What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB David Johnson, Retired (1 Viewer)

If Carolina gets up big maybe but if Carolina is in a close game can't Arizona still get the #1 seed if they win and Carolina loses?
Yes. AZ will probably play their starters most of the game unless either game gets out of hand early.

 
Chad Parsons@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015
In the last decade, the only rookie running back with more total touchdowns than David Johnson is Maurics Jones-Drew in 2006

Chad Parsons@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015
Rookie running backs since 2000 with 400+ rushing, 400+ receiving, 10+ TDs: David Johnson, Doug Martin, Matt Forte, Maurice Jones-Drew

Chad Parsons@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015
Last rookie running back in that 400-400-10 club before David Johnson lower than RD2 draft pick: Herschel Walker in '86

Chad Parsons@ChadParsonsNFL 30 Dec 2015
In short, ridiculous company for David Johnson and he was very much a role player with minimal work early in the season.

 
Moved him in dyno for amari cooper n tyler eifert.he might be over valued now. Cash in?
I'd take Amari Cooper straight up for DJ in dynasty but I would hate to see him go.
wow. It would take more for DJ than amari for m
Really depends on your team make-up. I've got Freeman & Gurley - if I were weak at WR I would probably take that. Lifespan of WR is longer, OAK is headed in right direction, etc....

 
Noah Davis said:
thehornet said:
Moved him in dyno for amari cooper n tyler eifert.he might be over valued now. Cash in?
I'd take Amari Cooper straight up for DJ in dynasty but I would hate to see him go.
wow. It would take more for DJ than amari for m
Really depends on your team make-up. I've got Freeman & Gurley - if I were weak at WR I would probably take that. Lifespan of WR is longer, OAK is headed in right direction, etc....
No way. DJ is special talent. I don't think I could trade him. The Julio Jones owner in my dynasty league loves him, but I don't even know that I would do it for Julio right now. Srsly.

Think about how thin the talent pool is at RB right now? Especially three down backs who get the short yardage and are good receivers and get TDs? In dynasty I can't name many guys I would rather have right now at the RB position.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bracie Smathers said:


Chad Parsons@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015

In the last decade, the only rookie running back with more total touchdowns than David Johnson is Maurics Jones-Drew in 2006



Chad Parsons@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015

Rookie running backs since 2000 with 400+ rushing, 400+ receiving, 10+ TDs: David Johnson, Doug Martin, Matt Forte, Maurice Jones-Drew



Chad Parsons@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015

Last rookie running back in that 400-400-10 club before David Johnson lower than RD2 draft pick: Herschel Walker in '86



Chad Parsons@ChadParsonsNFL 30 Dec 2015

In short, ridiculous company for David Johnson and he was very much a role player with minimal work early in the season.
Is it scary that everyone of those rbs fell off considerably in year 2? Obviously nice overall careers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absent some kind of major change in the status quo or strong hints by Arians to tap the brakes, DJ's an obvious 1st round in redraft next year. For dyno RBs I think I'd only rank Gurley higher right now, and I wouldn't trade away either guy unless the offer was absurdly good.

 
Noah Davis said:
thehornet said:
Moved him in dyno for amari cooper n tyler eifert.he might be over valued now. Cash in?
I'd take Amari Cooper straight up for DJ in dynasty but I would hate to see him go.
wow. It would take more for DJ than amari for m
Really depends on your team make-up. I've got Freeman & Gurley - if I were weak at WR I would probably take that. Lifespan of WR is longer, OAK is headed in right direction, etc....
No way. DJ is special talent. I don't think I could trade him. The Julio Jones owner in my dynasty league loves him, but I don't even know that I would do it for Julio right now. Srsly.

Think about how thin the talent pool is at RB right now? Especially three down backs who get the short yardage and are good receivers and get TDs? In dynasty I can't name many guys I would rather have right now at the RB position.
I know what you're saying but you get WR1 numbers for 8-9 years from Cooper. You get RB1 numbers from DJ for what? 4 maybe 5 years tops. Couple that with a slightly higher injury rate historically for RB and what seems to me as an easier time identifying RB to pick up off the WW and I think you have to do that deal.

 
Noah Davis said:
thehornet said:
Moved him in dyno for amari cooper n tyler eifert.he might be over valued now. Cash in?
I'd take Amari Cooper straight up for DJ in dynasty but I would hate to see him go.
wow. It would take more for DJ than amari for m
Really depends on your team make-up. I've got Freeman & Gurley - if I were weak at WR I would probably take that. Lifespan of WR is longer, OAK is headed in right direction, etc....
No way. DJ is special talent. I don't think I could trade him. The Julio Jones owner in my dynasty league loves him, but I don't even know that I would do it for Julio right now.Srsly.

