This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
But with a semi-viable QB, can they stop MJD and the run? The Colts aren't really a running threat, so that question is still unanswered. I'll want to see that before I invest a week inthe Raiders, and this week I think there are one or two better chances.
Cam was a top 5 projected qb that played against arguably the top defense in week 1. Odds would say Cam will pick it up.
Meh, I feel week 1 has so much adrenaline and emotion that I can't quite rely on Buffalo. Hated division rival that has been pummeling them for a decade comes in to their town. They have a solid gameplan and get a few early breaks to get the crowd in a frenzy. NE settles it down but Bills are still their at the half. Second half looks like an upset and everyone steps up their game riding on an emotional high. The letdown from the eventual loss could be huge though.
I think you posted this as I was typing mine....yes I'm going with the Cards wherever I can.
Yah it does feel like a classic Schwartz/Stafford 7turnover game just as everyone starts to believe in them.
Rule #1 contradicts itself as there are no stellar defenses on the WW usually. We're looking for the mediocre to good defenses with a good to great matchup week to week,
I have room for 2 but am in the same situation. My plan was to go with Oakland or Carolina this week and keep GB stashed, but tempted to pick up KC as a stash instead.
The only "bad" thing is this game is on the road, but I think sacks will occur because (1) AZ throws a lot and (2) has a bad oline.
Asked the same question, this is what he respond to me on twitter:
Again, a lot of people thought that last year when AZ started Lindley. Now AZ has a respectable QB? no thanks.
I'm sorry, but it looks like you're only looking at the final score. DET D played well that game. ARI had 2 pick 6's (not the DET D's fault), a muffed punt that set up ARI at the 5 (S Logan not on team anymore), and another int that set ARI up at the 3. That's 14pts off ints, and another 14pts where ARI only needed 8 total yards. DET only let up 104 passing yards and 99 rushing yards total that game.
The rams had 4 sacks, 1 int, and 1 forced fumble versus the cards (granted they were at home).
I didn't say the Cardinals were. That was in reference to starting SF @ GB
Levi Brown is much better than what they had on the left tackle spot last year. That position, the QBs blind side, is much improved.
Yeah, depends on your league. CAR and other teams mentioned here are not available in any of the leagues I am involved in.
@BUF, NYG, BYE
Agree. And I'll add that there is a new coach in town in Arians. He loves to run those deep routes resulting in sacks. Even when he had mobile Qbs in Luck and Ben they still ended up getting sacked a good bit. With a slow Qb in Palmer and a bad oline against a strong pass rush, watch out.
