This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The trick is knowing who your studs really are for the current season. Some would think Andrews is a "stud" but in 2024, he is clearly not.For me it was facing the league’s best run defense and coming off a multi-week injury. I knew he had a 2-TD game against them last year but I ignored it. I knew better and yet I didn’t. As the saying goes, “Never bench your studs.”I started him everywhere. Once they gave the all-clear on Friday that was all I needed.
Welcome to the party mr grubb. A lot of us saw this before he was in the NFL.x.com
x.com
Welcome to the party mr grubb. A lot of us saw this before he was in the NFL.x.com
It's still amazing to me how many people failed the eye test between him and Charbonnet. That is why some people are good at fantasy football and others are not in a nut shell.
Because Walker is very very good does not mean Charbs is bad.Welcome to the party mr grubb. A lot of us saw this before he was in the NFL.x.com
It's still amazing to me how many people failed the eye test between him and Charbonnet. That is why some people are good at fantasy football and others are not in a nut shell.
Might need to wait a week or 2 if you don't own him. The charbs owner most likely is waiting for another injury to KW. With each week that passes and he's healthy, the price goes down.Because Walker is very very good does not mean Charbs is bad.Welcome to the party mr grubb. A lot of us saw this before he was in the NFL.x.com
It's still amazing to me how many people failed the eye test between him and Charbonnet. That is why some people are good at fantasy football and others are not in a nut shell.
Side note, if you don't have Charbs as a cuff this might be the time to go acquire him.
Charbonet was a must draft handcuff to Walker.Because Walker is very very good does not mean Charbs is bad.Welcome to the party mr grubb. A lot of us saw this before he was in the NFL.x.com
It's still amazing to me how many people failed the eye test between him and Charbonnet. That is why some people are good at fantasy football and others are not in a nut shell.
Side note, if you don't have Charbs as a cuff this might be the time to go acquire him.
Personally, I've never said that. I've just always felt Walker was far better.Because Walker is very very good does not mean Charbs is bad.Welcome to the party mr grubb. A lot of us saw this before he was in the NFL.x.com
It's still amazing to me how many people failed the eye test between him and Charbonnet. That is why some people are good at fantasy football and others are not in a nut shell.
Side note, if you don't have Charbs as a cuff this might be the time to go acquire him.
I see it in every RB thread. Not saying it was you but it happens. Whoever someone drafts or trades for the other RB on the depth chart instantly sucks. It is fine that you believe in a player and it is fun to cheer for that player and see them succeed but too many times they try to rationalize it with saying the other RB sucks and is no good.Personally, I've never said that. I've just always felt Walker was far better.Because Walker is very very good does not mean Charbs is bad.Welcome to the party mr grubb. A lot of us saw this before he was in the NFL.x.com
It's still amazing to me how many people failed the eye test between him and Charbonnet. That is why some people are good at fantasy football and others are not in a nut shell.
Side note, if you don't have Charbs as a cuff this might be the time to go acquire him.
Jim Brown once said (around 2000 or so) he thought Fred Taylor was the best pure runner he'd seen since he retired.
My thought exactly. The guy that has him in my league won't let him go cheaply but hopefully over time bye-weeks and injuries to his team MAY inspire him to relinquish him.Might need to wait a week or 2 if you don't own him. The charbs owner most likely is waiting for another injury to KW. With each week that passes and he's healthy, the price goes down.Because Walker is very very good does not mean Charbs is bad.Welcome to the party mr grubb. A lot of us saw this before he was in the NFL.x.com
It's still amazing to me how many people failed the eye test between him and Charbonnet. That is why some people are good at fantasy football and others are not in a nut shell.
Side note, if you don't have Charbs as a cuff this might be the time to go acquire him.
Giants ouplayed them in three phases so non excuses. But I will say, weird game, giants had a long drive "fumbled" into the end zone, was picked up and up returned for a TD, got right back out for a long drive. Walker had like 3 carries for the longest time. Should have tried feeding him to get on scheduled, looked like the giants were all over everything Geno did passing wise, very effective blitzing. So a bit of a weird game
Why? They’re both high variance players with high ceilings and basement level floors. Seems like a fair comparison at this stage.
19, 33, 14.
Sorry, don’t play PPR. 55% of his points through 5 weeks came in 1 week. This pattern isn’t all that dissimilar from the guy I owned since his rookie year.
majority of leagues are ppr, and you can't actually be counting the weeks he was out to show that he is a high variance player lolSorry, don’t play PPR. 55% of his points through 5 weeks came in 1 week. This pattern isn’t all that dissimilar from the guy I owned since his rookie year.
