I won this by timestamps. Recognize.
what happened to young. I'm too lazy. I don't see much written about this anywhere.'jon_mx said:Tigers are in trouble with Young not looking likely. Tigers will need a huge pitching effort. Without Young, the Tigers are the underdog here.
tweaked his obliquewhat happened to young. I'm too lazy. I don't see much written about this anywhere.'jon_mx said:Tigers are in trouble with Young not looking likely. Tigers will need a huge pitching effort. Without Young, the Tigers are the underdog here.
Nope. "Third home game" only. Since that ended up being Game 6 on 10/15, I could have a problem. Girlfriend bought Avett Brothers tickets a long time ago. Same night.stu>u have game 1 tickets?
I give you propers.'culdeus said:I won this by timestamps. Recognize.
4th best ERA in AL this year. 2011 Team ERAAs a totally casual baseball fan is Texas pitching any good?
Tigers in 6
that was 2010 link...they were 5th this year. Better than the Tigers, but the Tigers 4th and 5th starters stunk up the league and then they added Fister and the rotation improved significantly.Interesting, if you look at just September, Texas and Detroit are #1 and #2 in the AL in ERA.4th best ERA in AL this year. ERA RankingsAs a totally casual baseball fan is Texas pitching any good?
Tigers in 6
I would Rank the pitchers in this series:1. Verlanderthat was 2010 link...they were 5th this year. Better than the Tigers, but the Tigers 4th and 5th starters stunk up the league and then they added Fister and the rotation improved significantly.Interesting, if you look at just September, Texas and Detroit are #1 and #2 in the AL in ERA.4th best ERA in AL this year. ERA RankingsAs a totally casual baseball fan is Texas pitching any good?
Tigers in 6
Agree with the top three, but I'd take Scherzer over the rest of the Texas rotation the way he looks right now. He's always had the stuff but he looks mentally tough and confident right now.I would Rank the pitchers in this series:1. Verlanderthat was 2010 link...they were 5th this year. Better than the Tigers, but the Tigers 4th and 5th starters stunk up the league and then they added Fister and the rotation improved significantly.Interesting, if you look at just September, Texas and Detroit are #1 and #2 in the AL in ERA.4th best ERA in AL this year. ERA RankingsAs a totally casual baseball fan is Texas pitching any good?
Tigers in 6
2. Wilson
3. Fister
T4. Lewis, Holland, Harrison
7. Sherzer
8. Porcello
Well it will be fun to see how it plays out. The other 3 have looked tough and confident most of the year. Their September lines look like this:Harrison 4-0 in 5 starts 2.64 ERAAgree with the top three, but I'd take Scherzer over the rest of the Texas rotation the way he looks right now. He's always had the stuff but he looks mentally tough and confident right now.I would Rank the pitchers in this series:1. Verlanderthat was 2010 link...they were 5th this year. Better than the Tigers, but the Tigers 4th and 5th starters stunk up the league and then they added Fister and the rotation improved significantly.Interesting, if you look at just September, Texas and Detroit are #1 and #2 in the AL in ERA.4th best ERA in AL this year. ERA RankingsAs a totally casual baseball fan is Texas pitching any good?
Tigers in 6
2. Wilson
3. Fister
T4. Lewis, Holland, Harrison
7. Sherzer
8. Porcello
Before the playoffs started I would have listed the pitchers in the same order. I can't really differentiate between Harrison, Holland and Lewis, they're like a faceless trio of guys who I'd say are above average but not great. Following Detroit all year and the ups and downs with Scherzer, he seemed like a different dude his last two appearances. Carried a no-hitter through five in Yankee stadium in the most pressure-filled game of the season and had good stuff yesterday. His downside is a common one among non-elite pitchers; he'll cruise until one disastrous meltdown inning. He's vulnerable to homeruns. But so far he looks very sure of himself and his change-up looks terrific.Well it will be fun to see how it plays out. The other 3 have looked tough and confident most of the year. Their September lines look like this:Harrison 4-0 in 5 starts 2.64 ERAAgree with the top three, but I'd take Scherzer over the rest of the Texas rotation the way he looks right now. He's always had the stuff but he looks mentally tough and confident right now.I would Rank the pitchers in this series:1. Verlanderthat was 2010 link...they were 5th this year. Better than the Tigers, but the Tigers 4th and 5th starters stunk up the league and then they added Fister and the rotation improved significantly.Interesting, if you look at just September, Texas and Detroit are #1 and #2 in the AL in ERA.4th best ERA in AL this year. ERA RankingsAs a totally casual baseball fan is Texas pitching any good?
