ShamrockPride
Footballguy
She's a 9 as long as she keeps her hair long. The short hair drops that number down dramatically.
This. Not ugly but not hot, imo.Solid 7.5
Don't get the love for her.
The definitions are more important than the pics. The pics match the definitions, and are just references for comparison.Ehhh, things were going well until 6. I'd bump her and the girls below her down a point. I don't see much difference between 1 and 2. Are we sure #2 isn't a dude in a dress?
Top 10 post ever.Koya said:As if we have something better to do? That's why we are still here after 15 years.
Those anecdotal pics now have me confused. I always thought the offdee scale was difficult; provocative, even. Game-changing. You picked an average model for anecdotal evidence of a ten.The definitions are more important than the pics. The pics match the definitions, and are just references for comparison.
6 and below have a bit more detail in the definitions because they are harder to rank...mostly because people don't bother to rank something that's not attractive.
7 is cute
8 is hot (and yes, there is a distinct difference between cute and hot)
9 and 10's are special and rarified air.
---
ETA: there is no denying Scarlett Johansen is hot (not cute), so that automatically makes her an 8. But the reality is there are tiers of hotness above her and overall she's not rarified air solely on looks which is what rating a chick is about.
Doesn't that have to be factored into the rating? Agree that ScarJo's were kinda scary though.Note to self: on future polls do NOT click on the every day links.
You realize that 1 in 50 people is eligible for Mensa. Even if you're just saying this is women only, 1 in every 50 women is a pretty low bar.To help the OP out, as seems he's unaware.
offdee scale
10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)
Dammit - i don't know why I felt the need to click on all of those.To help the OP out, as seems he's unaware.
offdee scale
10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)
http://i280.photobuc...Scale/TOS10.png
9: The hottest girl at the club, The hottest girl at school, etc (more locally amazing)
http://i280.photobuc...cale/TOS85b.jpg
8: One of the hotter women at the club, one of the hotter girls at school (upper class of hot women)
http://i280.photobuc...Scale/TOS8c.jpg
7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.
http://i280.photobuc...0Scale/TOS7.jpg
6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones
http://i280.photobuc...0Scale/TOS6.jpg
5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common
http://i280.photobuc...Scale/TOS5c.png
4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)
http://i280.photobuc...Scale/TOS4c.jpg
3: One of the uglier girls in school, one of the uglier girls at work (lower class of ugly women)
http://i280.photobuc...0Scale/TOS3.jpg
2: The ugliest girl in school, the ugliest girl at work (couldn't even get into a club)
http://i280.photobuc...0Scale/TOS2.jpg
1: Absolutely disgusting and hard to look at. Young children point and adults look away upon seeing (not one single redeeming quality)
http://i280.photobuc...0Scale/TOS1.jpg
Of course - but I'd rather eff up a poll than ruin all future ScarJo films.KarmaPolice said:Doesn't that have to be factored into the rating? Agree that ScarJo's were kinda scary though.
Start a thread rating cats.Sooooo....another 10 pages of the same arguments about rating women we've had for the last 15 years?