Where did you have him ranked last week?Emphasis on the FWIW.
Last week they had him #7.
He can only go bonkers if he gets the carries....that's the concern.Does anyone else think that Hyde may be a little tired of all these rumors and go bonkers today?
Don't want to bench Howard or D.Martin but it's tempting.
I am not sure if it's just you posting this multiple times or if others are as well but I have seen this refrain multiple in this thread and I have no idea what people are basing it on.
Shanahan wants to win. Shanahan also has a long history of feeding his primary RB when he has a legit lead RB. We can debate whether or not Hyde is a legit lead RB but I don't see how anyone can question Shanahan's usage of RBs.
Now if you want to talk about his failure to utilize his #1 WR near the goal line I'm totally on board that train. Actually I'm the conductor of that train.
I think the concerns have been outlined in great detail. It seems like so many people are already forgetting Hyde's upside.He can only go bonkers if he gets the carries....that's the concern.
Link? I haven't seen a single poster say he doesn't have plenty of upside, it's the (new) low floor that is the issue. He had 1.8 pts. standard, 2.8 ppr, under what should have been nearly ideal circumstances last week. I don't think anyone would even be thinking of starting him if they forgot his upside.I think the concerns have been outlined in great detail. It seems like so many people are already forgetting Hyde's upside.
And that is what he does. From Steve Slaton to Alfred Morris to Devonta Freeman he runs his lead RB until they break. He even made viable players out of guys like Ryan Torain and Roy Helu until they broke down.It’s called opinion. Hence the addition of IMO. I watched it plenty with his father too, as well as coaches like Chip Kelly. IMO their ego and their high opinion of themselves can be counterproductive to the interests of the team. I’m not sure how anyone looking in from the outside sees that Breida is a superior RB to Hyde. And if anyone knows that bellcow RBs need feeding, it ought to be a Shanahan.
Yahtzee!!!!Sweet, looks like he might get a goal line carry and they take a delay of game penalty.
Hyde is getting the majority of the snaps whenever I look at this game.Breida has more yards than Hyde on 1/4 the touches. Huh.
Hyde is getting the majority of the snaps whenever I look at this game.
   Did I say differently?I don't know. Felt like the implication was that breida was the right guy to have. Just giving the counterpoint that the volume would still favor Hyde.Did I say differently?
he`s exactly what we think he is ...a handcuffHyde put up quite a nice fantasy day. He has been the only bright spot for the 49ers to this point...The 49ers may want to work Breida in, but he really hasn’t shown anything to this point in the season.
Ha true.This time he benched the QB, which has worked out well for Hyde!
 ) so perhaps they wanted to lean more on Hydes experience. Most teams do not want rookies to support a new QB as part of setting the green QB up for success.
  and will stick with what the coach is actually doing with the players.He is not talking up Breida any more than passing comments that are barely worthy of being included in an off-season puff piece. Look at what is happening on the field and look at Shanahan's history with RBs those are the only things that matter. NaVorro Bowman has nothing to do with Hyde. The "ties to the organization" argument never holds up to scrutiny. 0-6 or not how many coaches are going to put a rookie RB in the same backfield protecting the rookie QB they are evaluating for the future?i have no new information to base this on, but it "feels" like I should be cutting bait with Hyde and selling high this week.
Really the injury history thing is the biggest issue, shannahan's comments arent helping either... Personally i like hyde's ability and i'm not getting why shannahan is so eager to talk up his rookie... i mean hyde isn't 29 he's only 26 and they should be able to count on him to be a contributer for another 2-3 more years.... the whole situation has me uneasy and I'm still really concerned week 14 hyde won't be a fantasy asset.
- Coach has been talking up his rookie RB (usage sunday didnt align with comments)
 
- hyde is not his player and has no ties to him
 
- 0-6 team with little incentive to play vets
 
- already released a respected vet (Bowman)
 
- hyde's past injury history (or just inability to stay healthy for 16 games)
 
I guess one way to qualm fears is to roster breida, but i really don't see much in breida. he looks like JAG to me. sorry to fear monger, but this whole thing has me on edge
The most likes on this page are for a guy saying he's eating crow.Well, I was super wrong about Hyde this week. Crazy as all the local radio talk was about phasing him out, not the future, looking to deal him, etc.
glad I don’t own him because he would have been on my bench.
but I came in here to eat my crow. I was, without question, super wrong about Hyde this week, and I apologize to anyone who listened to / was influenced by my comments.
my bad. :(
Hey, we all make mistakes. Owning them is the hard part.The most likes on this page are for a guy saying he's eating crow.
  But also how we learn from our mistakes.Hey, we all make mistakes. Owning them is the hard part.![]()
 Radio click-bait trying to catch earballs.Crazy as all the local radio talk was about phasing him out, not the future, looking to deal him, etc.
Yes we do and it really shouldn't be so difficult. I wish more people would. I have never understood people unwilling to admit making mistakes and/or refusing to apologize.Hey, we all make mistakes. Owning them is the hard part.![]()
Pretty sure you can take that one to the bank.But also how we learn from our mistakes.
It shows good character to admit when you are wrong. A lot of folks never do that and keep making the same mistakes over and over again because of it.
At least now your conscience is clear for you to make some new ones.![]()
  It's not a madden franchise. The incentive to play vets is that 7-9 is a lot better for Shanahan's job security going forward than 2-14 is. This is a team that's lost 5 straight games by 3 points or less. They're not as bad as their record indicates.i have no new information to base this on, but it "feels" like I should be cutting bait with Hyde and selling high this week.
- Coach has been talking up his rookie RB (usage sunday didnt align with comments)
 
- hyde is not his player and has no ties to him
 
- 0-6 team with little incentive to play vets
 
- already released a respected vet (Bowman)
 
- hyde's past injury history (or just inability to stay healthy for 16 games)
 
In year one of a to-the-studs remodel, with Hoyer and TheBeard at QB, neither Lynch's nor Shanahan's job are likely to be at risk.It's not a madden franchise. The incentive to play vets is that 7-9 is a lot better for Shanahan's job security going forward than 2-14 is. This is a team that's lost 5 straight games by 3 points or less. They're not as bad as their record indicates.
Thats some serious mental gymnastics to arrive at an incorrect conclusion.In year one of a to-the-studs remodel, with Hoyer and TheBeard at QB, neither Lynch's nor Shanahan's job are likely to be at risk.
But regarding Hyde, barring limited but successful usage in week 1 and two major defensive lapses by Seattle in week 2 (where ProBowl/AllPro players KJ Wright and Kam Chancellor brainfarted and committed to the wrong gap), in the last 4 games Hyde has 62 carries for 191 yards and 17/14 targets/catches for 91 yards while going against Rams, Cardinals, Colts, and Redskins, teams that are 18th, 7th, 21st, and 8th (average 13.5) in run defense DVOA. That's an average of (191+91)/(62+17) = 3.6 yards per utilization. That's pretty poor. He also has been consistently in the top 8 RBs of yards before first potential tackle (good OL play). He's has not been a special player so far this year. Breida may not be a super star, but there is little reason to expect Hyde to perform at an elite level of efficiency, nor little reason for the coaches to feed him the ball 30 times a game. Hyde is not head and shoulders better than his competition. Regression (after the first two games) for Hyde this season looks like a barely 3 ypc back with 15 carries per game and 4 receptions for 28 yards and .75 TD every game.
Well, if Walter says it's true...This site is reporting Hyde as being on the trade block. Anywhere else saying something along these lines? Sourced to a Broncos news site. Seems weak, but a Hyde trade wouldn't shock me.
http://walterfootball.com/nflpossibilities.php