Tigers in 6
2. Wilson
3. Fister
T4. Lewis, Holland, Harrison
7. Sherzer
8. Porcello
Holland 4-0 in 5 starts 2.20 ERA
Lewis 3-1 in 5 starts 5.65 ERA
Sherzer 2-1 in 5 starts 3.94 ERA
None of that matters now...
Advantage to the Tigers in starting pitching, with the Rangers having the better bullpen. lol at anyong thinking Harrison, Colby Cheese or the other guy are better than Scherzer, that is pretty entertaining. Hitting is pretty much the same, maybe a very slight advantage to the Rangers.These are the 5th and 6th biggest media markets in the AL, I think the ratings will be fine. Tigers have owned the Rangers the past few years and I think it continues here. Tigers in five.Game 1 Wilson- VerlanderGame 2 Holland- PorcelloGame 3 Lewis- FisterGame 4 Harrison- Sherzer![]()
I'll bet whatever the lowest ALCS ratings have been ever this is at least 25% lower than that.Advantage to the Tigers in starting pitching, with the Rangers having the better bullpen. lol at anyong thinking Harrison, Colby Cheese or the other guy are better than Scherzer, that is pretty entertaining. Hitting is pretty much the same, maybe a very slight advantage to the Rangers.These are the 5th and 6th biggest media markets in the AL, I think the ratings will be fine. Tigers have owned the Rangers the past few years and I think it continues here. Tigers in five.Game 1 Wilson- VerlanderGame 2 Holland- PorcelloGame 3 Lewis- FisterGame 4 Harrison- Sherzer![]()
Game 1 is late saturday. Not a good time for a game and traditionally shows poorly nationwide to limited fanbases.Game 2 is across from SNF. Epic fail. Keep in mind NYY-TEX lost to JAX-TEN last year.Game 3 is the only primetime game not directly across from a major sporting event. Big test here.Game 4 is 3pm CST start. Looking at record low number.Game 5 is 3pm CST start. Looking at record low number.Game 6 competes again with NCAAFGame 7 competes with SNFI think because Boston or New York are not playing, more people who usually don't watch will. It won't be huge, but there will not be a big drop off.
Scherzer 2011 Stats: 4.43 ERA, 15-9 (33), 1.35 whip, 0 CG'Doctor Detroit said:Advantage to the Tigers in starting pitching, with the Rangers having the better bullpen. lol at anyong thinking Harrison, Colby Cheese or the other guy are better than Scherzer, that is pretty entertaining. Hitting is pretty much the same, maybe a very slight advantage to the Rangers.These are the 5th and 6th biggest media markets in the AL, I think the ratings will be fine.'ctdub said:Game 1 Wilson- Verlander
Game 2 Holland- Porcello
Game 3 Lewis- Fister
Game 4 Harrison- Sherzer
![]()
Tigers have owned the Rangers the past few years and I think it continues here. Tigers in five.
My advice to you, don't start.Scherzer 2011 Stats: 4.43 ERA, 15-9 (33), 1.35 whip, 0 CG'Doctor Detroit said:Advantage to the Tigers in starting pitching, with the Rangers having the better bullpen. lol at anyong thinking Harrison, Colby Cheese or the other guy are better than Scherzer, that is pretty entertaining. Hitting is pretty much the same, maybe a very slight advantage to the Rangers.These are the 5th and 6th biggest media markets in the AL, I think the ratings will be fine.'ctdub said:Game 1 Wilson- Verlander
Game 2 Holland- Porcello
Game 3 Lewis- Fister
Game 4 Harrison- Sherzer
![]()
Tigers have owned the Rangers the past few years and I think it continues here. Tigers in five.
