What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rate the movie "LA Confidential" (spinoff from Ned's 90s movies thread) (3 Viewers)

Rate the movie "LA Confidential"

  • 10 - Amazing Movie

    Votes: 13 16.9%
  • 9 - Great Movie

    Votes: 31 40.3%
  • 8 - Good Movie

    Votes: 19 24.7%
  • 7 - Solid Movie

    Votes: 4 5.2%
  • 6 - Okay Movie

    Votes: 6 7.8%
  • 5 - I'm Indifferent

    Votes: 2 2.6%
  • 4 - Subpar

    Votes: 2 2.6%
  • 3 - Bad Movie

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2 - Terrible Movie

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1 - The Worst Movie

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    77
I've always felt like this was a movie that I should have absolutely loved, but just didn't. I don't know why this film doesn't really click with me. The story is good, the cast is phenomenal, it's well shot, etc. I don't know. Anyway, I voted for 8.
 
Great movie.

That shootout at the end is an all-timer.

The two lead actors, playing men with deep roots in Los Angeles--were both Australian.
 
Solid movie, but for some reason I always came away feeling like it "tried too hard". But yes, I was entertained.
 
I rewatched it about a month ago and really liked it. 8.5 for me on a tough scale.

ETA: it's definitely "Chinatown" in feel but still a little under "Chinatown" for me in comparison.
 
I always thought the biggest stars being supporting roles to lesser known actors worked out really well.

Actually, every single casting decision in this movie was a home run, come to think of it. Down to Johnny Stompanato and Mrs. Lefferts.
 
I think it is very well done but I've never loved this movie, so I give it an 8.

To me it feels surreal and over the top with way too much going on. I don’t mean it is too hard to follow, but feels like a cheesy amount of twists and turns. Like @Sleestak said above, it "tries too hard."
 
I read the book which is incredible. The layers of storytelling in the book was James Ellroy at his best.
The movie just was not going to live up to it and it didn't. It was definitely entertaining enough but just couldn't quite get it done for me
 
I read the book which is incredible. The layers of storytelling in the book was James Ellroy at his best.
The movie just was not going to live up to it and it didn't. It was definitely entertaining enough but just couldn't quite get it done for me
Interesting. I love the novel (and the whole LA quartet) but I thought the movie streamlined a lot and found a nice coherent story. It’s not the book, not by any stretch but that book could never be adapted perfectly into a movie. There’s just too much going on. The movie is a perfect adaptation of something seemingly I adaptable.

Ellroy hated the movie but he’s also a serious weirdo. He said he doesn’t care about anything after May 1972. He thinks Raymond Chandler sucks. He doesn’t believe WW2 has ended. He’s just either totally out there, somewhat ill or a contrarian to the power of 10.
 
:tebow:LA Confidential.:bow:

So many great scenes.
Best scene and one of the all-time greatest scenes in film history.
L.A. Confidential (3/10) Movie CLIP - The Interrogation (1997)
Second best scene, so many to choose from, could easily post a half dozen scenes.
L.A. Confidential (5/10) Movie CLIP - Shotgun Ed

So many great lines.
Best line.

"Av ya a valediction Boyo?"
L.A. Confidential(1997) - The Death Of Jack Vincennes

Second best line.

"Is that how you used to run the Good Cop/Bad Cop?"
L. A. Confidential Good Cop/Bad Cop
 
:tebow:LA Confidential.:bow:

So many great scenes.
Best scene and one of the all-time greatest scenes in film history.
L.A. Confidential (3/10) Movie CLIP - The Interrogation (1997)
Second best scene, so many to choose from, could easily post a half dozen scenes.
L.A. Confidential (5/10) Movie CLIP - Shotgun Ed

So many great lines.
Best line.

"Av ya a valediction Boyo?"
L.A. Confidential(1997) - The Death Of Jack Vincennes

Second best line.

"Is that how you used to run the Good Cop/Bad Cop?"
L. A. Confidential Good Cop/Bad Cop

:shock:
So there ARE spoiler tags? When did we find this out? And why is it "ISPOILER"?
 
