Yeah, but what do you have against vacationing in subtropical climates?No, I wouldn't go. I pretty much despise the Olympics.
lolWinter Olympics are the one time you can try to score with a biathlete, so yeah I'm in.
Oh wait.
DPI has legitimate uses, but in this case it is apparently aimed at allowing authorities to filter email for key words and track who's talking to whom, as well as what they're saying. In short, Soldatov explained to CBC News, every phone call, every email, every social media message in Sochi will be accessible, traceable by Russia's Federal Security Service — the FSB — the organization in charge of securing the Olympics...
These security measures range from the deployment of a whole brigade of elite special forces to the unprecedented requirement of background checks for spectators...
So Sochi is sealed tight, its streets a gauntlet of checkpoints under the vigilant watch of at least 70,000 police and soldiers. As well, an entire brigade of elite special forces are deployed in the mountains nearby. On top of that, Russia's Olympic arsenal will include anti-ballistic missiles, an underwater sonar system, even underwater machine guns. Another part of the arsenal are drones that will be, for the first time, monitoring the Games from above, as well as robotic bomb detectors that will prowl the Olympic grounds below.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-s-olympic-security-to-set-new-surveillance-standard-at-sochi-1.2492247
10 centimeter scar across left cheek, pronounced limp, & a left arm that doesn't bend below the elbow... She should blend right in.
Tellya who's doing it wrong:So because one person (heck, let's even say it's 100 persons) is going to blow themselves up in a city of millions, killing 10-20 (again, let's say 1,000-2,000, for argument's sake), everyone should run for their lives?
We're doing it exactly wrong related to terrorism. We spend trillions and scare the "ba-jeebus" out of grandma and grandpa with the 24/7 "Death Panel" network that is Fox News...when what we SHOULD do is make it known to terrorists that if you give us a "cut/bruise," we'll find out where you're from, find where your family lives, then send in drones to salt the Earth within five miles of said location...making you watch. THEN kill you...slow.
Terror is defined as "extreme fear." Fear is defined as "to be afraid of (someone or something) as likely to be dangerous, painful, or threatening." Specific to terrorism, do you think the goal is killing people? Or do you think the goal is fear? The destruction of peace of mind, as well as the resulting destruction of an economy from said loss of peace of mind? The former gets all the press/play. But I believe the goal of terrorism is actually the latter. Though if it is actually the latter, the US has been engaged in "terrorism" probably since its expansion West across the Appalachians and Plains.
I'm hoping Fallujah gets the next Summer Games.Tellya who's doing it wrong:So because one person (heck, let's even say it's 100 persons) is going to blow themselves up in a city of millions, killing 10-20 (again, let's say 1,000-2,000, for argument's sake), everyone should run for their lives?
We're doing it exactly wrong related to terrorism. We spend trillions and scare the "ba-jeebus" out of grandma and grandpa with the 24/7 "Death Panel" network that is Fox News...when what we SHOULD do is make it known to terrorists that if you give us a "cut/bruise," we'll find out where you're from, find where your family lives, then send in drones to salt the Earth within five miles of said location...making you watch. THEN kill you...slow.
Terror is defined as "extreme fear." Fear is defined as "to be afraid of (someone or something) as likely to be dangerous, painful, or threatening." Specific to terrorism, do you think the goal is killing people? Or do you think the goal is fear? The destruction of peace of mind, as well as the resulting destruction of an economy from said loss of peace of mind? The former gets all the press/play. But I believe the goal of terrorism is actually the latter. Though if it is actually the latter, the US has been engaged in "terrorism" probably since its expansion West across the Appalachians and Plains.
The International Olympic Committee - because who in their right flippin' mind would agree to do an Olympics in the Caucusus, home to Daghestan and Chenya and just a hop skip and molotov cocktail away from the world's terrorist epicenters?
It's one thing to say well the west invites trouble or don't know how to deal with it, it's another to go walking right into its neighborhood looking for it.
I think there's still a few buildings left up in Sarajevo that can be reused.I'm hoping Fallujah gets the next Summer Games.Tellya who's doing it wrong:So because one person (heck, let's even say it's 100 persons) is going to blow themselves up in a city of millions, killing 10-20 (again, let's say 1,000-2,000, for argument's sake), everyone should run for their lives?
