What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Rhamondre Stevenson, NE (3 Viewers)


Don't the Patriots have three good ones, including two rookies last year, right now?

That's not to say they won't take one as this draft seems loaded with them, but is CB a pressing need?

OL I'll grant and WR, too.

It is a need…Jack Jones looks like he can play but there are attitude issues with him which got him suspended last year and caused him to drop in the draft…there are questions whether they can rely on him…Marcus Jones is only 5’8” so he may project to being more of a slot CB…Jonathan Jones is solid but he is not a #1…after those 3 there really isn’t much at all…Tackle and WR are bigger needs but CB is definitely an area where they need to add another quality player.
 
Part of the need at CB is Jalen Mills is rumored / expected to move to safety. NE has generally done well with mid- to late- round DBs and not quite as well with early round picks.

Marcus Jones (Pick 85)
Jack Jones (121)
J.C. Jackson (UDFA)
Jonathan Jones (UDFA)
Malcolm Butler (UDFA)
Logan Ryan (83)
Duron Harmon (91)
Ellis Hobbs (84)
Asante Samuel (120)
Randall Gay (UDFA)

Kyle Dugger (37)
Joejuan Williams (45)
Duke Dawson (56)
Cyrus Jones (60)
Jordan Richard (64)
Tavon Wilson (48)
Ras-I Dowling (33)
Devin McCourty (27)
Patrick Chung (34)
Darius Butler (41)
Terrence Wheatley (62)
Brandon Meriweather (24)
Eugene Wilson (36)
 
Funny, I was in love with him early in the offseason and that cooled to being in like with him. From what I am seeing, they are really trying to off load a lot of his receiving duties and have a true receiving / 3rd down back, whether that be Montgomery, Strong, or Robinson. Sounds like they prefer RS to be an early down back. I have also seen reports that they will try to limit his workload to keep him fresh throughout the season so he doesn't run out of gas in December again. I have seen projections with him seeing 1100-1200 rushing yards but only 200-250 receiving yards. Roughly the same total yardage but a lot fewer receptions. Who knows what they will actually do, but those are the reports I am seeing.
 
Funny, I was in love with him early in the offseason and that cooled to being in like with him. From what I am seeing, they are really trying to off load a lot of his receiving duties and have a true receiving / 3rd down back, whether that be Montgomery, Strong, or Robinson. Sounds like they prefer RS to be an early down back. I have also seen reports that they will try to limit his workload to keep him fresh throughout the season so he doesn't run out of gas in December again. I have seen projections with him seeing 1100-1200 rushing yards but only 200-250 receiving yards. Roughly the same total yardage but a lot fewer receptions. Who knows what they will actually do, but those are the reports I am seeing.
I’m skeptical since he was a very effective receiver.

Why would they eliminate one of the strongest parts of his game?

Where did you see those reports? Any links?
 
Funny, I was in love with him early in the offseason and that cooled to being in like with him. From what I am seeing, they are really trying to off load a lot of his receiving duties and have a true receiving / 3rd down back, whether that be Montgomery, Strong, or Robinson. Sounds like they prefer RS to be an early down back. I have also seen reports that they will try to limit his workload to keep him fresh throughout the season so he doesn't run out of gas in December again. I have seen projections with him seeing 1100-1200 rushing yards but only 200-250 receiving yards. Roughly the same total yardage but a lot fewer receptions. Who knows what they will actually do, but those are the reports I am seeing.
I’m skeptical since he was a very effective receiver.

Why would they eliminate one of the strongest parts of his game?

Where did you see those reports? Any links?
I pretty much explained why already. They felt he played way too many snaps and wore down as the season progressed. He played on 700 snaps last year, and I think they want to reduce that load. So they would try to give him third downs off. He got the workload he did last year because DHarris was constantly injured. Over the past 15 years, BB's plan has been to use multiple backs and NOT have a workhorse back. A couple times he ended up with a guy with a big workload, but that was due to injuries to the rest of the backfield (not by design).

How they keep him fresh and not wear him out is open for debate. Over the years, that's been by using a receiving back or having a secondary back take a couple of series to himself each game. Maybe they still plan to throw to him on early downs. Maybe they will still use him some on 3rd downs.

As for links, most of the stuff has been on Twitter posted by any number of beat reporters. There have been multiple reports of who they are trying to develop as their receiving back.
 
Funny, I was in love with him early in the offseason and that cooled to being in like with him. From what I am seeing, they are really trying to off load a lot of his receiving duties and have a true receiving / 3rd down back, whether that be Montgomery, Strong, or Robinson. Sounds like they prefer RS to be an early down back. I have also seen reports that they will try to limit his workload to keep him fresh throughout the season so he doesn't run out of gas in December again. I have seen projections with him seeing 1100-1200 rushing yards but only 200-250 receiving yards. Roughly the same total yardage but a lot fewer receptions. Who knows what they will actually do, but those are the reports I am seeing.
I’m skeptical since he was a very effective receiver.

