What have I been wrong about? So far Freeman and his 7 fantasy points hasn't justified his draft stock.Hey Stu, lighten up. You had an opinion that turned out wrong for the moment & maybe the year. Big deal, so what? We are ALL wrong sometimes when it comes to FF football. Actually more times than we care to admit.
The only position I've been trying to sell is that Royce Freeman is over hyped , over drafted and that many in this thread have Rookie fever.Wait, what I said was worthy of you going all caps? And you call me sensitive?
You have been wrong about this the entire way. You said that booker would hold onto the starting job because he was the vet. I said you were wrong. I said that Lindsay would take over Booker's roll before long, not expecting it to be week 1, but there we have it.
I said your take on the situation was wrong and has been from the beginning. Those are facts. That's constructive criticism, not disrespect. Going all caps and name calling is where the disrespect starts and that starts with you.
I'd drop a "Lighten up, Francis" or "Maybe you should switch to decaf" but you would probably take that as a major insult for me calling you Francis or something.
I like him but I think Booker sits in front of him as starter all season.
I'm cool with being wrong about that. I'm happy he got the job! But Freeman still has to, you know, produce.
Oh the days of Em and RnR, but can't say I miss those guys.not if you're familiar with Eminence
Good Seattle run defense?71 yards, not bad against a still good Seattle run D
Quite the hot take on those podcasts. One guy is 5'7" 184 and the other is 6' 230. Given that, it's pretty crazy Freeman actually has a better agility score than Lindsay:Listening to podcasts of people that watched the games with interest - common thread is Freeman looks slow but has some power.
Linsay looks fast.
Think it depends on how the game plays out. Seattle is OK against the run, and the Broncos were down in the 4th so Lindsay and Booker are going to get their targets.But yes, Lindsay will be involved for sure so it is still an RBBC to a degree.I have a feeling he's going to be a very TD dependent back to own. He's my flex play and I can live with that IF he starts finding the end zone.
he looks OK but he's just splitting too many snaps with Lindsay, and Lindsay is a big play guy and frankly a more exciting player, on top of the pass catching. The redzone touches are OK but you can't rely on that.Barf. This guy is Leroy Hoard.
Sorry....no. 2 weeks into the season. Laugh all you want but Freeman is the best running back on Denver's roster.Where is everyone? I thought this was going to be a party!
Hope you guys had making fun of me all off-season. Because reality just hit you guys square in the jaw.
I was just trying to help you guys out. I always get the last laugh...
![]()
But you said a rookie wouldn't take over and Booker would start?Where is everyone? I thought this was going to be a party!
Hope you guys had making fun of me all off-season. Because reality just hit you guys square in the jaw.
I was just trying to help you guys out. I always get the last laugh...
![]()
Are you just repeating this over and over hoping it will come true?but Freeman is the best running back on Denver's roster.
I wouldn't say that was my thesis statement on the topic. I thought Booker would hold onto the job a little longer than he did as the incumbent starter.But you said a rookie wouldn't take over and Booker would start?
Oh yeah, gloating after Week 2 is bush league. But these guys were gloating and ridiculing me AFTER preseason.Lindsay is great, Freeman is too. If you’re betting a 185lb back survives 20 touches a game much longer you’re smoking some strong stuff. Also, gloating after week 2? Pretty damn foolish. Hope that pays off for you when all is said and done.
You're making yourself really unlikable. And I don't even own or like Freeman. You were (are so far) as wrong about Booker as the others were about Freeman. Would still take Freeman over Booker and it's not even close.Come on guys, give your buddy Stu a big hug! I'm here to love all of you and give you good fantasy football advice.
The last time I had this much fun was when I predicted that David Wilson (RB - NYG) would bust.
You can lead a horse to water...
I don't own Freeman in any leagues but I do own Lindsay in a lot of places.I wouldn't say that was my thesis statement on the topic. I thought Booker would hold onto the job a little longer than he did as the incumbent starter.
I'm totally cool admitting I was wrong about that. Unfortunately for you, that doesn't magically score Royce Freeman fantasy points.
Remember, this is the Royce Freeman thread. @TheFanatic and others chose to die on this hill. You're the ones who burned an early 4th round pick on him.
Even if I was wrong about Booker getting carries, I still don't have the blood of drafting this guy early on my hands.
In fact, I was able to get Lindsay in a few leagues so I feel great!
I love rostering the athletic satellites and have plenty of Lindsay and Breida. That being said, Sproles did his damage in space. Part of his carries came from draws or off-tackle. SF and DEN are pounding these guys up the middle. There have been instances of success over individual seasons, Warrick Dunn and Steve Slaton come to mind, but Sproles has had his fair share of injuries and Slaton was never the same after he got ran into the ground. Recent examples of guys who got ran into the ground in college and couldn’t hold up at that weight in the pros are Justin Jackson and Donnell Pumphrey. History suggests that these backs are better served to be under 15 touches per game.Everyone keeps saying these small backs won’t hold up. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see Lindsay and Breida both finish top 25, maybe even top 20. If they are used right, pretty much how they are right now, they will continue to be reliable on a week to week basis all season.
