So far in the preseason and last week, its true that RG3 didn't really look much to Davis. As a F.Davis owner, I'm a little concerned, but as a Skins fan, I'm happy to see RG3 looking down field for his WRs, and not just on little screen passes.Does anyone who follows colege know if RGIII threw alot to his TE's? Im thinking after week 1 that the quiet preseason that Davis had was not flukey. It seems that RGIII prefers throwing to his WRs much more than the TE position. Anyone have a beat on this?
Right...but i think what would be really telling is to know from someone who followed RGIII closely in college whether or not he liked throwing to his TEs. Luck leaned heavily on Fleener in college...who if any TE did RGIII lean on?So far in the preseason and last week, its true that RG3 didn't really look much to Davis. As a F.Davis owner, I'm a little concerned, but as a Skins fan, I'm happy to see RG3 looking down field for his WRs, and not just on little screen passes.Does anyone who follows colege know if RGIII threw alot to his TE's? Im thinking after week 1 that the quiet preseason that Davis had was not flukey. It seems that RGIII prefers throwing to his WRs much more than the TE position. Anyone have a beat on this?![]()
according to this 4 WRs got most of the passes thrown last year at Baylor. Only 256 yards out of the TE position.Right...but i think what would be really telling is to know from someone who followed RGIII closely in college whether or not he liked throwing to his TEs. Luck leaned heavily on Fleener in college...who if any TE did RGIII lean on?So far in the preseason and last week, its true that RG3 didn't really look much to Davis. As a F.Davis owner, I'm a little concerned, but as a Skins fan, I'm happy to see RG3 looking down field for his WRs, and not just on little screen passes.Does anyone who follows colege know if RGIII threw alot to his TE's? Im thinking after week 1 that the quiet preseason that Davis had was not flukey. It seems that RGIII prefers throwing to his WRs much more than the TE position. Anyone have a beat on this?![]()
Awesome exactly what I was looking for thanks dude. This combined with the preseason and week 1 production, in my mind, makes a strong argument for cutting bait on Fred Davis as an Elite TE1 or even a solid TE1 option this year. He might have his big games here and there but overall my gut tells me he disappoints. I don't think Griffin is fond of throwing to his TEs. He is a solid backup TE.according to this 4 WRs got most of the passes thrown last year at Baylor. Only 256 yards out of the TE position.Right...but i think what would be really telling is to know from someone who followed RGIII closely in college whether or not he liked throwing to his TEs. Luck leaned heavily on Fleener in college...who if any TE did RGIII lean on?So far in the preseason and last week, its true that RG3 didn't really look much to Davis. As a F.Davis owner, I'm a little concerned, but as a Skins fan, I'm happy to see RG3 looking down field for his WRs, and not just on little screen passes.Does anyone who follows colege know if RGIII threw alot to his TE's? Im thinking after week 1 that the quiet preseason that Davis had was not flukey. It seems that RGIII prefers throwing to his WRs much more than the TE position. Anyone have a beat on this?![]()
I think he will need to learn to utilize his TE, so hold on big rosters and dynasty... But yeah, sold backup TE... I am hoping he does well on Graham's bye week...Awesome exactly what I was looking for thanks dude. This combined with the preseason and week 1 production, in my mind, makes a strong argument for cutting bait on Fred Davis as an Elite TE1 or even a solid TE1 option this year. He might have his big games here and there but overall my gut tells me he disappoints. I don't think Griffin is fond of throwing to his TEs. He is a solid backup TE.according to this 4 WRs got most of the passes thrown last year at Baylor. Only 256 yards out of the TE position.Right...but i think what would be really telling is to know from someone who followed RGIII closely in college whether or not he liked throwing to his TEs. Luck leaned heavily on Fleener in college...who if any TE did RGIII lean on?So far in the preseason and last week, its true that RG3 didn't really look much to Davis. As a F.Davis owner, I'm a little concerned, but as a Skins fan, I'm happy to see RG3 looking down field for his WRs, and not just on little screen passes.Does anyone who follows colege know if RGIII threw alot to his TE's? Im thinking after week 1 that the quiet preseason that Davis had was not flukey. It seems that RGIII prefers throwing to his WRs much more than the TE position. Anyone have a beat on this?![]()
If we're talking dynasty you make a good point.But Manning's rookie year at Indy he had a passer rating of 71.2.Careful about using those college comparisons when trying to gauge how much they may throw to TE's. In Peyton Manning's last year at Tennessee the TE's caught 3 balls all season.
