What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB David Johnson, Retired (1 Viewer)

Hu-Tang Clan said:
Players have incentives in their contracts and franchises would look selfish if they started resting players even though they are eliminated.  What kind of free agent wants to sign if they bench players at the end of the year.  
Click to expand...
Plus it's a business. You got partners, mainly TV and they don't pay you to sit players like it's the NBA or something. You got your fans, season ticket holders who already have to pay for two preaseason games for 7-8 homes games a year.  I believe,as I said earlier, his workload should have been scaled back when they were eliminated and using him like a workhorse since that time is something I think is a truly bad short sighted decision but if he was healthy I think he should have been playing. Only reason I see to not play someone this week is if they  need rest for playoffs or are not healthy.

 
Milkman said:
It's not about DJ's reaction. Teams are dumb though. It's not about records. It's not about AJ Greens feelings.  It's about doing what's optimal for the team. That is resting proven studs when you are eliminated, getting younger players reps to help speed up their development and identify talent, and get the best draft pick you can by losing.

How does it help the team if DJ had 170 yards receiving today?
Click to expand...
Because he would go down in history as one of only 3 guys to do it. And forever, people would mention the Arizona Cardinals when talking about all-time great RBs. You don't think that's a good thing if you own the team?

 
Portis Homer said:
Chao only mentioned mcl sprain as the concern based on video, the guy is almost never wrong, I wouldn't panic or be overly worried about his dynasty value yet.
Click to expand...
Well a bit concerning in that he just said best case is MCL an worse case is multi-ligament ACL and threw out Bowman as example.

 
Milkman said:
OMG how does it help the team to risk a top 3 asset in the NFL in a meaningless game? It's amazing to me that it is so widely accepted.
Click to expand...
You are going off the deep end here. I think if you really thought about this a bit you'd change your mind.

 
kutta said:
Because he would go down in history as one of only 3 guys to do it. And forever, people would mention the Arizona Cardinals when talking about all-time great RBs. You don't think that's a good thing if you own the team?
Click to expand...
So it's good for the team to not have him ready for next season? The Cardinal will be lucky if they win 5 games next year without him.

 
Milkman said:
OMG how does it help the team to risk a top 3 asset in the NFL in a meaningless game? It's amazing to me that it is so widely accepted.
Click to expand...
I hate that he got hurt, but using your logic, he shouldn't have been playing the last 2 weeks either; those games were "meaningless" for the Cards, as well. 

Your opinion that this game is meaningless seems to be coming from a FF perspective (since most leagues don't play in week 17), in which case, it is a bad argument to say a player shouldn't play in a game that is meaningless for FF.

 
Willie Neslon said:
What about Luck, Cam, Evans, Winston, etc, etc, etc.  Should they all have sat today too? Give me a break.
Click to expand...
If you owned something that cost you millions of dollars and you couldn't replace and using that resource would either result in no benefit to you or potentially very negative results, would you put it in harm's way? 

Really, your question about all these players is simple. the answer is no, clearly, by any logical measure. But the NFL is a business that doesn't want deal with the backlash of resting star players as the NBA rightfully does (yet catches grief over).  But football is a much more injury-likely sport so really playing any player at anytime you are eliminated is 100% counter-productive, especially when you could actually get better draft picks by not playing them. that's not tanking. that's smart resource management.  But the NFL doesn't care about that and so teams don't (or aren't allowed).  And people that think unique star players should carelessly risk their careers are just buying the NFL product. Hook, line, and sinker. 

 
Milkman said:
So it's good for the team to not have him ready for next season? The Cardinal will be lucky if they win 5 games next year without him.
Click to expand...
Look, I own him in dynasty too. And I'm a Cardinals season ticket holder. But you just don't start sitting your stars when you're out of the playoffs. Name one team who did that this year.

 
Milkman said:
It's not about DJ's reaction. Teams are dumb though. It's not about records. It's not about AJ Greens feelings.  It's about doing what's optimal for the team. That is resting proven studs when you are eliminated, getting younger players reps to help speed up their development and identify talent, and get the best draft pick you can by losing.