Think about how thin the talent pool is at RB right now? Especially three down backs who get the short yardage and are good receivers and get TDs? In dynasty I can't name many guys I would rather have right now at the RB position.
I know what you're saying but you get WR1 numbers for 8-9 years from Cooper. You get RB1 numbers from DJ for what? 4 maybe 5 years tops. Couple that with a slightly higher injury rate historically for RB and what seems to me as an easier time identifying RB to pick up off the WW and I think you have to do that deal.
We don't know either of these things. (We don't "KNOW" anything about how long these guys will play/dominate/do well, period). Neither of them have a long track record, and either of them could be "atypical."

Cooper could be like Michael Clayton and never put up decent numbers again, he could be like Anquan Boldin and put up good numbers, but never really be a "stud," or he could be like Jerry Rice where he has a long career with many "stud" seasons.

David Johnson could be like Kevan Barlow and never really live up to the hype, he could be like Duce Staley and be solid for a while, but never really a "stud," or he could be like Curtis Martin with a 10+ year career with numerous "stud" seasons.

How you perceive him is how you value him. Personally, I'd value him over Cooper, but I'd value WRs like Watkins, Evans, etc over him.

 
Bracie Smathers said:
Chad Parsons ‏@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015

In the last decade, the only rookie running back with more total touchdowns than David Johnson is Maurics Jones-Drew in 2006

Chad Parsons ‏@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015

Rookie running backs since 2000 with 400+ rushing, 400+ receiving, 10+ TDs: David Johnson, Doug Martin, Matt Forte, Maurice Jones-Drew

Chad Parsons ‏@ChadParsonsNFL 29 Dec 2015

Last rookie running back in that 400-400-10 club before David Johnson lower than RD2 draft pick: Herschel Walker in '86



Chad Parsons ‏@ChadParsonsNFL 30 Dec 2015

In short, ridiculous company for David Johnson and he was very much a role player with minimal work early in the season.
Is it scary that everyone of those rbs fell off considerably in year 2? Obviously nice overall careers
They fell off after their rookies seasons but they are different from David Johnson's rookie season.

MJD - 5'7 but packed solid at 210 lbs. In his rookie season the Jags didn't use him a lot for the first few games but then started feeding him and he had two games of over 20 carries in his rookie year but in his second year they used him more consistently but never fed him 20 carries in any game. It was more in the 11 carry range and that had more to do with his size.

They never gave him more than 200 carries his first three years in the league but then in 2009 they decided to feature him and he had 3 consecutive seasons with over 300 carries. Makes sense that they were being cautious and/or simply didn't think he could carry the load at his small size.

Doug Martin - Isn't tall but at 5'9 and 223 lbs he is also packed solidly however the reason his production fell after his rookie season is injury. He played in all 16 games his rookie year but only 6 in his second season. He also missed 5 games his third year in the league and seemed in the coaches' doghouse until he re-emerged this year. In his rookie season he had over 300 carries (319) but has never had another 300 carry season in his career.

Matt Forte - is more like David Johnson in that he's 6'2 218 lbs and DJ is 6'1 224 lbs Forte started out with a bang with 316 for 1,238 yards but the Bears cut back his carry numbers after his rookie year and he's NEVER had another 300 carry game in his career.

MDJ wasn't used at a high volume his first few years in the league but flashed huge potential and eventually got fed more 300 carry seasons than any of the backs listed with 3 consecutive 300 carry seasons in a row in the meat of his career. Doug Martin got injured after blowing up his rookie season with over 300 carries. And the Bears cut back on Forte's carries after a career high 316 carries his rookie year and have never given him that number of carries again.

MJD - 166 carries and 46 receptions for a total of 212 offensive touches

Doug Martin - 319 carries and 49 receptions for a total of 368 offensive touches

Matt Forte - 316 carries and 63 receptions for a total of 379 offensive touches

Now compare to David Johnson's rookie season of only 125 carries and only 36 receptions for a grand total of 161 offensive touches.

- 51 less than MJD

- 207 less than Dough Martin

- 218 less than Forte

I don't anticipate a drop in his numbers but I think he will see a significant increase in carries and receptions and obviously think he will produce much more his second season.

 
Look at all the people here who learned nothing from cj Anderson and Jeremy hill last year.
What does this even mean?

Are you saying that no RB will ever follow up a successful first year as a starter ever again because those two didn't?
I think it means that it's a bad idea to burn a 1st or 2nd round pick on a guy who has only proven it over a relatively short period of time...especially a RB. I'll be struggling with this concept next season with respect to David Johnson. I love what I've seen so far, but he's still only shown us a small sample.

 
Quasimoto said:
Look at all the people here who learned nothing from cj Anderson and Jeremy hill last year.
What does this even mean?

Are you saying that no RB will ever follow up a successful first year as a starter ever again because those two didn't?
I think it means that it's a bad idea to burn a 1st or 2nd round pick on a guy who has only proven it over a relatively short period of time...especially a RB. I'll be struggling with this concept next season with respect to David Johnson. I love what I've seen so far, but he's still only shown us a small sample.
Its always different when its YOUR guy. I would expect nothing less in a DJ thread. No need to see him produce as the lead guy for a full season. He is already a top 5 asset. Ridiculous.
 
