Might be time to trade Kareem Hunt then. I'm a Hunt owner in one league and I don't believe he's a great talent. On the other hand, with the way people value young RBs, he'll be a top 30 startup pick next year if he rushes for 1k+ this season on 3.8+ YPC, which is very doable.rickyg said:Hunt went 1.2 in my dynasty rookie draft his morning.
What do you base his lack of elusiveness on?I can see Hunt thriving, but style-wise I don't see a comparison between him and Westbrook/McCoy/Charles. He doesn't have the elusiveness of the first two or the speed of the latter. If we're talking Reid backs, he's more like Correll Buckhalter.
A RBs ability to make defenders miss and create on their own is something I value very highly and what I look for in a college prospect. Hunt certainly shows that at the college level, being able to string multiple moves together and navigate traffic. It is not the only way he wins, but it is certainly one of the traits he has that I would describe as a strength.Hunt’s 98 total missed tackles forced were second-most in the nation in 2016.
I can see Hunt thriving, but style-wise I don't see a comparison between him and Westbrook/McCoy/Charles. He doesn't have the elusiveness of the first two or the speed of the latter. If we're talking Reid backs, he's more like Correll Buckhalter.
Ware is just as talented as Hunt. Ware proved himself capable in the passing game/pass protection yet West still saw the field. West will again see the field, probably more than Hunt owners would like.Skimmer Alert: Hunt's pass protection is unproven and the regular season could present more complex problems than he can handle. If he doesn't adjust fast, he could wind up in a committee. Don't count on him as one of your first RBs during a draft unless you have a couple of mid-round starters in your back pocket that you are certain will compensate for him underwhelming in this area to the point that it hurts his workload.
If broken tackles (i.e. running through defenders/arm tackles/etc) also count towards elusiveness stats then I don't think those stats reflect actual elusiveness, which to me means the ability to make sharp cuts and avoid contact, not the ability to shed/run through contact. The latter is what I would call power, not elusiveness.Anyhow if you could expand on why you think he is less elusive than Westbrook much appreciated. I am not really seeing Hunt that way. Hunt seems very elusive to me. One of the reasons he was one of my favorite RB to watch from the 2017 draft.
RB Kareem Hunt, Toledo - I'm surprised he isn't higher on most devy boards by virtue of his metrics alone. He's a big back at approximately 5'11" 220. He ran an automatic 10.8 in the 100m as a high schooler. He also high jumped 6'8". So he's an explosive athlete for his size. On the field, he ranked third in the country in rushing yards per game behind Melvin Gordon and Tevin Coleman and topped 100+ in every game. He also had an obscene long run percentage, busting 20 plays of 20+ yards on just 205 carries. I was strongly tempted to draft him and he was probably the next guy up on my board after the two that I took in this draft. What ultimately dissuaded me from making the pick was his clips. I felt like he lacked good east-west plant-and-drive quickness. He was more of a musclebound straight-line runner sort of in the mold of Rashard Mendenhall. Practically looks like a Mendy clone on this run, spin move and all. When running through the line of scrimmage, he seemed to struggle to make hard lateral cuts and instead would sort of jump or shuffle to the side. It's hard to explain, but it ended up getting him tackled in weird and stressful ways. Beyond that, the MAC is a creampuff conference and Toledo has a friendly system that inflates RB production (look at David Fluellen's numbers from the last few years). Hunt is a better prospect than Fluellen and I could see him going in the 2nd-4th round of the draft next year, but ultimately I did not see the crisp movement of a first round back.
Lol. Great examples. This makes me want to draft Mixon not Hunt.If broken tackles (i.e. running through defenders/arm tackles/etc) also count towards elusiveness stats then I don't think those stats reflect actual elusiveness, which to me means the ability to make sharp cuts and avoid contact, not the ability to shed/run through contact. The latter is what I would call power, not elusiveness.
I know Hunt well. Not that it really matters much, but I was the first person to mention him on these message boards, as far as I know. I watched a lot of college players from 2014-2015 and he came onto my radar because of his production at Toledo. Here is what I said about him back then:
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/666153-dynasty-non-draft-eligible-college-prospects/?page=29#comment-17766414
I've watched a lot of RBs over the years and I would not compare Hunt to McCoy or Westbrook. He's significantly bigger than McCoy. Westbrook had a similar BMI, but was almost 15 pounds lighter by virtue of being two inches shorter. Hunt is not as big or heavy as he looks on the field, but physically he doesn't really fit the scatback type of mold like the other two. Style-wise it's the same story. You talked about Hunt's elusiveness, but from my perspective that has always been the biggest weakness in his game.
