Chadstroma
Footballguy
So the Lions are trying to get rid of their best defensive player and their best offensive player.
Ok then.
Ok then.
I actually think trading Roy at this time would be smart for the Lions. I don't think they "want" to get rid of him, but his value will never be higher. The draft class and free agent pool is not very deep or talented. Williams would be a huge get for any team. Now Rodgers on the other hand . . . something isn't right. Yes, the guy takes 15 plays off a game, has weight problems . . . etc., but he is still a dominant D Tackle. Millen said something like "Weight is the least of his problems". Something is going on there.So the Lions are trying to get rid of their best defensive player and their best offensive player. Ok then.
I know. You said you posted "this", which doesn't mention Dallas.Post #91They'll be involved if they don't land Fitzgerald.great, but how are the Cowboys involved with this post?Ya, I posted this in the Cowboys thread over a month ago and everybody wanted to beat me up about it.I just told them to be patient, it would come out eventually.No comments on this bit? Has this already been rumored?*The availability of wide receiver Roy Williams is also in hot debate with Jacksonville, Tennessee, Tampa Bay and New Orleans all interested. The Lions are looking for a second round pick and have told several clubs they would even consider a pick in next years' draft to get a deal done.

Hell yea, Roy for a 2nd rounder? Ill take that every day of the week. Can you imagine Roy, Colston and Bush? Throw in Pierre Thomas, and if we can get our TE game going that offense is a steamrollerhe would fantastic in black and gold.The rumor is that once he becomes a FA he will jump ship to Dallas, Houston or NO in order to be closer to his family.
Shocked......seriously? They must have to sit through some really poor interviews.*Rutgers' offensive lineman Jeremy Zuttah's interviews have also been going very well. One A.F.C. North G.M. who interviewed him Friday night said he specifically asked him a question right at the beginning to throw this kid off. He questioned his ability to play tackle or guard at the next level and told him several reasons why he felt that way and asked him how he could overcome it to make himself a player? Zuttah, without hesitation, said that no offensive lineman in this draft plays with more effort and "want to" than him and that if this G.M. drafted him he'd work extremely hard to become a pro bowl center. His remarks shocked the G.M. and he went on to say it was one of the better interviews he has seen.
It is a decent look into their character however. As much as GMs, scouts and fantasy football players would like the combine and the draft to be an exact science it isn't. There are a lot of physical specimens and combine freaks who do not succeed on the NFL level because they don't have enough "want to".Shocked......seriously? They must have to sit through some really poor interviews.*Rutgers' offensive lineman Jeremy Zuttah's interviews have also been going very well. One A.F.C. North G.M. who interviewed him Friday night said he specifically asked him a question right at the beginning to throw this kid off. He questioned his ability to play tackle or guard at the next level and told him several reasons why he felt that way and asked him how he could overcome it to make himself a player? Zuttah, without hesitation, said that no offensive lineman in this draft plays with more effort and "want to" than him and that if this G.M. drafted him he'd work extremely hard to become a pro bowl center. His remarks shocked the G.M. and he went on to say it was one of the better interviews he has seen.Actually, I find all the war stories about snappy responses to be funny in light of the weight they're apparently given.
Ok, so the guy can rap with you, but that doesn't change you see on film, chief. Now, if they demonstrate in their interviews that they understand coverages, blitz pickups, etc., that's a different story, but defiants statements in response to criticism isn't all that impressive if you ask me.
Believe me, I agree that interviews are important. You find out a lot about workplace compatibility of a person, etc. It's just that there are as many non-verbal messages as verbal ones, and the stories about these meetings lose a LOT in the retelling.It is a decent look into their character however. As much as GMs, scouts and fantasy football players would like the combine and the draft to be an exact science it isn't. There are a lot of physical specimens and combine freaks who do not succeed on the NFL level because they don't have enough "want to".Shocked......seriously? They must have to sit through some really poor interviews.*Rutgers' offensive lineman Jeremy Zuttah's interviews have also been going very well. One A.F.C. North G.M. who interviewed him Friday night said he specifically asked him a question right at the beginning to throw this kid off. He questioned his ability to play tackle or guard at the next level and told him several reasons why he felt that way and asked him how he could overcome it to make himself a player? Zuttah, without hesitation, said that no offensive lineman in this draft plays with more effort and "want to" than him and that if this G.M. drafted him he'd work extremely hard to become a pro bowl center. His remarks shocked the G.M. and he went on to say it was one of the better interviews he has seen.Actually, I find all the war stories about snappy responses to be funny in light of the weight they're apparently given.