Apprently not RG#Rookie QBs love TEs, and they use them as a safety valves when things get a bit rough.
Things haven't gotten rough yet for RG3!Apprently not RG#Rookie QBs love TEs, and they use them as a safety valves when things get a bit rough.
This was proven false a couple of years ago, but it continues to be repeated as gospel."It is known".But it actually isn't.Rookie QBs love TEs, and they use them as a safety valves when things get a bit rough.
sounds like a good buy lowThey said on SiriusXM yesterday that they specifically drew up the game plan vs. the Saints to match RGIII's offense at Baylor to make him more comfortable in his first start. They'll probably work Davis into his reads more as the season goes on (and if Garcon's injury lingers or other WRs start to drop) but it could be slow production for Davis for at least the first few weeks.
Could be...its still early so davis can end up the #1 TE for all we know. Im just not banking on that.sounds like a good buy lowThey said on SiriusXM yesterday that they specifically drew up the game plan vs. the Saints to match RGIII's offense at Baylor to make him more comfortable in his first start. They'll probably work Davis into his reads more as the season goes on (and if Garcon's injury lingers or other WRs start to drop) but it could be slow production for Davis for at least the first few weeks.
ok, show the link pleaseThis was proven false a couple of years ago, but it continues to be repeated as gospel."It is known".But it actually isn't.Rookie QBs love TEs, and they use them as a safety valves when things get a bit rough.
Check out the Browns stat line.ok, show the link pleaseThis was proven false a couple of years ago, but it continues to be repeated as gospel."It is known".But it actually isn't.Rookie QBs love TEs, and they use them as a safety valves when things get a bit rough.
Gigantic difference between TE1 and a droppable TE (~TE15-18)'rickyg said:Could be...its still early so davis can end up the #1 TE for all we know. Im just not banking on that.'JoeSteeler said:sounds like a good buy low'The Kuhn said:They said on SiriusXM yesterday that they specifically drew up the game plan vs. the Saints to match RGIII's offense at Baylor to make him more comfortable in his first start. They'll probably work Davis into his reads more as the season goes on (and if Garcon's injury lingers or other WRs start to drop) but it could be slow production for Davis for at least the first few weeks.
He hasn't been used because Wash has been catering their offense around what RG3 did at Baylor right now. Baylor ran a spread that basically ignored the TE position. That will change over time.I agree with you, Davis is way too talented to not get more involved. I'm not sure why they don't expand his role to fit more into the system. Perhaps because they don't expect to make it routine.Fred Davis is a mismatch for defenses. He is one of those big, fast, and very athletic tight ends. He can really play. It is odd to see how little he has been used, but let's see what happens vs the Rams before jumping to any conclusions. I think that the Redskins would be wise to use him, but time will tell.
This is definitely great insight. But at the end of the day it points to a slow start and a down year for Davis of its true, depending on how long it takes to move away from that Baylor-esque offense.He hasn't been used because Wash has been catering their offense around what RG3 did at Baylor right now. Baylor ran a spread that basically ignored the TE position. That will change over time.I agree with you, Davis is way too talented to not get more involved. I'm not sure why they don't expand his role to fit more into the system. Perhaps because they don't expect to make it routine.Fred Davis is a mismatch for defenses. He is one of those big, fast, and very athletic tight ends. He can really play. It is odd to see how little he has been used, but let's see what happens vs the Rams before jumping to any conclusions. I think that the Redskins would be wise to use him, but time will tell.
bum deal... gotta go shopping for TE's in both leagues this week.. the one where i took a TE high (hernandez)and the one where i bottom fished with FDavisDrafted him in a few leagues and hell be on the bench until he proves himself this year.
Fred Davis tied for the team lead in targets against the Rams with 5. The problem is that there aren't alot of targets to go around right now (Griffin had only 26 and 29 pass attempts in his first 2 games).Glad I went with my instinct and traded Davis away after his poor week 1 showing. RgIII has no interest in feeding him the ball, even when garçon is out of the lineup. No bueno