What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rome is on Fire - no new Pope (1 Viewer)

first googly reports are saying fire, not explosion... and in Rome next to VC.

and I came in wanting to drop the smoke joke- :kicksrock:  

 
Local reports indicate the fire is at a nearby car pound, and has "shrouded a building".
from one of those insta-"news" british tabloids. also included a "vatican is on fire" quoted tweet.

 
I knew Roma fans would be mad when Salah left for Liverpool but this is over-the-top imo

Edit:  @Kafka

 
Last edited by a moderator:
from italian news RAI:

A fire of vast proportions broke out inside a car depot in Via Mattia Battistini, 116 in Rome. A column of black smoke rose up over the entire area west of the capital. On the spot immediately intervened two teams of the Fire Department with tankers and the State Police. It seems to cause the fire and subsequent cloud were some cars that were inside the junkyard. Flames erupted from a car would initially deposited within the demolition center and then are quickly propagated. The heat caused the explosion of glass and pieces of other cars, causing a series of explosions as the cars involved in the fire are over 50. Several explosions from tanks of the vehicles. According to what has been learned by firefighters, the structure was completely destroyed by fire. The fire was limited.
  - 

 
It's amazing in the chase for new news that we are now reporting and chatting about a fire in an random city on the other side of the globe

 
first reports were "explosions, fire IN vatican city".

most definitely not a random city.

as it is- a fire in an auto salvage yard 3 miles from vatican city doesn't have quite the same ring.
He's right though, in this day and age of instant news, this is a story. Pre-twitter/iPhones, this was just a fire in a junkyard of cars that was large, but contained.The Fake News part of it is just the news agencies trying to get hits/viewers with the sensationalism. Better to take the most headline worthy angle and then pare it down. Always loved the Simpsons episode with Kent Brockman and the storm death toll scrolling bar at the bottom. So true and prescient of where we are now.

 
He's right though, in this day and age of instant news, this is a story. Pre-twitter/iPhones, this was just a fire in a junkyard of cars that was large, but contained.The Fake News part of it is just the news agencies trying to get hits/viewers with the sensationalism. Better to take the most headline worthy angle and then pare it down. Always loved the Simpsons episode with Kent Brockman and the storm death toll scrolling bar at the bottom. So true and prescient of where we are now.
I'm tired and gassy and having a hard time processing today... are you advocating to make fake news and then reverse course? vatican city esplodes! ... ooops!- cars in another town. or saying that that's just where we are now and were stuck with it? or that a car fire in rome is news?

 
I would expect a fire within the Vatican itself would be extinguished rather quickly considering they use holy water in the sprinkler systems.

 
I'm tired and gassy and having a hard time processing today... are you advocating to make fake news and then reverse course? vatican city esplodes! ... ooops!- cars in another town. or saying that that's just where we are now and were stuck with it? or that a car fire in rome is news?
Where we are now and stuck with it. A car fire in Rome isn't news and it's unfortunate that the first headline is explosion in Vatican City. I think the news' approach nowadays is to sensationalize as much as possible and then back down knowing they already got the hits/viewers. I am from Charlotte and read up on the Panthers a lot. Just this morning, something posted something on the ESPN scroller about RB competition at OTAs between Stewart and the rookie (McCaffery). It all stemmed from a reporter asking Stewart a question about it and his response was to stop asking and that the team's only concern was winning the Super Bowl and not about carries. He's shared the backfield before and said he was happy they brought McCaffery in, especially since he's near the end of his career. The funniest part is that due to NFL rules and McCaffery coming from Stanford, he can't be at OTAs until they graduate, so he's not even there. ESPN has so much content to fill that they basically make stuff up all the time. It sucks for most rational thinkers because blurbs like that just get regurgitated and then you get "news" out in the general public that isn't reality.

 
El Floppo said:
yeah- this first and foremost.

and given the location, scary also to think what kind of history/anitquities might be going up in flames
One kinda did this past Sunday... :kicksrock:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top