Go.
No comment.Those uni's have to be embarrasing to Seahawks fans...no?
OL not getting any push at all. I think Cable will be chewing a few asses at halftime.Any news on Lynch and his 5 carries for 1 yard?
Only when playing weak teams. Actual NFL caliber teams don't get beat 27-7.Or wait, am I supposed to start crying about being baited now?Seattle's offensive sure is a juggernaut.
Tate's very frustrating in that he makes circus catches but doesn't seem to be a good route runner and could help so many more ways if he had more than a ten cent head. Wilson's been outstanding in the pocket though. He's escaped a lot of pressure, left a few defenders with broken ankles. I expect some serious halftime adjustments.Horrible deep throw by Wilson. Great catch by Tate.Miami DTs are owning the line of scrimmage so far.
I was surprised they didn't review it. It did look like he lost possession of it before he passed the cone. Dunno if it was as blatantly obvious as needed to overturn, but that most likely should've been a touchback. I was even more surprised that the Seattle coaching staff wasn't all over the refs for it so I kind of assumed it wasn't what I thought I saw.Just got in to watch the game and was catching up using he DVR. On that Bush TD run Earl Thomas hits the ball when Reggie is at the 1 & a half yard line. The ball clearly becomes dislodged from Reggie's left hand immediately and begins moving in his right hand prior to crossing the goal line. By the time he hits the ground the ball is no longer in his possession. Obvious question is why wouldn't that be a fumble; but to me the bigger issue is how the whole process of instant replay has become less about getting the call right per the rules and more about verifying the call on the field. This should probably be in one of the instant replay threads, but the instant review process, and replay in general, needs to be retooled (if not completely scrapped).
That was the second or third big play of the drive with a PA out of the backfield. Using the DL against itself, a good halftime adjustment. I would love to see Beast get it there, but I love a TD for the indispensable Robinson too.ughh... couldve used a beast mode TD instead of that PA to Richardson
Buffalo Wild Wings at it again
And we're going to OVERTIME!!!Buffalo Wild Wings at it again![]()
Figured someone would've posted that in this thread before I got here. Regardless,Buffalo Wild Wings at it again![]()
All TD's are automatically reviewed; that's somewhat the point. There is, at this point within the current system, a rush to get a call rather than a commitment to get the right call. You see questionable reviews every week. This simply shouldn't happen.I was surprised they didn't review it. It did look like he lost possession of it before he passed the cone. Dunno if it was as blatantly obvious as needed to overturn, but that most likely should've been a touchback. I was even more surprised that the Seattle coaching staff wasn't all over the refs for it so I kind of assumed it wasn't what I thought I saw.Just got in to watch the game and was catching up using he DVR. On that Bush TD run Earl Thomas hits the ball when Reggie is at the 1 & a half yard line. The ball clearly becomes dislodged from Reggie's left hand immediately and begins moving in his right hand prior to crossing the goal line. By the time he hits the ground the ball is no longer in his possession. Obvious question is why wouldn't that be a fumble; but to me the bigger issue is how the whole process of instant replay has become less about getting the call right per the rules and more about verifying the call on the field. This should probably be in one of the instant replay threads, but the instant review process, and replay in general, needs to be retooled (if not completely scrapped).
Goodell changes it on a weekly basis.Don't helmets have to hit for it to be a helmet to helmet penalty?
I think it was the fore arm. You can't graze a QB's helmet with your pinky.Don't helmets have to hit for it to be a helmet to helmet penalty?
I meant, they should've buzzed it down and made the ref do an official review. That's what the replay booth is supposed to do when it's close. I didn't think the Thomas TD was even close to needing to be reviewed, but they did. The Bush TD was a lot less clear but it wasn't reviewed.All TD's are automatically reviewed; that's somewhat the point. There is, at this point within the current system, a rush to get a call rather than a commitment to get the right call. You see questionable reviews every week. This simply shouldn't happen.I was surprised they didn't review it. It did look like he lost possession of it before he passed the cone. Dunno if it was as blatantly obvious as needed to overturn, but that most likely should've been a touchback. I was even more surprised that the Seattle coaching staff wasn't all over the refs for it so I kind of assumed it wasn't what I thought I saw.Just got in to watch the game and was catching up using he DVR. On that Bush TD run Earl Thomas hits the ball when Reggie is at the 1 & a half yard line. The ball clearly becomes dislodged from Reggie's left hand immediately and begins moving in his right hand prior to crossing the goal line. By the time he hits the ground the ball is no longer in his possession. Obvious question is why wouldn't that be a fumble; but to me the bigger issue is how the whole process of instant replay has become less about getting the call right per the rules and more about verifying the call on the field. This should probably be in one of the instant replay threads, but the instant review process, and replay in general, needs to be retooled (if not completely scrapped).