Juxtatarot
Footballguy
Balls to the wall. After all, your legs should be well rested.Hmmm....how to pick a tempo pace when you've barely trained and you haven't run a "race" since Boston....

Balls to the wall. After all, your legs should be well rested.Hmmm....how to pick a tempo pace when you've barely trained and you haven't run a "race" since Boston....

The McMillan predictor works pretty well for the most part. But the one issue is that it assumes you're equally trained aerobically and anaerobically. If like me, your aerobic ability is behind your speed, then the longer the race, the more it's going to be off.Five mile tempo, seven total this morning:
8:52 118
7:39 144 uphill
7:32 149 uphill
7:28 152
7:09 152 downhill
7:08 153 downhill
8:00 149
I like the GAP data Strava gives, and that tells me the effort was pretty consistent for the 5 at tempo, which sounds right.
I need to figure out what my goal pace for my 10/25 HM is. McMillan says I shoul be able to run 7:20 (1:36) based on 5k time but that sounds ridiculous. I'm thinking a more reasonable goal, but stll, tough, would be to break 1:40 (7:37 pace). I ran a 1:48 in the same race last year so I think that would be a solid leap. Thoughts? How accurate have you guys found McMillan to be as a predictor?
Then there's some of us with no speed but decent aerobic capacity.The McMillan predictor works pretty well for the most part. But the one issue is that it assumes you're equally trained aerobically and anaerobically. If like me, your aerobic ability is behind your speed, then the longer the race, the more it's going to be off.Five mile tempo, seven total this morning:
8:52 118
7:39 144 uphill
7:32 149 uphill
7:28 152
7:09 152 downhill
7:08 153 downhill
8:00 149
I like the GAP data Strava gives, and that tells me the effort was pretty consistent for the 5 at tempo, which sounds right.
I need to figure out what my goal pace for my 10/25 HM is. McMillan says I shoul be able to run 7:20 (1:36) based on 5k time but that sounds ridiculous. I'm thinking a more reasonable goal, but stll, tough, would be to break 1:40 (7:37 pace). I ran a 1:48 in the same race last year so I think that would be a solid leap. Thoughts? How accurate have you guys found McMillan to be as a predictor?
Not sure that's you but if that was the case, you should do better than the predictor the longer the race gets.Then there's some of us with no speed but decent aerobic capacity.The McMillan predictor works pretty well for the most part. But the one issue is that it assumes you're equally trained aerobically and anaerobically. If like me, your aerobic ability is behind your speed, then the longer the race, the more it's going to be off.Five mile tempo, seven total this morning:
8:52 118
7:39 144 uphill
7:32 149 uphill
7:28 152
7:09 152 downhill
7:08 153 downhill
8:00 149
I like the GAP data Strava gives, and that tells me the effort was pretty consistent for the 5 at tempo, which sounds right.
I need to figure out what my goal pace for my 10/25 HM is. McMillan says I shoul be able to run 7:20 (1:36) based on 5k time but that sounds ridiculous. I'm thinking a more reasonable goal, but stll, tough, would be to break 1:40 (7:37 pace). I ran a 1:48 in the same race last year so I think that would be a solid leap. Thoughts? How accurate have you guys found McMillan to be as a predictor?
I guess I don't have as much faith in me as you do. And to Hang's point I have no idea how my aerobic vs anaerobic fitness levels compare. I'm not sure how to glean that by looking at my run data. I think I'm better at running in an uncomfortable zone for shorter distances than I am long but that might apply to most people. I should probably find a 10k to race and see how that goes.Nigel - From some of the runs you've been doing, I certainly don't think 1:36 is crazy. 1:40 sounds like a conservative goal.
I guess I don't have as much faith in me as you do. And to Hang's point I have no idea how my aerobic vs anaerobic fitness levels compare. I'm not sure how to glean that by looking at my run data. I think I'm better at running in an uncomfortable zone for shorter distances than I am long but that might apply to most people. I should probably find a 10k to race and see how that goes.Nigel - From some of the runs you've been doing, I certainly don't think 1:36 is crazy. 1:40 sounds like a conservative goal.
