After finally convincing some friends that the Wizards were worth watching, and getting them to go to a game, last night went as I should have expected.
Not just three straight road games, but followed by a home date with the Rockets to make four games in five days. This is the second-toughest stretch of the schedule. The toughest stretch of the schedule comes three weeks later, when they take five straight losses to end January and start February (@GS, @LAC, vs OKC, vs. POR, vs SA). They could be ten games under a month from now. That could be it for Wittman, although I also think Leonsis might let he and Grunfeld ride out the year and then start fresh this summer. Kendall Marshall starring for the Lakers after the Wizards released him is the latest Grunfeld turd to get the fans' attention.When your best shooters go ice cold Beal(14-44),Ariza(5-24)and Webster(10-26)in the last 3 games and your defense gets abused in 2 of those you won't win many games.
The next 3 are on the road against Char,N.O. and the Pacers.Could spell the end for Wittman if they don't turn this around in the next month.
Starting to think he is losing this team or has lost some of it already.
Number 6 overall pick a couple of years ago.I give up trying to figure out this team after 2 more road wins to easily top last years win total on the road.
They put together 3 strong quarters of basketball and then forgot how to do anything and almost let the Pelicans steal it from them late.
Beal starting to heat up and I have no idea who this Jan Vesely guy is but I find myself rooting for the kid like no other.Vesely can't make anything more than 10 feet away from the hoop but man does he hustle and just get in the way enough to cause turnovers or get a block.
I was being a tad bit sarcastic about Vesely.Number 6 overall pick a couple of years ago.I give up trying to figure out this team after 2 more road wins to easily top last years win total on the road.
They put together 3 strong quarters of basketball and then forgot how to do anything and almost let the Pelicans steal it from them late.
Beal starting to heat up and I have no idea who this Jan Vesely guy is but I find myself rooting for the kid like no other.Vesely can't make anything more than 10 feet away from the hoop but man does he hustle and just get in the way enough to cause turnovers or get a block.
Ryan Kelly @RyanJKelly
37m
What's the weirdest thing to ever happen at Verizon Center? A) Guns in locker room, B) Rain delay or C) Shoe defecation?
The kid does play with some energy. He's sorta like a weimaraner.I was being a tad bit sarcastic about Vesely.Number 6 overall pick a couple of years ago.I give up trying to figure out this team after 2 more road wins to easily top last years win total on the road.
They put together 3 strong quarters of basketball and then forgot how to do anything and almost let the Pelicans steal it from them late.
Beal starting to heat up and I have no idea who this Jan Vesely guy is but I find myself rooting for the kid like no other.Vesely can't make anything more than 10 feet away from the hoop but man does he hustle and just get in the way enough to cause turnovers or get a block.
Too late. Tom Halberstroh already stoked the fires on this one with an article at espn.com yesterday about whether LeBron has been coasting lately. To which LeBron replied:Me and 3 other buddies will be at tonight's game. Should be a packed house.I have mixed feeling on if I want the Heat to care enough to play hard. If the heat tries to win the game then we can at least let the guys see how champions play rather then catch the Heat sleeping.
If Wade doesn't play I could see the hairline go off for 50.
And being a longtime Wiz/Bullets fan I know that when the Heat got it to within 9 your butt clinched just a little knowing they could blow this at any time.TobiasFunke said:That was glorious. I felt like I was on acid for the first 45 minutes.
Of course I assumed they'd blow it when the lead was down to 9. Twitter was a mess. The whole game one of the crazier Wizards Twitter experiences ever.And being a longtime Wiz/Bullets fan I know that when the Heat got it to within 9 your butt clinched just a little knowing they could blow this at any time.TobiasFunke said:That was glorious. I felt like I was on acid for the first 45 minutes.
It was a great win against what looked to be a very tired or unmotivated Heat team.The ball movement and defensive hustle was outstanding and they took the Heat's best shot and punched right back to close it out.
Good to see a solid home effort against a top team.