We're doing it exactly wrong related to terrorism. We spend trillions and scare the "ba-jeebus" out of grandma and grandpa with the 24/7 "Death Panel" network that is Fox News...when what we SHOULD do is make it known to terrorists that if you give us a "cut/bruise," we'll find out where you're from, find where your family lives, then send in drones to salt the Earth within five miles of said location...making you watch. THEN kill you...slow.
Terror is defined as "extreme fear." Fear is defined as "to be afraid of (someone or something) as likely to be dangerous, painful, or threatening." Specific to terrorism, do you think the goal is killing people? Or do you think the goal is fear? The destruction of peace of mind, as well as the resulting destruction of an economy from said loss of peace of mind? The former gets all the press/play. But I believe the goal of terrorism is actually the latter. Though if it is actually the latter, the US has been engaged in "terrorism" probably since its expansion West across the Appalachians and Plains.
The International Olympic Committee - because who in their right flippin' mind would agree to do an Olympics in the Caucusus, home to Daghestan and Chenya and just a hop skip and molotov cocktail away from the world's terrorist epicenters?
It's one thing to say well the west invites trouble or don't know how to deal with it, it's another to go walking right into its neighborhood looking for it.
Just a little light reading to soak away the cares of the world.Boy this thread is just full of rainbows and sunshine.
this. It's highly likely that something will be attempted, but likely it will fail.I wouldn't be nervous about being in Sochi. I'd be worried about the surrounding areas. Security at Sochi will be nuts.
What, are you nuts? With HD TVs there is really no reason to go to the stadium anymore for Curling. Traffic is atrocious and concessions are overpriced. At home you can always pause the action on your DVR between the sixth and seventh stones when that 40 of Labatts is really needing release without missing a single stone landing on the button.I'd go to watch the curling, but I don't have a ####### clue most of the time what is going on so it's better watched from my couch. Other stuff that I like like the halfpipe would be useless to watch in person.
Put me down in the camp that thinks a terrorist threat is fairly low risk here.
This is a new event...synchronized pooping.
In Russia, TV enjoy watching you.But I wouldn't go. Of course, I'm not a huge Olympics fan. I enjoy watching it on TV, but have no desire to go to the games. So that could weigh into my decision.
I'm not sure I'd want to embarass Putin on a global stage like this... If they do attack the olympics I expect retribution to be sudden, severe, and the rest of the world to turn a blind eye to the massacre that would go down .Of all the people I would enjoy seeing the muslims piss off simply because the response would be brutal, Putin is right near the top of my list. Let's see if these clowns really want a war.
Anyone else have this image in their mind when they read Datonn posts?So because one person (heck, let's even say it's 100 persons) is going to blow themselves up in a city of millions, killing 10-20 (again, let's say 1,000-2,000, for argument's sake), everyone should run for their lives?
We're doing it exactly wrong related to terrorism. We spend trillions and scare the "ba-jeebus" out of grandma and grandpa with the 24/7 "Death Panel" network that is Fox News...when what we SHOULD do is make it known to terrorists that if you give us a "cut/bruise," we'll find out where you're from, find where your family lives, then send in drones to salt the Earth within five miles of said location...making you watch. THEN kill you...slow.
Terror is defined as "extreme fear." Fear is defined as "to be afraid of (someone or something) as likely to be dangerous, painful, or threatening." Specific to terrorism, do you think the goal is killing people? Or do you think the goal is fear? The destruction of peace of mind, as well as the resulting destruction of an economy from said loss of peace of mind? The former gets all the press/play. But I believe the goal of terrorism is actually the latter. Though if it is actually the latter, the US has been engaged in "terrorism" probably since its expansion West across the Appalachians and Plains.
A good nice place by our current standards, or a good nice place in comparison to other Sochi resorts?Because it's international, let's say First Class. As for hotel, I'd say above average. Not the best, but a good, nice place.More important questions:
First Class airfare?
What type of hotel accommodation? Like luxury suite at the Ritz or queen bed at a Best Western?