out of the shower wearing a towel. full backside and then a topless sideboob.Head-to-toe, just topless... what are we dealing with here?
Travolta movie?out of the shower wearing a towel. full backside and then a topless sideboob.Head-to-toe, just topless... what are we dealing with here?
nothing gay about it.Travolta movie?out of the shower wearing a towel. full backside and then a topless sideboob.Head-to-toe, just topless... what are we dealing with here?
Once you see the goods for real, you realize that there's a lot more attractive women out there on the interweb already taking off all their clothes.Oh wow, nice.I will say though it's always better in the imagination.
Mentioned this here before, but I met her a few months ago. She's obviously an attractive woman and seemed really nice, but she really didn't bowl me over in the looks department like I would have expected. There were at least five better-looking women in the room.
Yeah, it's a nice butNice posterior but the boob looks deflated.
Just assume whenever someone starts a thread without a link, you should head over to Tyler asap.thanks for the link
Because it's real.I have always been in the "overrated' camp, but after seeing these, I'm starting to lean the other way.Nice posterior but the boob looks deflated.
Is my spidey sense in my pants?Anyone else's spidey sense tingling
from the nudie site where i first saw the pix yesterday:"Looks like the hacker, responsible for the leaks of private photos of Renee Olstead and Scarlett Johansson which happened in March, came out of hiding and finally posted uncensored versions of Scarlett Johansson's nude photos.When original leak happened back in March, there was only enough time for the hacker to release uncensored private photos of Renee. But when the media started coming up with, more or less, fabricated stories that mobile phones of over 50 celebrities were hacked, celebs which were mentioned included Vanessa Hudgens, Ali Larter, Busy Philipps, Miley Cyrus, Emma Caulfield and Addison Timlin among others, FBI and lawyers got involved in the story as well, so the only natural thing to do for the hacker was to go in the hiding for a while.Well, now he's back..."Ok, first of all, thanks for giving me a new site to look at. I like itBut why on earth would SJ post that and put it on INternet. Anyone else's spidey sense tingling
Unless you met her at the playboy mansion or were in the middle of some Saudi prince's harem:Mentioned this here before, but I met her a few months ago. She's obviously an attractive woman and seemed really nice, but she really didn't bowl me over in the looks department like I would have expected. There were at least five better-looking women in the room.
I got no reason to lie. But yeah, it wasn't just some random house party. This chick was there and owned the room (my wife excepted of course), but there were a few other 9+s on the offdee scale. Mostly, though, Scarlett just wasn't that amazing. She has a very striking face and she carries herself really well, but she also a less-than-toned body and a little acne. I hate being that nitpicky and critical, but it it what it is. Here's two pictures of her from the party where I met her (I'm not Bradley Cooper). Maybe I just caught her on a bad day, because honestly she doesn't look great in those photos either.Unless you met her at the playboy mansion or were in the middle of some Saudi prince's harem:Mentioned this here before, but I met her a few months ago. She's obviously an attractive woman and seemed really nice, but she really didn't bowl me over in the looks department like I would have expected. There were at least five better-looking women in the room.![]()
Thanks for ruining my day.(I'm not Bradley Cooper)
Send me a PM or something, cause it sure sounds like we aren't talking about "the scene" from years ago.2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1and it's not even close. I can taste the morning breath in the first shot.
No we're not.Send me a PM or something, cause it sure sounds like we aren't talking about "the scene" from years ago.2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1and it's not even close. I can taste the morning breath in the first shot.
Check out Tyler.Send me a PM or something, cause it sure sounds like we aren't talking about "the scene" from years ago.2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1and it's not even close. I can taste the morning breath in the first shot.
it's on some blog called i like girls daily. i'm sure soon to be all over the intarweb. google/ogle away.edit: i accidentally all my grammar
it's on some blog called i like girls daily. i'm sure soon to be all over the intarweb. google/ogle away.edit: i accidentally all my grammaredited no less....
I'm in my late 40's and I got the wife to do some Polaroids back in the day. Nothing to porny but fun(for me) none the less.One of the things I most regret about being born when I was (I'm in my early 40s) is that I missed the whole era where hot chicks feel compelled to take nude pics of themselves. My stupid wife won't hear of it, and I have an almost teen daughter that I have to worry about. I get all the negatives and none of the positives. Stupid 80's.![]()
lolI have to say though that it would never cross my mind to send pics of my junk to anyone. Who would want to see that?my wife won't hear of it either. she also informed me that if i ever sent her junk pics that she'd assume they were intended for somebody else.
