Is this the same reggie Bush that has caused me to pull my hair out the past 4 years?'Raiderfan32904 said:![]()
Yeah, I think he's a must start. He will get plenty of touches and even if it's a blowout, he'll be heavily in the mix on every series. About the only thing I don't count on him for are GL looks. In PPR, he's money.
I'm not sure who the sarcasm is directed at but here is a link to Rotoworld quoting Tony Sparano saying he will get the bulk of the touches.http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/3600/reggie-bushNice link...![]()
Considering benching Felix for him due to the formidable jets d at home, but not sure yet... Knowing he would be getting a full load would help, but not gonna just take your word for it.
Luckily I get to make the call after the bulk of the day is done, so it might depend on where my score is at and what I need out of my rb2.
His first 3 years in NO, when he got 10+ carries most games... he was a top 10 fantasy point per game back in PPR.Actual finishes of 10th, 6th, 10th. What happens when he gets a full load?And as far as predicting injuries go, which I don't do... I'll add that he looked considerably bulked up in preseason. I looked at his arms and the first thing I thought was "wow those are Thomas Jones like biceps." He just looked like a different player to me.for those who are high on Bush now, what is it exactly that leads you to thinking that he is going to be more productive on the Dolphins than he was with brees and the Saints and all those weapons?
I think you ask a good question. In PPR, I think Bush will finish, in terms of ppg, as a top 10 back. I qualify this with PPG as injuries are always a concern. Without PPR, his value is pretty low, but no back gets a bigger bump in PPR than Reggie Bush. Here are his per game averages since he arrived in PPR:06: 16.8 (ninth overall for RBs)Is this the same reggie Bush that has caused me to pull my hair out the past 4 years?'Raiderfan32904 said:![]()
Yeah, I think he's a must start. He will get plenty of touches and even if it's a blowout, he'll be heavily in the mix on every series. About the only thing I don't count on him for are GL looks. In PPR, he's money.
Not trying to be Snarky: serious question here...for those who are high on Bush now, what is it exactly that leads you to thinking that he is going to be more productive on the Dolphins than he was with brees and the Saints and all those weapons? I get the idea of increased comitment, but the Saints had tons of opportunities where the Dolphins simply are not that good on offense. So, is it really so much better to say we are going to heavily commit to a guy (but only have 40 offensive plays) vs. saying we are going to use a guy sparingly (but have 80 plays)?
The sarcasm was at someone asserting something, but not providing a link or a quote. Had they done what you did, Mr Roll eyes wouldn't come out.As you know as along timer here, many people just make their own assertions here as if they can will things to happen. If you re gonna start a thread, might as well go the extra inch and add a link/paragraph/quote etc...I'm not sure who the sarcasm is directed at but here is a link to Rotoworld quoting Tony Sparano saying he will get the bulk of the touches.http://www.rotoworld...600/reggie-bushNice link...![]()
Considering benching Felix for him due to the formidable jets d at home, but not sure yet... Knowing he would be getting a full load would help, but not gonna just take your word for it.
Luckily I get to make the call after the bulk of the day is done, so it might depend on where my score is at and what I need out of my rb2.
I don't think anyone is saying he's Jamaal Charles, but compared to many matchup RB2's and Flex options this week he's looking like a good play.
When asked about Reggie Bush Tuesday, coach Tony Sparano said, "I would think he's going to have the most touches and the most carries."This is mere confirmation after Daniel Thomas face-planted in his rookie training camp. Bush is going to start and be the primary runner in the early part of the season. We're skeptical that he'll be able to sustain health and effectiveness in that role, but with 16-20 touches weekly Bush figures to be a PPR asset. Aug 30 - 12:04 PM
Source: Jeff Darlington on Twitter
Bush is getting the nod for me over Felix.Nice link...Considering benching Felix for him due to the formidable jets d at home, but not sure yet... Knowing he would be getting a full load would help, but not gonna just take your word for it.Luckily I get to make the call after the bulk of the day is done, so it might depend on where my score is at and what I need out of my rb2.
I don't know about that. I've got a feeling Ryan Mathews is primed for the breakout year that everyone was expecting from him as a rookie. And he's gonna kick things off with a big week 1 vs. a depleted Vikes front.I'm starting him over Ingram (so far, so good) and Mathews.
Looking for Reggie to come out extremely fired up in his new feature role on MNF and after seeing Sproles tear up the Packers. My hope is for close to 100 total yards and a 50/50 shot at getting in the end zone.
Same here ... in a .5 ppr.I'm considering starting him over Ahmed Bradshaw. Non PPR league. I just haven't been able to pull the trigger.
