RBs (1 Viewer)

[wiscstlatlmia]

Thoughts and opinions please...

 

[wiscstlatlmia]

I think Best has the most potential out of this group, but i am not sure about his situation....SJAX looks to have a solid qb of the future and has the talent running and catching the ball to lead all rbs in fantasy points for the next few years...

 

[djmich]

I have JStew in my dynasty and love the possibilities long term but the love he gets is crazy when he is pulling more votes than Gore. I can't even start JStew week 1 and who knows when he would be my RB2/3

 

[joffer]

Deangelo williams [ 1 ] [4.17%]

Jonathan Stewart [ 9 ] [37.50%]

this boggles the mind

 

[Angus82]

I voted Matthews because of Rivers being somewhat young and the fact that he appears to be an all around back. Best seems smallish and not someone that I would predict for a long career.

 

[wiscstlatlmia]

Deangelo williams [ 1 ] [4.17%] Jonathan Stewart [ 9 ] [37.50%] this boggles the mind

i agree ...i mean stewart is 4 years younger but hes not even an rb 1 this year

 

[thatguy]

Tough question, and I think who you choose is, or at least should be, largely dependent on your current situation.

If you have a great team that is primed to contend for the next 2-3 years, I think Gore is the choice. But a strong case could be made for DWill, SJax, and Turner. Personally, I feel any one of them could be the most valuable of the 4 over the next 2-3 years, but my money is on Gore.

If your team is in rebuilding mode, and unlikely to contend for the next 2-3 years, I think Stewart is the easy choice. However, a strong case could be made for Best and Mathews.

In truth, Best and Mathews could potentially fit both situations, as many feel they're primed to be studs right out of the gate. However, given that they're relative unknowns, they're not nearly as safe as the likes of Gore, DWill, SJax and Turner - I guess this is largely dependent on how risk averse the owner is.

IMO, the odd man out is Grant, as he is in the contend now group, but nowhere near as talented as the other names mentioned.

 

[wiscstlatlmia]

Tough question, and I think who you choose is, or at least should be, largely dependent on your current situation. If you have a great team that is primed to contend for the next 2-3 years, I think Gore is the choice. But a strong case could be made for DWill, SJax, and Turner. Personally, I feel any one of them could be the most valuable of the 4 over the next 2-3 years, but my money is on Gore. If your team is in rebuilding mode, and unlikely to contend for the next 2-3 years, I think Stewart is the easy choice. However, a strong case could be made for Best and Mathews. In truth, Best and Mathews could potentially fit both situations, as many feel they're primed to be studs right out of the gate. However, given that they're relative unknowns, they're not nearly as safe as the likes of Gore, DWill, SJax and Turner - I guess this is largely dependent on how risk averse the owner is. IMO, the odd man out is Grant, as he is in the contend now group, but nowhere near as talented as the other names mentioned.

 

[Bill]

mathews