i (almost 60) have a whole collection of polaroids from peahens looking for a.....and i werent no great shakes nor that much of a macI'm in my late 40's and I got the wife to do some Polaroids back in the day. Nothing to porny but fun(for me) none the less.One of the things I most regret about being born when I was (I'm in my early 40s) is that I missed the whole era where hot chicks feel compelled to take nude pics of themselves. My stupid wife won't hear of it, and I have an almost teen daughter that I have to worry about. I get all the negatives and none of the positives. Stupid 80's.![]()
I got no reason to lie. But yeah, it wasn't just some random house party. This chick was there and owned the room (my wife excepted of course), but there were a few other 9+s on the offdee scale. Mostly, though, Scarlett just wasn't that amazing. She has a very striking face and she carries herself really well, but she also a less-than-toned body and a little acne. I hate being that nitpicky and critical, but it it what it is. Here's two pictures of her from the party where I met her (I'm not Bradley Cooper). Maybe I just caught her on a bad day, because honestly she doesn't look great in those photos either.Unless you met her at the playboy mansion or were in the middle of some Saudi prince's harem:Mentioned this here before, but I met her a few months ago. She's obviously an attractive woman and seemed really nice, but she really didn't bowl me over in the looks department like I would have expected. There were at least five better-looking women in the room.![]()
I thought all the parties in So Cal are like that too. Was I misinformed?Don't know to tell you, friend. Five feet away, face to face, I just wasn't overly impressed. I'm sure my expectations were too high because she's Scarlett Johansson and in some way that simply fact sets an impossibly high standard that nobody can deliver on. And it's not like she wasn't a hot chick. She just wasn't a total knockout. If it wasn't for the novelty that it was Scarlett Johansson's cleavage I was staring at, I would have shifted my gaze to other nearby cleavage in a matter of seconds.I got no reason to lie. But yeah, it wasn't just some random house party. This chick was there and owned the room (my wife excepted of course), but there were a few other 9+s on the offdee scale. Mostly, though, Scarlett just wasn't that amazing. She has a very striking face and she carries herself really well, but she also a less-than-toned body and a little acne. I hate being that nitpicky and critical, but it it what it is. Here's two pictures of her from the party where I met her (I'm not Bradley Cooper). Maybe I just caught her on a bad day, because honestly she doesn't look great in those photos either.Unless you met her at the playboy mansion or were in the middle of some Saudi prince's harem:Mentioned this here before, but I met her a few months ago. She's obviously an attractive woman and seemed really nice, but she really didn't bowl me over in the looks department like I would have expected. There were at least five better-looking women in the room.![]()
O.k. so I should also have listed the White House Press and Vanity Fair parties in my "unless" clause. But you're nuts if you don't think she looks beautiful in those pictures.
Still the butt shot was working.All that money and still a low megapixel camera.
I think you hit it pretty well. We see them on the big screen where they get every digital advantage and it's virtually impossible to live up to that in person 99.99% of the time. Probably come closest when they spend hours with a stylist getting ready for 2 minutes on the red carpet.I thought all the parties in So Cal are like that too. Was I misinformed?Don't know to tell you, friend. Five feet away, face to face, I just wasn't overly impressed. I'm sure my expectations were too high because she's Scarlett Johansson and in some way that simply fact sets an impossibly high standard that nobody can deliver on. And it's not like she wasn't a hot chick. She just wasn't a total knockout. If it wasn't for the novelty that it was Scarlett Johansson's cleavage I was staring at, I would have shifted my gaze to other nearby cleavage in a matter of seconds.I got no reason to lie. But yeah, it wasn't just some random house party. This chick was there and owned the room (my wife excepted of course), but there were a few other 9+s on the offdee scale. Mostly, though, Scarlett just wasn't that amazing. She has a very striking face and she carries herself really well, but she also a less-than-toned body and a little acne. I hate being that nitpicky and critical, but it it what it is. Here's two pictures of her from the party where I met her (I'm not Bradley Cooper). Maybe I just caught her on a bad day, because honestly she doesn't look great in those photos either.Unless you met her at the playboy mansion or were in the middle of some Saudi prince's harem:Mentioned this here before, but I met her a few months ago. She's obviously an attractive woman and seemed really nice, but she really didn't bowl me over in the looks department like I would have expected. There were at least five better-looking women in the room.![]()
O.k. so I should also have listed the White House Press and Vanity Fair parties in my "unless" clause. But you're nuts if you don't think she looks beautiful in those pictures.
There's definitely something to that, but it wasn't only that. There were other famous attractive women around and many of them completely bowled me over. She didn't at all. Not something you can really explain.It was the first time I'd ever seen her with that red hair, though, so GDogg may be on to something. I'm definitely a guy that prefers blondes.I think you hit it pretty well. We see them on the big screen where they get every digital advantage and it's virtually impossible to live up to that in person 99.99% of the time. Probably come closest when they spend hours with a stylist getting ready for 2 minutes on the red carpet.