Quasimoto said:
Look at all the people here who learned nothing from cj Anderson and Jeremy hill last year.
What does this even mean?

Are you saying that no RB will ever follow up a successful first year as a starter ever again because those two didn't?
I think it means that it's a bad idea to burn a 1st or 2nd round pick on a guy who has only proven it over a relatively short period of time...especially a RB. I'll be struggling with this concept next season with respect to David Johnson. I love what I've seen so far, but he's still only shown us a small sample.
Its always different when its YOUR guy. I would expect nothing less in a DJ thread. No need to see him produce as the lead guy for a full season. He is already a top 5 asset. Ridiculous.
Some people had him ranked a lot higher so it's not as much of a stretch. I would have drafted him at 1.03 behind only Cooper and Gurley so moving him into the top 15 overall isn't as much of a stretch. Lots of WR I'd put ahead of him but not many RB. Heck look at that game last week where Arizona got killed, who did they turn to in their time of need? DJ got 8 targets in the first half. He and Palmer weren't on the same page because he should have gone to some kind of hot route but that will be fixed. It's the perfect offense for him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To Milkman's credit he does say he thinks Johnson was being drafted too low in rookie drafts. I don't see any suggestion on his part that Johnson should have been the third rookie drafted, but he does say Johnson was being drafted too late.

The statement gets followed up by gems like this:

Comparing Freeman to Johnson is like comparing a 1985 Datsun to 2015 F250. They are not remotely the same player athletically. Doesn't mean Johnson is going to be successful but Freeman never had a shot at hitting. Johnson has a shot at being the best RB in this class.
Negative. You need a certain level of athletic ability. Some of the RB in this class don't have it. Not saying it's likely but Johnson has the athletic traits needed.
Not exactly saying that Johnson should be drafted 3rd overall. If someone had said this I likely would have asked for further explanation.

 
Quasimoto said:
Look at all the people here who learned nothing from cj Anderson and Jeremy hill last year.
What does this even mean?

Are you saying that no RB will ever follow up a successful first year as a starter ever again because those two didn't?
I think it means that it's a bad idea to burn a 1st or 2nd round pick on a guy who has only proven it over a relatively short period of time...especially a RB. I'll be struggling with this concept next season with respect to David Johnson. I love what I've seen so far, but he's still only shown us a small sample.
Yeah I can understand that I guess (and I'd avoid him in the first as well, despite being a fan) - but at the same time, I'm sure I can list many counterexamples where a guy's strong finish was a sign of things to come the following year (Bell, Ingram, Foster, etc,).

I still think whatever happened to Anderson and Hill is meaningless to what will happen with Johnson. People can decide on risk v, reward on a case by case basis.

 
I still think whatever happened to Anderson and Hill is meaningless to what will happen with Johnson. People can decide on risk v, reward on a case by case basis.
I agree. With Anderson, you had a new coaching staff that had no prior commitment to Anderson. Sure Anderson didn't do much himself, but it's not like he had the job to himself from the get-go this year. In a similar manner, Hill always had the threat of RBBC with a talented guy in Gio, with the latter starting out hot and earning some meaningful carries.

If the Cardinals sign or draft a talented guy, then it's possible that Johnson's value could slip a bit. I don't see it, but it's possible.

 
Look at all the people here who learned nothing from cj Anderson and Jeremy hill last year.
Betting on a player to fail is the easy way out, since the majority of un-proven palyers will not excel at the highest level. You'll be right more often than wrong.

I'm going the other way and betting DJ will be a top 10 RB for years to come.

 
I'm not betting on him to fail. I think betting on him to succeed is a good bet at the right price. I think people in this thread are suggesting paying too high a price.

 
To Milkman's credit he does say he thinks Johnson was being drafted too low in rookie drafts. I don't see any suggestion on his part that Johnson should have been the third rookie drafted, but he does say Johnson was being drafted too late.

The statement gets followed up by gems like this:

Comparing Freeman to Johnson is like comparing a 1985 Datsun to 2015 F250. They are not remotely the same player athletically. Doesn't mean Johnson is going to be successful but Freeman never had a shot at hitting. Johnson has a shot at being the best RB in this class.
Negative. You need a certain level of athletic ability. Some of the RB in this class don't have it. Not saying it's likely but Johnson has the athletic traits needed.
Not exactly saying that Johnson should be drafted 3rd overall. If someone had said this I likely would have asked for further explanation.
I would have drafted him 1.03 and I thought I had stated that last summer but maybe it was another forum.

 
http://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nfl/cardinals/2016/01/07/arizona-cardinals-david-johnson-named-nfl-offensive-rookie-month/78406636/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Arizona Cardinals' David Johnson named NFL Offensive Rookie of the MonthRunning back David Johnson was named the NFL’s offensive rookie of the month for his performance in December and January.

Johnson led all players with 658 yards from scrimmage and was the only player in the league with at least 400 rushing yards (442) and at least 200 receiving yards (216) over the past month.