Post AS Break:4.09 ERA, 5-5 (14)
Harrison
2011 Season: 3.39 ERA, 14-9 (30), 1.28 Whip, 0 CG
Post ASG: 3.84 ERA, 7-2 (14)
Holland
2011 Season: 3.95 ERA 16-5 (32), 1.35 whip, 4 CG shutouts
Post ASG: 3.06 ERA, 9-1 (14)
Lewis
2011 Season: 4.40 ERA, 14-10(32), 1.21 whi, 2 CG, 1 CGSO
Post ASG: 4.43, 6-3(14)
Silly me for thinking these 3 are better than the mighty Scherzer. That is seriously funny. Silly me.
Such aMy advice to you, don't start.Scherzer 2011 Stats: 4.43 ERA, 15-9 (33), 1.35 whip, 0 CG'Doctor Detroit said:Advantage to the Tigers in starting pitching, with the Rangers having the better bullpen. lol at anyong thinking Harrison, Colby Cheese or the other guy are better than Scherzer, that is pretty entertaining. Hitting is pretty much the same, maybe a very slight advantage to the Rangers.These are the 5th and 6th biggest media markets in the AL, I think the ratings will be fine.'ctdub said:Game 1 Wilson- Verlander
Game 2 Holland- Porcello
Game 3 Lewis- Fister
Game 4 Harrison- Sherzer
![]()
Tigers have owned the Rangers the past few years and I think it continues here. Tigers in five.
Post AS Break:4.09 ERA, 5-5 (14)
Harrison
2011 Season: 3.39 ERA, 14-9 (30), 1.28 Whip, 0 CG
Post ASG: 3.84 ERA, 7-2 (14)
Holland
2011 Season: 3.95 ERA 16-5 (32), 1.35 whip, 4 CG shutouts
Post ASG: 3.06 ERA, 9-1 (14)
Lewis
2011 Season: 4.40 ERA, 14-10(32), 1.21 whi, 2 CG, 1 CGSO
Post ASG: 4.43, 6-3(14)
Silly me for thinking these 3 are better than the mighty Scherzer. That is seriously funny. Silly me.
194815 GBSuch aMy advice to you, don't start.Scherzer 2011 Stats: 4.43 ERA, 15-9 (33), 1.35 whip, 0 CG'Doctor Detroit said:Advantage to the Tigers in starting pitching, with the Rangers having the better bullpen. lol at anyong thinking Harrison, Colby Cheese or the other guy are better than Scherzer, that is pretty entertaining. Hitting is pretty much the same, maybe a very slight advantage to the Rangers.These are the 5th and 6th biggest media markets in the AL, I think the ratings will be fine.'ctdub said:Game 1 Wilson- Verlander
Game 2 Holland- Porcello
Game 3 Lewis- Fister
Game 4 Harrison- Sherzer
![]()
Tigers have owned the Rangers the past few years and I think it continues here. Tigers in five.
Post AS Break:4.09 ERA, 5-5 (14)
Harrison
2011 Season: 3.39 ERA, 14-9 (30), 1.28 Whip, 0 CG
Post ASG: 3.84 ERA, 7-2 (14)
Holland
2011 Season: 3.95 ERA 16-5 (32), 1.35 whip, 4 CG shutouts
Post ASG: 3.06 ERA, 9-1 (14)
Lewis
2011 Season: 4.40 ERA, 14-10(32), 1.21 whi, 2 CG, 1 CGSO
Post ASG: 4.43, 6-3(14)
Silly me for thinking these 3 are better than the mighty Scherzer. That is seriously funny. Silly me.![]()
I think lots watch bos and nyy hoping they lose.Every time a Detroit teams advances in the playoffs people want to dump on the city and prattle on about how low the ratings will be. Who gives a ####? There are fans of teams and fans of the game. If your team is out and you're not a fan of the game, and you're watching because New York or Boston is playing and hoping they win, you're a doosh.