W1 16.9
W2 0
W3 0
W4 29.6
W5 7.6
5 weeks or 3, he still produced 55% of his total points in one week. He is a high variance player, review his game logs from season 1 and 2. I’m not even sure why you’re arguing.majority of leagues are ppr, and you can't actually be counting the weeks he was out to show that he is a high variance player lolSorry, don’t play PPR. 55% of his points through 5 weeks came in 1 week. This pattern isn’t all that dissimilar from the guy I owned since his rookie year.
W1 16.9
W2 0
W3 0
W4 29.6
W5 7.6
19, 33, 14 is not that crazy variance at all.5 weeks or 3, he still produced 55% of his total points in one week. He is a high variance player, review his game logs from season 1 and 2. I’m not even sure why you’re arguing.majority of leagues are ppr, and you can't actually be counting the weeks he was out to show that he is a high variance player lolSorry, don’t play PPR. 55% of his points through 5 weeks came in 1 week. This pattern isn’t all that dissimilar from the guy I owned since his rookie year.
W1 16.9
W2 0
W3 0
W4 29.6
W5 7.6
ETA lol
And yet, 17, 30 and 7...is.19, 33, 14 is not that crazy variance at all.5 weeks or 3, he still produced 55% of his total points in one week. He is a high variance player, review his game logs from season 1 and 2. I’m not even sure why you’re arguing.majority of leagues are ppr, and you can't actually be counting the weeks he was out to show that he is a high variance player lolSorry, don’t play PPR. 55% of his points through 5 weeks came in 1 week. This pattern isn’t all that dissimilar from the guy I owned since his rookie year.
W1 16.9
W2 0
W3 0
W4 29.6
W5 7.6
ETA lol
Anyways.
You should cut him.And yet, 17, 30 and 7...is.19, 33, 14 is not that crazy variance at all.5 weeks or 3, he still produced 55% of his total points in one week. He is a high variance player, review his game logs from season 1 and 2. I’m not even sure why you’re arguing.majority of leagues are ppr, and you can't actually be counting the weeks he was out to show that he is a high variance player lolSorry, don’t play PPR. 55% of his points through 5 weeks came in 1 week. This pattern isn’t all that dissimilar from the guy I owned since his rookie year.
W1 16.9
W2 0
W3 0
W4 29.6
W5 7.6
ETA lol
Anyways.
Anyways. Check his history.
How do you make that leap?You should cut him.And yet, 17, 30 and 7...is.19, 33, 14 is not that crazy variance at all.5 weeks or 3, he still produced 55% of his total points in one week. He is a high variance player, review his game logs from season 1 and 2. I’m not even sure why you’re arguing.majority of leagues are ppr, and you can't actually be counting the weeks he was out to show that he is a high variance player lolSorry, don’t play PPR. 55% of his points through 5 weeks came in 1 week. This pattern isn’t all that dissimilar from the guy I owned since his rookie year.
W1 16.9
W2 0
W3 0
W4 29.6
W5 7.6
ETA lol
Anyways.
Anyways. Check his history.
I believe he's a great RB. He has been very up and down, even more so since they drafted Charbonnet. Look at his game log last season and let me know if you disagree. 
Honestly, I think from a future projection standpoint, this game was more encouraging than his 3-TD game. This game showed his absolute floor, and he still had 14 PPR points. Its not crazy to think Walker could be the #1 overall RB (with a top-6 floor) if (big if) he stays healthy.
The MAIN argument from the Charbonet crowd was he was the preferred passing down back. That Walker wasn't a good receiver.
They had about 15 seconds left and no timeouts. If he got stuffed they would’ve came away with no points
Yea I don't blame them for that one other then they wasted their timeouts to be in that position.
Seattle never runs from the 1 when the game is on the line.... Here's a little flashback from the League: https://youtu.be/xA4qJPhxhTU?si=fsu3A4li7HL5elK-
There is time to get a spike or another play (if its already called) off in that scenario. Everyone is right there, and if SF holds the RB, they'll get called for delay of game, and you'll get an untimed down.
Plenty of time to spike it.
Let me clarify, I am saying this as a positive. That, despite posting a good score, it could have been better. Could have been 3 TD's.
You gotta be kidding me.
