Some are so intent on saying who "should" be starting, they seem to forget that opinion is meaningless in this discussion. It's all about who the coaches actually put out there that counts in FF. And that looks to be
Walker
.
That's who the coaching staff put out there LAST YEAR. It's a new year, and as we all know, things change fast in fantasy football. Two years ago the Jags coaching staff very clearly preferred
Travis Etienne
to
Tank Bigsby
. Last year things were different.
I think you're missing the point of what's being said.
Coaches change their mind on these things all the time, and this situation is more ripe for them changing their mind on it than any we've seen in a long time. My point, as I've laid out explicitly, is how much longer will they stick with playing KW3 as the feature back when all that has lead to is him getting hurt, under performing, and not breaking off any of those long runs they seem to covet, while his highly drafted better performing backup sits there.
If we get a few weeks into the season and they're splitting much more evenly we'll look back at it and assume it was the most obvious and predictable change to a split (or even Charbs taking the lead) we've seen in a long time. Because objectively it makes little sense to spend a premium draft pick on Charbs and then not use him while the starter consistently struggles to carry the load. Last year they tried to do it anyway, but that doesn't mean they will again this year, given the results of last year.