I don't get to see a ton of Heat games but is Wade basically done or is he just "resting"?Of course I assumed they'd blow it when the lead was down to 9. Twitter was a mess. The whole game one of the crazier Wizards Twitter experiences ever.And being a longtime Wiz/Bullets fan I know that when the Heat got it to within 9 your butt clinched just a little knowing they could blow this at any time.TobiasFunke said:That was glorious. I felt like I was on acid for the first 45 minutes.
It was a great win against what looked to be a very tired or unmotivated Heat team.The ball movement and defensive hustle was outstanding and they took the Heat's best shot and punched right back to close it out.
Good to see a solid home effort against a top team.
I also thought the Heat looked tired and unmotivated, but they had no reason to be. They hadn't played since last Friday (!) and ESPN published a story on Monday asking if LeBron is "coasting" this year, a narrative that might cost him the MVP if it takes off. I thought we were set up for one of their best regular seasons efforts of the year.
Bit of both, IMO. Wade's definitely on the downside of his career. He turns 32 tomorrow and has a ridiculous amount of mileage on him. Think of how much basketball the Heat have played the last three years, it's surreal. They sit him all the time now, since they clearly won't face any must wins until May. Still has his moments, though. Last night wasn't one of them.I don't get to see a ton of Heat games but is Wade basically done or is he just "resting"?Of course I assumed they'd blow it when the lead was down to 9. Twitter was a mess. The whole game one of the crazier Wizards Twitter experiences ever.And being a longtime Wiz/Bullets fan I know that when the Heat got it to within 9 your butt clinched just a little knowing they could blow this at any time.TobiasFunke said:That was glorious. I felt like I was on acid for the first 45 minutes.
It was a great win against what looked to be a very tired or unmotivated Heat team.The ball movement and defensive hustle was outstanding and they took the Heat's best shot and punched right back to close it out.
Good to see a solid home effort against a top team.
I also thought the Heat looked tired and unmotivated, but they had no reason to be. They hadn't played since last Friday (!) and ESPN published a story on Monday asking if LeBron is "coasting" this year, a narrative that might cost him the MVP if it takes off. I thought we were set up for one of their best regular seasons efforts of the year.
Looks like a shell of himself that is only getting worse.
Tonight's the night they finally get over .500. Celtics on the tail end of back-to-back roadies, and they went after the Heat last night since they had a shot at the upset until the final minute. Rondo played 25+ minutes. Wouldn't surprise me if they sit him tonight.Back to .500 again after beating a really bad Sixers team.The quest to get a game over .500 for the first time since Wall has been here comes next with the Celtics in town on Wed.
After that things get real tough with games @Phx,Utah,GS and the Clippers and then they return home to face OKC,Portland,S.A.,Clev and the Kings.
Let's see what they are made of during this brutal stretch.Best case scenario is they go 6-4 IMO but they very easily could go 2-8.
Come on now. There's a pretty good chance they lose each of their next seven individually, but a seven game losing streak? Even if you only have only a 20% chance of winning each of those games it's still highly unlikely you lose all seven. And they have a better than 20% chance at all of them. They'll probably be close to a pick at Utah Saturday night, the Warriors have been slipping lately, and the Clips are without Paul. The three home games are all against powerhouses, but at least they're at home. 1-6 maybe, but 0-7 would take quite a run of failure. I predict 2-5 with wins over Utah and Portland.I hope Wall enjoyed all 29 of those shots last night, because I only see maybe 4 games that the wizards will be favored in through the end of Feb., and there's a pretty good chance they lose their next 7.
I missed the Utah game - they should win that one. But they are a mediocre team playing a bunch of really good teams during this stretch. That's why you have to take care of the Bostons of the league at home, so you can build a cushion to weather these rough patches on the schedule.Come on now. There's a pretty good chance they lose each of their next seven individually, but a seven game losing streak? Even if you only have only a 20% chance of winning each of those games it's still highly unlikely you lose all seven. And they have a better than 20% chance at all of them. They'll probably be close to a pick at Utah Saturday night, the Warriors have been slipping lately, and the Clips are without Paul. The three home games are all against powerhouses, but at least they're at home. 1-6 maybe, but 0-7 would take quite a run of failure. I predict 2-5 with wins over Utah and Portland.I hope Wall enjoyed all 29 of those shots last night, because I only see maybe 4 games that the wizards will be favored in through the end of Feb., and there's a pretty good chance they lose their next 7.