How does it help the team if DJ had 170 yards receiving today?
Click to expand...
As mad as Green was, I could see his benching affecting his willingness to re-sign with a team.

The Cardinals likely want Johnson staying with the team after his rookie contract expires, and keeping him happy letting him play for records could play a signficant role in that sort of decision.  Speculative of course, but it isn't hard to imagine that there could be sound business decisions involved in playing him, as well as sitting him.

 
kutta said:
Look, I own him in dynasty too. And I'm a Cardinals season ticket holder. But you just don't start sitting your stars when you're out of the playoffs. Name one team who did that this year.
Click to expand...
So because nobody is doing it it's not optimal? I think teams are really dumb marching their franchise QB back out on the field with 3 mins to go down 3 scores too but they do it all the time.

 
Arodin said:
As mad as Green was, I could see his benching affecting his willingness to re-sign with a team.

The Cardinals likely want Johnson staying with the team after his rookie contract expires, and keeping him happy letting him play for records could play a signficant role in that sort of decision.  Speculative of course, but it isn't hard to imagine that there could be sound business decisions involved in playing him, as well as sitting him.
Click to expand...
I wonder how happy DJ is right now.........

 
kutta said:
Yes
Click to expand...
LOL ok I'm done. They are essentially doing the same thing (trying to win a SB) they are just at different stages of achieving that goal. 

Enjoy discussing his recovery this offseason. He seriously may never be the same.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They just showed him on the sideline in street clothes and Jen Hale said is moving well, putting weight on the knee, and smiling.

 
Milkman said:
Playing Luck today was incredibly dumb too but obviously it's standard to risk your franchise QB to protect feelings.
Click to expand...
Bottom line here: Your train of thought may be correct on paper. But that's never been the standard convention of how it plays on the field. Never has been, never will be. It's just not how it has ever or will ever work. Go write a letter to the owners/GMs of these teams if it bothers you that much. It will make no difference.

 
ShamrockPride said:
Bottom line here: Your train of thought may be correct on paper. But that's never been the standard convention of how it plays on the field. Never has been, never will be. It's just not how it has ever or will ever work. Go write a letter to the owners/GMs of these teams if it bothers you that much. It will make no difference.
Click to expand...
It's going to take a career ending injury to a franchise QB and things will start to shift but I agree that it's certainly not SOP right now.

 
Roto: According to ESPN's Adam Schefter, initial tests on David Johnson's injured left knee showed meniscus damage, though his ACL remains intact.

Source: Adam Schefter on Twitter 

Jan 1 - 6:55 PM

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Milkman said:
LOL ok I'm done. They are essentially doing the same thing (trying to win a SB) they are just at different stages of achieving that goal. 

Enjoy discussing his recovery this offseason. He seriously may never be the same.
Click to expand...
You are smart enough to know the difference. I think :unsure:  

 
Arians said the other day that David Johnson could average 200 yards per game. I don't think they have any intentions of scaling back his workload next year.

 
Coach Bruce Arians said he'd like to get David Johnson 30 touches per game this season.

We've heard this "30 touches per game" thing from Arians before, and it's never exactly translated to that much work, but Johnson did average over 23 per game in 2016 and appears capable of more. Arians said Johnson is still too young to be "overused" at 25 years old. The Cardinals know they can't ask Carson Palmer to throw 40 times a week at his age in this downfield offense, so putting more on Johnson's plate is their best chance at winning games. Johnson is the early leader in the clubhouse to go No. 1 overall in fantasy drafts this summer.

 
 
Source: Josh Weinfuss on Twitter 
Mar 29 - 11:18 AM
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Frankman
Kameron Johnson - WR, Tampa Bay
Replies
1
Views
332
The Frankman
The Frankman
JohnnyU
Dynasty: Kaleb Johnson vs Kendre Miller
Replies
33
Views
852
dipandglide
dipandglide
P
D'Andre Swift with Ben Johnson
Replies
19
Views
5K
menobrown
M

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top