Ok, so the guy can rap with you, but that doesn't change you see on film, chief. Now, if they demonstrate in their interviews that they understand coverages, blitz pickups, etc., that's a different story, but defiants statements in response to criticism isn't all that impressive if you ask me.
You obviously don't draft a guy on desire alone, but it is not outlandish to consider it.
I was referring more to his availability than the teams mentioned, but Dallas is in it.I know. You said you posted "this", which doesn't mention Dallas.Post #91They'll be involved if they don't land Fitzgerald.great, but how are the Cowboys involved with this post?Ya, I posted this in the Cowboys thread over a month ago and everybody wanted to beat me up about it.I just told them to be patient, it would come out eventually.No comments on this bit? Has this already been rumored?*The availability of wide receiver Roy Williams is also in hot debate with Jacksonville, Tennessee, Tampa Bay and New Orleans all interested. The Lions are looking for a second round pick and have told several clubs they would even consider a pick in next years' draft to get a deal done.![]()
McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
Very good.

Vert Jump 33" is that good?McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()

Vert Jump 33" is that good?McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Good prospects usually do at least 35. Some numbers from the past two years:Booker - 35.5Bradshaw - 34Henry - 36Lynch - 35.5Peterson - 38.5Irons - 38Jackson - 37Addai - 38.5Bush - 40.5MJD - 36DWill - 35.5Norwood - 36.5Calhoun - 31.5Not sure why the numbers are so bad this year. 
It's close to what I thought He would do. 34 was my guess.But it is still good. Great NO.Vert Jump 33" is that good?McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Good prospects usually do at least 35. Some numbers from the past two years:Booker - 35.5Bradshaw - 34Henry - 36Lynch - 35.5Peterson - 38.5Irons - 38Jackson - 37Addai - 38.5Bush - 40.5MJD - 36DWill - 35.5Norwood - 36.5Calhoun - 31.5Not sure why the numbers are so bad this year.
![]()
Let's try to keep this on the low, I'm enjoying the "Chris Perry and Kenny Watson are better RBs than Irons" commentary here in the shark pool.Irons - 38
IMO, Irons was clearly the third best back last year. I think he would've made some noise if he hadn't gotten injured. His problem is the same as Caddy's: he runs like a power back, but has the body of a scat back. Basically, he takes too many hits.Let's try to keep this on the low, I'm enjoying the "Chris Perry and Kenny Watson are better RBs than Irons" commentary.Irons - 38
Jacksonville probably has the least leverage of all 2nd round picks but it would be a coup if chose Jacksonville. Great player at a great value. And a proven #1.No comments on this bit? Has this already been rumored?*The availability of wide receiver Roy Williams is also in hot debate with Jacksonville, Tennessee, Tampa Bay and New Orleans all interested. The Lions are looking for a second round pick and have told several clubs they would even consider a pick in next years' draft to get a deal done.
I guess the talk is that Roy is going to leave as soon as he can one way or the other- so I guess it makes sense to get some value for him when you can. But it just tells you something about the franchise when your best young players on both sides of the ball are being looked to be shipped.I actually think trading Roy at this time would be smart for the Lions. I don't think they "want" to get rid of him, but his value will never be higher. The draft class and free agent pool is not very deep or talented. Williams would be a huge get for any team. Now Rodgers on the other hand . . . something isn't right. Yes, the guy takes 15 plays off a game, has weight problems . . . etc., but he is still a dominant D Tackle. Millen said something like "Weight is the least of his problems". Something is going on there.So the Lions are trying to get rid of their best defensive player and their best offensive player. Ok then.
Why the quick dead end on Bush? What has he shown or not shown at this level to make any sort of guess on what he might do? Dude was a beast before the leg injury and nothing I have read says he won't be fully ready to take his shot this year. If he were in the rookie class this year, where would you rank him?1. IF Quentin Groves is healthy, he is capable of a 4.4 and will be a top 20 pick. I'm not sold myself, as he never looked effective after the multiple-toe-dislocation.
