Please See Mine
Footballguy
WTF?
That had better not be true.Edwin Encarnacion and Yonder Alonso for Rolen.
Holy Jeebus, please don't be true.Edwin Encarnacion and Yonder Alonso for Rolen.
Is this a record for the baseball forum?Nick Johnson to the fish.52 User(s) are browsing this forum (9 Guests and 3 Anonymous Users)40 Members: Sammy3469, Sea Bass, Reaper, Jene Bramel, ianfitzy, Fodasme69, Tom Servo, Wrigley, T Bell, Pipes, meeka, stevegamer, Limp Ditka, whoknew, The Ghost of Common, Parmcat, bicycle_seat_sniffer, guru_007, Darth Cheney, Buckfast 1, D-BO, cheese, wadegarrett, jobarules, jamny, hooter311, baymen, Please See Mine, Captain Quinoa, Bobcat10, wilked, chet, The Man with the Plan, Mr. Know-It-All, JetsWillWin, E-A-G-L-E-S, TLEF316, Kraft..., TenTimes, The Platinum Standard
3:00pm: A 180 in this rumor - FOX now says the Marlins acquired Johnson for Double A lefty Aaron Thompson, with the Nats paying Johnson's remaining salary.
Pretty obvious that the Alonso rumor was untrue. Still, I don't like this trade unless the BJ's picked up some of Rolen's money.Word around here is that the minor leaguers are Josh Roenicke and Zach Stewart.
Stewart has looked good in his transition to SP, but that'd be tons better than Alonso. Still, Rolen is another big contract without much for the future. Bad news on Volquez seems likely too. Ugh.Word around here is that the minor leaguers are Josh Roenicke and Zach Stewart.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/9876768...B-Rolen-to-RedsToronto third baseman Scott Rolen has been traded to the Reds, one major league source told FOXSports.com.Pretty obvious that the Alonso rumor was untrue. Still, I don't like this trade unless the BJ's picked up some of Rolen's money.Word around here is that the minor leaguers are Josh Roenicke and Zach Stewart.
They got raped with just giving up EERolen's 8 years older and on the wrong side of 30. EE's just hitting his prime years and doesn't cost $11m next year.If it's Edwin and Alsonso, the Reds got absolutely raped here.
Encarnacion sucksLimp Ditka said:They got raped with just giving up EERolen's 8 years older and on the wrong side of 30. EE's just hitting his prime years and doesn't cost $11m next year.MrPhoenix said:If it's Edwin and Alsonso, the Reds got absolutely raped here.
Encarnacion sucksLimp Ditka said:They got raped with just giving up EERolen's 8 years older and on the wrong side of 30. EE's just hitting his prime years and doesn't cost $11m next year.MrPhoenix said:If it's Edwin and Alsonso, the Reds got absolutely raped here.
With a name like that, there's no way that's aEncarnacion sucksLimp Ditka said:They got raped with just giving up EERolen's 8 years older and on the wrong side of 30. EE's just hitting his prime years and doesn't cost $11m next year.MrPhoenix said:If it's Edwin and Alsonso, the Reds got absolutely raped here.Some really inflated perceptions of EE in here. He's one of the worst fielding 3B in the league, he has a terrible attitude, and he hasn't hit at all this season.
Rolen is one of the best of all-time defensively at 3rd, seems to have found his stroke (minus the 30 HR power), and is a gritty veteran presence that the Reds desperately need. He's certainly an upgrade over EE in his current state. Toronto is picking up the tab on part of Rolen's contract (the specifics are unknown at this point).
Seeing that Alonso wasn't involved in this trade, I think the Reds will be just fine with this.
I dont necessarily disagree with anything you say here except Encarnacion sucks. He has no upside. What you see is what you get.With a name like that, there's no way that's acomment
From what I've seen Toronto's basically paying the rest of this year ($4m) and that's it.That means - Toronto gets almost $10m off of the books next year- That $12m is in the form of a 34 year old player that has played more than 3/4 of the season once in the last 4 years- In return. they got a 26 year old, who still has upside, with 4 years of MLB experience.- They also got two prospects in returnThis could turn into the Pirates trading Aramis Ramirez, but dumber as at least Pittsburgh tried to get upside guys in return.hRicciardi didn't even bring lube.
Ok, you are right. Walt Jocketty has no idea what he's doing, J.P. Ricciardi is a genius. Track record certainly supports your claim on this one.The only reason we're even having this conversation is because Rolen had a severe shoulder injury a few years ago. The guy is a much better baseball player than EE, period. You can argue until you are blue in the face that EE is younger and cheaper, but that doesn't make him better.With a name like that, there's no way that's aEncarnacion sucksLimp Ditka said:They got raped with just giving up EERolen's 8 years older and on the wrong side of 30. EE's just hitting his prime years and doesn't cost $11m next year.MrPhoenix said:If it's Edwin and Alsonso, the Reds got absolutely raped here.Some really inflated perceptions of EE in here. He's one of the worst fielding 3B in the league, he has a terrible attitude, and he hasn't hit at all this season.