I read the book which is incredible. The layers of storytelling in the book was James Ellroy at his best.
The movie just was not going to live up to it and it didn't. It was definitely entertaining enough but just couldn't quite get it done for me
Interesting. I love the novel (and the whole LA quartet) but I thought the movie streamlined a lot and found a nice coherent story. It’s not the book, not by any stretch but that book could never be adapted perfectly into a movie. There’s just too much going on. The movie is a perfect adaptation of something seemingly I adaptable.

Ellroy hated the movie but he’s also a serious weirdo. He said he doesn’t care about anything after May 1972. He thinks Raymond Chandler sucks. He doesn’t believe WW2 has ended. He’s just either totally out there, somewhat ill or a contrarian to the power of 10.
L.A., especially during that time period, had so many rabbit holes that led to other rabbit holes that I wouldn't be surprised if writing 4 books about it led to his 'quirkiness.' Or, the only way he could have endured writing them was that he was crazy beforehand and the subject matter drew him like a moth to a flame.
 
I read the book which is incredible. The layers of storytelling in the book was James Ellroy at his best.
The movie just was not going to live up to it and it didn't. It was definitely entertaining enough but just couldn't quite get it done for me
Interesting. I love the novel (and the whole LA quartet) but I thought the movie streamlined a lot and found a nice coherent story. It’s not the book, not by any stretch but that book could never be adapted perfectly into a movie. There’s just too much going on. The movie is a perfect adaptation of something seemingly I adaptable.

Ellroy hated the movie but he’s also a serious weirdo. He said he doesn’t care about anything after May 1972. He thinks Raymond Chandler sucks. He doesn’t believe WW2 has ended. He’s just either totally out there, somewhat ill or a contrarian to the power of 10.
L.A., especially during that time period, had so many rabbit holes that led to other rabbit holes that I wouldn't be surprised if writing 4 books about it led to his 'quirkiness.' Or, the only way he could have endured writing them was that he was crazy beforehand and the subject matter drew him like a moth to a flame.
The article I read seems to indicate he’s always been bizarre (or at least that’s how he chooses to paint himself). He said ask a kid he would tell his mom WW2 was still going on. She would explain it ended before he was born but he refused to believe it.
 
I read the book which is incredible. The layers of storytelling in the book was James Ellroy at his best.
The movie just was not going to live up to it and it didn't. It was definitely entertaining enough but just couldn't quite get it done for me
Interesting. I love the novel (and the whole LA quartet) but I thought the movie streamlined a lot and found a nice coherent story. It’s not the book, not by any stretch but that book could never be adapted perfectly into a movie. There’s just too much going on. The movie is a perfect adaptation of something seemingly I adaptable.

Ellroy hated the movie but he’s also a serious weirdo. He said he doesn’t care about anything after May 1972. He thinks Raymond Chandler sucks. He doesn’t believe WW2 has ended. He’s just either totally out there, somewhat ill or a contrarian to the power of 10.
My take on Ellroy is that he is a contrarian publicly but some of his takes he is just playing with people. Don't get me wrong, he's a strange guy but I don't think he's that disconnected from reality.
 
I read the book which is incredible. The layers of storytelling in the book was James Ellroy at his best.
The movie just was not going to live up to it and it didn't. It was definitely entertaining enough but just couldn't quite get it done for me
Interesting. I love the novel (and the whole LA quartet) but I thought the movie streamlined a lot and found a nice coherent story. It’s not the book, not by any stretch but that book could never be adapted perfectly into a movie. There’s just too much going on. The movie is a perfect adaptation of something seemingly I adaptable.