Don't get me wrong, they definitely dug themselves a huge hole last night, and I don't think they get back to .500 this year because of the schedule over the next two weeks. But they're not gonna go 4-16 over their next 20 or something. They're just mediocre, not awful.
Yup. Not just the Bostons of the league, but Boston without Rondo and Bradley, at home.I missed the Utah game - they should win that one. But they are a mediocre team playing a bunch of really good teams during this stretch. That's why you have to take care of the Bostons of the league at home, so you can build a cushion to weather these rough patches on the schedule.Come on now. There's a pretty good chance they lose each of their next seven individually, but a seven game losing streak? Even if you only have only a 20% chance of winning each of those games it's still highly unlikely you lose all seven. And they have a better than 20% chance at all of them. They'll probably be close to a pick at Utah Saturday night, the Warriors have been slipping lately, and the Clips are without Paul. The three home games are all against powerhouses, but at least they're at home. 1-6 maybe, but 0-7 would take quite a run of failure. I predict 2-5 with wins over Utah and Portland.I hope Wall enjoyed all 29 of those shots last night, because I only see maybe 4 games that the wizards will be favored in through the end of Feb., and there's a pretty good chance they lose their next 7.
Don't get me wrong, they definitely dug themselves a huge hole last night, and I don't think they get back to .500 this year because of the schedule over the next two weeks. But they're not gonna go 4-16 over their next 20 or something. They're just mediocre, not awful.
On the flip side, if they can squeak out a few wins over the next month or so, April is looking really easy - they are capable of running the table at the end of the year.
I think defensive lapses are actually more common, but I have a theory on the offense too. I blame the persistence of John Wall hero ball, which is really more of a coaching issue.So what is the opinion as to why the offense looks so bad at times?
So we are seeing the same things here,excellent post!I think defensive lapses are actually more common, but I have a theory on the offense too. I blame the persistence of John Wall hero ball, which is really more of a coaching issue.So what is the opinion as to why the offense looks so bad at times?
Check Wall's splits by quarter and by time left in quarter for some evidence His percentages go down as the game goes on and as the time winds down in each quarter. I think it's because they trend away from ball movement to a simple one move pick and roll offense with Wall and Gortat/Nene as the game moves on. They have three excellent 3 point shooters on this team. There's at least two on the floor at pretty much any time. Sure, sometimes Wall kicks it to them off the pick and roll or other penetration as the clock goes down. But I think they'd be much better off running the same offense all game that they run in the first quarter- Early movement with five moving pieces.
You don't have a single player who demands a double. Your most dominant offensive player is Wall and the defensive play late against Wall is to play a step off and make him shoot over the top.So what is the opinion as to why the offense looks so bad at times?
A superstar scorer would of course help, but I think Tobias is right. They have very good players in their starting 5 that fit well together and can generate offense just fine through passing and off ball movement. It appears to me that they have improved quite a bit in terms of actually implementing such an offensive system since the first month or so of the season, but it has a tendency to break down at the end of games.You don't have a single player who demands a double. Your most dominant offensive player is Wall and the defensive play late against Wall is to play a step off and make him shoot over the top.So what is the opinion as to why the offense looks so bad at times?
You need a wing player whose jumper is wet enough to force defenses to crowd him, yet has enough shakes to create his own shot. I thought Beal had a shot to be that guy, but he hasn't become that guy yet.
Once you get that dominant wing, he can either turn poor possessions into good looks on his own, or he can draw doubles that lead to open shots for Webster and Wall.
I'd defer to Tobias as well since he knows what he's talking about and watches far more Wiz hoops than I do.A superstar scorer would of course help, but I think Tobias is right. They have very good players in their starting 5 that fit well together and can generate offense just fine through passing and off ball movement. It appears to me that they have improved quite a bit in terms of actually implementing such an offensive system since the first month or so of the season, but it has a tendency to break down at the end of games.You don't have a single player who demands a double. Your most dominant offensive player is Wall and the defensive play late against Wall is to play a step off and make him shoot over the top.So what is the opinion as to why the offense looks so bad at times?
