Thanks for posting!
How so? Allen got benched late in the season at Carolina last year. He was that bad. I dont see much change in the rushing numbers but in PPR it should be a boast as Allen checks down a lotAllen should open things up for Gibson.
Bc Haskins was that bad. One of the worst instinctive Qbs I've seen since maybe Jemarcus Russell.How so? Allen got benched late in the season at Carolina last year. He was that bad. I dont see much change in the rushing numbers but in PPR it should be a boast as Allen checks down a lot
And we have a BINGO.Bc Haskins was that bad. One of the worst instinctive Qbs I've seen since maybe Jemarcus Russell.
Actually I don't know if the staff really wanted him to begin with. I seem to recall reading that Gruden didn't want him. I'm sure others know more about that than I do though.And we have a BINGO.
You can have all the physical tools in the world. Unfortunately you don't have all day to make a decision and throw.
Unfortunately for Dwayne, the staff and front office that had so much vested interest in him is gone. He'll never have that same level of commitment from another staff. This new staff gave him a month trial. Odds of him even getting that again are slim.
They didn't, from what I heard. I do not have a link so consider it reading the tea leaves. Gruden was trying to save his job and wanted a veteran starter, which is partly the reason they went with Keenum for a while. When that proved untenable, Gruden threw Haskins in at halftime of the Giants game without warning or prep. Quite the place to put a rookie QB if you're got a vested interest in him.Actually I don't know if the staff really wanted him to begin with. I seem to recall reading that Gruden didn't want him. I'm sure others know more about that than I do though.
Yea, I think he might've been able to take that second one to the house if he angled towards the pylon more. Pretty sure we see a 50+ yarder out of him eventually this year. Just needs more snaps in the 4th vs gassed/uninterested D's.Thanks for posting!
This is by far the best he has played. Really starting to see that speed now. Not sure he has the long speed that the best have, but it's plenty. That first run as he turns the corner is a good example.
Agreed. Haskins was a Snyder pick, IIRTRCThey didn't, from what I heard. I do not have a link so consider it reading the tea leaves. Gruden was trying to save his job and wanted a veteran starter, which is partly the reason they went with Keenum for a while. When that proved untenable, Gruden threw Haskins in at halftime of the Giants game without warning or prep. Quite the place to put a rookie QB if you're got a vested interest in him.Actually I don't know if the staff really wanted him to begin with. I seem to recall reading that Gruden didn't want him. I'm sure others know more about that than I do though.
Agreed. Each week his touches increase and the highlights look a little more like a young player that is starting to think less and play faster. With the injury bug hitting hard across the league (esp. at RB), one would have to have a pretty deep roster to not consider starting Gibson as an RB2/Flex every week.I think his floor has been raised from week 1 to now such that he should be a solid low end RB2 on the average day. And a blowup outing is undoubtedly coming.
I’m tempted to start him over Taylor in full point PPR but it’s not yet time.Broke the seal and promoted him off my taxi squad and starting over Gurley....whoo whoo!
https://twitter.com/jagibbs_23/status/1314550177978490881?s=21Jacob Gibbs @jagibbs_23
Reminder:
Gibson is tied with Josh Jacobs for 1st in the NFL in broken tackles on half the carries.
Among qualified RB, he ranks:
- 3rd in PFF rushing grade
- 11th in receiving grade
- 8th in elusiveness grade
Upcoming schedule: NYG,DAL,NYG,DET,CIN,DAL
He's gonna ball tf out
You want to Ram with me?Antonio Gibson flew to South Dakota this week to lock horns with actual rams. Immediately following, the Fish and Wildlife Service has announced them as endangered species.
Exact same thoughts here. RB2 at worst for ROS (for non-ppr, but even better if you're ppr) and I'm sensing a bright horizon soon to the land of RB1 or somewhere in between RB1-2. Last wk was his nice blowup kick through the door, especially against BAL's D. And if he does it again this wk against the Rams, oh boy... His trade value's gonna skyrocket. I'm putting him in this wk over Gordon and McKinnon. Excited about their QB change, and I'm thinking it'll truly help ascend him to be the "CMC lite" they've talked of.I think his floor has been raised from week 1 to now such that he should be a solid low end RB2 on the average day. And a blowup outing is undoubtedly coming.
I sat Mixon last week and lost my match up. Tough to sit a guy after last weeks performance.jtp1982 said:Leaning hard on putting him in over Mixon this week. Just from a gamescript perspective doesn’t feel like a Mixon week and I need wins I’m 1-3.
LA with the early start 10am their time. Goff doesn’t travel well. I’d love to see DC give them a run for their money and either way I need the W.
After the Rams this week his schedule is:Buck Bradcanon said:I think his floor has been raised from week 1 to now such that he should be a solid low end RB2 on the average day. And a blowup outing is undoubtedly coming.
This is what I'm doing, I've gotten in trouble to many times chasing last weeks points.jtp1982 said:Leaning hard on putting him in over Mixon this week. Just from a gamescript perspective doesn’t feel like a Mixon week and I need wins I’m 1-3.
LA with the early start 10am their time. Goff doesn’t travel well. I’d love to see DC give them a run for their money and either way I need the W.
We also see that Mike Davis is RB7 in PPR over the last 2 weeks. The talent gap between CMC and Davis is probably even greater than the gap between CMC and Gibson. If Gibson gets CMC's opportunities, he'll be a top 10 back. However, his usage is just not high enough yet. McKissic has been on the field more than him in 3 of the 4 games.Is everyone forgetting that CMC is more talented than Gibson? I like the opportunity but Allen in CAR was targeting a much more talented RB than he is in Washington.
Don’t remember anyone comparing Gibson to CMC. This is about pass targets.Is everyone forgetting that CMC is more talented than Gibson? I like the opportunity but Allen in CAR was targeting a much more talented RB than he is in Washington.
Yep.If you could flip him for a top 4 2021 rookie pick in Superflex leagues are you pulling the trigger on that?
weak RB class?Yep.
2021 QB class looking to be very good. I heard some one mention 1983 good which is of course hyperbolic but its looking to have several good QB prospects as well as some good WRs.
Watch those targets just go to McKissic. Though to be fair, he's looked pretty good too.Don’t remember anyone comparing Gibson to CMC. This is about pass targets.
Im not sure I like some of them like Travis Etienne and Chuba Hubbard but they are overshadowed by the QBs.weak RB class?
He has looked good. We don’t know that Allen will be targeting the RB at this point. Gibson owners can dream though.Watch those targets just go to McKissic. Though to be fair, he's looked pretty good too.
I think Gibson is the start. Kyle getting his first start is going to check down a lot IMO...he did that with CMC and I'm sure he'll do it with GibsonStill mulling over Gibson over Jonathan Taylor in my ppr league. IMO Gibson has a higher ceiling
That's my thinking. The check down receptions give him a solid floorI think Gibson is the start. Kyle getting his first start is going to check down a lot IMO...he did that with CMC and I'm sure he'll do it with Gibson