Rolen is one of the best of all-time defensively at 3rd, seems to have found his stroke (minus the 30 HR power), and is a gritty veteran presence that the Reds desperately need. He's certainly an upgrade over EE in his current state. Toronto is picking up the tab on part of Rolen's contract (the specifics are unknown at this point).
Seeing that Alonso wasn't involved in this trade, I think the Reds will be just fine with this.comment
![]()
From what I've seen Toronto's basically paying the rest of this year ($4m) and that's it.
That means
- Toronto gets almost $10m off of the books next year
- That $12m is in the form of a 34 year old player that has played more than 3/4 of the season once in the last 4 years
- In return. they got a 26 year old, who still has upside, with 4 years of MLB experience.
- They also got two prospects in return
This could turn into the Pirates trading Aramis Ramirez, but dumber as at least Pittsburgh tried to get upside guys in return.h
Ricciardi didn't even bring lube.
I dont necessarily disagree with anything you say here except Encarnacion sucks. He has no upside. What you see is what you get.With a name like that, there's no way that's acomment
From what I've seen Toronto's basically paying the rest of this year ($4m) and that's it.That means - Toronto gets almost $10m off of the books next year- That $12m is in the form of a 34 year old player that has played more than 3/4 of the season once in the last 4 years- In return. they got a 26 year old, who still has upside, with 4 years of MLB experience.- They also got two prospects in returnThis could turn into the Pirates trading Aramis Ramirez, but dumber as at least Pittsburgh tried to get upside guys in return.hRicciardi didn't even bring lube.
The offense has potential, Rolen should hit around .300, and Votto is going to just get better and better. The big question is, will Jay Bruce ever fulfill his promise? he was atrocious before getting injured. With Volquez going down, there is not enough pitching depth. Harang and Cueto are fine, but like Jay Bruce, can Homer Bailey fulfill his promise or is he just a AAAA pitcher?The Reds honestly think they can win next year, that's why they made the move. Toronto agreed to pay his remaining salary for this season. I read somewhere that the owner or GM tried to spin it like he was a hometown kid and it would boost sales. From what I've read, he grew up closer to St. Louis, not cincy (3 hrs?).
Well, since the Reds don't think he has upside, that must mean he doesn't. They are obviously the pinnacle when it comes to assessing and developing MLB talent over the last decade so it's hard to go against what they've determined. But I'm just crazy enough to do that.Again, the kid's only 26 and has 4 years under his belt. He simply has room to mature and improve. The fact that you, as well as the perennial contender that is the Reds, fail to see that is comical. And if the Reds did this move because they think they have a shot next year, then I don't know what to say.Ok, you are right. Walt Jocketty has no idea what he's doing, J.P. Ricciardi is a genius. Track record certainly supports your claim on this one.The only reason we're even having this conversation is because Rolen had a severe shoulder injury a few years ago. The guy is a much better baseball player than EE, period. You can argue until you are blue in the face that EE is younger and cheaper, but that doesn't make him better.With a name like that, there's no way that's ah
Encarnacion sucksSome really inflated perceptions of EE in here. He's one of the worst fielding 3B in the league, he has a terrible attitude, and he hasn't hit at all this season.
Rolen is one of the best of all-time defensively at 3rd, seems to have found his stroke (minus the 30 HR power), and is a gritty veteran presence that the Reds desperately need. He's certainly an upgrade over EE in his current state. Toronto is picking up the tab on part of Rolen's contract (the specifics are unknown at this point).
Seeing that Alonso wasn't involved in this trade, I think the Reds will be just fine with this.comment
![]()
From what I've seen Toronto's basically paying the rest of this year ($4m) and that's it.
That means
- Toronto gets almost $10m off of the books next year
- That $12m is in the form of a 34 year old player that has played more than 3/4 of the season once in the last 4 years
- In return. they got a 26 year old, who still has upside, with 4 years of MLB experience.
- They also got two prospects in return
This could turn into the Pirates trading Aramis Ramirez, but dumber as at least Pittsburgh tried to get upside guys in return.h
Ricciardi didn't even bring lube.
Want to take a statistical look at this?
2009
Rolen: .320/.370/.476 with GG caliber defense
EE: .209/.333/.374 with below average defense
Career
Rolen: .284/.370/.500 with 6 Gold Gloves
EE: .262/.345/.449 with 0 Gold Gloves
Bottom line, the Reds were fed up with EE. He has underwhelmed, and shown a real poor attitude in the process. He has done nothing to make himself better at the plate, and continues to be a problem in the field. The Reds don't view EE as a long-term solution at 3B anymore, so the "upside" card doesn't play. They see a revitalized Rolen as a good gamble for 1 1/2 years. They're committing to him through his 35-year-old season. Let's not paint this into something it isn't.
