RB to Exploit -Avoid...NO vs GB (1 Viewer)

[atcdav]

Been waiting a long time to finally try out my new toy in Mark Ingram. If he goes off on my bench, I'm gonna be but I'm going with safer week one options.

Why don't you share what those other option safe so we have a chance to compare. I'm sure others have the same dilemma.

Personally, it was between Ingram and Beanie Wells as my RB3 (McFadden and Rice starting). I went with Beanie this week and his good matchup against the Carolina Defense. I have a feeling this will be a constant struggle all season long for who to start of those 2.

Well that is one tough call for week 1. A guy with 20+ touches vs a guy with 10 or so. Yardage will probably be equal based on preseason 20-30/yds :tongueincheeck:

 

[zoonation]

 

[Ministry of Pain]

"I can see Grant ending up with 40 yds"



9/40 on the night

 

[Saint]

The James Starks logic on this board makes no sense. Why the love for this guy is beyond me. If you think the Packers are not going to run Ryan Grant into the ground you are nuts. Its funny to me that everyone selectively forgets that Starks has a long long history of major injuries.

 

[zoonation]

"I can see Grant ending up with 40 yds"



9/40 on the night

Nice call. I think the question of who RB1 is answered though. Starks had to be on the field for 80% of the plays. He is clearly the guy right now.

 

[Ministry of Pain]

"I can see Grant ending up with 40 yds"

9/40 on the night

Nice call. I think the question of who RB1 is answered though. Starks had to be on the field for 80% of the plays. He is clearly the guy right now.

I don't think Starks was on the field until midway thru the 2nd, both of them had 5 carries until the end of the 3rd Q.

Starks had a terrific run on the TD, Grant had a nice run with a slick stiff arm to the corner, good news for Packersfans...they have 2 legit RBs.

I agree though that Starks looked good tonight. Until the TD run he was at 3.2 ypc vs Grant 5.2 ypc...but again Starks had the best run of the night.