bulger2holt
Footballguy
Look for the Rams to be very active in F/A too. They have lots of money to spend and one of the wealthiest owners in pro sports.
How do you rate their OL as "one of the best in the league?"If their pass blocking was solid, that would allow their QB time to throw downfield. However, Bradford was 30th in YPA, at 6.0. If their run blocking was solid, their RBs would gain yardage. However, SJax at 3.8ypg was 36th in the league.So how is their OL "one of the best in the league" when their passing and rushing attacks are both at the bottom of the league standings?Football Outsiders ranks the Ram OL as 26the best in the league.Just because we have some excited fanboys posting about how Good the Ram OL is...doesn't make it so. Facts are facts. This is a bad OL.The oline is meh? The oline in St. L is one of the best in the league IMO. Their D is awful and so are their receiving options. Overall the team is poor. The oline is certainly not though.The OL is meh. SJax is winding down, and the WR corp is putrid. A healthy Avery would do wonders to his numbers.
What do you think Bradford's YPA should be to reflect a good Oline? He was a rookie QB with awful receiving threats. From games I watched his YPA was low because he throw a lot of short, high percentage passes and the guys catching them simply didn't break them very often. That is also why Bradford's completion percentage was high (60%) as a rookie. Teams were stacking to stop Jackson, the biggest offensive threat on St. L. I don't see how either of your points validate that the St. L Oline was poor. From the games I watched they played extremely well but the offense as a whole operated extremely conservatively. The stats seem to support that view as St. L, despite having a rookie QB and awful receiving options, ranked #10 in the NFL in adjusted pass protection.Again, I have to disagree with you. This is a good Oline with a lot of great young talent.How do you rate their OL as "one of the best in the league?"If their pass blocking was solid, that would allow their QB time to throw downfield.The oline is meh? The oline in St. L is one of the best in the league IMO. Their D is awful and so are their receiving options. Overall the team is poor. The oline is certainly not though.The OL is meh. SJax is winding down, and the WR corp is putrid. A healthy Avery would do wonders to his numbers.
However, Bradford was 30th in YPA, at 6.0.
If their run blocking was solid, their RBs would gain yardage. However, SJax at 3.8ypg was 36th in the league.
So how is their OL "one of the best in the league" when their passing and rushing attacks are both at the bottom of the league standings?
Football Outsiders ranks the Ram OL as 26the best in the league.
Just because we have some excited fanboys posting about how Good the Ram OL is...doesn't make it so. Facts are facts. This is a bad OL.
Bradford was a rookie so he was probably reigned in a bit, as far as throwing downfield. Also one of his main targets, Danny Amendola, had no ability to create yards after the catch and had the lowest ypc amongst WRs in the league.The Rams have a good young o-line, but it was probably a stretch to call them one of the best in the league.How do you rate their OL as "one of the best in the league?"If their pass blocking was solid, that would allow their QB time to throw downfield. However, Bradford was 30th in YPA, at 6.0.The oline is meh? The oline in St. L is one of the best in the league IMO. Their D is awful and so are their receiving options. Overall the team is poor. The oline is certainly not though.The OL is meh. SJax is winding down, and the WR corp is putrid. A healthy Avery would do wonders to his numbers.
this tracks pretty closely with the fact that the rams were nearly top 5 in red zone appearances (tied with colts for 6th?)... of those teams, only SD didn't make the playoffs (and they had #1 offense & defense, but were killed by ST implosions)...only five teams had less than the rams 20 RZ TDs (BUF, CLE, MIA, ARI & CAR), and only CAR had a lower % than their 35.7 (none of the other 30 teams were lower than 40%)...'Chase Stuart said:If I could short Sam Bradford stock, I would do so with most of my disposable income. The hype in here is insanely out of control. Rams quarterbacks ranked in the bottom 5 in fantasy points last season, and that was despite ranking fifth in pass attempts.
Bradford could improve by leaps and bounds and fall far short of some of the expectations here.
My guess is INTs should be higher with DCs having a whole offseason to plan for him and he's learning yet another new offense. I don't like the Rams WRs YAC ability and think those numbers should be so much higher with Bradford's great placement. We'll see in 2011, hopefully, but if they can't "finish" then Steven Jackson should get plenty of TDs.3900 yards 25tds 12ints qb rating 90I think he could very easily go higher than all of these but, trying to be unbiased I believe these are realistic stats for him.
First half of their schedule is a little tough, and it could be slow going now that Jackson is hurt and the WRs/TEs need to gel a bit. Once they get past NO in week 8, though, it's hard not to like them going forward:2 vs. ARICLE2 vs. SEA2 vs. SFCIN(PIT)He's tough to hold onto right now, but I'd put him, Jackson, and Alexander in the buy low target category after their week 5 bye.So are people jumping ship or waiting things out with Bradford? I drafted him and have him on my bench but just don't know what to think. I'm still excited about the possibilities with McDaniels but will it happen this year?
His o-line is not giving him any time and his WR's don't get seperation and drop way too many balls. Not a good combo.
Look who he played the first 3 weeks. Not a good matchup this week either but he's not in a strong division. He'll look a lot better as the season goes on. His receivers (including Amendola) limit his ceiling but his talent doesnt.If Jackson could remarkebly stay healthy the ramainder of the season and with the return of Amendola is there a chance Bradford could become a viable spot starter in 2011?
This is why they threw underneath so much last year. Josh is throwing downfield this year leaving SB exposed to more hits. They need to get back to 3 step drops and quicker throws other wise SB isn't going to last the season in one piece.Sadly, I see the same thing happening to Bradford as I did Marc Bulger, who coincidentally also was a victim of St. Louis' shoddy offensive line.
Listen, even NFL players are human and have an aversion to getting their ### kicked. You can only get sacked and hit so many times before you get that 'deer in headlights' gunshy look to your game. That's exactly what I'm seeing from Bradford now. Bulger used to be a good QB. Remember that? But the guy got pounded for 2 years straight, and he never recovered.
There is absolutely no excuse for the St. Louis Rams to allow their budding franchise QB to have his ### handed to him each and every week. No excuse. And now they are ruining their future.
In 2 of his 3 games so far he has thrown for less than 190 yds.'Chase Stuart said:Bradford is averaging more yards per game and more yards per pass attempt this year than he did last year.
Yeah, I expected him to put up worse numbers than Colt McCoy, and so far he has delivered. I don't quite understand why everyone was so high on the guy, considering he had one of the worst YPA in the league last year, and basically disappeared at the end of the season last year.In 2 of his 3 games so far he has thrown for less than 190 yds.'Chase Stuart said:Bradford is averaging more yards per game and more yards per pass attempt this year than he did last year.
Make it 3 of 4 games with less than 190 yds.Yeah, I expected him to put up worse numbers than Colt McCoy, and so far he has delivered. I don't quite understand why everyone was so high on the guy, considering he had one of the worst YPA in the league last year, and basically disappeared at the end of the season last year.In 2 of his 3 games so far he has thrown for less than 190 yds.Bradford is averaging more yards per game and more yards per pass attempt this year than he did last year.