This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Depends, how many WR's do you have to start? How many teams in your league? Do you get any bonuses for long TDs?
Not wanting help on my team, which is why I left all that out. Just wanting some discussion on these guys, then I can make my own decision.
1) Robinson: He's won a starting gig opposite a second year WR. He's also a physical specimen who isn't a slouch in speed. I think he could be the leading receiver in SL. The bad news is, he'd be the leading receiver in SL. Similar to Kelly and Stovall, their offenses deflate the value they would normally have as a starting WR.2) Kelly: I believe he's got the starting gig even though I don't think it's been announced "officially". He could be a nice PPR find. That offense isn't a source for optimism, though. Poor WR2 numbers for years...how much of that was Randle El's fault I don't know. I like the kid and am glad to see him start...I just don't know if the O could be holding him back from decent WR3 fantasy potential.3) Meacham: Would be next to last on my list if he weren't on the Saints. An injury here and there, there's enough opportunity to make some noise for Meacham. Given the injury history of Colston and recent problems with Moore, I give him a bump.4) Williamson: If I had any confidence in the guy's hands, he'd be #1 on this list based on his opportunity as a starter on what I think will be a productive offense. And he's starting opposite an old and arthritic Holt who has more trouble getting open. But I can't get those drops out of my mind. If you are convinced he's finally learned how to catch, he should be #1.5) Stovall: He's not a starter and isn't on a high-powered O like Meacham is. I think his path to a starting gig is as difficult as Meacham's and if he get's there, where will he be? Tampa. I think Kelly and Robinson are as talented, if not more, than Stovall and also have starting gigs already; but some people love this kid and have been watching him for some time.
And I agree with most of this. However, I'm not sure Kelly is good as a PPR WR. I think that will go more to S. Moss and Cooley. I do think however, that he could be a nice redzone target with his size and hands. When he played with the first team offense in wk 3, he had at least 3 targets in the endzone...didn't come up with any but it was encouraging. I see him as a bad PPR WR, but some upside as far as a potential for TDs.