When I think of McCoy, I think of crazy jump cuts and jukes. That's pretty much McCoy's entire game. He's fast, but he's light and weak. The reason he thrives is because he can make instant, violent lateral cuts without losing speed. You can't tackle a back if you can't hit him. Westbrook was more of a straight line player, but he also had the ability to break people down in the open field and to string together multiple moves without losing much speed.
That's not really Kareem Hunt's style. He can make one move early in the play, but he can't usually string together multiple moves or shake people at full speed. Here's a good recent example. Hunt gets the ball with a nice lane in front of him, but even with 8 yards of separation between him and the defender, he is unable to redirect his momentum and avoid the tackle in the 1v1 situation. All he can do is awkwardly prepare for the hit. When I watched Hunt at Toledo, I saw this type of thing again and again.
Here he gets the ball down the sideline. He sees the tackler coming, but decides to lower his shoulder instead of making a sharp and sudden cut. Same game, a short while later. Hunt gets the ball and makes a nice initial move. When he gets to the second level, he is unable to make a decisive cut and instead is left to barrel into the defender. You see this more than a few times with Hunt. He has very nice elusiveness early in the play, but he struggles to cut at top speed. Once again, he gets into the second level and can't make the tackler miss. To be fair to Hunt, he definitely has some elusiveness. Here's a nice run where he makes a crisp move to beat the defender. Here's another really good move.
Hunt isn't completely linear as a runner, but he doesn't compare to the most elusive backs either. Watch his clips and then watch a back like Joe Mixon, who is constantly running with loose hips and instant redirection. Even when he gets momentum behind him and gets into the second level, he's still able to find another move and avoid contact instead of being forced to lower his shoulder and take a hit. That might be the difference between a good back and a great one. Hunt is a lot bigger than McCoy/Westbrook and runs with good determination and balance. He gets a lot of second effort yards because he's hard to bring down and he always keeps churning. I can see him having some success for KC, but I'm not convinced he's worthy of comparison to people like McCoy and Westbrook.
I did yesterday. I feel really good about it. Lots of RBs taken early. I had the 10th pick and took Jordy and Michael Thomas at 1 and 2. Got Hunt in the 3rd as my RB1 and Hill in the 4th as my WR3.Anyone get him and Hill? If so, how do you feel about that?
Thanks for the thoughtful response.If broken tackles (i.e. running through defenders/arm tackles/etc) also count towards elusiveness stats then I don't think those stats reflect actual elusiveness, which to me means the ability to make sharp cuts and avoid contact, not the ability to shed/run through contact. The latter is what I would call power, not elusiveness.
I know Hunt well. Not that it really matters much, but I was the first person to mention him on these message boards, as far as I know. I watched a lot of college players from 2014-2015 and he came onto my radar because of his production at Toledo. Here is what I said about him back then:
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/666153-dynasty-non-draft-eligible-college-prospects/?page=29#comment-17766414
I've watched a lot of RBs over the years and I would not compare Hunt to McCoy or Westbrook. He's significantly bigger than McCoy. Westbrook had a similar BMI, but was almost 15 pounds lighter by virtue of being two inches shorter. Hunt is not as big or heavy as he looks on the field, but physically he doesn't really fit the scatback type of mold like the other two. Style-wise it's the same story. You talked about Hunt's elusiveness, but from my perspective that has always been the biggest weakness in his game.
When I think of McCoy, I think of crazy jump cuts and jukes. That's pretty much McCoy's entire game. He's fast, but he's light and weak. The reason he thrives is because he can make instant, violent lateral cuts without losing speed. You can't tackle a back if you can't hit him. Westbrook was more of a straight line player, but he also had the ability to break people down in the open field and to string together multiple moves without losing much speed.
That's not really Kareem Hunt's style. He can make one move early in the play, but he can't usually string together multiple moves or shake people at full speed. Here's a good recent example. Hunt gets the ball with a nice lane in front of him, but even with 8 yards of separation between him and the defender, he is unable to redirect his momentum and avoid the tackle in the 1v1 situation. All he can do is awkwardly prepare for the hit. When I watched Hunt at Toledo, I saw this type of thing again and again.