Why would they eliminate one of the strongest parts of his game?

Where did you see those reports? Any links?
I pretty much explained why already. They felt he played way too many snaps and wore down as the season progressed. He played on 700 snaps last year, and I think they want to reduce that load. So they would try to give him third downs off. He got the workload he did last year because DHarris was constantly injured. Over the past 15 years, BB's plan has been to use multiple backs and NOT have a workhorse back. A couple times he ended up with a guy with a big workload, but that was due to injuries to the rest of the backfield (not by design).

How they keep him fresh and not wear him out is open for debate. Over the years, that's been by using a receiving back or having a secondary back take a couple of series to himself each game. Maybe they still plan to throw to him on early downs. Maybe they will still use him some on 3rd downs.

As for links, most of the stuff has been on Twitter posted by any number of beat reporters. There have been multiple reports of who they are trying to develop as they’re receiving back.
I guess I’ll have to keep hope alive that those rumors prove to be unfounded & that RS has a larger role this year.

Interesting to hear/read directly from the horses mouth that the Pats will be feeding him a significantly larger role in the absence of Harris. Like, RS literally just said that. Makes me wonder if some of the rumors are Pats subterfuge or writers speculating
 
Last edited:
He was PPR gold last season but in what I was able to watch, a good amount of those points came late in garbage time as the Pats tried to close in on the lead. The field was spread and the QB would dump off to RS who was able to chew yardage.

That's still entirely possible to repeat this year. But a new OC and possibly different game scenarios will bring out other aspects of his game too. Lots of possibilities here.
 
Last year, Stevenson was free money in redraft leagues. He still probably is slightly undervalued (I think so far his ADP is RB12 or RB13.) He has the upside to be a Top 5 back, but I still think NE will give their other backs enough touches to hold RS back some.

Last year, Harris was banged up, Montgomery went on IR after one game, and they didn’t really trust their two rookies. I suspect RS got more work than they intended.

Maybe RS is so much better than their other options that they decide they really do need to keep feeding him the ball. I don’t think they are there yet. I will continue to monitor to see what the vibe is the closer we get to the start of the season.
 
Last year, Stevenson was free money in redraft leagues. He still probably is slightly undervalued (I think so far his ADP is RB12 or RB13.) He has the upside to be a Top 5 back, but I still think NE will give their other backs enough touches to hold RS back some.

Last year, Harris was banged up, Montgomery went on IR after one game, and they didn’t really trust their two rookies. I suspect RS got more work than they intended.

Maybe RS is so much better than their other options that they decide they really do need to keep feeding him the ball. I don’t think they are there yet. I will continue to monitor to see what the vibe is the closer we get to the start of the season.
He cost me a 5th round pick - not exactly free.

I do see him as the best all around back they’ve had since Corey Dillon.

I also believe there will be more offensive plays due to sheer competence of play calling. Also potentially more high quality plays - the Pats had some struggles in short yardage.

My question is whether they’ll go back to the run gun offense that BOB ram his first stint with 2 TE sets, or if they’ll continue to run from behind center with a fullback.

I’m hoping for the former, as there was a lot of success in NE under that system.
 
RB7 in ppr last year. They didn't draft anyone, ler Harris walk, ain't nothing but JAGs behind him. Literally every other skill position on the depth chart is average replacement level players.

Green light pick for me starting in the back half of the second round for redraft.
Agree. I’m seeing top 5.

I do like Strong though, and BOB did use a 3rd down back IIRC. That said, I’m not sure they had as complete a RB as RS on the team when BOB was OC there last.

2011…wasn’t that Law Firm?

ETA: I googled it. It was indeed BenJarvis Green-Ellis

Great nickname. So so running back.
 
RB7 in ppr last year. They didn't draft anyone, ler Harris walk, ain't nothing but JAGs behind him. Literally every other skill position on the depth chart is average replacement level players.

Green light pick for me starting in the back half of the second round for redraft.
Feel free to think what you want, but I am pretty confident that NE would pick to have RS get 15-17 carries and 3-4 receptions per game on average with the JAGs getting the rest of the touches. If we allocate Stevenson to play 14.5 games with a 5.0 ypc and 6.0 ypr, that would work out to about 1160 rushing yards, 50 receptions, and 300 receiving yards. That would probably rank him in the RB10-12 range this year.

BB is not going to give Stevenson 300 caries and 75 receptions. I think his total yardage numbers will be very similar to last year. As always, TDs will always be variable. People can choose to ignore Harris being hurt all season, their 3rd down back missing all season, and their depth guys not being ready to play last year . . . but all the signs are there.