For the season, Johnson totaled 1,636 all-purpose yards and a franchise rookie record 13 touchdowns. Johnson is the third player in team history to be named offense rookie of the month, joining receiver Anquan Boldin (2003) and quarterback Jake Plummer (1997)

Release from the Arizona Cardinals:

Arizona Cardinals running back David Johnson has been named “NFL Offensive Rookie of the Month” for December/January after he led all NFL players with 658 yards from scrimmage and was the only player in the league with 400+ rushing yards (442) and 200+ receiving yards (216) over the past month.

Johnson made his first five career starts in that span and helped the Cardinals to a 4-1 in the final month of the regular season.

Among NFL rookies, Johnson’s 658 scrimmage yards the past month were 230 more than the next highest player (Buck Allen–428 yards) and his 442 rushing yards led all rookies by 130 yards (Todd Gurley–312). Johnson also led all rookies in total touchdowns (five) and his four rushing touchdowns tied Rams running back Todd Gurley for the NFL lead...
 
http://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nfl/cardinals/2016/01/07/arizona-cardinals-david-johnson-named-nfl-offensive-rookie-month/78406636/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Arizona Cardinals' David Johnson named NFL Offensive Rookie of the MonthRunning back David Johnson was named the NFL’s offensive rookie of the month for his performance in December and January.

Johnson led all players with 658 yards from scrimmage and was the only player in the league with at least 400 rushing yards (442) and at least 200 receiving yards (216) over the past month.

For the season, Johnson totaled 1,636 all-purpose yards and a franchise rookie record 13 touchdowns. Johnson is the third player in team history to be named offense rookie of the month, joining receiver Anquan Boldin (2003) and quarterback Jake Plummer (1997)

Release from the Arizona Cardinals:

Arizona Cardinals running back David Johnson has been named “NFL Offensive Rookie of the Month” for December/January after he led all NFL players with 658 yards from scrimmage and was the only player in the league with 400+ rushing yards (442) and 200+ receiving yards (216) over the past month.

Johnson made his first five career starts in that span and helped the Cardinals to a 4-1 in the final month of the regular season.

Among NFL rookies, Johnson’s 658 scrimmage yards the past month were 230 more than the next highest player (Buck Allen–428 yards) and his 442 rushing yards led all rookies by 130 yards (Todd Gurley–312). Johnson also led all rookies in total touchdowns (five) and his four rushing touchdowns tied Rams running back Todd Gurley for the NFL lead...
The bolded blows my mind given that he only started a few games and was basically a backup/role player all year.

 
Moved him in dyno for amari cooper n tyler eifert.he might be over valued now. Cash in?
I'd take Amari Cooper straight up for DJ in dynasty but I would hate to see him go.
wow. It would take more for DJ than amari for m
Really depends on your team make-up. I've got Freeman & Gurley - if I were weak at WR I would probably take that. Lifespan of WR is longer, OAK is headed in right direction, etc....
No way. DJ is special talent. I don't think I could trade him. The Julio Jones owner in my dynasty league loves him, but I don't even know that I would do it for Julio right now.Srsly.

Think about how thin the talent pool is at RB right now? Especially three down backs who get the short yardage and are good receivers and get TDs? In dynasty I can't name many guys I would rather have right now at the RB position.
I know what you're saying but you get WR1 numbers for 8-9 years from Cooper. You get RB1 numbers from DJ for what? 4 maybe 5 years tops. Couple that with a slightly higher injury rate historically for RB and what seems to me as an easier time identifying RB to pick up off the WW and I think you have to do that deal.
We don't know either of these things. (We don't "KNOW" anything about how long these guys will play/dominate/do well, period). Neither of them have a long track record, and either of them could be "atypical."

Cooper could be like Michael Clayton and never put up decent numbers again, he could be like Anquan Boldin and put up good numbers, but never really be a "stud," or he could be like Jerry Rice where he has a long career with many "stud" seasons.

David Johnson could be like Kevan Barlow and never really live up to the hype, he could be like Duce Staley and be solid for a while, but never really a "stud," or he could be like Curtis Martin with a 10+ year career with numerous "stud" seasons.

How you perceive him is how you value him. Personally, I'd value him over Cooper, but I'd value WRs like Watkins, Evans, etc over him.
Long-time Raider fan and big fan of Cooper. I think Cooper develops into a solid WR1 next season. This season was cut short with the foot injury that he tried to play through. That being said, I would rather take a chance on Johnson. 3-down RBs are very difficult to find. You almost have to take a chance on him if it is an option You can replace Cooper with another WR. In today's passing NFL, lots of WRs put up good numbers.

 
Otis said:
Bracie Smathers said:
http://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nfl/cardinals/2016/01/07/arizona-cardinals-david-johnson-named-nfl-offensive-rookie-month/78406636/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Arizona Cardinals' David Johnson named NFL Offensive Rookie of the MonthRunning back David Johnson was named the NFL’s offensive rookie of the month for his performance in December and January.

Johnson led all players with 658 yards from scrimmage and was the only player in the league with at least 400 rushing yards (442) and at least 200 receiving yards (216) over the past month.