Here he gets the ball down the sideline. He sees the tackler coming, but decides to lower his shoulder instead of making a sharp and sudden cut. Same game, a short while later. Hunt gets the ball and makes a nice initial move. When he gets to the second level, he is unable to make a decisive cut and instead is left to barrel into the defender. You see this more than a few times with Hunt. He has very nice elusiveness early in the play, but he struggles to cut at top speed. Once again, he gets into the second level and can't make the tackler miss. To be fair to Hunt, he definitely has some elusiveness. Here's a nice run where he makes a crisp move to beat the defender. Here's another really good move.
Hunt isn't completely linear as a runner, but he doesn't compare to the most elusive backs either. Watch his clips and then watch a back like Joe Mixon, who is constantly running with loose hips and instant redirection. Even when he gets momentum behind him and gets into the second level, he's still able to find another move and avoid contact instead of being forced to lower his shoulder and take a hit. That might be the difference between a good back and a great one. Hunt is a lot bigger than McCoy/Westbrook and runs with good determination and balance. He gets a lot of second effort yards because he's hard to bring down and he always keeps churning. I can see him having some success for KC, but I'm not convinced he's worthy of comparison to people like McCoy and Westbrook.
I can remember the play in my mind and an example of him stringing multiple moves together to make defenders miss. I just can't find the play right now.The thing that I like about him is his vision and ability to create opportunities for himself when not much is there. He has several different moves to make defenders miss or get a bad angle on their tackle attempt. On one of his runs he combines a jump cut to make one defender miss, then takes a hop step backwards to make a second defender miss before proceeding with the play. That is a result of good balance as well, but the spatial awareness combined with this creativity is what makes him fun to watch.
Fwiw, he went pick #108 in my 10 team league but that was August 10th, dynasty, 2qb. Right before I took tevin Coleman and I would have taken hunt.Ketamine Dreams said:He went for $30 in our 10 team ppr $200 auction on Saturday, just as an FYI.
Ya think?Took him at 5.1 In a 12 teamer. All the horses were gone except Gore. I like Frank Gore but I think hunts ceiling is much higher. I grabbed Doug Martin at 7.1 and I already had David Johnson.
I have them both on one team. We drafted on the 18th. It's a keeper league and we do a 1-round rookie draft before the actual draft. I had 1.05 and took Hunt with that pick. Then took Hill in the 3rd. Earlier than most leagues, but keep in mind the 3rd in that draft was more like the 5th in normal drafts with all the keepers factored in.Anyone get him and Hill? If so, how do you feel about that?
If someone takes Hunt over those guys they're doing fantasy wrong. And I don't even like Watkins or Robinson.Is he worth more than a guy like Sammy Watkins or Allen Robinson in dynasty?
In redraft, yes. In dynasty, he's just behind the 4 top ones in my eyes.Where do you guys value Hunt in terms of the other rookie RB's? Does he leapfrog guys like Cook, Mixon, CMc???
Yeah I'm upset I missed out on him in my leagues.easy top 10 ppr finish if he stays healthy. he is going to get fed.
Overall or among RBs?easy top 10 ppr finish if he stays healthy. he is going to get fed.
Quite the bold claim... I'm intriguedeasy top 10 ppr finish if he stays healthy. he is going to get fed.
Link, please?ESPN just moved Hunt up in their default rankings to mid 30s. He was at 57 yesterday.
He'll have a defined role and it will be as the lead back but I am not sure he will match even Ware's per game touches+targets from last season. Ware's pace was 288 touches, I don't think Hunt gets that much.Hunt will have a defined role on a team that is going to feed him the ball often. Andy Reed typically doesn't go with RBBC so his popularity is warranted.
Why not?He'll have a defined role and it will be as the lead back but I am not sure he will match even Ware's per game touches+targets from last season. Ware's pace was 288 touches, I don't think Hunt gets that much.
He could, and it will all come down to pass pro. Waldman wrote a good article recently breaking down what Hunt needs to work on from what he saw during the preseason.Why not?
Because I think Reid trusted Were more as an established vet. Hunt is a rookie so I expect him to be spelled more often for that reason alone.Why not?
There's no link. If you are drafting in an ESPN league and do a mock, you can see the default settings.Link, please?
Even if you're right, Ware was 10th among RBs last year in yards from scrimmage despite missing 2 3/4 games.He'll have a defined role and it will be as the lead back but I am not sure he will match even Ware's per game touches+targets from last season. Ware's pace was 288 touches, I don't think Hunt gets that much.
Kareem of wheat ?We have an official nickname yet?
Kareem the Dream?
KHunt?