When BOB was in NE the first time, they pretty much were RBBC exclusively. When he was in HOU, from year to year, Foster / Miller / Hyde / Johnson pretty much fell in line with the usage totals I just cited for Stevenson. IMO, people are coming up with outcomes that may not fit the trends / patterns / situation. I'd love to see RS with 2200 YFS and 20 TD. But I just don't see it happening.

As for last season, Stevenson had an ADP of RB36 and ended up ranked RB8. Thus the free money comment. This year, he will probably be drafted as one of the last RB1s or early RB2s. He should earn his draft spot back and maybe a little extra, but it would take injuries to other backs (like last year) for him to get a much bigger workload. NE backs often get banged up . . . but it could just as easily be RS that gets nicked for awhile.

As for who the #2 is, I don't think NE even knows that yet.
 
averaging 15 carries x 17 games = 255, would have been 9th in rushing attempts last year
averaging 17 carries x 17 games = 289, would have been 5th in rushing attempts last year

Rhamondre finished RB7 last whilst averaging 12.35 rushing attempts per game
 
. If we allocate Stevenson to play 14.5 games with a 5.0 ypc and 6.0 ypr, that would work out to about 1160 rushing yards, 50 receptions, and 300 receiving yards. That would probably rank him in the RB10-12 range this year.
Wouldn’t TDs give him room to move up? I could see double digit rushing TDs and 3-4 receiving TDs.
Sure . . . but TDs are highly variable. NE RB leader in total TD the past 10 years: 6, 15, 6, 7, 12, 9, 18, 7, 5, 7. Stevenson has scored 11 times in 30 games for NE.
 
averaging 15 carries x 17 games = 255, would have been 9th in rushing attempts last year
averaging 17 carries x 17 games = 289, would have been 5th in rushing attempts last year

Rhamondre finished RB7 last whilst averaging 12.35 rushing attempts per game
Faulty logic. Stevenson has not shown he can play every game. He's played in 29 regular season games in two years = 14.5 games/yr. As you said, he averaged a little over 12 carries per game, and he was banged up and not quite as effective later in the season. They didn't give him the same workload by the end of the year (10 or fewer carries in 5 of his last 7 games). Like I said, here's hoping RS get 350 touches and plays in every game . . . cause if that happens NE should be a playoff team.
 
averaging 15 carries x 17 games = 255, would have been 9th in rushing attempts last year
averaging 17 carries x 17 games = 289, would have been 5th in rushing attempts last year

Rhamondre finished RB7 last whilst averaging 12.35 rushing attempts per game
Faulty logic. Stevenson has not shown he can play every game. He's played in 29 regular season games in two years = 14.5 games/yr. As you said, he averaged a little over 12 carries per game, and he was banged up and not quite as effective later in the season. They didn't give him the same workload by the end of the year (10 or fewer carries in 5 of his last 7 games). Like I said, here's hoping RS get 350 touches and plays in every game . . . cause if that happens NE should be a playoff team.

OK boss
 
When BOB was in NE the first time, they pretty much were RBBC exclusively.
And once again, I’ll point out that it was a backfield consisting of BenJarvis Green-Ellis & a host of other forgettable RBs

Kind of begs the question of whether it was RBBC by design or by necessity.

Without googling the rest of the depth chart, imma go out on a limb and say RS is 10x the quality of RB than anyone on that 2011 Patriots roster.
 
RS has averaged 11.8 attempts and 2.9 receptions a game over his career. What workload do you think he will get? How many games do you think he will play?
I’m pretty close to your projections.

I’ll give him 16 games because he’s been pretty healthy &’it’s difficult to project injury.

Let’s say 15-17 carries, 5-8 targets per game. I’ll say he grabs 4.2 of those per on average.

So 16 x 4.8 (career Ave) x 16 = 1228 RuYd
4.2 x 16 = 67 receptions x 6.6 (career Ave) = 442 ReYd

Imma say 10 total TD, which is a total WAG.

That all said, you seem to be underselling Harris as “hurt all year”. He started 9 games (2 more than RS) and had 106 carries & 17 receptions.
 
When BOB was in NE the first time, they pretty much were RBBC exclusively.
And once again, I’ll point out that it was a backfield consisting of BenJarvis Green-Ellis & a host of other forgettable RBs

Kind of begs the question of whether it was RBBC by design or by necessity.

Without googling the rest of the depth chart, imma go out on a limb and say RS is 10x the quality of RB than anyone on that 2011 Patriots roster.
Over the past 10 seasons, the only true workhorse back in NE (for one season) was LaGarrette Blount when every other back on the roster was banged up. Sony Michel had one season when he averaged 16 carries . . . NE just does not give guys a ton of carries. It's not how BB operates. In 30 games in NE, RS has had more than 16 carries 6 times. Damien Harris was hurt or very limited in 5 of them.
 
That all said, you seem to be underselling Harris as “hurt all year”. He started 9 games (2 more than RS) and had 106 carries & 17 receptions.
RS had 3 times the snaps and 2.25 the touches. Pretty sure that wasn't the plan when the season started. But it was pretty predictable that RS would get more work than anticipated (he was better and injured less). But it took Harris getting banged up for him to get more touches.
 