For the season, Johnson totaled 1,636 all-purpose yards and a franchise rookie record 13 touchdowns. Johnson is the third player in team history to be named offense rookie of the month, joining receiver Anquan Boldin (2003) and quarterback Jake Plummer (1997)

Release from the Arizona Cardinals:

Arizona Cardinals running back David Johnson has been named “NFL Offensive Rookie of the Month” for December/January after he led all NFL players with 658 yards from scrimmage and was the only player in the league with 400+ rushing yards (442) and 200+ receiving yards (216) over the past month.

Johnson made his first five career starts in that span and helped the Cardinals to a 4-1 in the final month of the regular season.

Among NFL rookies, Johnson’s 658 scrimmage yards the past month were 230 more than the next highest player (Buck Allen–428 yards) and his 442 rushing yards led all rookies by 130 yards (Todd Gurley–312). Johnson also led all rookies in total touchdowns (five) and his four rushing touchdowns tied Rams running back Todd Gurley for the NFL lead...
The bolded blows my mind given that he only started a few games and was basically a backup/role player all year.
Does that include Special teams duty or something? I'm looking at 581 rushing and 487 receiving for a total of 1,068 on the season.

 
Look at all the people here who learned nothing from cj Anderson and Jeremy hill last year.
What does this even mean?

Are you saying that no RB will ever follow up a successful first year as a starter ever again because those two didn't?
I think it means that it's a bad idea to burn a 1st or 2nd round pick on a guy who has only proven it over a relatively short period of time...especially a RB. I'll be struggling with this concept next season with respect to David Johnson. I love what I've seen so far, but he's still only shown us a small sample.
Yeah I can understand that I guess (and I'd avoid him in the first as well, despite being a fan) - but at the same time, I'm sure I can list many counterexamples where a guy's strong finish was a sign of things to come the following year (Bell, Ingram, Foster, etc,).

I still think whatever happened to Anderson and Hill is meaningless to what will happen with Johnson. People can decide on risk v, reward on a case by case basis.
You may be right. If nearly everything remains unchanged, then Johnson is a good bet to have a great year. If there are significant and unforeseen changes, then all bets are off. It's all about continuity.

 
Otis said:
Bracie Smathers said:
http://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nfl/cardinals/2016/01/07/arizona-cardinals-david-johnson-named-nfl-offensive-rookie-month/78406636/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Arizona Cardinals' David Johnson named NFL Offensive Rookie of the MonthRunning back David Johnson was named the NFL’s offensive rookie of the month for his performance in December and January.

Johnson led all players with 658 yards from scrimmage and was the only player in the league with at least 400 rushing yards (442) and at least 200 receiving yards (216) over the past month.

For the season, Johnson totaled 1,636 all-purpose yards and a franchise rookie record 13 touchdowns. Johnson is the third player in team history to be named offense rookie of the month, joining receiver Anquan Boldin (2003) and quarterback Jake Plummer (1997)

Release from the Arizona Cardinals:

Arizona Cardinals running back David Johnson has been named “NFL Offensive Rookie of the Month” for December/January after he led all NFL players with 658 yards from scrimmage and was the only player in the league with 400+ rushing yards (442) and 200+ receiving yards (216) over the past month.

Johnson made his first five career starts in that span and helped the Cardinals to a 4-1 in the final month of the regular season.

Among NFL rookies, Johnson’s 658 scrimmage yards the past month were 230 more than the next highest player (Buck Allen–428 yards) and his 442 rushing yards led all rookies by 130 yards (Todd Gurley–312). Johnson also led all rookies in total touchdowns (five) and his four rushing touchdowns tied Rams running back Todd Gurley for the NFL lead...
The bolded blows my mind given that he only started a few games and was basically a backup/role player all year.
Does that include Special teams duty or something? I'm looking at 581 rushing and 487 receiving for a total of 1,068 on the season.
http://www.sportingcharts.com/dictionary/nfl/all-purpose-yardage.aspx

What is All-Purpose Yardage?The combined total of receiving, rushing, punt/kickoff return, interception, and fumble return yards for a particular player. Passing yards are not included in all-purpose yardage calculations.

 
The following rankings are not specifically for dynasty drafts but in the 'RBs are worthless' thread I shared early fantasy rankings by a Chicago paper within the last week so this is current. Here are the top 20 players listed in order.

Arizona RB David Johnson is ranked 11th.