You need a wing player whose jumper is wet enough to force defenses to crowd him, yet has enough shakes to create his own shot. I thought Beal had a shot to be that guy, but he hasn't become that guy yet.
Once you get that dominant wing, he can either turn poor possessions into good looks on his own, or he can draw doubles that lead to open shots for Webster and Wall.
I know you've spent 15 years watching Kobe, but it's naive to think you need a top 5 isolation scorer to play well in the fourth quarter. It's not like the Wizards need tricky back door cuts or 15 seconds of a motion play to generate offense - they just need to movethe ball around, get Wall in a position where he can catch his defender a little off balance, drive to the hoop and draw a double, or run some quick screening action that makes the defense guard Nene with a smaller player. This isn't terribly complicated, but it requires more creativity than just letting Wall dribble it up and having Nene/Gortat set a pick for him 24 feet from the basket.I'd defer to Tobias as well since he knows what he's talking about and watches far more Wiz hoops than I do.A superstar scorer would of course help, but I think Tobias is right. They have very good players in their starting 5 that fit well together and can generate offense just fine through passing and off ball movement. It appears to me that they have improved quite a bit in terms of actually implementing such an offensive system since the first month or so of the season, but it has a tendency to break down at the end of games.You don't have a single player who demands a double. Your most dominant offensive player is Wall and the defensive play late against Wall is to play a step off and make him shoot over the top.So what is the opinion as to why the offense looks so bad at times?
You need a wing player whose jumper is wet enough to force defenses to crowd him, yet has enough shakes to create his own shot. I thought Beal had a shot to be that guy, but he hasn't become that guy yet.
Once you get that dominant wing, he can either turn poor possessions into good looks on his own, or he can draw doubles that lead to open shots for Webster and Wall.
But overall I think the "just run the same offense late in the 4th that was successful in the 1st" theory is naive. I'm not saying it should be strictly iso down the stretch, but NBA defenses are too good to simply run regular sets at crunch time without focusing on advantageous match ups.
Great call...........................................................said nobodytom22406 said:TONIGHT is the night they get over the .500 hump!
![]()
Of course Gunz is wrong!thecatch said:I know you've spent 15 years watching Kobe, but it's naive to think you need a top 5 isolation scorer to play well in the fourth quarter. It's not like the Wizards need tricky back door cuts or 15 seconds of a motion play to generate offense - they just need to movethe ball around, get Wall in a position where he can catch his defender a little off balance, drive to the hoop and draw a double, or run some quick screening action that makes the defense guard Nene with a smaller player. This isn't terribly complicated, but it requires more creativity than just letting Wall dribble it up and having Nene/Gortat set a pick for him 24 feet from the basket.tommyGunZ said:I'd defer to Tobias as well since he knows what he's talking about and watches far more Wiz hoops than I do.thecatch said:A superstar scorer would of course help, but I think Tobias is right. They have very good players in their starting 5 that fit well together and can generate offense just fine through passing and off ball movement. It appears to me that they have improved quite a bit in terms of actually implementing such an offensive system since the first month or so of the season, but it has a tendency to break down at the end of games.tommyGunZ said:You don't have a single player who demands a double. Your most dominant offensive player is Wall and the defensive play late against Wall is to play a step off and make him shoot over the top.So what is the opinion as to why the offense looks so bad at times?
You need a wing player whose jumper is wet enough to force defenses to crowd him, yet has enough shakes to create his own shot. I thought Beal had a shot to be that guy, but he hasn't become that guy yet.
Once you get that dominant wing, he can either turn poor possessions into good looks on his own, or he can draw doubles that lead to open shots for Webster and Wall.
But overall I think the "just run the same offense late in the 4th that was successful in the 1st" theory is naive. I'm not saying it should be strictly iso down the stretch, but NBA defenses are too good to simply run regular sets at crunch time without focusing on advantageous match ups.
