Insein
Footballguy
That was my deciding factor to not play him.Vance’s pregame comments on playing him more teased me into flexing him into my lineup. Frustration level has now reached level 9 and climbing ...
That was my deciding factor to not play him.Vance’s pregame comments on playing him more teased me into flexing him into my lineup. Frustration level has now reached level 9 and climbing ...
My deciding factor to drop him and grab Blue.That was my deciding factor to not play him.
He had a total of 7 rushing yards from all his carries prior to one 24 yard rush when the Jets were defending the catch up passing.Don't Noonan said:2nd straight week as the highest YPC back for the Broncos plus he added a few receptions this week. Maybe they wake up and start running the ball more after a dismal loss against the Jets.
And Lindsay had 11 carries for 32 yards after his 29 yard run. Point?He had a total of 7 rushing yards from all his carries prior to one 24 yard rush when the Jets were defending the catch up passing.
Won’t be trusting him any time soon.
Saying Freeman had a higher ypc was meaningless?And Lindsay had 11 carries for 32 yards after his 29 yard run. Point?
Umm, ok. Cutting edge analysisSaying Freeman had a higher ypc was meaningless?
I was referring to the suggestion that Royce actually ran well as evident by his YPC, which we both know is just a fallacious argument.And Lindsay had 11 carries for 32 yards after his 29 yard run. Point?
There is a stat that shows Freeman faces the most 8 man fronts by far on his rushes so don't cherry pick one run.He had a total of 7 rushing yards from all his carries prior to one 24 yard rush when the Jets were defending the catch up passing.
Won’t be trusting him any time soon.
I don't know that stat to be accurate or current. Last time I looked at those stats (two weeks ago) he was not at the top of the list.There is a stat that shows Freeman faces the most 8 man fronts by far on his rushes so don't cherry pick one run.
can you link that stat? because they use Freeman and Lindsay the same way so it's not like the Broncos tip their hand by who is on the field.There is a stat that shows Freeman faces the most 8 man fronts by far on his rushes so don't cherry pick one run.
I saw it in an article, I will try and find it.can you link that stat? because they use Freeman and Lindsay the same way so it's not like the Broncos tip their hand by who is on the field.
I don't think it's that. I think it's more like "It's not Lindsay and not Booker. So it's most likely a run."I take back my statement - he is 1. But only on 24 rushing attempts lots of people with more carries have seen 8 with the similar number of carries. Would also be good to know how many of these came late in games. I don;t think anyone sees Freeman in and says lets stack the box cause he's awesome.
https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/stats/rushing#percent-eight-defenders
I don't think anyone sees Keenum and says let's sell out to defend the pass.I don;t think anyone sees Freeman in and says lets stack the box cause he's awesome.
Who or what is going to wake them up? It certainly won't be Vance Joseph. That clown is a joke of a coach. Why Elway gave him another year I will never know.Don't Noonan said:2nd straight week as the highest YPC back for the Broncos plus he added a few receptions this week. Maybe they wake up and start running the ball more after a dismal loss against the Jets.
Tatum Bell?So the coach speak this last week was "Freeman will get more carries and Hyde will get fewer (to give more to Chubb)." Both lies.
When the heck is Bell coming back because I need a RB BAD!?
Why? They use Lindsay in the identical way they use Freeman. They don't really pass to either.I don't think it's that. I think it's more like "It's not Lindsay and not Booker. So it's most likely a run."
Well Lindsay averages 5 targets a game to Freeman's 2. Freeman also averages more carries per game than Lindsay. If I'm the defense and I see Freeman in the game, more than likely thinking run. Thats probably why he sees the most 8 man fronts.Why? They use Lindsay in the identical way they use Freeman. They don't really pass to either.
As is apparently the donkey OFreeman instantly becomes a RB1 if Lindsay gets hurt, but as long as they're sharing time, both are merely flex options. And hit or miss ones at that.
Great guy to try to buy low.What are people thinking about Freeman long(er) term?
Yes, but that'll be up for the next coach to decide. I'm not sure Vance survives the year. He's about to be 2-4 on what was supposed to be a win now team.Does he have the talent to separate from Lindsay/Booker?
Yeah, Vance is gone after this year. It can only get better for Freeman.Great guy to try to buy low.
Yes, but that'll be up for the next coach to decide. I'm not sure Vance survives the year. He's about to be 2-4 on what was supposed to be a win now team.