1. Antonio Brown, Steelers (1)

2. Julio Jones, Falcons (2)

3. Adrian Peterson, Vikings (3)

4. Todd Gurley, Rams (4)

5. Odell Beckham Jr., Giants (5)

6. DeAndre Hopkins, Texans (6)

7. Le’Veon Bell, Steelers (7)

8. Marshawn Lynch, Seahawks (8)

9. Rob Gronkowski, Patriots (9)

10. David Johnson, Cardinals (10)

11. Cam Newton, Panthers (11)

12. Tom Brady, Patriots (12)

13. Dez Bryant, Cowboys (13)

14. Allen Robinson, Jaguars (14)

15. Aaron Rodgers, Packers (15)

16. Carson Palmer, Cardinals (16)

17. Andrew Luck, Colts (17)

18. Doug Martin, Buccaneers* (18)

19. Devonta Freeman, Falcons (19)

20. Russell Wilson, Seahawks (20)
I argued that thread that there are more WRs on a typical play so there are more productive WRs over starting RBs so obviously there are more WRs to choose from so it is easier to find top WRs in the 3rd/4th rounds. Knowing the cold hard numbers to choose from I would not rule out taking a RB in the first round.

If players go off the board in the order ranked and if you hold the 11th pick in the 1st round and the 14th pick in the 2nd round then you could come away with the 5th ranked RB and WR. If owners go WR/WR in the 1st and 2nd rounds and they held those same picks they would wind up taking Dez and A-Rob and then they'd have to find a RB in the 3rd to match DJ at RB.

So heading into the 3rd round, one owner would need a number one RB and the other would need a number two WR.

Here are the top-five remaining top players listed:

- Brandon Marshall, Jets
- Mark Ingram, Saints
- LeSean McCoy, Bills
- Jamaal Charles, Chiefs
- Demaryius Thomas, Broncos

You would have to figure that of the remaining players that the top-five players have the highest chance to go off the board which would leave these five players.
- A.J. Green, Bengals
- Jordy Nelson, Packers
- Ben Roethlisberger, Steelers
- Drew Brees, Saints
- Blake Bortles, Jaguars

Two top ranked WRs but no top ranked RBs.

I'd rather go into a season with team comprised of RB David Johnson, WR Allen Robinson, and WR A.J. Green then a team with WR Dez Bryant, WR Allen Robinson, and a 30+ year old RB Frank Gore or a Chris Ivory or whoever is left to pick from in the 3rd round as my top RB.

Back to where DJ is ranked or when he should go off the board. It depends on when your first and second round picks come up and who was taken and who is available but using this example I wouldn't rule David Johnson un-draftable in the first round especially if it were a dynasty start-up. I'd much rather have him over some older RBs who I would likely be choosing from in later rounds as my #1 RB.
 
The following rankings are not specifically for dynasty drafts but in the 'RBs are worthless' thread I shared early fantasy rankings by a Chicago paper within the last week so this is current. Here are the top 20 players listed in order.

Arizona RB David Johnson is ranked 11th.

1. Antonio Brown, Steelers (1)

2. Julio Jones, Falcons (2)

3. Adrian Peterson, Vikings (3)

4. Todd Gurley, Rams (4)

5. Odell Beckham Jr., Giants (5)

6. DeAndre Hopkins, Texans (6)

7. Le’Veon Bell, Steelers (7)

8. Marshawn Lynch, Seahawks (8)

9. Rob Gronkowski, Patriots (9)

10. David Johnson, Cardinals (10)

11. Cam Newton, Panthers (11)

12. Tom Brady, Patriots (12)

13. Dez Bryant, Cowboys (13)

14. Allen Robinson, Jaguars (14)

15. Aaron Rodgers, Packers (15)

16. Carson Palmer, Cardinals (16)

17. Andrew Luck, Colts (17)

18. Doug Martin, Buccaneers* (18)

19. Devonta Freeman, Falcons (19)

20. Russell Wilson, Seahawks (20)
I argued that thread that there are more WRs on a typical play so there are more productive WRs over starting RBs so obviously there are more WRs to choose from so it is easier to find top WRs in the 3rd/4th rounds. Knowing the cold hard numbers to choose from I would not rule out taking a RB in the first round.

If players go off the board in the order ranked and if you hold the 11th pick in the 1st round and the 14th pick in the 2nd round then you could come away with the 5th ranked RB and WR. If owners go WR/WR in the 1st and 2nd rounds and they held those same picks they would wind up taking Dez and A-Rob and then they'd have to find a RB in the 3rd to match DJ at RB.

So heading into the 3rd round, one owner would need a number one RB and the other would need a number two WR.

Here are the top-five remaining top players listed:

- Brandon Marshall, Jets
- Mark Ingram, Saints
- LeSean McCoy, Bills
- Jamaal Charles, Chiefs
- Demaryius Thomas, Broncos

You would have to figure that of the remaining players that the top-five players have the highest chance to go off the board which would leave these five players.
- A.J. Green, Bengals
- Jordy Nelson, Packers
- Ben Roethlisberger, Steelers
- Drew Brees, Saints
- Blake Bortles, Jaguars

Two top ranked WRs but no top ranked RBs.

I'd rather go into a season with team comprised of RB David Johnson, WR Allen Robinson, and WR A.J. Green then a team with WR Dez Bryant, WR Allen Robinson, and a 30+ year old RB Frank Gore or a Chris Ivory or whoever is left to pick from in the 3rd round as my top RB.