 
 YepI normally wouldn't say that 11 mile run with a 9:15 avg (150bpm) was something to be proud of but when the SI is 158, I'll call that a win.
I have been trying to do recovery runs on lifting days, after I'm done, for specifically this reason. I'm gassed by the time I get out to run and have no interest in trying to go any faster than a slow crawl.YepI normally wouldn't say that 11 mile run with a 9:15 avg (150bpm) was something to be proud of but when the SI is 158, I'll call that a win.
New discovery: running after 15 minutes rowing is harder than running after a couple hours of cycling.
400 meters. 4 laps should be just short of a mile.This is a stupid question but how far is a lap around the typical high school track using the first lane? Quarter mile? 400 meters (.2485 miles)? pbm mentioned how GPS doesn't always measure the curves of a track well so it has me thinking about my interval sessions.
Yeah, that's what I thought. For full disclosure, I usually set autolapping on the Garmin so all the times I've reported on track workouts over the years are at least a few seconds off.400 meters. 4 laps should be just short of a mile.This is a stupid question but how far is a lap around the typical high school track using the first lane? Quarter mile? 400 meters (.2485 miles)? pbm mentioned how GPS doesn't always measure the curves of a track well so it has me thinking about my interval sessions.
 
 I KNEW ITYeah, that's what I thought. For full disclosure, I usually set autolapping on the Garmin so all the times I've reported on track workouts over the years are at least a few seconds off.400 meters. 4 laps should be just short of a mile.This is a stupid question but how far is a lap around the typical high school track using the first lane? Quarter mile? 400 meters (.2485 miles)? pbm mentioned how GPS doesn't always measure the curves of a track well so it has me thinking about my interval sessions.
But seriously, I like using the manual lap button when I'm at the track. That's kinda the beauty of running at a track. You don't need the watch to tell you how far you've run.Yeah, that's what I thought. For full disclosure, I usually set autolapping on the Garmin so all the times I've reported on track workouts over the years are at least a few seconds off.400 meters. 4 laps should be just short of a mile.This is a stupid question but how far is a lap around the typical high school track using the first lane? Quarter mile? 400 meters (.2485 miles)? pbm mentioned how GPS doesn't always measure the curves of a track well so it has me thinking about my interval sessions.
Yes, I'll have to do that in the future. I noticed today with intervals at 1/2 mile on the Garmin I was about 10 to 15 yards short each time.But seriously, I like using the manual lap button when I'm at the track. That's kinda the beauty of running at a track. You don't need the watch to tell you how far you've run.Yeah, that's what I thought. For full disclosure, I usually set autolapping on the Garmin so all the times I've reported on track workouts over the years are at least a few seconds off.400 meters. 4 laps should be just short of a mile.This is a stupid question but how far is a lap around the typical high school track using the first lane? Quarter mile? 400 meters (.2485 miles)? pbm mentioned how GPS doesn't always measure the curves of a track well so it has me thinking about my interval sessions.
Good luck to your Mom worrierking. And I like this plan for the HM, thanks.My mother is having more health issues, so I missed running yesterday. I got a slow five in today. Garmin swallowed Tuesday's run, so I entered it manually.
Nigel, I think your 1:40 goal is conservative, but my experience is that a negative split half is optimum. Start at 1:40 pace and by mile 8 or so you should be able to re-evaluate. Chances are you have enough juice left to hammer the last five miles and get well below 1:40.
Good for you, CG. Sounds like you'll be using the "love of the game" approach for a while, and that's absolutely fine. It was always neat to see your training and race results, but it's also neat to see you this happy with your new soul-mate.So I had an epiphany this morning, and I'm pretty sure that I won't be doing the Milwaukee marathon on November 1 and that my pacing gig at Fox Cities next month is going to be my last marathon for a long while. It's just feeling like a job. I still wanna run for fitness, 90-minute weekend long runs, etc., but I have zero desire to do 15- to 20-mile long runs anymore. I honestly doubt I'll even do Boston next year, especially since we'll have two wedding receptions to pay for next fall (Poland and here). Plus this will give me more time to do yoga and strength training and have a much more well-rounded fitness routine.