How long has Sproles been in the league killing it?
So your goal is to be an unlikeable troll? Hmm. Interesting life goal.Come on guys, give your buddy Stu a big hug! I'm here to love all of you and give you good fantasy football advice.
The last time I had this much fun was when I predicted that David Wilson (RB - NYG) would bust.
You can lead a horse to water...
What don't you understand? This isn't about Booker. He was an 11th round footnote.You're making yourself really unlikable. And I don't even own or like Freeman. You were (are so far) as wrong about Booker as the others were about Freeman. Would still take Freeman over Booker and it's not even close.
Not at all. But when somebody treats me like a piece of garbage over my fantasy football opinion that ended up being RIGHT.So your goal is to be an unlikeable troll? Hmm. Interesting life goal.
Then don't fault others for not having a crystal ball regarding him either. If Lindsay wasn't doing what he was doing, Freeman would be getting 75% of the team's carries. The only thing we know so far is that Booker isn't the guy, Freeman was gonna be the guy, but Lindsay came out of nowhere and is deserving of more and more touches.What don't you understand? This isn't about Booker. He was an 11th round footnote.
The story here is the guy that crept up to the 3rd round and was going to be a stud week in and week out.
I'm the only one who had the balls to say that wouldn't happen. Replace Booker with Lindsay and it's still the RBBC I predicted.
I also mentioned frequently that Freeman was a 3 yards a cloud of dust runner. Convenient you don't bring that up...
Don't fault me for not having a crystal ball regarding Lindsay! Nobody saw that coming.
My apologies. I didn't realize what a legendary fantasy rep you have. Had I known, I'd have rushed out and invested in Booker. OoopsNot at all. But when somebody treats me like a piece of garbage over my fantasy football opinion that ended up being RIGHT.
Damn right I'm going to run their noses in it. If you know who I am, I have a great track record in fantasy. I'm the guy who started the first Leveon Bell and DeAndre Hopkins thread, fwiw. So when Iknow I'm right like in this situation, it's just plain fun.
Believe me. I take my pleasure in others misery. But I sure as hell enjoy making those who try to make me miserable pay.
Listen man, this is personal. I was treated like a non-human in this thread. And you know what? The chickens have come to roost.Then don't fault others for not having a crystal ball regarding him either. If Lindsay wasn't doing what he was doing, Freeman would be getting 75% of the team's carries. The only thing we know so far is that Booker isn't the guy, Freeman was gonna be the guy, but Lindsay came out of nowhere and is deserving of more and more touches.
This situation is more an attribute to Lindsay and not a sleight on Freeman. Jeez, you look desperate to be right and gloat here. C'mon dude.
Bragging about this quality??? You seem like you'd be a tough person to hang out with. This whole post is awful.Not at all. But when somebody treats me like a piece of garbage over my fantasy football opinion that ended up being RIGHT.
Damn right I'm going to run their noses in it. If you know who I am, I have a great track record in fantasy. I'm the guy who started the first Leveon Bell and DeAndre Hopkins thread, fwiw. So when Iknow I'm right like in this situation, it's just plain fun.
Believe me. I take my pleasure in others misery. But I sure as hell enjoy making those who try to make me miserable pay.
Listen man, this is personal. I was treated like a non-human in this thread. And you know what? The chickens have come to roost.
Even if Freeman got more carries, his 3.5 YPC doesn't inspire much confidence for a bigger fantasy day. He's Legarette Blount lite.
I wish the guy would have accepted my bet. I love taking money from egotistical people. In 2016, posters in this board made a bet with me that Donald Trump wouldn't be elected.
He was almost as smug as the guys in this thread were.![]()
Lol, so sad that all you Freeman backers have left is ripping on Booker.My apologies. I didn't realize what a legendary fantasy rep you have. Had I known, I'd have rushed out and invested in Booker. Ooops
That was supposed to say, "I don't take pleasure in others misery" hence the usage of the word "but" as an exception.Bragging about this quality??? You seem like you'd be a tough person to hang out with. This whole post is awful.
And gloating over starting a Bell or Hopkins thread? LOL. Wow.
Being this vengeful is just as ugly a quality as taking pleasure in others' misery.Stuart Ullman said:That was supposed to say, "I don't take pleasure in others misery" hence the usage of the word "but" as an exception.
Listen man, they were being MEAN. Maybe you're right but what's better than bullying a bully?Being this vengeful is just as ugly a quality as taking pleasure in others' misery.
Honestly I think you would have made your point about Freeman better by not saying anything at all.
Trust me, you're not gaining any respect by doing this.Listen man, they were being MEAN. Maybe you're right but what's better than bullying a bully?
If someone won't give you respect, sometimes you have to take it.