He was just kind of cracking a joke about it- he said he had to deal with 100 ticket requests for this game and then said "imagine if I played here ..." That was it. I didn't think much of it one way or another. I think there's a chance, but it's more about what OKC does over the next three years. If he's happy with their moves I think he stays. If not I think DC is on the short list. It's the obvious choice from a PR standpoint- Durant is pretty much universally adored, and probably the only free agency option that would let him keep that status is a return to his hometown. Plus there's obviously a perfect setup for him here with the young pieces in place who can spread the floor without demanding a ton of shots.I had tickets and was excited to go last night, but then got sick and couldn't make it. Turned out to be a rather boring blow out... In the wizards favor. Very surprised.
On sports center they quoted Durant as saying it would be tough playing here because of all the family and friends (ticket requests etc.). I have no idea what the context was, but in isolation that was interesting as I thought DC might have a decent shot at him in FA.
I've been really impressed. Obviously they have exceeded my expectations recently. There's a pretty high ceiling and low floor for this team for some reasonHe was just kind of cracking a joke about it- he said he had to deal with 100 ticket requests for this game and then said "imagine if I played here ..." That was it. I didn't think much of it one way or another. I think there's a chance, but it's more about what OKC does over the next three years. If he's happy with their moves I think he stays. If not I think DC is on the short list. It's the obvious choice from a PR standpoint- Durant is pretty much universally adored, and probably the only free agency option that would let him keep that status is a return to his hometown. Plus there's obviously a perfect setup for him here with the young pieces in place who can spread the floor without demanding a ton of shots.I had tickets and was excited to go last night, but then got sick and couldn't make it. Turned out to be a rather boring blow out... In the wizards favor. Very surprised.
On sports center they quoted Durant as saying it would be tough playing here because of all the family and friends (ticket requests etc.). I have no idea what the context was, but in isolation that was interesting as I thought DC might have a decent shot at him in FA.
More importantly- this is a helluva run, best in recent memory. Not even close to what any of us predicted for this brutal 7 game stretch; 4-2 so far and it wouldn't surprise me if they won tonight to go 5-2. And both of those losses were in the second of back-to-back roadies. I thought best case scenario was 3-4. And there's legitimate buzz, too. Hopefully the fans start filling the Verizon Center up a bit, that's really the one thing missing from a really fun season so far.
Yup. It'll be real problem at the end of this season though. If they had at least gotten some hints that Porter could eventually be a lockdown defender who could hit some corner 3s they could let Ariza go in free agency and use the money elsewhere. They've already got Webster signed to play the same role, you don't need three of the same guy. But they've gotten no such indication, so they're in a real pickle with Ariza, who has been awesome. Gonna have to make the call on Porter far sooner than they'd like to.The decent record doing a good job of keeping people from complaining that yet another draft pick isn't contributing?
This has been a season long crisis for this team and he seems to have(once again)no clue what to do“There is a big difference, a big commitment, a big way you have to play from being an average team, to being a team well over .500,” Wittman said. “And I told these guys, I think they should be well over .500 and we’re not. And why are those reasons, and those are the reasons: we don’t come out on a consistent basis and play with the energy and effort at the start of games that we need to. You got to do more than be an above average team. Are you willing to do that?”
So yes he does get that he is part of the problem as well but is he a good enough coach to get the best out of what he has?I say no.“I’ve got to figure something new out obviously, that falls on my shoulders,” Wittman said. “I don’t have any answer for why that happens.”
Yeah I think that's the reasoning. He's what, the tenth or eleventh man on this team? And I guess more importantly, the #4 wing option. Given what they're trying to do this year they need him on the bench in case there's an in-game injury to Webster or Ariza or one of them fouls out or something.I can see the argument for sending Porter down to the D-league, but I think he's too important to send down. He did get 20 minutes in a game just a couple of weeks ago. If an emergency comes up, I'd rather he's still around to get minutes than having to rely on somebody like Singleton. And I think he can learn a lot practicing with the team, which is probably the biggest thing he needs after he missed all of the offseason.