RB7 in ppr last year. They didn't draft anyone, ler Harris walk, ain't nothing but JAGs behind him. Literally every other skill position on the depth chart is average replacement level players.

Green light pick for me starting in the back half of the second round for redraft.
Agree. I’m seeing top 5.

I do like Strong though, and BOB did use a 3rd down back IIRC. That said, I’m not sure they had as complete a RB as RS on the team when BOB was OC there last.

2011…wasn’t that Law Firm?

ETA: I googled it. It was indeed BenJarvis Green-Ellis

Great nickname. So so running back.
Did not read thru all the posts, seems like the discussion centers around RS being mid rd rb1 or late rd rb1? I think he is terrific, but would probably go with the latter projection. As for who is the 2nd NE rb to own, I agree and I am all in on Strong.
 
RS had 3 times the snaps and 2.25 the touches. Pretty sure that wasn't the plan when the season started. But it was pretty predictable that RS would get more work than anticipated (he was better and injured less). But it took Harris getting banged up for him to get more touches.
True. I drafted him with that expectation.

Quite a few in the FF community were on that too.

I do recall some saying Harris would split all the work, and cautioned against RS.

Anyway, our projections really aren’t that far apart. I have him with ~1 more carry & ~1 more rec per game.
 
I'm going to say it's possible RS really showed how valuable he is in space last season for QBs who need a dump off option. That facet was really valuable to this offense and I'm wondering if they've improved enough to limit that option. PPR value for RS is worth a slightly inflated draft position for that reason IMO - If the touchdowns happen too, he's going to have some monster weeks.
 
RS had 3 times the snaps and 2.25 the touches. Pretty sure that wasn't the plan when the season started. But it was pretty predictable that RS would get more work than anticipated (he was better and injured less). But it took Harris getting banged up for him to get more touches.
True. I drafted him with that expectation.

Quite a few in the FF community were on that too.

I do recall some saying Harris would split all the work, and cautioned against RS.

Anyway, our projections really aren’t that far apart. I have him with ~1 more carry & ~1 more rec per game.
It's all good. I trust try to provide my best guess (whether that aligns with other opinions or not).
 
It's all good. I trust try to provide my best guess (whether that aligns with other opinions or not).
It is funny how just 1 carry & 1 reception per game can mean the difference between say, top 12, and top 6.
The other thing about RS . . . he wasn't really a heavy carry back at Oklahoma. He averaged 5 carries his first year and 16 carries his second year. Not saying he couldn't handle a consistently bigger workload, but we haven't really seen him do it yet.
 
15 carries and 5 targets per game is a solid day’s work for a RB in today’s NFL. That’s likely the floor here. Sure the ceiling isn’t much higher, but you could do way worse for one of your starting RBs.
Every season is different. Things are different in NE without Damien Harris in town. However, in 30 games in NE, RS has had 15 carries 9 times and 5 targets 12 times. He's had 15 carries AND 5 targets 5 times. Of those 5 games, Harris was out for 3 of them, one was a game Harris got hurt early in the game, and the other was his first game back coming off an injury. IMO, Stevenson's floor workload wise is lower than 15 carries and 5 targets. How much lower is a point of inflection . . . and where people set that could determine if people value him as a Top 5 back, a Top 10 back, or a borderline fantasy RB1.
 
15 carries and 5 targets per game is a solid day’s work for a RB in today’s NFL. That’s likely the floor here. Sure the ceiling isn’t much higher, but you could do way worse for one of your starting RBs.
Every season is different. Things are different in NE without Damien Harris in town. However, in 30 games in NE, RS has had 15 carries 9 times and 5 targets 12 times. He's had 15 carries AND 5 targets 5 times. Of those 5 games, Harris was out for 3 of them, one was a game Harris got hurt early in the game, and the other was his first game back coming off an injury. IMO, Stevenson's floor workload wise is lower than 15 carries and 5 targets. How much lower is a point of inflection . . . and where people set that could determine if people value him as a Top 5 back, a Top 10 back, or a borderline fantasy RB1.

I think it also matters how good the other RBs are or aren't this year...right now that is a mystery as you don't know what you have in Strong and Harris, Montgomery gets raves in practice but overall his career has been very lackluster in the stat department and James Robinson is another question mark...in the past the Pats have had more known quantities in the backfield so it was a given the touches would be spread out but right now outside of Stevenson no one knows what to expect be it good or bad with these other RBs
 
Starting to get a Michael Turner vibe with Stevenson from a running standpoint. Agree with Anarchy99 that he won’t get the crazy volume, which Turner got, but as a runner I think they have same bruising style with some wiggle. 1000/10 all day with more TD upside.
 