2. Oakland makes too much sense for M.Turner. They already believe in taking that kind of player. Not only Jordan, but nearly all of their recent Super Bowl team. This draft is deep on both lines, and that's where they would like to spend their picks. J.Fargas is the best back on the team (sorry M.Bush supporters, but he'll likely be out of football in 3 more years).
I'd rank him around the 8th-10th RB if he was in this class.Why the quick dead end on Bush? What has he shown or not shown at this level to make any sort of guess on what he might do? Dude was a beast before the leg injury and nothing I have read says he won't be fully ready to take his shot this year. If he were in the rookie class this year, where would you rank him?1. IF Quentin Groves is healthy, he is capable of a 4.4 and will be a top 20 pick. I'm not sold myself, as he never looked effective after the multiple-toe-dislocation.
2. Oakland makes too much sense for M.Turner. They already believe in taking that kind of player. Not only Jordan, but nearly all of their recent Super Bowl team. This draft is deep on both lines, and that's where they would like to spend their picks. J.Fargas is the best back on the team (sorry M.Bush supporters, but he'll likely be out of football in 3 more years).
DMacMedenhallWhy the quick dead end on Bush? What has he shown or not shown at this level to make any sort of guess on what he might do? Dude was a beast before the leg injury and nothing I have read says he won't be fully ready to take his shot this year. If he were in the rookie class this year, where would you rank him?1. IF Quentin Groves is healthy, he is capable of a 4.4 and will be a top 20 pick. I'm not sold myself, as he never looked effective after the multiple-toe-dislocation.
2. Oakland makes too much sense for M.Turner. They already believe in taking that kind of player. Not only Jordan, but nearly all of their recent Super Bowl team. This draft is deep on both lines, and that's where they would like to spend their picks. J.Fargas is the best back on the team (sorry M.Bush supporters, but he'll likely be out of football in 3 more years).
From what I saw of him, he wasn't a beast. He was not quick, nor tough. For a guy his size, he didn't run w/ a lot of power and didn't have nearly the lateral movement of say, Jacobs. I saw Ron Dayne again, maybe. Big and fast is a problem for a lot of college defenders. Not so in the NFL. His backup looked almost as good as Bush did after the broken leg.Why the quick dead end on Bush? What has he shown or not shown at this level to make any sort of guess on what he might do? Dude was a beast before the leg injury and nothing I have read says he won't be fully ready to take his shot this year. If he were in the rookie class this year, where would you rank him?1. IF Quentin Groves is healthy, he is capable of a 4.4 and will be a top 20 pick. I'm not sold myself, as he never looked effective after the multiple-toe-dislocation.
2. Oakland makes too much sense for M.Turner. They already believe in taking that kind of player. Not only Jordan, but nearly all of their recent Super Bowl team. This draft is deep on both lines, and that's where they would like to spend their picks. J.Fargas is the best back on the team (sorry M.Bush supporters, but he'll likely be out of football in 3 more years).
Maybe even Forte, Choice and Charles above Bush.DMacMedenhallWhy the quick dead end on Bush? What has he shown or not shown at this level to make any sort of guess on what he might do? Dude was a beast before the leg injury and nothing I have read says he won't be fully ready to take his shot this year. If he were in the rookie class this year, where would you rank him?1. IF Quentin Groves is healthy, he is capable of a 4.4 and will be a top 20 pick. I'm not sold myself, as he never looked effective after the multiple-toe-dislocation.
2. Oakland makes too much sense for M.Turner. They already believe in taking that kind of player. Not only Jordan, but nearly all of their recent Super Bowl team. This draft is deep on both lines, and that's where they would like to spend their picks. J.Fargas is the best back on the team (sorry M.Bush supporters, but he'll likely be out of football in 3 more years).