1st, I think his overall productivity when healthy is underestimated. He has averaged almost exactly 5 catches per game during his 5 year career. That projects out to 80 catches per season. He leads all RBs in receptions since 2006 even with all the time he's missed. 2nd, With that in mind, I think it is fair to say he is going to be on the field a lot more and is on a team with way fewer offensive weapons where he'll receive even more targets. He has a good shot to give Ray Rice and LeSean McCoy a run for their money for most receptions by a RB. I think he is at least going to meet his 5 catch per game career average.Is this the same reggie Bush that has caused me to pull my hair out the past 4 years?'Raiderfan32904 said:![]()
Yeah, I think he's a must start. He will get plenty of touches and even if it's a blowout, he'll be heavily in the mix on every series. About the only thing I don't count on him for are GL looks. In PPR, he's money.
Not trying to be Snarky: serious question here...for those who are high on Bush now, what is it exactly that leads you to thinking that he is going to be more productive on the Dolphins than he was with brees and the Saints and all those weapons? I get the idea of increased comitment, but the Saints had tons of opportunities where the Dolphins simply are not that good on offense. So, is it really so much better to say we are going to heavily commit to a guy (but only have 40 offensive plays) vs. saying we are going to use a guy sparingly (but have 80 plays)?
I don't think this statement takes into consideration how he has been used this preseason.Bush isn't going to live up to the hype over the long haul. He's not a between the tackles runner or an every down back and it wont take long for teams to scheme him out. Miami is going to have to throw a lot unless LJ or Thomas can get a grinding run game going.
1. No one is arguing he's a good running back in 'real' football, only 'fantasy' football, and even more specifically, 'fantasy' football.2. If he goes back to being a COP, isn't the ideal 'sell high' candidate?New Orleans stopped using him a lot because he was awful running the ball. He isn't a big play rb that people think he is and by all metrics rb's are judged he is bad.He will put up decent stats because Miami will give him touches, but it will be to the detriment of the teams success and eventually they will convert him back to the cop role he fits into.
I suppose what it will come down to, in the end, is a simple question.... is Reggie Bush good? Can he dominate the game when given ample opportunity? I believe he can. I just don't believe it.... this week. That's why, for the purpose of this thread, I believe you bench Bush if you have someone decent to throw in there. (I have Jahvid Best).It is what it is. Reggie will get his, but the Patriots are ready and have earned our respect, fantasy or otherwise.I love you all but enough is enough. Go with your RB2, resist the urge. The clouds will part.1. No one is arguing he's a good running back in 'real' football, only 'fantasy' football, and even more specifically, 'fantasy' football.2. If he goes back to being a COP, isn't the ideal 'sell high' candidate?New Orleans stopped using him a lot because he was awful running the ball. He isn't a big play rb that people think he is and by all metrics rb's are judged he is bad.He will put up decent stats because Miami will give him touches, but it will be to the detriment of the teams success and eventually they will convert him back to the cop role he fits into.
I'm very high on Bush, but I do agree with this. I think he's a really nice flex play in PPR, but I don't know that I'd be starting him at RB2 over guys like Jahvid Best, Ahmad Bradshaw, etc. I'm personally starting him in all 3 leagues I own him in but due in some part to the specific circumstances. In 1 league I'm awful at RB and have no other legit options, in 1 league b/c Bush is filling in for Arian Foster week 1 and in 1 league b/c he's the clear best option at flex (guys like A. Hernandez, J. Ford, etc. as the other options make it a no-brainer). Without looking at the rankings/matchups really in-depth, for now I have Reggie in that 16-20 range of my week 1 RB rankings for PPR. A nice option, but not a guy I'm benching my early round picks for just yet.'GCP said:I suppose what it will come down to, in the end, is a simple question.... is Reggie Bush good? Can he dominate the game when given ample opportunity? I believe he can. I just don't believe it.... this week. That's why, for the purpose of this thread, I believe you bench Bush if you have someone decent to throw in there. (I have Jahvid Best).It is what it is. Reggie will get his, but the Patriots are ready and have earned our respect, fantasy or otherwise.I love you all but enough is enough. Go with your RB2, resist the urge. The clouds will part.'Raiderfan32904 said:1. No one is arguing he's a good running back in 'real' football, only 'fantasy' football, and even more specifically, 'fantasy' football.2. If he goes back to being a COP, isn't the ideal 'sell high' candidate?'moderated said:New Orleans stopped using him a lot because he was awful running the ball. He isn't a big play rb that people think he is and by all metrics rb's are judged he is bad.He will put up decent stats because Miami will give him touches, but it will be to the detriment of the teams success and eventually they will convert him back to the cop role he fits into.