2019 - the year of Chad and Royce.Yeah, Vance is gone after this year. It can only get better for Freeman.
I agree. Great buy low candidate, especially for keeper/dynasty leagues.Great guy to try to buy low.
Yes, but that'll be up for the next coach to decide. I'm not sure Vance survives the year. He's about to be 2-4 on what was supposed to be a win now team.
Let see, Royce running well, up on the arch rival, bench the RB, lose the game. Then they get spanked by the Jets without using Freeman hardly at all. How does this guy get through his post mortem meeting with Elway every week?I agree. Great buy low candidate, especially for keeper/dynasty leagues.
One would think that Freeman would have been fed in the Chiefs' game when they were up by 10 in the 4th quarter and he was running so well. But evidently Vance Joseph is a proud graduate of the Andy Reid School of Clock Management and didn't utilize Royce. Then he promises to get more touches for Freeman going into the Jets' game and he gets 8 total touches.
The next coach will certainly do so.
Per #NextGenStats, Royce Freeman sees an 8-man box more than any other RB in the NFL at 51.02% (Alex Collins is next at 43.86%). Royce is 8th in avg with 5.1 yards (minimum 30 attempts). Phillip Lindsay sees an 8-man box 22.81% of the time and leads rookies with 5.8 avg. #Broncos
You keep using that word..........I really do think Lindsay is fools gold and the great buy here is Freeman. Especially with a potential new coach coming in the future.
I think that's the first or second time I've said that. I started the Lindsay thread and hyped him up quite a bit. I was looking at him before you even knew who he was.You keep using that word..........
He's not fool's gold - he's a low end RB2 for redraft right now that will probably dominate in pass catching if Freeman takes over and still have value.
Probably the best you can get from Freeman is RB2
I know we all take the X number of plays we see and assuming something should change. But the coaches are seeing something in practice and in games that makes them prefer Lindsay.
A new coach would likely be next year. I would imagine the OC would take over this year and there's no reason to expect significant change.
Well the good news for Lindsay owners then is that Freeman seems to be the one that telegraphs what the team is going to do - you know since everyone keeps bringing up how he faces more stacked boxes than any other RB.I think that's the first or second time I've said that. I started the Lindsay thread and hyped him up quite a bit. I was looking at him before you even knew who he was.
I'm not talking redraft, I'm talking dynasty. I said there is likely a new coach coming in the future. Which I know future could be tomorrow or next year, maybe I should have been more clear, but Freeman is a huge buy in dynasty and I think Lindsay may be a significant sell high in dynasty. When you have a player who is dependant on a pass catching role (which I think eventually Lindsay will be relegated to that), then that player is very coach/OC dependant for value, as not every coach wants to 1- telegraph plays with specific backs, and 2- use a back for receiving purposes only
Yep. It's an interesting scenario for sure. Lindsay has looked like the better feature back than Freeman.Well the good news for Lindsay owners then is that Freeman seems to be the one that telegraphs what the team is going to do - you know since everyone keeps bringing up how he faces more stacked boxes than any other RB.
Lindsay has been more effective running the ball and catching the ball.
Booker gets snaps because VJ is an idiot. Booker shouldn't even be on the team..I picked up Freeman last week in a short bench league, but will be dropping this week. I made a 2 for 1 deal and don't have the room. Is this destined to be a split like GB? Does Booker get any snaps?
Objection, Your Honor. Speculation.Booker gets snaps because VJ is an idiot. Booker shouldn't even be on the team..
The offense cant support both of them like NO can support Kamara and Ingram, or like Pitt will support Bell/Conner.
You forgot Saints backfield lite. Gordon/EkelerBooker gets snaps because VJ is an idiot. Booker shouldn't even be on the team..
The offense cant support both of them like NO can support Kamara and Ingram, or like Pitt will support Bell/Conner.
Careful, pal. Royce Freeman is the messiah.Lindsay has been the better overall back of the two. I don't understand why people assume Freeman is a buy low in dynasty when everything so far has shown Lindsay to be more versatile.
I'd like to believe that too, but Lindsay is not being leveraged that much in the passing game -- far from the clear-cut choice in terms of passing down back (that seems to be Booker); he's also struggled in the pass pro department (again, the reason why Booker is still trotted out there).Lindsay has been the better overall back of the two. I don't understand why people assume Freeman is a buy low in dynasty when everything so far has shown Lindsay to be more versatile.