15 carries and 5 targets per game is a solid day’s work for a RB in today’s NFL. That’s likely the floor here. Sure the ceiling isn’t much higher, but you could do way worse for one of your starting RBs.
Every season is different. Things are different in NE without Damien Harris in town. However, in 30 games in NE, RS has had 15 carries 9 times and 5 targets 12 times. He's had 15 carries AND 5 targets 5 times. Of those 5 games, Harris was out for 3 of them, one was a game Harris got hurt early in the game, and the other was his first game back coming off an injury. IMO, Stevenson's floor workload wise is lower than 15 carries and 5 targets. How much lower is a point of inflection . . . and where people set that could determine if people value him as a Top 5 back, a Top 10 back, or a borderline fantasy RB1.

Every time RS has hit the thresholds people are projecting, is has been because Harris out or left the game early. Now he's gone. So it stands to reason there is optimism. The other part of it also depends on how talented you think RS is to the rest of the RB crew this year. Surely BB can see that, and wants to get his best players on the field.

IMO the offense should be much better than last year now that the Matt P show is over. To me this should drive additional opportunities for RS if the offense is more productive and able to sustain drives.

He is rising to the 2-3 turn now (depending on the draft) but I still like him in the early 3rd all day long. At least in June haha
 
15 carries and 5 targets per game is a solid day’s work for a RB in today’s NFL. That’s likely the floor here. Sure the ceiling isn’t much higher, but you could do way worse for one of your starting RBs.
Every season is different. Things are different in NE without Damien Harris in town. However, in 30 games in NE, RS has had 15 carries 9 times and 5 targets 12 times. He's had 15 carries AND 5 targets 5 times. Of those 5 games, Harris was out for 3 of them, one was a game Harris got hurt early in the game, and the other was his first game back coming off an injury. IMO, Stevenson's floor workload wise is lower than 15 carries and 5 targets. How much lower is a point of inflection . . . and where people set that could determine if people value him as a Top 5 back, a Top 10 back, or a borderline fantasy RB1.

Every time RS has hit the thresholds people are projecting, is has been because Harris out or left the game early. Now he's gone. So it stands to reason there is optimism. The other part of it also depends on how talented you think RS is to the rest of the RB crew this year. Surely BB can see that, and wants to get his best players on the field.

IMO the offense should be much better than last year now that the Matt P show is over. To me this should drive additional opportunities for RS if the offense is more productive and able to sustain drives.

He is rising to the 2-3 turn now (depending on the draft) but I still like him in the early 3rd all day long. At least in June haha

I think Stevenson is a very safe pick this year...unless he gets injured I don't see a scenario where he is not really productive...the key is remembering this is BB and the Pats and it is never easy for fantasy purposes so you just need to keep things realistic and you will end up being happy with him.
 
. If we allocate Stevenson to play 14.5 games with a 5.0 ypc and 6.0 ypr, that would work out to about 1160 rushing yards, 50 receptions, and 300 receiving yards. That would probably rank him in the RB10-12 range this year.
Wouldn’t TDs give him room to move up? I could see double digit rushing TDs and 3-4 receiving TDs.
Sure . . . but TDs are highly variable. NE RB leader in total TD the past 10 years: 6, 15, 6, 7, 12, 9, 18, 7, 5, 7. Stevenson has scored 11 times in 30 games for NE.
Sure, TDs are variable but still need to be factored in if we're talking the difference between a RB2 and a RB1, for fantasy. Stevenson seems primed to be one of the top TD scorers among RBs this upcoming season. He's the by far the Patriots most powerful runner and the Pats seem to prefer to be conservative in the red-zone.

Lets say he scores 11 total TDs (which seems pretty reasonable) - where does that rank him?
 
Sure, TDs are variable but still need to be factored in if we're talking the difference between a RB2 and a RB1, for fantasy. Stevenson seems primed to be one of the top TD scorers among RBs this upcoming season. He's the by far the Patriots most powerful runner and the Pats seem to prefer to be conservative in the red-zone.

Lets say he scores 11 total TDs (which seems pretty reasonable) - where does that rank him?
I will answer your question as best I can, but IMO it's also pretty reasonable to predict that RS DOESN'T get 11 TD for all the reasons I have already mentioned. Last season, he had 279 touches and scored 6 times. It's not like Damien Harris was a huge TD vulture . . . he only scored 3 TD. Sure, ditching Patricia should help the offense . . . but who knows if Stevenson will be the one that gets a bigger piece of the TD pie.

Let's use Mike Clay's projections for Stevenson. He has him projected at 200-885-6 with 58-408-1 for 229 fantasy points in PPR scoring. That would rank him as RB11 in his rankings. You want to bump that to 11 TD, which would be 24 more points = 253 points. That would get him to RB6. (I don't really care so much where a guy ranks, I care more about where his total is in terms of tiers.) In Clay's system, RS would be very close to ranking 8th (which again really isn't the point I am trying to make).

