What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB strategy (1 Viewer)

For those interested, I'm going to apply projected point totals for this the two possibilities I listed and see which looks better on paper.
What about Dillion and Marone & Addai and Rhodes?They could fall right in your strategy rnds too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haven't analyzed this info yet, but here are the results:

Projected pt total, using FBG projection dominator (most are 20% weighted from each expert)

SA 296

Owen 210

Harrison 196

Roy 180

Dunn 179

Addai 147

Rhodes 111

Total: 1319

SA 296

Owens 210

K. Jones 198

Roy 180

Bell 163

Mason 141

dayne 143

Total: 1331

Not sure how much this helps, as a figure of the average production from the Indy vs Den backfield may be more useful. Plus, that figure compared to the dropoff at WR you have from Harrison to Mason.

At first glance, I like the 2nd scenario better, but will have to analyze this info at little more and maybe get some Den vs Indy avg production. The rest of the draft should go similar for each scenario, which is why I only projected to this point. (have 4 rbs and 3 wrs on each scenario)

 
Stay away from the Denver backfield -- every year they cause more ulcers than all the others combined ----- just a helpful note of discretion from your FF grandmother.....

 
Great thread guys. I really like some of these situations as well and think that loading up with 2 or 3 excellent/very good wideouts somewhate mitigates losing out on the 2nd tier running back.

I have the 6 spot in my main league and will probably land Edge, Tiki, or Rudi and then go WR crazy for a few rounds to try and gain an edge somewhere. Great input here.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top