30 I kept thinking "OK, you can beep now......... OK BEEP!............ BEEP &Code:Time Plan Act. Act.Goal Pace Pace Mileage+----+---------+-----+-------+03:00|10-10:59 |10:37|0.28+----+---------+-----+-------+10:30}7:45-8:30|07:45|1.35+----+---------+-----+-------+03:00|10-10:59 |10:31|0.28+----+---------+-----+-------+10:30|7:45-8:30|07:53|1.33+----+---------+-----+-------+03:00|10-10:59 |10:05|0.30+----+---------+-----+-------+^*$%#$@)"
try running barefoot. for just 1/4 mile, see how your foot feels. my guess is your stride will correct itself for that distance, but don't go further the first time. otherwise, I think it's just a matter of taking it slow and thinking about it for a mile each time you run. of course, I only presume you mean you're stepping down too hard on the ball of your foot, as I don't know which is your front foot. another presumption is you're not a dog.Ran 2.5 miles this morning after a one day break. I started fast, too fast, by running the first mile in 10:00 flat and the second mile was in 10:40. The final half mile was just about 5:30 which was surprising to me because it felt much slower but also during running that half mile it felt like I at least had a stride... thus a not slow pace overall.One thing I keep noticing and have no idea how to improve it is for some reason I am stepping heavily on my front foot. Don't know if its the shoes or what but I need to perform more of a glide, in my mind, and not keep stepping so roughly. Any ideas on that one?
Awesome news. I hope everything comes up clean on the CAT scan.BassNBrew said:Got some relatively good news back today. Blood and urine work came back normal except my liver numbers were slightly elevated. Something like 10-40 being normal and mine were 45. Next up is a CAT scan.
___________________Did 5 yesterday at 8:25/mi. Today is an SDO, as is tomorrow. Saturday morning is my last 22 miler.I don't see a problem with this if you're feeling good. IMO, Higdon over-emphasizes the importance of running slow all the time.Saturday is 8 miles at easy pace, not marathon pace like usual. So for the 18-mile long run on Sunday, Higdon says it's o.k. to step up the pace for the last 4-5 miles, but still keep it slower than Marathon goal pace. But I was thinking of starting at Long Run pace, then trying to run goal pace for miles 12-16 or so, then cool down for the last couple of miles. Any thoughts about this?