Last season, Stevenson was drafted as RB36 and ended up as RB8. The #36 RB scored 142 points last season, yet RS scored 251 points (essentially 109 points more than his draft value). This season, Stevenson is getting drafted as RB12 so far . . . and with early reports being all positive about the NE offense, I think he will creep into the Top 10. Let's say he gets drafted as RB10. Last year, that was worth 246 fantasy points in PPR leagues. Using the numbers I just cited (253 points), that really isn't a huge ROI on Stevenson (and certainly nothing near what he was worth last year value wise). Like I said, whether he ends up ranked 7th or 12th doesn't really matter much to me if the scoring difference across those spots is only a handful of points. Yes, RS has a higher ceiling than that, and if healthy he really shouldn't perform much worse than that. But he is not going to be filet mignon at hamburger prices like last year.

I also posted that NE's RBs as a group have been tremendously productive for over 20 years now. The JAGs in the backfield have typically been extremely productive (just not really fantasy useful as they haven't gotten a huge volume). That's where I think people are somewhat misreading the situation. BB always finds other guys to give work to (if guys are healthy). I think some people are expecting touches that were slated to DHarris last year to go to RS this year instead. IMO, those touches will go to someone else (Robinson / Montgomery / Strong / the other Harris). Those guys should see enough work to get Stevenson owners frustrated. Mike Clay has that grouping of flotsam and jetsam getting approximately 225 touches (vs. 258 for Stevenson).
 
Just chiming in to refute the "Stevenson losing steam" by the end of last season. He averaged 6.47 ypc over the last third of the season. Also have never put much stock in the "X team or X coach has never done this before so they won't do it now" arguments. Could just as easily say how BB has never really praised a specific player, especially a RB, like he's very vocally heaped it on Rhamondre all of last year. Or the fact that normally a bone head play will get you riding the pine for the rest of the game, if not the next one; yet after Rhamondre's horrid lateral against LV and 2 fumbles against Cincy the next week, he stayed in the game and continued getting use to close out the season.

“I’m not going to second-guess Rhamondre on what he did,” Belichick said during an appearance on The Greg Hill Show, via ESPN’s Mike Reiss. “Rhamondre’s ball security has been pretty good all year. He had two hands on the ball, they were running him back, and they knocked it out at the end.

“…Rhamondre is a really good competitor. He’s one of our best players. I’m sure he’ll be ready to go.”

Taking his history of comments about players into consideration, there's also him comparing his growth and development to Tom Brady and Lawrence Taylor. Unless the CIA replaced BB with a doppelganger, I'd say it's safe to assume he likes him more than just about any player he's had in his backfield in a very, very long time.

Link to comments
 
Just chiming in to refute the "Stevenson losing steam" by the end of last season.
He saw his touches taper off from an average of 22 per game over a 2-month stretch to about half that the last few weeks of the season. He also saw a lot fewer receptions. Sure, his touches were productive, but his workload was reduced quite a bit.
 
Just chiming in to refute the "Stevenson losing steam" by the end of last season.
He saw his touches taper off from an average of 22 per game over a 2-month stretch to about half that the last few weeks of the season. He also saw a lot fewer receptions. Sure, his touches were productive, but his workload was reduced quite a bit.
Over the course of the season he averaged 11.6 rpg and 4.8 tpg. The last four weeks he averaged 11.5 rpg and 4.5 tpg. I'm not trying to attack you here, just pointing out a lot of your posts seem like real speculation (or unlinked twitter commentary) or just not based on the real numbers of what actually happened. Really the only arguments I've seen you made based on facts are all around Patriots/BB historical usage of RB. Which I kind of equate to the people who say "Don't draft an Ohio state QB, they never work out". Just seems like faulty logic as there is so much more that goes into what will actually play out (as well as why things played out the way they have in the past). Basically correlation does not equal causation. And things change for many reasons. It's not like me or others are even predicting a change. That happened last year already. We are saying there doesn't seem to be any real evidence of it changing back this upcoming season.

In fact, most signs point to it not changing for RS. BB sings his praises higher than any player other than Brady that I can remember, they drafted no one else at the position despite wide speculation they would, and neither a 30 year old never better than RB3 Ty Montgomery or James Robinson off an achilles tear that no RB has ever shown to come back from and play at a high level scare me. If he was still on the team, Damien Harris would still be ahead of both of them, yet they let Harris walk. Even in the worst case, non-injury scenario; Rhamondre gets 0 added touches over what he did last year when he wound up the PPR RB7. In one of the worst versions of their offense we've seen in years led by..... Matt Patricia lol, to finish in the bottom 10 of nearly every offensive category and get universally panned for how terrible the play calling was.