Thanks, buddy. I appreciate that.Good for you, CG. Sounds like you'll be using the "love of the game" approach for a while, and that's absolutely fine. It was always neat to see your training and race results, but it's also neat to see you this happy with your new soul-mate.So I had an epiphany this morning, and I'm pretty sure that I won't be doing the Milwaukee marathon on November 1 and that my pacing gig at Fox Cities next month is going to be my last marathon for a long while. It's just feeling like a job. I still wanna run for fitness, 90-minute weekend long runs, etc., but I have zero desire to do 15- to 20-mile long runs anymore. I honestly doubt I'll even do Boston next year, especially since we'll have two wedding receptions to pay for next fall (Poland and here). Plus this will give me more time to do yoga and strength training and have a much more well-rounded fitness routine.
 
 Solid epiphany!!! I think you'll enjoy the freedom. Until getting injured, I sort of operated under the idea that I'd like to be in good enough shape at any given time that I could either run a 1/2 marathon at around 5 to 10 minutes longer than if I had really trained for it or could complete an Olympic Tri in under 3 hours (pr is 2:30). The idea is that at any given time if someone said "hey, are you racing XXX next weekend" if I wanted to do, I was in and would at least know I could finish in a decent time (and be standing to enjoy post race beverages).Thanks, buddy. I appreciate that.Good for you, CG. Sounds like you'll be using the "love of the game" approach for a while, and that's absolutely fine. It was always neat to see your training and race results, but it's also neat to see you this happy with your new soul-mate.So I had an epiphany this morning, and I'm pretty sure that I won't be doing the Milwaukee marathon on November 1 and that my pacing gig at Fox Cities next month is going to be my last marathon for a long while. It's just feeling like a job. I still wanna run for fitness, 90-minute weekend long runs, etc., but I have zero desire to do 15- to 20-mile long runs anymore. I honestly doubt I'll even do Boston next year, especially since we'll have two wedding receptions to pay for next fall (Poland and here). Plus this will give me more time to do yoga and strength training and have a much more well-rounded fitness routine.
"Love of the game" is a good way to put it. It doesn't really even have much to do with the new relationship; I just want to run for running's sake, not because I'm training for something. I don't want to do a 10-mile run and feel disappointed because my schedule said I was supposed to do 15.
Thanks, buddy. I appreciate that.Good for you, CG. Sounds like you'll be using the "love of the game" approach for a while, and that's absolutely fine. It was always neat to see your training and race results, but it's also neat to see you this happy with your new soul-mate.So I had an epiphany this morning, and I'm pretty sure that I won't be doing the Milwaukee marathon on November 1 and that my pacing gig at Fox Cities next month is going to be my last marathon for a long while. It's just feeling like a job. I still wanna run for fitness, 90-minute weekend long runs, etc., but I have zero desire to do 15- to 20-mile long runs anymore. I honestly doubt I'll even do Boston next year, especially since we'll have two wedding receptions to pay for next fall (Poland and here). Plus this will give me more time to do yoga and strength training and have a much more well-rounded fitness routine.
"Love of the game" is a good way to put it. It doesn't really even have much to do with the new relationship; I just want to run for running's sake, not because I'm training for something. I don't want to do a 10-mile run and feel disappointed because my schedule said I was supposed to do 15.
 Great approach.
     Great approach.I have it every week.I've had that same epiphany four or five times.