Stewart
F. Jones
Ray Rice
Chris Johnson
Kevin Smith
Mike Hart
Michael Bush
Jamal Charles
if they run what we hear they will run their forties in -- both are rumored to run sub 4.4's from their camps....One wide receiver Seattle really likes is Vanderbilt's Earl Bennett, because he is a great route runner already and he is quick out of breaks much like Deion Branch. Bennett has reportedly also hit the ball out of the park in interviews.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()

Little help for ya. You can't be fast without being explosive (explosive = fast). You are welcome.Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
So the Combine is rigged for McFadden to do well.Thats just not fair.Little help for ya. You can't be fast without being explosive (explosive = fast). You are welcome.Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
But there are a lot of good linebackers to be had in the second round, coupled with the fact they are few quality LB's in FA, I don't know if I would do this.Hell yea, Roy for a 2nd rounder? Ill take that every day of the week. Can you imagine Roy, Colston and Bush? Throw in Pierre Thomas, and if we can get our TE game going that offense is a steamrollerhe would fantastic in black and gold.The rumor is that once he becomes a FA he will jump ship to Dallas, Houston or NO in order to be closer to his family.
*The Deep targets are few and far between in this draft.....Malcolm Kelly of Oklahoma (prototype west coast offense Z WR), Adrian Arrington and Mario Manningham of Michigan and Harry Douglas of Louisville.....Nebraska's Maruice Purify also looks to be an ideal west coast offense wide receiver, but his off field issues may knock him down and make him a value. San Francisco seems very interested in him. Most expect these guys to also run well....The speed burners are DeSean Jackson (small frame), Donnie Avery of Houston (who wont run) and Darius Reynaud. These guys project more as special teams ace's in their rookie year.
Personally, I've never bought into the Michael Bush hype. He was the 10th RB drafted and a 4th rounder because his broken leg was a pretty serious matter. He's also 250 pounds, and RBs of that size who have been successful with any longevity are few and far between. And, although he put up big stats at Louisville, so did Eric Shelton who preceded him and busted as a 2nd round NFL pick. Finally, he's a Raider. So, I've just never really had any interest in owning Bush and don't see why there's always been so much love for him on this board. He's likely to never amount to very much as a fantasy commodity.Maybe even Forte, Choice and Charles above Bush.DMacMedenhallWhy the quick dead end on Bush? What has he shown or not shown at this level to make any sort of guess on what he might do? Dude was a beast before the leg injury and nothing I have read says he won't be fully ready to take his shot this year. If he were in the rookie class this year, where would you rank him?1. IF Quentin Groves is healthy, he is capable of a 4.4 and will be a top 20 pick. I'm not sold myself, as he never looked effective after the multiple-toe-dislocation.
2. Oakland makes too much sense for M.Turner. They already believe in taking that kind of player. Not only Jordan, but nearly all of their recent Super Bowl team. This draft is deep on both lines, and that's where they would like to spend their picks. J.Fargas is the best back on the team (sorry M.Bush supporters, but he'll likely be out of football in 3 more years).
Stewart
F. Jones
Ray Rice
Chris Johnson
Kevin Smith
Mike Hart
Michael Bush
Jamal Charles
Wow. You really are not making any sense. Anyway, have fun with toothpick legs McFadden.So the Combine is rigged for McFadden to do well.Thats just not fair.Little help for ya. You can't be fast without being explosive (explosive = fast). You are welcome.Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
They seem pretty fastHere are the top 10 running back 40 times:Chris Johnson, East Carolina -- 4.24Darren McFadden, Arkansas -- 4.33Anthony Aldridge, Houston -- 4.36Jamaal Charles, Texas -- 4.38Chad Simpson, Morgan St. -- 4.42Rashard Mendenhall, Illinois -- 4.45Matthew Forte, Tulane -- 4.46Felix Jones, Arkansas -- 4.47Jalen Parmele, Toldeo -- 4.47Jonathan Stewart, Oregon -- 4.48INDIANAPOLIS -- East Carolina running back Chris Johnson posted the top 40-yard dash time of the combine thus far with a blazing 4.24 today. That was even faster than Arkansas running back Darren McFadden, who is supposed to be a top five pick.