Since there really isn't much to go on with RS other than what we saw last season, I can see people just agreeing to disagree and saying we'll see how it turns out this year. I'm not projecting him to get 15 carries a week myself. I also don't see much regression needed in his 4.8 tpg as it doesn't seem extraordinarily high to me. I just think it's bad process to continue using "but Patriots RBs bad" as a reasoning after watching the guy put up the season he did last year in a bottom 5 offense on already limited touches.
 
240/1200/8 + 50/350/2
The premise is that his role on a percentage basis does not increase (Montgomery, Strong, etc.), but that the offense becomes significantly more effective than 2022 (more touches at fixed share, more effective end zone penetration).
 
For people that were asking, after surveying the landscape and hearing what the beat guys had to say, AS OF THIS JUNCTURE IN TIME, the backfield most likely shapes up as follows:

- Stevenson early down work as both rusher and receiver. Probably 3rd and short yardage situations as well.
- Kevin Harris as the backup to Stevenson . . . meaning he won't get much work if RS is healthy.
- Pierre Strong in the Rex Burkhead type role. In NE, that usually means he would get a series to himself each half and would come in to give RS a breather if needed.
- Ty Montgomery as the receiving / 3rd down back on passing downs. Probably won't get many carries.
- J.J. Taylor as the fill in if someone is hurt and not on the game day roster.

It appears they are trying to figure out how best to utilize Strong, but several people have said he is very hard to catch up to and tackle in space. But he's more of a break things to the outside type of a back. Harris is more of a between the tackles, grinder type back. I am of the opinion that Harris and Strong are fine having practiced and observed for a season (like Vereen, White, and others before them). Maybe Strong can develop into a James White type receiving back, but as of now, he appears to be more of a speed rusher than true receiving back.

I have heard some speculation (that I am not in agreement with) that NE may install a goal line / wildcat package for Malik Cunningham. That certainly wouldn't help Stevenson's cause in terms of getting into the end zone. But I don't see this happening, as that would force NE to carry three active QBs on game day. I don't see any way that the Pats would turn to Cunningham to take any meaningful QB snaps in regular situations, as they would go with Zappe if Jones got hurt in game. I don't think Cunningham will end up making the final roster, but we are a long way away from trimming down the roster.
 
Last edited:
For people that were asking, after surveying the landscape and hearing what the beat guys had to say, AS OF THIS JUNCTURE IN TIME, the backfield most likely shapes up as follows:

- Stevenson early down work as both rusher and receiver. Probably 3rd and short yardage situations as well.
- Kevin Harris as the backup to Stevenson . . . meaning he won't get much work if RS is healthy.
- Pierre Strong in the Rex Burkhead type role. In NE, that usually means he would get a series to himself each half and would come in to give RS a breather if needed.
- Ty Montgomery as the receiving / 3rd down back on passing downs. Probably won't get many carries.
- J.J. Taylor as the fill in if someone is hurt and not on the game day roster.

It appears they are trying to figure out how best to utilize Strong, but several people have said he is very hard to catch up to and tackle in space. But he's more of a break things to the outside type of a back. Harris is more of a between the tackles, grinder type back. I am of the opinion that Harris and Strong are fine having practiced and observed for a season (like Vereen, White, and others before them). Maybe Strong can develop into A James White type receiving back, but as of now, he appears to be more of a speed rusher than true receiving back.

I have heard some speculation (that I am not in agreement with) that NE may install a goal line / wildcat package for Malik Cunningham. That certainly wouldn't help Stevenson's cause in terms of getting in to the end zone. But I don't see this happening, as that would force NE to carry three active QBs on game day. I don't see any way that the Pats would turn to Cunningham to take any meaningful QB snaps in regular situations, as they would go with Zappe if Jones got hurt in game. I don't think Cunningham will end up making the final roster, but we are a long way away from trimming down the roster.
You foresee them increasing the amount of 12 personnel sets (I feel like I've read that a few times now, especially after adding Gesicki)? What are the chances that if Montgomery lives up to coaching staffs high expectations of last year before getting injured, he and Rhamondre spend some time on the field together with Montgomery put in motion/split out due to the lack of receiving weapons?
 
For people that were asking, after surveying the landscape and hearing what the beat guys had to say, AS OF THIS JUNCTURE IN TIME, the backfield most likely shapes up as follows:

- Stevenson early down work as both rusher and receiver. Probably 3rd and short yardage situations as well.
- Kevin Harris as the backup to Stevenson . . . meaning he won't get much work if RS is healthy.
- Pierre Strong in the Rex Burkhead type role. In NE, that usually means he would get a series to himself each half and would come in to give RS a breather if needed.
- Ty Montgomery as the receiving / 3rd down back on passing downs. Probably won't get many carries.
- J.J. Taylor as the fill in if someone is hurt and not on the game day roster.