Yup, coincidentally it usually happens 3/4 through my long run.I have it every week.I've had that same epiphany four or five times.
frankly, that's been my problem in training. Even with a specific event, I mostly do what I want and not what any specific plan says. Pretty sure I could do better if I followed a plan, but it wouldn't be as enjoyable.gruecd said:I just love the idea of waking up on Saturday morning and just saying, "I'm gonna go run. It might be long or short, fast or slow....I'm just gonna go run whatever I feel like running." #freedom
Yesterday I went out to do 5 recovery miles and felt like I wanted to do more, but I stopped because my schedule said "5 recovery," and I knew I was supposed to run 15 this morning. This morning it was humid as hell, and I was a sweaty, dehydrated mess, so I only did 10 miles, and then I felt guilty. Stupid.
Good to see. We all go through different phases of this, and a phase of just running for fun when you feel like it sounds great! I think listening to your motivation is probably key to having a long "career" in running, and not burning out after a few years. Enjoy!gruecd said:Thanks, buddy. I appreciate that.tri-man 47 said:Good for you, CG. Sounds like you'll be using the "love of the game" approach for a while, and that's absolutely fine. It was always neat to see your training and race results, but it's also neat to see you this happy with your new soul-mate.gruecd said:So I had an epiphany this morning, and I'm pretty sure that I won't be doing the Milwaukee marathon on November 1 and that my pacing gig at Fox Cities next month is going to be my last marathon for a long while. It's just feeling like a job. I still wanna run for fitness, 90-minute weekend long runs, etc., but I have zero desire to do 15- to 20-mile long runs anymore. I honestly doubt I'll even do Boston next year, especially since we'll have two wedding receptions to pay for next fall (Poland and here). Plus this will give me more time to do yoga and strength training and have a much more well-rounded fitness routine.
"Love of the game" is a good way to put it. It doesn't really even have much to do with the new relationship; I just want to run for running's sake, not because I'm training for something. I don't want to do a 10-mile run and feel disappointed because my schedule said I was supposed to do 15.
I think I just used all mine catching up on the last week of this thread after being up in Oregon for vacation, during which I had a few days with almost no internet access. It was heavenly!There's a limit?Slow down, guys. I'm running out of likes.
For my fellow strava guys, and those who like to rag on us. Duck might especially enjoy the first one since I am fairly sure it's made by someone in his neck of the woods with all the references to the Northern Cal running trails/clubs/runners. (I followed that scene pretty closely for awhile because one of my good friends was trying to make a post-college comeback on the PAUSATF circuit a few years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03Z-WQpHFhw
 I was laughing so hard watching this my girlfriend came in to the room....and walked out 45 seconds later saying, "you're such a nerd."  This was obviously made by a local, as I know every person and trail referenced in it.  So funny, in an inside baseball kind of way......
  I was laughing so hard watching this my girlfriend came in to the room....and walked out 45 seconds later saying, "you're such a nerd."  This was obviously made by a local, as I know every person and trail referenced in it.  So funny, in an inside baseball kind of way......His name is Mike Styczynkski and he ran for the River City Rebels for awhile, I think he runs for the Fleet Feet Sacramento store now. We have been classmates since 7th grade and ran pretty much every practice together between sophomore and senior year of HS. He was a D3 All-American in cross-country and was still going at it pretty good until about 2011-2012. You might still see his name in the road races around Sacramento or the PAUSATF circuit here and there, the dude is crazy talented and runs close to 16 minutes on about 40-50 miles a week with no speed work.For my fellow strava guys, and those who like to rag on us. Duck might especially enjoy the first one since I am fairly sure it's made by someone in his neck of the woods with all the references to the Northern Cal running trails/clubs/runners. (I followed that scene pretty closely for awhile because one of my good friends was trying to make a post-college comeback on the PAUSATF circuit a few years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03Z-WQpHFhwI was laughing so hard watching this my girlfriend came in to the room....and walked out 45 seconds later saying, "you're such a nerd." This was obviously made by a local, as I know every person and trail referenced in it. So funny, in an inside baseball kind of way......
Who was your friend, btw?
Nice.155SI at 5am. Awesome.