But, hey, I'm just a "Scott Rolen homer." Whatever that is...![]()
I definitely think this is the route the Jays will take.Well, since the Reds don't think he has upside, that must mean he doesn't. They are obviously the pinnacle when it comes to assessing and developing MLB talent over the last decade so it's hard to go against what they've determined. But I'm just crazy enough to do that.Again, the kid's only 26 and has 4 years under his belt. He simply has room to mature and improve. The fact that you, as well as the perennial contender that is the Reds, fail to see that is comical. And if the Reds did this move because they think they have a shot next year, then I don't know what to say.Ok, you are right. Walt Jocketty has no idea what he's doing, J.P. Ricciardi is a genius. Track record certainly supports your claim on this one.The only reason we're even having this conversation is because Rolen had a severe shoulder injury a few years ago. The guy is a much better baseball player than EE, period. You can argue until you are blue in the face that EE is younger and cheaper, but that doesn't make him better.With a name like that, there's no way that's ah
Encarnacion sucksSome really inflated perceptions of EE in here. He's one of the worst fielding 3B in the league, he has a terrible attitude, and he hasn't hit at all this season.
Rolen is one of the best of all-time defensively at 3rd, seems to have found his stroke (minus the 30 HR power), and is a gritty veteran presence that the Reds desperately need. He's certainly an upgrade over EE in his current state. Toronto is picking up the tab on part of Rolen's contract (the specifics are unknown at this point).
Seeing that Alonso wasn't involved in this trade, I think the Reds will be just fine with this.comment
![]()
From what I've seen Toronto's basically paying the rest of this year ($4m) and that's it.
That means
- Toronto gets almost $10m off of the books next year
- That $12m is in the form of a 34 year old player that has played more than 3/4 of the season once in the last 4 years
- In return. they got a 26 year old, who still has upside, with 4 years of MLB experience.
- They also got two prospects in return
This could turn into the Pirates trading Aramis Ramirez, but dumber as at least Pittsburgh tried to get upside guys in return.h
Ricciardi didn't even bring lube.
Want to take a statistical look at this?
2009
Rolen: .320/.370/.476 with GG caliber defense
EE: .209/.333/.374 with below average defense
Career
Rolen: .284/.370/.500 with 6 Gold Gloves
EE: .262/.345/.449 with 0 Gold Gloves
Bottom line, the Reds were fed up with EE. He has underwhelmed, and shown a real poor attitude in the process. He has done nothing to make himself better at the plate, and continues to be a problem in the field. The Reds don't view EE as a long-term solution at 3B anymore, so the "upside" card doesn't play. They see a revitalized Rolen as a good gamble for 1 1/2 years. They're committing to him through his 35-year-old season. Let's not paint this into something it isn't.
But, hey, I'm just a "Scott Rolen homer." Whatever that is...![]()
And how about you not painting this into something it isn't? If he continues to suck, who says they have to offer him arbitration? They can let him walk after next year, still save $9m and still come out ahead in this deal from just a financial stance, and still have 2 prospects that can develop.
Baseball might be a buffet line in Boston and New York. Here, we’re always on a diet. If we’re not strict about it, if we ditch the grilled salmon for the chocolate mousse, we’ll never get the body we want.
The Reds can’t trade two young arms for Scott Rolen, a 34-year-old third baseman due $11 million next year. No one outside the executive offices at Pretty Good American Ball Park will argue this point. Neither will some inside the executive offices.
The Big Man’s paws are all over this one. Look: I love the guy. Bob Castellini’s passion roars all over the ballpark. He wants to do right by the fans. But he’s beyond impatient with wanting to Win Now. Even if it’s just to finish 82-80. It’s starting to hurt his team.
It doesn’t help that the lieutenant Castellini brought in to tame the Big Man’s instincts has pretty much gone along for the ride. GM Walt Jocketty blessed the deal entirely.
But we digress.
The Reds aren’t going to contend this year. With the double whammy of the trade and the loss until next August of Edinson Volquez, they’re not contending next year, either. Aaron Harang, Bronson Arroyo and Francisco Cordero are owed $35 million next season. Harang is as trade-able now as Manhattan for beads.
Apparently, the Reds aren’t on the hook for all of Rolen’s $11 million in 2010. Jocketty wouldn’t say what the team’s obligation is, so feel free to wonder. Not that it matters. This was a short-term move by a club that has to think long term with everything it does. The Reds sell the hens, then wonder where the eggs went. It’s bad thinking from an organization that needs to be smart every day, just to compete.