Wrong, explosive = quick. It is possible to be fast (think top speed) without being quick/explosive.HTHLittle help for ya. You can't be fast without being explosive (explosive = fast). You are welcome.Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
Think Brandon Jacobs as fast but not quick. He's in the 4.4 range but it takes a little longer to get there, plus he's not as quick in the hips so he can't change directions as fast.Wrong, explosive = quick. It is possible to be fast (think top speed) without being quick/explosive.Little help for ya. You can't be fast without being explosive (explosive = fast). You are welcome.Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
I traded for him last year (buy low...) in the middle of the season and I am very high on him because of what I have seen of him in tape. For such a big guy he has good quickness and very good footwork and agility. The big guys who fail (Dayne eg.) lack these skills. He is able to make guys miss and yet also can run over them and has the strength to get extra yards. As far as the Oakland situation, I like it. The OL came together last year and right now he has an not so young and oft injured RB in Fargas in front of him. He should be starting by week 5.Personally, I've never bought into the Michael Bush hype. He was the 10th RB drafted and a 4th rounder because his broken leg was a pretty serious matter. He's also 250 pounds, and RBs of that size who have been successful with any longevity are few and far between. And, although he put up big stats at Louisville, so did Eric Shelton who preceded him and busted as a 2nd round NFL pick. Finally, he's a Raider. So, I've just never really had any interest in owning Bush and don't see why there's always been so much love for him on this board. He's likely to never amount to very much as a fantasy commodity.Maybe even Forte, Choice and Charles above Bush.DMacMedenhallWhy the quick dead end on Bush? What has he shown or not shown at this level to make any sort of guess on what he might do? Dude was a beast before the leg injury and nothing I have read says he won't be fully ready to take his shot this year. If he were in the rookie class this year, where would you rank him?1. IF Quentin Groves is healthy, he is capable of a 4.4 and will be a top 20 pick. I'm not sold myself, as he never looked effective after the multiple-toe-dislocation.
2. Oakland makes too much sense for M.Turner. They already believe in taking that kind of player. Not only Jordan, but nearly all of their recent Super Bowl team. This draft is deep on both lines, and that's where they would like to spend their picks. J.Fargas is the best back on the team (sorry M.Bush supporters, but he'll likely be out of football in 3 more years).
Stewart
F. Jones
Ray Rice
Chris Johnson
Kevin Smith
Mike Hart
Michael Bush
Jamal Charles
This has GOT to mean the Eagles are targeting Samuel in FA.*With Asante Samuel ready to steal a Brinks truck next Friday, the Patriots are now in discussions with the Philadelphia Eagles about acquiring Lito Shepard in a trade.
Why?This has GOT to mean the Eagles are targeting Samuel in FA.*With Asante Samuel ready to steal a Brinks truck next Friday, the Patriots are now in discussions with the Philadelphia Eagles about acquiring Lito Shepard in a trade.
No CB to replace Lito on their roster. No other top CB in FA. Would not start a rookie.Unless they are planning on another trade to bring in Deangelo Hall or some damn thing.Why?This has GOT to mean the Eagles are targeting Samuel in FA.*With Asante Samuel ready to steal a Brinks truck next Friday, the Patriots are now in discussions with the Philadelphia Eagles about acquiring Lito Shepard in a trade.![]()
My scouting department tells me to always take a quick back over a pure speed back. I'll be waiting for the shuttle runs, thats where you learn things.Wrong, explosive = quick. It is possible to be fast (think top speed) without being quick/explosive.HTHLittle help for ya. You can't be fast without being explosive (explosive = fast). You are welcome.Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
Change the word back to wr or TE and I agree with you completely.My scouting department tells me to always take a quick back over a pure speed back. I'll be waiting for the shuttle runs, thats where you learn things.Wrong, explosive = quick. It is possible to be fast (think top speed) without being quick/explosive.HTHLittle help for ya. You can't be fast without being explosive (explosive = fast). You are welcome.Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()
If 4.5 is sort of the benchmark for 40 times, what is the benchmark for shuttle? What is the minimum you are looking for and what is the range that really makes you take notice? Thanks.My scouting department tells me to always take a quick back over a pure speed back. I'll be waiting for the shuttle runs, thats where you learn things.Wrong, explosive = quick. It is possible to be fast (think top speed) without being quick/explosive.HTHLittle help for ya. You can't be fast without being explosive (explosive = fast). You are welcome.Forgot He's not fast.His explosiveness is not in doubt. It's just about everything else.McFadden Broad 10.8.Not sure, is that good?
![]()
![]()