Based on what? You posted earlier that you found it entertaining that anyone would think that those 3 are better than Scherzer. When he is is "hit" he is better than those 3? You mean like throwing 4 complete game shut outs "hit"? Scherzer is older than Holland and Harrison and has pitched roughly 200 more big league innings so far in his career than the other 2 and they both outpitched him in a hitters ballpark no less this season. They are probably very, very close right now, but based on results this year you are obviously just being a homer.Cutb>talent-wise and at this place in time Scherzer is easily as good as those three Rangers starters. He is hit or miss, but when he's hit he's better than any of those three.
Easy there.'Doctor Detroit said:Advantage to the Tigers in starting pitching, with the Rangers having the better bullpen. lol at anyong thinking Harrison, Colby Cheese or the other guy are better than Scherzer, that is pretty entertaining. Hitting is pretty much the same, maybe a very slight advantage to the Rangers.These are the 5th and 6th biggest media markets in the AL, I think the ratings will be fine.'ctdub said:Game 1 Wilson- Verlander
Game 2 Holland- Porcello
Game 3 Lewis- Fister
Game 4 Harrison- Sherzer
![]()
Tigers have owned the Rangers the past few years and I think it continues here. Tigers in five.
They have out-pitched Scherzer this year, but if you watched Scherzer the last month or so he is pitching the best he has all year. That may be true for the Texas guys too as they have been hot too. It probably is a homer perspective, but Scherzer is pitching better right now than his stats suggest. But all that matters now is how each pitcher pitches in Game 2 when they start.Based on what? You posted earlier that you found it entertaining that anyone would think that those 3 are better than Scherzer. When he is is "hit" he is better than those 3? You mean like throwing 4 complete game shut outs "hit"? Scherzer is older than Holland and Harrison and has pitched roughly 200 more big league innings so far in his career than the other 2 and they both outpitched him in a hitters ballpark no less this season. They are probably very, very close right now, but based on results this year you are obviously just being a homer.Cutb>talent-wise and at this place in time Scherzer is easily as good as those three Rangers starters. He is hit or miss, but when he's hit he's better than any of those three.
I agree about Scherzer. Love him and he might be the 2nd best pitcher in this series when he's on (which he clearly is now)That said, you need to check out what the Rangers starters have done over the last month. Wilson, Holland, and Harrison were all out of their minds in September. Wilson obviously wasn't so hot in the ALDS.I'd put all 6 of the non-Verlander, non-Porcello guys in a similar category. As you said, it only matters what they do now and Scherzer/Fister/Wilson/Holland/Harrison/Lewis are all capable of pitching gems and also capable of getting roughed up.It's going to be an exciting series.They have out-pitched Scherzer this year, but if you watched Scherzer the last month or so he is pitching the best he has all year. That may be true for the Texas guys too as they have been hot too. It probably is a homer perspective, but Scherzer is pitching better right now than his stats suggest. But all that matters now is how each pitcher pitches in Game 2 when they start.Based on what? You posted earlier that you found it entertaining that anyone would think that those 3 are better than Scherzer. When he is is "hit" he is better than those 3? You mean like throwing 4 complete game shut outs "hit"? Scherzer is older than Holland and Harrison and has pitched roughly 200 more big league innings so far in his career than the other 2 and they both outpitched him in a hitters ballpark no less this season. They are probably very, very close right now, but based on results this year you are obviously just being a homer.Cutb>talent-wise and at this place in time Scherzer is easily as good as those three Rangers starters. He is hit or miss, but when he's hit he's better than any of those three.
Enjoy the OU win. Rangers going to take Tigers down. Rangers in 5.'Doctor Detroit said:Advantage to the Tigers in starting pitching, with the Rangers having the better bullpen. lol at anyong thinking Harrison, Colby Cheese or the other guy are better than Scherzer, that is pretty entertaining. Hitting is pretty much the same, maybe a very slight advantage to the Rangers.These are the 5th and 6th biggest media markets in the AL, I think the ratings will be fine. Tigers have owned the Rangers the past few years and I think it continues here. Tigers in five.'ctdub said:Game 1 Wilson- VerlanderGame 2 Holland- PorcelloGame 3 Lewis- FisterGame 4 Harrison- Sherzer![]()