This isn’t about Rolen. By all accounts, he’s a solid veteran, someone to add maturity to the home clubhouse. He’s a vast upgrade in the field. He can still hit, even if his offensive numbers the last four years are not notably better than those of the guy he’s replacing, Edwin Encarnacion. If trades were judged on intangibles, the Reds just committed grand larceny. They’re not.
Rolen is the guy you add when you’re a piece from winning something. You want to look good at the Oscars? Rolen is the diamonds for the wrist, the pearls for the neck. This just in: The Reds aren’t going to the Oscars.
It doesn’t matter if Scott Rolen is Clubhouse MVP or if he’s going to field like Brooks Robinson and hit like Frank. Maybe he’ll do all that. The Reds cannot win on the fly. They can’t contend while rebuilding. They’re only putting lipstick on a flying pig. They’ve tried that for almost a decade. The results speak for themselves.
Cincinnati gave up two young pitchers for Rolen. A major league scout said Monday that Zach Stewart was Cincinnati’s best pitching prospect. The Reds controlled Josh Roenicke for four more years. No one sheds tears over the departure of Encarnacion, whose future here was history, and whose past and present were symbolic of an amotivated clubhouse.
But trading credible young pitching for a relative senior citizen is not how you win in small-money places like this one. Especially when the contending portion of the 2009 program is over. Rolen is an uptown pickup. The Reds are downtown.
Whatever they pay Rolen next year, it’ll be more than the $4.75 million owed Encarnacion. And there is no reason to believe the Reds will be adding payroll in ‘10. Rolen was the player the Reds needed in January or March, or even a month ago. Now he’s the chocolate mousse, wrecking the diet.
You eat the wrong stuff, you get the body you deserve.
Well, since the Reds don't think he has upside, that must mean he doesn't. They are obviously the pinnacle when it comes to assessing and developing MLB talent over the last decade so it's hard to go against what they've determined. But I'm just crazy enough to do that.Ok, you are right. Walt Jocketty has no idea what he's doing, J.P. Ricciardi is a genius. Track record certainly supports your claim on this one.The only reason we're even having this conversation is because Rolen had a severe shoulder injury a few years ago. The guy is a much better baseball player than EE, period. You can argue until you are blue in the face that EE is younger and cheaper, but that doesn't make him better.With a name like that, there's no way that's ah
Encarnacion sucksSome really inflated perceptions of EE in here. He's one of the worst fielding 3B in the league, he has a terrible attitude, and he hasn't hit at all this season.
Rolen is one of the best of all-time defensively at 3rd, seems to have found his stroke (minus the 30 HR power), and is a gritty veteran presence that the Reds desperately need. He's certainly an upgrade over EE in his current state. Toronto is picking up the tab on part of Rolen's contract (the specifics are unknown at this point).
Seeing that Alonso wasn't involved in this trade, I think the Reds will be just fine with this.comment
![]()
From what I've seen Toronto's basically paying the rest of this year ($4m) and that's it.
That means
- Toronto gets almost $10m off of the books next year
- That $12m is in the form of a 34 year old player that has played more than 3/4 of the season once in the last 4 years
- In return. they got a 26 year old, who still has upside, with 4 years of MLB experience.
- They also got two prospects in return
This could turn into the Pirates trading Aramis Ramirez, but dumber as at least Pittsburgh tried to get upside guys in return.h
Ricciardi didn't even bring lube.
Want to take a statistical look at this?
2009
Rolen: .320/.370/.476 with GG caliber defense
EE: .209/.333/.374 with below average defense
Career
Rolen: .284/.370/.500 with 6 Gold Gloves
EE: .262/.345/.449 with 0 Gold Gloves
Bottom line, the Reds were fed up with EE. He has underwhelmed, and shown a real poor attitude in the process. He has done nothing to make himself better at the plate, and continues to be a problem in the field. The Reds don't view EE as a long-term solution at 3B anymore, so the "upside" card doesn't play. They see a revitalized Rolen as a good gamble for 1 1/2 years. They're committing to him through his 35-year-old season. Let's not paint this into something it isn't.
But, hey, I'm just a "Scott Rolen homer." Whatever that is...![]()
Again, the kid's only 26 and has 4 years under his belt. He simply has room to mature and improve. The fact that you, as well as the perennial contender that is the Reds, fail to see that is comical. And if the Reds did this move because they think they have a shot next year, then I don't know what to say.
And how about you not painting this into something it isn't? If he continues to suck, who says they have to offer him arbitration? They can let him walk after next year, still save $9m and still come out ahead in this deal from just a financial stance, and still have 2 prospects that can develop.
Pretty sure I'd rather have Rolen's glove than Edwin's bat at this point still.
And hopefully it's on the field for more than the 100ish games he's averaged over the last 5 years.Pretty sure I'd rather have Rolen's glove than Edwin's bat at this point still.It's all yours, for this year and this year only, for the low low price of $4.66M