Dont assume Miami will fall behind!! Miami has owned NE in the past, its kinda one of those head scratchers for me!!! But I do see Bush having a good night regardless of the score!!Bush is going to have a hard time matching what Sproles did THU night - 250 total yards getting touches four different ways. Just rushing & receiving in a 1.0 PPR Sproles put up a 15.2. Really wondering if Bush can match that. The key is Miami has to throw him the ball a lot, not just from a FF perspective but from an NFL perspective that team needs to figure out how to move the ball downfield. If they fall behind vs NE (good chance of that) they may just rely on him quite a bit.
Yes. Bush vs. Mathews is a close call.Bush has a higher floor IMO (esp. in PPR) due to a lot of positive intangibles and less uncertainty over being the feature back. I would say Mathews could have higher upside, however, (esp. if SD gets the lead early) with a greater likelihood of getting in the end zone (SD more powerful offense, Bush hasn't impressed me around the GL and big plays seem tough against NE).'Scrappy Doo said:I don't know about that. I've got a feeling Ryan Mathews is primed for the breakout year that everyone was expecting from him as a rookie. And he's gonna kick things off with a big week 1 vs. a depleted Vikes front.I'm starting him over Ingram (so far, so good) and Mathews.
Looking for Reggie to come out extremely fired up in his new feature role on MNF and after seeing Sproles tear up the Packers. My hope is for close to 100 total yards and a 50/50 shot at getting in the end zone.
Phins are going to have a really hard time getting any push at all against Wilfork/Haynesworth.
GL
No comparison. Bush got a lot of touches his first few years, and had a bad YPC/bad YPC/and very few big plays. It isn't like McFadden who had much better production given his opportunities.I cant wait. Wasnt the knock on mcfadden is thar he couldnt stay healthy? Is it inreasonable to think bush could be as flashy. We've all been waiting for the year bush busts out. He will finally get the workload. I hope we hit the homerun here
He got more running opportunities as a rook, but he tore it up on the recieving game. Is it possible he is a different/better runner now than his rookie year?No comparison. Bush got a lot of touches his first few years, and had a bad YPC/bad YPC/and very few big plays. It isn't like McFadden who had much better production given his opportunities.I cant wait. Wasnt the knock on mcfadden is thar he couldnt stay healthy? Is it inreasonable to think bush could be as flashy. We've all been waiting for the year bush busts out. He will finally get the workload. I hope we hit the homerun here
I love how Jahvid Best is being considered better than Reggie Bush when he has never had as good of a season as Bush.... he was hurt all year long last year, and he is splitting the Carries this year.... is this because he hasn't made you very angry yet?? ... don't worry... it will happen I had him last year... he is not an every down back, and Reggie Bush could easily get more receptions as well as way more rushing yards playing in a system that loves to run the ball...I'm very high on Bush, but I do agree with this. I think he's a really nice flex play in PPR, but I don't know that I'd be starting him at RB2 over guys like Jahvid Best, Ahmad Bradshaw, etc.'GCP said:I suppose what it will come down to, in the end, is a simple question.... is Reggie Bush good? Can he dominate the game when given ample opportunity? I believe he can. I just don't believe it.... this week. That's why, for the purpose of this thread, I believe you bench Bush if you have someone decent to throw in there. (I have Jahvid Best).'Raiderfan32904 said:1. No one is arguing he's a good running back in 'real' football, only 'fantasy' football, and even more specifically, 'fantasy' football.2. If he goes back to being a COP, isn't the ideal 'sell high' candidate?'moderated said:New Orleans stopped using him a lot because he was awful running the ball. He isn't a big play rb that people think he is and by all metrics rb's are judged he is bad.
He will put up decent stats because Miami will give him touches, but it will be to the detriment of the teams success and eventually they will convert him back to the cop role he fits into.
It is what it is. Reggie will get his, but the Patriots are ready and have earned our respect, fantasy or otherwise.
I love you all but enough is enough. Go with your RB2, resist the urge. The clouds will part.
I'm personally starting him in all 3 leagues I own him in but due in some part to the specific circumstances. In 1 league I'm awful at RB and have no other legit options, in 1 league b/c Bush is filling in for Arian Foster week 1 and in 1 league b/c he's the clear best option at flex (guys like A. Hernandez, J. Ford, etc. as the other options make it a no-brainer).
Without looking at the rankings/matchups really in-depth, for now I have Reggie in that 16-20 range of my week 1 RB rankings for PPR. A nice option, but not a guy I'm benching my early round picks for just yet.
oh crap...:thunderstorm:starting him over best, rice and lynch in my leagues. expecting a breakout game today