I don't think that is what was said. This still needs time and is still a GTD.
I'm sure someone else can confirm, but she said a Rams source said they do not EXPECT him to play. Maybe I heard wrong but I thought that was exactly what she said.I don't think that is what was said. This still needs time and is still a GTD.
Nobody is going to run on the Bears today after 13 days of rest. And Stl Rams has a work in progress oline.I can see Richardson having having a surprise, solid game against the Bears. He won't be a bad flex option.
Nobody is going to run on the Bears today after 13 days of rest. And Stl Rams has a work in progress oline.I can see Richardson having having a surprise, solid game against the Bears. He won't be a bad flex option.
don't get defensive. he's right. your thread title was misleading.'Buck Stop said:Just changed it. sorry for any Kleenex this thread caused you to use this morning.The thread title is misleading. Even is she said "Not expected to play" as you say, there's no official word that he's NOT playing.Wording is everything.
I don't even have SJax or his backup so you didn't cause me to use any Kleenex. I just don't think someone should be trying to break news, get it wrong, and let it be misleading.'Buck Stop said:Just changed it. sorry for any Kleenex this thread caused you to use this morning.The thread title is misleading. Even is she said "Not expected to play" as you say, there's no official word that he's NOT playing.Wording is everything.
'Buck Stop said:Just changed it. sorry for any Kleenex this thread caused you to use this morning.The thread title is misleading. Even is she said "Not expected to play" as you say, there's no official word that he's NOT playing.Wording is everything.
don't be defensive, he was just apologizing for being the cause of needless tree wastedon't get defensive. he's right. your thread title was misleading.'Buck Stop said:Just changed it. sorry for any Kleenex this thread caused you to use this morning.The thread title is misleading. Even is she said "Not expected to play" as you say, there's no official word that he's NOT playing.Wording is everything.
Yeah, as a DRich fan, this is not the game you want as his "coming out party".Nobody is going to run on the Bears today after 13 days of rest. And Stl Rams has a work in progress oline.I can see Richardson having having a surprise, solid game against the Bears.
He won't be a bad flex option.
Its not...but with a choice of him, Shonn Greene or Lance Moore or Torrey Smith at flex...I may role with Richardson.Yeah, as a DRich fan, this is not the game you want as his "coming out party".Nobody is going to run on the Bears today after 13 days of rest. And Stl Rams has a work in progress oline.I can see Richardson having having a surprise, solid game against the Bears.
He won't be a bad flex option.
If u can misdirect or time a run well against the bears u can gash them on the ground. The bears do can penetrate well but not that great on gap control/contain and their Lber core is a shell of itself. Richadson could end up with 80± rushing with a lot of stuffs/1yard/2yard gains b/c he could pop off a few long gainers b/c his speedYeah, as a DRich fan, this is not the game you want as his "coming out party".Nobody is going to run on the Bears today after 13 days of rest. And Stl Rams has a work in progress oline.I can see Richardson having having a surprise, solid game against the Bears.
He won't be a bad flex option.
should probably change title of this thread ASAP
Or Jackson toughs it out like the warrior he is but does nothing due to his injury and Richardson spends most of the day on the sidelines watching him.I don't think either RB is a worthy start today.It's perfect scenario for Fisher to push SJax out the door quicker. He faces a tough Bears defense, will get bottled up so Fisher can then turn to dRich for a spark once the Rams are down by 2+TDs. That's what I see anyways.
I like your thinking, sir.:richardsowner:It's perfect scenario for Fisher to push SJax out the door quicker. He faces a tough Bears defense, will get bottled up so Fisher can then turn to dRich for a spark once the Rams are down by 2+TDs. That's what I see anyways.
Or Jackson toughs it out like the warrior he is but does nothing due to his injury and Richardson spends most of the day on the sidelines watching him.I don't think either RB is a worthy start today.It's perfect scenario for Fisher to push SJax out the door quicker. He faces a tough Bears defense, will get bottled up so Fisher can then turn to dRich for a spark once the Rams are down by 2+TDs. That's what I see anyways.
I agree that neither are good starts but I am thinking 2 weeks down the road.I like your thinking, sir.:richardsowner:It's perfect scenario for Fisher to push SJax out the door quicker. He faces a tough Bears defense, will get bottled up so Fisher can then turn to dRich for a spark once the Rams are down by 2+TDs. That's what I see anyways.
Me too Brutha...god speed.Sitting Sjax for Leshoure
Urgggg. Was hoping he'd be out and I could start Richardson.Now its between a Ram RB, Britt, and Hillis.F it. Rolling with S-JaxI think Im going to have to run with him as my other option is Kenny Britt.
I am actually going with Britt. Going with the boom/bust option here.I think Im going to have to run with him as my other option is Kenny Britt.
I think he's definitely a sell if you can get something decent back. The problem is who would want him? I might even sell him for Chris Johnson right now lol.SJax a sell or a hold? He doesn't seem trustworthy going forward.
nice call.Sitting Sjax for Leshoure