Ellroy hated the movie but he’s also a serious weirdo. He said he doesn’t care about anything after May 1972. He thinks Raymond Chandler sucks. He doesn’t believe WW2 has ended. He’s just either totally out there, somewhat ill or a contrarian to the power of 10.
L.A., especially during that time period, had so many rabbit holes that led to other rabbit holes that I wouldn't be surprised if writing 4 books about it led to his 'quirkiness.' Or, the only way he could have endured writing them was that he was crazy beforehand and the subject matter drew him like a moth to a flame.
His mother was murdered when he was 10 years old so IMO impossible to be "normal" after something like that happens
 
I read the book which is incredible. The layers of storytelling in the book was James Ellroy at his best.
The movie just was not going to live up to it and it didn't. It was definitely entertaining enough but just couldn't quite get it done for me
Interesting. I love the novel (and the whole LA quartet) but I thought the movie streamlined a lot and found a nice coherent story. It’s not the book, not by any stretch but that book could never be adapted perfectly into a movie. There’s just too much going on. The movie is a perfect adaptation of something seemingly I adaptable.

Ellroy hated the movie but he’s also a serious weirdo. He said he doesn’t care about anything after May 1972. He thinks Raymond Chandler sucks. He doesn’t believe WW2 has ended. He’s just either totally out there, somewhat ill or a contrarian to the power of 10.
L.A., especially during that time period, had so many rabbit holes that led to other rabbit holes that I wouldn't be surprised if writing 4 books about it led to his 'quirkiness.' Or, the only way he could have endured writing them was that he was crazy beforehand and the subject matter drew him like a moth to a flame.
His mother was murdered when he was 10 years old so IMO impossible to be "normal" after something like that happens
Terrible. I didn't know about his past. Hope writing was at least a little therapeutic.
 

Ellroy had very nice things to say about the movie in this lil documentary-type thing.

One of the things I really liked was that the director was saying he had chosen songs for the movie, and they were able to really make the scenes fit because they knew which songs they were using. Personally, I am a bit shocked that doesn't happen more often.
 
His mother was murdered when he was 10 years old so IMO impossible to be "normal" after something like that happens
His Wiki page includes some 'other' disturbing aspects of his childhood.

...At the age of 7, Ellroy saw his mother naked and began to sexually fantasize about her. He struggled in youth with this obsession, as he held a psycho-sexual relationship with her, and tried to catch glimpses of her nude.[6][7] Ellroy stated that "I lived for naked glimpses. I hated her and lusted for her..."[8]

On June 22, 1958, when Ellroy was ten years old, his mother was raped and murdered.[8] Ellroy later described his mother as "sharp-tongued [and] bad-tempered",[9] unable to keep a steady job, alcoholic, and sexually promiscuous. His first reaction upon hearing of her death was relief: he could now live with his father, whom he preferred.[10] His father was more permissive and allowed Ellroy to do as he pleased, namely be "left alone to read, to go out and peep through windows, prowl around and sniff the air."[4] The police never found his mother's killer, and the case still remains unsolved. The murder, along with reading The Badge by Jack Webb (a book comprising sensational cases from the files of the Los Angeles Police Department, a birthday gift from his father), were important events of Ellroy's youth.[5][9]

Ellroy's inability to come to terms with the emotions surrounding his mother's murder led him to transfer them onto another murder victim, Elizabeth Short. Nicknamed the "Black Dahlia," Short was a young woman murdered in 1947, her body cut in half and discarded in Los Angeles, in a notorious and unsolved crime...

I think we can understand why he was drawn to crime from that era and how his books delve deeply into the seedy underbelly of LA since that was the defining backdrop of his childhood.
 
One of the things I really liked was that the director was saying he had chosen songs for the movie, and they were able to really make the scenes fit because they knew which songs they were using. Personally, I am a bit shocked that doesn't happen more often.

Copyrights and time issues. I am also surprised it doesn't happen more often, but we know why. Some of L.A. Confidential's music is probably in the public domain for copyright, so you can find a song and use it.
 
Watched once. Remember nothing about it.
Not real compelled to watch again but I know I probably should.
I am basically the same. I watched it once.......probably a couple years ago. I didn't think it lived up to the hype. Maybe I need to watch it again.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top