Back to where DJ is ranked or when he should go off the board. It depends on when your first and second round picks come up and who was taken and who is available but using this example I wouldn't rule David Johnson un-draftable in the first round especially if it were a dynasty start-up. I'd much rather have him over some older RBs who I would likely be choosing from in later rounds as my #1 RB.
I appreciate the work you put into that. I have been drafting WR/WR a lot the last 3-4 years when I'm picking late in the first round. One thing you have to consider is this approach hasn't been the standard approach so even last year if you did this you could have come away with a Brown/Beckham in the first two rounds. Now has we move forward you are going to see those WR gone in the first round and you won't be able to get the same level of WR in the second. So there might be value in drafting a different way. I still probably will draft WR/WR but it's been very successful for me now for years. I don't draft a RB at all until the 5th or 6th round. Then I just kill the WW every year. I have ended up with RB like Forsett, David Johnson, Doug Martin, Spencer Ware, Hightower....... a couple of those names weren't even drafted this year and DJ was dropped in a couple of my league midseason. Then you head into the payoffs with two top 5 WR, a Stud QB, a stud TE, and the one or two of the hottest RB in the league. I haven't won every league but I've won a few and it's working very well for me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wasn't able to watch 100% of the game on Saturday but I did notice Ellington take over one drive. Anyone see if this happened other times?

Seems like DJ is still the unquestionable lead dog. I wonder what happens if AZ makes it to Super Bowl, anyone think CJ?K wins his starting gig back?

 
ahartig said:
Wasn't able to watch 100% of the game on Saturday but I did notice Ellington take over one drive. Anyone see if this happened other times?

Seems like DJ is still the unquestionable lead dog. I wonder what happens if AZ makes it to Super Bowl, anyone think CJ?K wins his starting gig back?
IIRC, it wasnt very much. And Ellington didn't look very good. I can't imagine they'd stray away from DJ though barring injury. He has to have won the lead back role for sure. They'll probably add depth next year because Ellington is definitely expendable at this point.

 
Moved him in dyno for amari cooper n tyler eifert.he might be over valued now. Cash in?
I'd take Amari Cooper straight up for DJ in dynasty but I would hate to see him go.
wow. It would take more for DJ than amari for m
Really depends on your team make-up. I've got Freeman & Gurley - if I were weak at WR I would probably take that. Lifespan of WR is longer, OAK is headed in right direction, etc....
Doesn't depend at all. You have to be ######ed to take Johnson.

 
The following rankings are not specifically for dynasty drafts but in the 'RBs are worthless' thread I shared early fantasy rankings by a Chicago paper within the last week so this is current. Here are the top 20 players listed in order.

Arizona RB David Johnson is ranked 11th.

1. Antonio Brown, Steelers (1)

2. Julio Jones, Falcons (2)

3. Adrian Peterson, Vikings (3)

4. Todd Gurley, Rams (4)

5. Odell Beckham Jr., Giants (5)

6. DeAndre Hopkins, Texans (6)

7. Le’Veon Bell, Steelers (7)

8. Marshawn Lynch, Seahawks (8)

9. Rob Gronkowski, Patriots (9)

10. David Johnson, Cardinals (10)

11. Cam Newton, Panthers (11)

12. Tom Brady, Patriots (12)

13. Dez Bryant, Cowboys (13)

14. Allen Robinson, Jaguars (14)

15. Aaron Rodgers, Packers (15)

16. Carson Palmer, Cardinals (16)

17. Andrew Luck, Colts (17)

18. Doug Martin, Buccaneers* (18)

19. Devonta Freeman, Falcons (19)

20. Russell Wilson, Seahawks (20)
I argued that thread that there are more WRs on a typical play so there are more productive WRs over starting RBs so obviously there are more WRs to choose from so it is easier to find top WRs in the 3rd/4th rounds. Knowing the cold hard numbers to choose from I would not rule out taking a RB in the first round.

If players go off the board in the order ranked and if you hold the 11th pick in the 1st round and the 14th pick in the 2nd round then you could come away with the 5th ranked RB and WR. If owners go WR/WR in the 1st and 2nd rounds and they held those same picks they would wind up taking Dez and A-Rob and then they'd have to find a RB in the 3rd to match DJ at RB.

So heading into the 3rd round, one owner would need a number one RB and the other would need a number two WR.

Here are the top-five remaining top players listed:

- Brandon Marshall, Jets
- Mark Ingram, Saints
- LeSean McCoy, Bills
- Jamaal Charles, Chiefs
- Demaryius Thomas, Broncos

You would have to figure that of the remaining players that the top-five players have the highest chance to go off the board which would leave these five players.
- A.J. Green, Bengals
- Jordy Nelson, Packers
- Ben Roethlisberger, Steelers
- Drew Brees, Saints
- Blake Bortles, Jaguars

Two top ranked WRs but no top ranked RBs.

I'd rather go into a season with team comprised of RB David Johnson, WR Allen Robinson, and WR A.J. Green then a team with WR Dez Bryant, WR Allen Robinson, and a 30+ year old RB Frank Gore or a Chris Ivory or whoever is left to pick from in the 3rd round as my top RB.