It appears they are trying to figure out how best to utilize Strong, but several people have said he is very hard to catch up to and tackle in space. But he's more of a break things to the outside type of a back. Harris is more of a between the tackles, grinder type back. I am of the opinion that Harris and Strong are fine having practiced and observed for a season (like Vereen, White, and others before them). Maybe Strong can develop into A James White type receiving back, but as of now, he appears to be more of a speed rusher than true receiving back.

I have heard some speculation (that I am not in agreement with) that NE may install a goal line / wildcat package for Malik Cunningham. That certainly wouldn't help Stevenson's cause in terms of getting in to the end zone. But I don't see this happening, as that would force NE to carry three active QBs on game day. I don't see any way that the Pats would turn to Cunningham to take any meaningful QB snaps in regular situations, as they would go with Zappe if Jones got hurt in game. I don't think Cunningham will end up making the final roster, but we are a long way away from trimming down the roster.
You foresee them increasing the amount of 12 personnel sets (I feel like I've read that a few times now, especially after adding Gesicki)? What are the chances that if Montgomery lives up to coaching staffs high expectations of last year before getting injured, he and Rhamondre spend some time on the field together with Montgomery put in motion/split out due to the lack of receiving weapons?
They already have plenty of receiving weapons, only more so if they sign Hopkins. JuJu, Parker, Bourne, and Thornton are all good but not great. Henry and Gesicki are both receiving threats. The offense should look like an improved version of the 2021 team. Everyone has more experience, BOB is a legit offensive coordinator, and the reports out of camp are all positive: the players are happy, Mac has been sharp and engaged, everyone is on the same page, and no one is griping that the coaching staff has no idea what they are doing.

There's been talk of using more 12 personnel, but I am not sure that fits who they have available on offense. I would guess they use it more than the past couple of years, but I think they will play more situationally and use schemes and alignments based on down, distance, and field position. O'Brien should certainly be able to scheme guys open more and make in game adjustments, something Patricia certainly struggled to do.

Overall, I think they will have more points scored and more yardage gained. Not sure how that will shape up . . . and that distribution would change if they bring in Hopkins.
 
For people that were asking, after surveying the landscape and hearing what the beat guys had to say, AS OF THIS JUNCTURE IN TIME, the backfield most likely shapes up as follows:

- Stevenson early down work as both rusher and receiver. Probably 3rd and short yardage situations as well.
- Kevin Harris as the backup to Stevenson . . . meaning he won't get much work if RS is healthy.
- Pierre Strong in the Rex Burkhead type role. In NE, that usually means he would get a series to himself each half and would come in to give RS a breather if needed.
- Ty Montgomery as the receiving / 3rd down back on passing downs. Probably won't get many carries.
- J.J. Taylor as the fill in if someone is hurt and not on the game day roster.

It appears they are trying to figure out how best to utilize Strong, but several people have said he is very hard to catch up to and tackle in space. But he's more of a break things to the outside type of a back. Harris is more of a between the tackles, grinder type back. I am of the opinion that Harris and Strong are fine having practiced and observed for a season (like Vereen, White, and others before them). Maybe Strong can develop into A James White type receiving back, but as of now, he appears to be more of a speed rusher than true receiving back.

I have heard some speculation (that I am not in agreement with) that NE may install a goal line / wildcat package for Malik Cunningham. That certainly wouldn't help Stevenson's cause in terms of getting in to the end zone. But I don't see this happening, as that would force NE to carry three active QBs on game day. I don't see any way that the Pats would turn to Cunningham to take any meaningful QB snaps in regular situations, as they would go with Zappe if Jones got hurt in game. I don't think Cunningham will end up making the final roster, but we are a long way away from trimming down the roster.
You foresee them increasing the amount of 12 personnel sets (I feel like I've read that a few times now, especially after adding Gesicki)? What are the chances that if Montgomery lives up to coaching staffs high expectations of last year before getting injured, he and Rhamondre spend some time on the field together with Montgomery put in motion/split out due to the lack of receiving weapons?
They already have plenty of receiving weapons, only more so if they sign Hopkins. JuJu, Parker, Bourne, and Thornton are all good but not great. Henry and Gesicki are both receiving threats. The offense should look like an improved version of the 2021 team. Everyone has more experience, BOB is a legit offensive coordinator, and the reports out of camp are all positive: the players are happy, Mac has been sharp and engaged, everyone is on the same page, and no one is griping that the coaching staff has no idea what they are doing.

There's been talk of using more 12 personnel, but I am not sure that fits who they have available on offense. I would guess they use it more than the past couple of years, but I think they will play more situationally and use schemes and alignments based on down, distance, and field position. O'Brien should certainly be able to scheme guys open more and make in game adjustments, something Patricia certainly struggled to do.

Overall, I think they will have more points scored and more yardage gained. Not sure how that will shape up . . . and that distribution would change if they bring in Hopkins.

Reports out-of-camp (and it should not surprise anyone) are the Tackle position has a chance to be a complete disaster...if that ends up being the case not much else is going to matter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top