Back to where DJ is ranked or when he should go off the board. It depends on when your first and second round picks come up and who was taken and who is available but using this example I wouldn't rule David Johnson un-draftable in the first round especially if it were a dynasty start-up. I'd much rather have him over some older RBs who I would likely be choosing from in later rounds as my #1 RB.
Every day you post a link to some "expert". Just because a guy can write English doesn't mean they know anything.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The following rankings are not specifically for dynasty drafts but in the 'RBs are worthless' thread I shared early fantasy rankings by a Chicago paper within the last week so this is current. Here are the top 20 players listed in order.

Arizona RB David Johnson is ranked 11th.

1. Antonio Brown, Steelers (1)

2. Julio Jones, Falcons (2)

3. Adrian Peterson, Vikings (3)

4. Todd Gurley, Rams (4)

5. Odell Beckham Jr., Giants (5)

6. DeAndre Hopkins, Texans (6)

7. Le’Veon Bell, Steelers (7)

8. Marshawn Lynch, Seahawks (8)

9. Rob Gronkowski, Patriots (9)

10. David Johnson, Cardinals (10)

11. Cam Newton, Panthers (11)

12. Tom Brady, Patriots (12)

13. Dez Bryant, Cowboys (13)

14. Allen Robinson, Jaguars (14)

15. Aaron Rodgers, Packers (15)

16. Carson Palmer, Cardinals (16)

17. Andrew Luck, Colts (17)

18. Doug Martin, Buccaneers* (18)

19. Devonta Freeman, Falcons (19)

20. Russell Wilson, Seahawks (20)
I argued that thread that there are more WRs on a typical play so there are more productive WRs over starting RBs so obviously there are more WRs to choose from so it is easier to find top WRs in the 3rd/4th rounds. Knowing the cold hard numbers to choose from I would not rule out taking a RB in the first round.

If players go off the board in the order ranked and if you hold the 11th pick in the 1st round and the 14th pick in the 2nd round then you could come away with the 5th ranked RB and WR. If owners go WR/WR in the 1st and 2nd rounds and they held those same picks they would wind up taking Dez and A-Rob and then they'd have to find a RB in the 3rd to match DJ at RB.

So heading into the 3rd round, one owner would need a number one RB and the other would need a number two WR.

Here are the top-five remaining top players listed:

- Brandon Marshall, Jets
- Mark Ingram, Saints
- LeSean McCoy, Bills
- Jamaal Charles, Chiefs
- Demaryius Thomas, Broncos

You would have to figure that of the remaining players that the top-five players have the highest chance to go off the board which would leave these five players.
- A.J. Green, Bengals
- Jordy Nelson, Packers
- Ben Roethlisberger, Steelers
- Drew Brees, Saints
- Blake Bortles, Jaguars

Two top ranked WRs but no top ranked RBs.

I'd rather go into a season with team comprised of RB David Johnson, WR Allen Robinson, and WR A.J. Green then a team with WR Dez Bryant, WR Allen Robinson, and a 30+ year old RB Frank Gore or a Chris Ivory or whoever is left to pick from in the 3rd round as my top RB.

Back to where DJ is ranked or when he should go off the board. It depends on when your first and second round picks come up and who was taken and who is available but using this example I wouldn't rule David Johnson un-draftable in the first round especially if it were a dynasty start-up. I'd much rather have him over some older RBs who I would likely be choosing from in later rounds as my #1 RB.
Every day you post a link to some "expert". Just because a guy can write English doesn't mean they know anything.
Ironic post is ironic

 
#1 RB in FF heading into next year I would think.
Over Levon bell and some others? I think it will be hard to actually pull the trigger on that one. I love David Johnson but I can see the mind think of the other side of that coin. I can actually see some people putting DJ in that top tier but seeing a difference between him and bell and those 2-3 guys and placing DJ in a lump with Peterson, Dion Lewis and some others.

 
#1 RB in FF heading into next year I would think.
Over Levon bell and some others? I think it will be hard to actually pull the trigger on that one. I love David Johnson but I can see the mind think of the other side of that coin. I can actually see some people putting DJ in that top tier but seeing a difference between him and bell and those 2-3 guys and placing DJ in a lump with Peterson, Dion Lewis and some others.
Yeah I'd draft him in front of Bell coming off his second knee injury in 2 years. They have very similar usage and both are on great offenses. DJ is a proven commodity now in my eyes.

DJ

Gurley

Bell

 
As a Johnson dynasty owner/impartial fan, I am actually kind of glad the Cardinals didn't advance. While I doubt it would have happened at this point, last thing Johnson owners would want to see is Chris Johnson come back for the Super Bowl and make it a time share.

Looking forward to DJ assuming the bell cow role for a full year. Besides his production, have to think that Arians was very happy with the way he played through some nicks that always seemed to zap Ellington, and that the rookie did a good job of holding on to the ball after a few early season fumbles.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top